Public Comment on the CCT-RT report

Farell Folly farellfolly at GMAIL.COM
Wed Jan 10 02:31:53 EET 2018


Thanks Ayden for bringing our attention on that. I will take care.



Regards
@__f_f__
https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
________________________________
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.

Le 10 janv. 2018 12:54 AM, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> a écrit :

> Thank you to everyone who was involved in drafting this document! I think
> it is in great shape, and offers an excellent analysis on the sections of
> the CCT-RT's draft report. I have made a number of suggested edits to the
> Google Doc now. I also wanted to note that I think there's at least three
> blog posts in here, if someone was to take them out, add a little more
> rhetoric, and find an external home for these observations. The INTA
> survey, for instance, is outrageous and its flaws something we should be
> drawing real attention to...
>
> — Ayden
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Public Comment on the CCT-RT report
> Local Time: 9 January 2018 3:51 PM
> UTC Time: 9 January 2018 14:51
> From: farellfolly at GMAIL.COM
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>
> Dear All,
>
> The Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team has
> recently issued a new version of their report by adding new sections to the
> previous one. They sought to receive comments on these new sections only.
> The draft version of the NCSG comment
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zvwTtxa4GGMll-OwAAqnuYYahxtff5qrOeMpUYPiuYQ/edit>
> is now ready and I encourage everyone to take a look and give feedback.
> However given the deadline (January 15th is the hard deadline which
> extended from January 8th), it is better not to bring new ideas without
> rationale. For instance, all comments so far are against having a DNS
> Dispute Reolsution Policy, therefore if somebody does agree with this
> DADRP, please state that alongside witth a justfication (one sentence or
> two) supporting you idea.
>
> I would also like to thank every member who worked on this, especially
> Kathy Kleiman, Juan Manual, Rafik, etc. Your contributions are outstanding.
>
>
> Both the draft and the report are attached.
>
>
> --
> Regards
> @__f_f__
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180110/9132ee26/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list