ICANN has appointed a Chief Data Protection Officer
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA
Mon Jul 31 08:09:42 EEST 2017
This is a great point Baudouin. I raised the matter of accrediting
those who purport to be working on cybercrime or investigations on the
RDS discussion a while ago, and got pretty well attacked....but I stick
to my guns. If a person or group is a legitimate contractor working on
cybercrime, or a law enforcement body, they should have some kind of
official recognition in order to get the detailed personal information
they want. Why should a reseller be forced to accept some stranger's
word for who they are? Accreditation is a two way street....
Stephanie Perrin
On 2017-07-31 09:03, Baudouin SCHOMBE wrote:
> Indeed, Kris, I agree with you on this point. You have just awakened
> my attention by this observation. At the local level, this could
> enable us to solve the problems of registrars not accredited and who
> abound in the country at the risk of deliveries the personal data to
> any person pretending to be of the intelligence service.
>
> *SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
> *
> *SECRETAIRE EXECUTIF FGI-IGF RDC
> *
> *COORDINATION NATIONALE CAFEC
> ICANN/AFRALO Member
> *
> *ISOC Member**
> *Téléphone mobile:+243998983491/+243813684512
> email : b.schombe at gmail.com <mailto:b.schombe at gmail.com>
> skype : b.schombe
> blog : http://akimambo.unblog.fr
>
>
>
>
> 2017-07-31 13:42 GMT+01:00 Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com
> <mailto:seeburn.k at gmail.com>>:
>
> To the point….but i guess since the CDPO has been appointed he
> would need to look and be able to advise on public view of data in
> the whois for example. I am sure we need the correct and validated
> details of anyone who registers to have them on Data base but some
> information coming from special request like authorities needs a
> different access. Based on who and what the subject of the issue
> comes to be.
>
> You have valid points which everyone must come to a middle ground
> to succeed Privacy laws and certainly GDPR is going to affect many
> dealings with EU be it online or cloud.The challenges are gona
> need to happen not only within the groups but affects ICANN directly.
>
> But looks like stephanie has provided some more background. The
> bigger question is that whatever happens we all need to tie down
> to GDPR else no business at all and no safe harbor.
>
> My acid test here is to see what the new Chief brings in. He
> should be able to look at everything and have guidelines for all
> groups and for ICANN as well.
>
> Kris
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Ade Bo <adebodea at GMAIL.COM
>> <mailto:adebodea at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Has anyone thought how are these changes going to influence
>> cybercrime?
>> How much harder is it going to be to find information necessary
>> to prosecute someone?
>> We are thinking of protecting privacy but isn’t there nothing
>> contradicting that ?
>> I believe these matter should be looked at from all the
>> stakeholders perspective.
>>
>> With kind regards
>>
>> Adela Bodea
>>
>> "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination”
>> Albert Einstein
>>
>>> On 31 Jul 2017, at 14:06, Michael Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:mike.oghia at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree too Stephanie, excellent points David.
>>>
>>> Would anyone support us as the NCSG requesting a formal response
>>> to David's points (and a formal explanation as to the motivation
>>> behind Mr. Halloran's appointment)?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Stephanie Perrin
>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I totally agree David, and as someone who last worked in
>>> risk management, if I were the CEO looking at this mess
>>> right now I would be asking hard questions of the people who
>>> have advised the Board to just ignore the data protection
>>> commissioners for the past 17 years. First position paper on
>>> WHOIS being illegal was in 2000. Makes a heck of an easy
>>> case to take to Court....
>>>
>>> Stephanie Perrin
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-07-31 03:33, David Cake wrote:
>>>> I admit I find this development disappointing.
>>>> While it is a sign (along with the GDPR task force
>>>> established at the last meeting) that ICANN has finally
>>>> understood the significance of its downplaying and
>>>> avoidance of the GDPR and other international data
>>>> protection law over the last few years, it is disappointing
>>>> that:
>>>> a) ICANN is still not taking the issue that seriously, as
>>>> it is in addition to existing Deputy General Counsel
>>>> duties, so represents a limited allocation of resources to
>>>> the issue;
>>>> b) is a missed opportunity to bring additional experience
>>>> and expertise into the organisation, expertise ICANN
>>>> desperately needs (and is currently relying on its
>>>> volunteers to provide);
>>>> c) is continuing to the have the issue managed by the same
>>>> team whose denial and obstinate avoidance of the issue has
>>>> led to the organisation now facing a crisis;
>>>> d) continues a pattern of having ICANN legal be put in
>>>> charge of areas where it is largely responsible for
>>>> continued organisation dysfunction, so effectively being
>>>> given the opportunity to manage criticism but not given any
>>>> strong inventive to admit to past mistakes. .
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 29 Jul 2017, at 3:32 am, Ayden Férdeline
>>>>> <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ICANN has now appointed someone
>>>>> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/introducing-icann-s-chief-data-protection-officer-cdpo>
>>>>> to the role of "Chief Data Protection Officer". Daniel
>>>>> Halloran, who in his bio is described as "one of
>>>>> ICANN's longest-serving employees" and reports directly to
>>>>> John Jeffrey, does not list his experience in establishing
>>>>> privacy frameworks nor their associated compliance
>>>>> structures in his bio. That said, I wish him all the best
>>>>> in this new role and look forward to seeing how ICANN's
>>>>> understanding of data protection law evolves over the
>>>>> coming months now that this position has been created...
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Kris Seeburn
> seeburn.k at gmail.com <mailto:seeburn.k at gmail.com>
>
> *
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170731/56df95cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list