GNSO NCPH Intersessional Meeting 2017 Travel Report

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA
Wed Oct 18 19:37:23 EEST 2017


You should have got my per diem.  I returned it.  I tried to cancel it, 
but even though I had not received it yet, finance could not respond 
quickly enough to cancel it.

Stephanie


On 2017-10-18 19:43, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> Just for the record, I was a last minute substitute attendee in 
> Iceland. I was given an already booked hotel room, but paid my own 
> airfare, and received no per diem. I moved to the hotel from my B&B 
> accommodations. So, I reduced ICANN'S costs. 😕
>
> Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: GNSO NCPH Intersessional Meeting 2017 Travel Report
> From: Wisdom Donkor
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> CC:
>
>
>     Thanks for the update.
>
>     On Wednesday, October 18, 2017, Ayden Férdeline
>     <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Raoul,
>
>         Great question. Although there has been some variance in the
>         amount of transit time, by and large most (all?) travellers
>         arrived the night before the meeting begun. As all 3 NCPH
>         Intersessionals have thus far been the same length, from a
>         review of the past travel reports, it appears that each
>         traveller has received an average of 4 nights hotel per
>         meeting. A small number left a day early. It's just that on
>         every metric - hotel, flight, per diem - Iceland was more
>         expensive than Los Angeles and Washington DC.
>
>         Now this does not explain why some people receive greater per
>         diems than others, or why others have expenses reimbursed
>         (which are recorded differently to visas), but I wanted to
>         flag this travel report because it was a community decision to
>         take the meeting to Iceland. And it was the NCSG which pushed
>         the strongest for this location, though I concede the NCUC
>         Chair Farzaneh Badii did try to inject a dose of reality into
>         the conversation by noting that her research indicated that
>         Iceland was more expensive than Singapore (itself not the most
>         economical destination).
>
>         Please remember that this travel report does not include other
>         associated costs -- venue hire, location scouting (I am told
>         that the Meetings team did a visit to Iceland a few weeks
>         ahead of time to inspect the hotel), catering, staff and Board
>         travel.
>
>         In the past we have had conversations around whether or not
>         the Intersessional is 'worth it', and on balance, I feel very
>         strongly that it is. But I think it was incorrect for us to
>         assert, as some of our members did, that Iceland would be a
>         more economical option than the US. That's something that I
>         think we have to acknowledge. We were wrong. In the future if
>         we push for meeting rotations, I hope we can provide a better
>         justification, remembering that this is not an outreach event;
>         this should be a strategy workshop.
>
>         Just my thoughts,
>
>         Ayden
>
>
>>         -------- Original Message --------
>>         Subject: Re: GNSO NCPH Intersessional Meeting 2017 Travel Report
>>         Local Time: 18 October 2017 2:59 PM
>>         UTC Time: 18 October 2017 13:59
>>         From: plommer at GMAIL.COM
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','plommer at GMAIL.COM');>
>>         To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU');>
>>
>>             There was a modest increase by four supported travellers.
>>             However, on a per participant basis, the cost per
>>             supported traveller increased. This can only be explained
>>             by the destination of the meeting.
>>
>>
>>         It could also be, that people were given less time in a hotel
>>         in LA, because the transit was so much shorter, I'm just
>>         guessing here though. Arsene's question on different per
>>         diems is an extremely valid one if everyone spent the same
>>         time on their journey. $350 vs $600+ sounds like a really big
>>         leap and even one day extra doesn't explain it. Thanks for
>>         following this up Ayden.
>>
>>         -Raoul
>>
>>         On 18 October 2017 at 16:46, Ayden Férdeline
>>         <icann at ferdeline.com
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','icann at ferdeline.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Arsene,
>>
>>             There was a modest increase by four supported travellers.
>>             However, on a per participant basis, the cost per
>>             supported traveller increased. This can only be explained
>>             by the destination of the meeting.
>>
>>             It is a good question you raise regarding individual
>>             costs and higher than average per diems and reimbursement
>>             requests. I do not know why this is the case.
>>
>>             The intersessional has previously been in Los Angeles,
>>             and costs remained steady (certainly lower than Iceland).
>>             Furthermore most participants from the CSG travel from
>>             North America so it is a short hop for them.
>>
>>             Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>
>>>             -------- Original Message --------
>>>             Subject: Re: GNSO NCPH Intersessional Meeting 2017
>>>             Travel Report
>>>             Local Time: 18 October 2017 2:40 PM
>>>             UTC Time: 18 October 2017 13:40
>>>             From: arsenebaguma at GMAIL.COM
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','arsenebaguma at GMAIL.COM');>
>>>             To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU');>
>>>
>>>             Hi Ayden,
>>>
>>>             Thanks for pointing our members to this information, we
>>>             need to be
>>>             looking into the way ICANN resources are being used. I
>>>             was glad to
>>>             note that it is YOU (our member) who raised that
>>>             question with regards
>>>             to the cost of the meeting :)
>>>
>>>             I had a quick look at the minutes and the travel report
>>>             (https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents?preview=/63144488/71603236/GNSO%20NCPH%20Intersessional%20Meeting%202017%20Travel%20Report.pdf
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents?preview=/63144488/71603236/GNSO%20NCPH%20Intersessional%20Meeting%202017%20Travel%20Report.pdf>)
>>>             and have the following comments:
>>>
>>>             - I maybe wrong, but i think the reason (or one of the
>>>             reasons) behind
>>>             the increase compared to 2016 is because this year, the
>>>             numbers have
>>>             increased in terms of participants (attendees), number
>>>             of travel
>>>             support given, hotel supports, etc. I believe that"s why
>>>             more money
>>>             was spent?
>>>
>>>             - I have a question (maybe odd) but what criteria
>>>             determines the
>>>             amount of perdiem/stipend received by attendees? I see
>>>             many received
>>>             $350 (including yourself) but others over that, some
>>>             even over $600?
>>>             How is this determined?
>>>
>>>             - Now that the upcoming Intercessional will be in LA
>>>             next year, can we
>>>             expect to have another raise in the budget? LA might be
>>>             more expensive
>>>             than Iceland, i believe?
>>>
>>>             Thanks,
>>>             Arsene
>>>
>>>             2017-10-18 1:30 UTC+02:00, Ayden Férdeline
>>>             <icann at ferdeline.com
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','icann at ferdeline.com');>>:
>>>             > I forgot to add, the reason I have been following up
>>>             is because, as recorded
>>>             > on page 33 of these minutes, we were told that the
>>>             cost of this
>>>             > Intersessional in Iceland would be "relatively the
>>>             same" compared with past
>>>             > Intersessionals, and that we"d have the figures in 3
>>>             or 4 weeks time. 4
>>>             > weeks passed, no report was forthcoming, though it has
>>>             now surfaced 8 months
>>>             > later and we can see the total spend was 25% greater
>>>             than in 2016. Given the
>>>             > supposed rationale behind having the meeting in
>>>             Iceland (a rationale that
>>>             > one of our members made, incidentally) was because it
>>>             was supposedly an
>>>             > economical destination, I found this interesting.
>>>             >
>>>             > Thanks, Ayden
>>>             >
>>>             >> -------- Original Message --------
>>>             >> Subject: GNSO NCPH Intersessional Meeting 2017 Travel
>>>             Report
>>>             >> Local Time: 18 October 2017 12:20 AM
>>>             >> UTC Time: 17 October 2017 23:20
>>>             >> From: icann at ferdeline.com
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','icann at ferdeline.com');>
>>>             >> To: NCSG <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu');>>
>>>             >>
>>>             >> In case it is of interest, the travel report from the
>>>             Intersessional in
>>>             >> Reykjavik in February was uploaded to [this
>>>             >>
>>>             page](https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents>)
>>>             >> yesterday. It does not appear on the travel report
>>>             page of the ICANN
>>>             >> website. Some of us have been enquiring for a few
>>>             months as to when it
>>>             >> might be published, so I figure I might share it with
>>>             you here in the
>>>             >> interest of transparency...
>>>             >>
>>>             >> Thanks, Ayden
>>>             >>
>>>             >>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>             >>> Subject: [community] Non-Contracted Parties House >
>>>             Intersessional 2017 -
>>>             >>> Documents
>>>             >>> Local Time: 16 October 2017 3:46 PM
>>>             >>> UTC Time: 16 October 2017 14:46
>>>             >>> From: no-reply at icann.org
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','no-reply at icann.org');>
>>>             >>> To: icann at ferdeline.com
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','icann at ferdeline.com');>
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Ozan
>>>             Sahin](https://community.icann.org/display/~ozan.sahin
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/display/%7Eozan.sahin>)
>>>             edited the
>>>             >>> page:
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Intersessional 2017 -
>>>             >>>
>>>             Documents](https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents>)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> Useful Documents
>>>             >>> [Plenary Lunch - Contractual Compliance and Consumer
>>>             Safeguards](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Plenary Lunch - Locating Compliance Metrics on
>>>             ICANN Website](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Plenary Lunch - The 10 Most Abused Top Level
>>>             Domains](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Plenary Session #2 - Compare Final Draft v NCPH
>>>             Process for Selecting
>>>             >>> GNSO Council Vice Chair](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Plenary Session #2 - 2017 Board Seat 14 Election
>>>             Timeline 13 February
>>>             >>> 2017](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Plenary Session #3 - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>>>             Community Comment
>>>             >>> Update](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Plenary Session #6 - NCPH Presenting](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Plenary Session #6 - NCPH Call for GNSO Structural
>>>             Review](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [Meeting Report - Co-chair Session Notes/Action
>>>             items/ Next Steps](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [ICANN Response to Questions from ICANN Compliance
>>>             Session](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [GNSO NCPH Intersessional Meeting 2017 Evaluation
>>>             Survey](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [NCPH Intersessional 2017 - Evaluation Survey
>>>             >>> Results](/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=64082814)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [NCPH Intersessional 2017 - Evaluation Survey
>>>             Results.pdf](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [GNSO NCPH Intersessional Meeting 2017 Travel Report](#)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> [View
>>>             >>>
>>>             Online](https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+2017+-+Documents>)
>>>             >>> · [View
>>>             >>>
>>>             Changes](https://community.icann.org/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=63144488&revisedVersion=12&originalVersion=11
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=63144488&revisedVersion=12&originalVersion=11>)
>>>             >>> ·
>>>             >>>
>>>             [Like](https://community.icann.org/plugins/likes/like.action?contentId=63144488
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/plugins/likes/like.action?contentId=63144488>)
>>>             >>> [Stop watching
>>>             >>>
>>>             page](https://community.icann.org/users/removepagenotification.action?pageId=63144488
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/users/removepagenotification.action?pageId=63144488>)
>>>             >>> · [Manage
>>>             >>>
>>>             notifications](https://community.icann.org/users/editmyemailsettings.action
>>>             <https://community.icann.org/users/editmyemailsettings.action>)
>>>             >>>
>>>             >>> This message was sent by [Atlassian
>>>             >>>
>>>             Confluence](http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence
>>>             <http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence>) 6.1.3, [Team
>>>             >>> Collaboration
>>>             >>>
>>>             Software](http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/overview/team-collaboration-software?utm_source=email-footer
>>>             <http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/overview/team-collaboration-software?utm_source=email-footer>)
>>>
>>>
>>>             -- 
>>>             ------------------------
>>>             **Arsène Tungali* <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>*
>>>             Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international
>>>             <http://www.rudiinternational.org
>>>             <http://www.rudiinternational.org>>*,
>>>             CEO,* Smart Services Sarl <http://www.smart-serv.info>*,
>>>             *Mabingwa Forum
>>>             <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com>*
>>>             Tel: +243 993810967 <tel:+243%20993%20810%20967>
>>>             GPG: 523644A0
>>>             *Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo*
>>>
>>>             2015 Mandela Washington Felllow
>>>             <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html
>>>             <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html>>
>>>             (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil
>>>             <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors
>>>             <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors>>
>>>             & Mexico
>>>             <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors
>>>             <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>>)
>>>             - AFRISIG 2016
>>>             <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/
>>>             <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/>> - Blogger
>>>             <http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN Fellow (Los Angeles
>>>             <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-07-18-en
>>>             <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-07-18-en>>
>>>             & Marrakech
>>>             <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/marrakech55-attendees-2016-03-14-en
>>>             <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/marrakech55-attendees-2016-03-14-en>>
>>>             ). AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius
>>>             <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners
>>>             <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners>>)*
>>>             - *IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet
>>>             Governance - Internet
>>>             Freedom.
>>>
>>>             Check the *2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC* report
>>>             (English
>>>             <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234
>>>             <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>>) and (French
>>>             <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242
>>>             <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>>)
>>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     *WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
>     E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist*
>     *
>     ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
>     Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
>     OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member
>     Email: wisdom.dk at gmail.com <mailto:wisdom.dk at gmail.com>
>     Skype: wisdom_dk
>     facebook: facebook at wisdom_dk
>     Website: www.data.gov.gh <http://www.data.gov.gh/>
>     www.isoc.gh <http://www.isoc.gh/> / www.itag.org.gh
>     <http://www.itag.org.gh/>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20171018/618e6070/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list