Reminder CCT RT Initial Draft Comments for NCSG

[Kathy Kleiman]

I agree with Ayden about adding sections that review the recommendations 
one by one. The fact that there are 50 is extraordinary in and of itself.

Some initial thoughts:
1)  A large amount of collection of pricing data is requested in Draft 
Recommendations 2-8.  For those who work with pricing issues, what 
concerns are raised by ICANN collecting, publishing and acting on 
pricing data?
2) A number of recommendations direct the GNSO Working Groups to take 
additional interests and concerns into account.  Should a Review Team be 
directing Working Groups and GNSO policy considerations (particularly 
here where the Review Team is putting their fingers on the scale towards 
the interests of Intellectual Property and Business Constituencies?)
3) A number of the recommendations are very vague. This gives great 
power and discretion to those who will interpret and implement the 
recommendations. How best to clarify?
4) As Ayden points out, Shadow Regulation appears to be an integral part 
of these recommendations -- with a very broad approach to abuse.  How to 
narrow to the type of abuse we generally consider to be within the scope 
of ICANN, e.g,. abuse that impacts the security and stability of the 
Internet (botnets, malware...)

Work ahead!  Please jump in!
Kathy

On 5/15/2017 10:57 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The Google Doc is opening for me. Thanks for the first draft of this, 
> Poncelet. I would like to suggest that we structure our comment along 
> the 50 (!) recommendations that are in the draft report, if not 
> addressing all of them, at least reacting to the most pertinent ones.
>
> From memory, the Canadian International Pharmacy Association expressed 
> concern in Copenhagen over similarities between some of the 
> recommendations in the CCT RT initial draft and the "Healthy" Domains 
> Initiative. So we might want to look out for traces of shadow 
> regulation in the report. Thanks.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Reminder CCT RT Initial Draft Comments for NCSG
>> Local Time: May 15, 2017 2:12 PM
>> UTC Time: May 15, 2017 1:12 PM
>> From: matthew at INTPOLICY.COM
>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>
>>
>> Hi all - thanks Rafik.
>>
>> Have any third parties - outside of ICANN - done any work on this 
>> issue?   It would be important to see if there has been I think.
>>
>> Also, I don't seem to be able to access the google.doc  - says I need 
>> permission.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> On 15/05/2017 14:22, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> this is a reminder to review and add your comments on the draft made 
>>> by Poncelet for NCSG on the Competition, Consumer, Consumer Choice 
>>> review team report 
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1agDMTd8rDvhDb5mwg6fdfQSyRpQZjtjxmGaqx5NCJG8/edit 
>>>
>>> (the public comment is here 
>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cct-rt-draft-report-2017-03-07-en)
>>> the deadline for submission is the 19th May.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Matthew Shears
>> matthew at intpolicy.com
>> +447712472987
>> Skype:mshears
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170515/e4b4e08c/attachment.htm>