<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>I agree with Ayden about adding sections that review the
recommendations one by one. The fact that there are 50 is
extraordinary in and of itself. <br>
</p>
Some initial thoughts:<br>
1) A large amount of collection of pricing data is requested in
Draft Recommendations 2-8. For those who work with pricing issues,
what concerns are raised by ICANN collecting, publishing and acting
on pricing data? <br>
2) A number of recommendations direct the GNSO Working Groups to
take additional interests and concerns into account. Should a
Review Team be directing Working Groups and GNSO policy
considerations (particularly here where the Review Team is putting
their fingers on the scale towards the interests of Intellectual
Property and Business Constituencies?)<br>
3) A number of the recommendations are very vague. This gives great
power and discretion to those who will interpret and implement the
recommendations. How best to clarify? <br>
4) As Ayden points out, Shadow Regulation appears to be an integral
part of these recommendations -- with a very broad approach to
abuse. How to narrow to the type of abuse we generally consider to
be within the scope of ICANN, e.g,. abuse that impacts the security
and stability of the Internet (botnets, malware...)<br>
<br>
Work ahead! Please jump in!<br>
Kathy<br>
<br>
<p>On 5/15/2017 10:57 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:l28sViuGmQfn6gf2tgnfYiKRhI9KCs55KXfKRVgaJncs1YsD2ZeaBG_Stk58z1wffoYYq9LNGYKsRWXBpdUN2k5bMRFhG55oM4nrHFAhL8E=@ferdeline.com"
type="cite">
<div>Hi all,<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The Google Doc is opening for me. Thanks for the first draft
of this, Poncelet. I would like to suggest that we structure our
comment along the 50 (!) recommendations that are in the draft
report, if not addressing all of them, at least reacting to the
most pertinent ones.<br>
<br>
From memory, the Canadian International Pharmacy Association
expressed concern in Copenhagen over similarities between some
of the recommendations in the CCT RT initial draft and the
"Healthy" Domains Initiative. So we might want to look out for
traces of shadow regulation in the report. Thanks.<br>
<br>
Best wishes,</div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="protonmail_signature_block ">
<div class="protonmail_signature_block-user ">
<div>Ayden Férdeline<br>
</div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline"
title="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline">linkedin.com/in/ferdeline</a><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="protonmail_signature_block-proton
protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite">
<div>-------- Original Message --------<br>
</div>
<div>Subject: Re: Reminder CCT RT Initial Draft Comments for
NCSG<br>
</div>
<div>Local Time: May 15, 2017 2:12 PM<br>
</div>
<div>UTC Time: May 15, 2017 1:12 PM<br>
</div>
<div>From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:matthew@INTPOLICY.COM">matthew@INTPOLICY.COM</a><br>
</div>
<div>To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU">NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<p>Hi all - thanks Rafik.<br>
</p>
<p>Have any third parties - outside of ICANN - done any work on
this issue? It would be important to see if there has been I
think.<br>
</p>
<p>Also, I don't seem to be able to access the google.doc -
says I need permission.<br>
</p>
<p>Thanks.<br>
</p>
<p>Matthew<br>
</p>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/05/2017 14:22, Rafik Dammak
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi all, <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>this is a reminder to review and add your comments on
the draft made by Poncelet for NCSG on the Competition,
Consumer, Consumer Choice review team report <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1agDMTd8rDvhDb5mwg6fdfQSyRpQZjtjxmGaqx5NCJG8/edit"
rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1agDMTd8rDvhDb5mwg6fdfQSyRpQZjtjxmGaqx5NCJG8/edit</a> <br>
</div>
<div>(the public comment is here <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cct-rt-draft-report-2017-03-07-en"
rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener">https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cct-rt-draft-report-2017-03-07-en</a>)<br>
</div>
<div>the deadline for submission is the 19th May.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Rafik<br>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener"><img
moz-do-not-send="true" style="width: 46px;
height: 29px;" alt=""
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png"
height="29" width="46"></a><br>
</td>
<td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color:
#41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial,
Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">Virus-free.
<a moz-do-not-send="true" style="color: #4453ea;"
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener">www.avg.com</a><br>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<pre cols="72" class="moz-signature">--
Matthew Shears
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:matthew@intpolicy.com" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener">matthew@intpolicy.com</a>
+447712472987
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Skype:mshears</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>