[council] Proposed motion for the selection of the Empowered Community representative

[Matthew Shears]

Agree - additional VC flexibility is a good suggestion.

Matthew


On 18/06/2017 11:15, Edward Morris wrote:
> Agreed.
> In porting the Accountability reforms to the GNSO, the Drafting Team 
> involved always assumed that it would be the GNSO Chair who would 
> represent the SO in the Empowered Community Administration (ECA). I 
> think expanding that concept to allow for a Vice Chair to take that 
> role if so desired and/or required is an improvement on that concept 
> and should be supported.
> Best,
> Ed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: "Robin Gross" <robin at IPJUSTICE.ORG>
> *Sent*: Sunday, June 18, 2017 4:49 PM
> *To*: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject*: Re: [council] Proposed motion for the selection of the 
> Empowered Community representative
> I agree that the GNSO Chair or VC is the appropriate person for this 
> capacity.  No need to reinvent the wheel and start creating new and 
> confusing power structures for the GNSO to act in the empowered 
> community.
> Thanks,
> Robin
>> On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:29 AM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net 
>> <mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>> wrote:
>> I support the motion, the GNSO Chair or Vice Chair is the best placed 
>> person to serve in such a capacity in my opinion.
>> -J
>> *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU]*On Behalf 
>> Of*Stephanie Perrin
>> *Sent:*18 June 2017 14:15
>> *To:*NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>> *Subject:*Fwd: [council] Proposed motion for the selection of the 
>> Empowered Community representative
>>
>> This is an important motion on how the GNSO will select its 
>> representative for the Empowered Community, just now submitted by the 
>> Standing Selection Committee.  Please let your councilors know your 
>> views on the matter prior to the meeting in Joburg.
>>
>> Stephanie Perrin
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> *Subject:*
>> 	
>> [council] Proposed motion for the selection of the Empowered 
>> Community representative
>> *Date:*
>> 	
>> Sat, 17 Jun 2017 19:52:49 -0700
>> *From:*
>> 	
>> Susan Kawaguchi<susankpolicy at gmail.com> <mailto:susankpolicy at gmail.com>
>> *To:*
>> 	
>> council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>>
>> Hello,
>> Please see the attached proposed motion from the Standing Selection 
>> Committee for the Empowered Community representative from the GNSO.
>> After several weeks of meetings, discussions and reviewing the 
>> requirements for this role the committee determine this process was 
>> the most beneficial to the council.
>> Best regards,
>> Standing Selection Committee
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>
>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

-- 
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
+447712472987
Skype:mshears

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170618/b31ccd0e/attachment.htm>