two letter domain names and GAC
Kris Seeburn
seeburn.k at GMAIL.COM
Thu Jul 6 01:52:27 EEST 2017
Agreed this is very factual...
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:47 AM, avri doria <avri at APC.ORG> wrote:
>
> On 05-Jul-17 15:59, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> However I will not make attempt to change an NCUC position (since it
>> seem it's a done deal?)
>
> Really? We have a done deal?
>
> Even the Board policy is not a done deal as the new gTLD Subsequent
> Procedure PDP WG will need to evaluate that and either recommend it
> becomes a done deal or gets changed. Currently Sub Team 2. which I
> think owns this topic, seems on the way to deciding to stay with the
> status quo as indicated by the Board, but the GAC has not jumped on the
> topic in the WG yet. They still might as they do keep bringing in ISO 2l
> codes into the geonames discussion.
>
> Stay tuned.
>
> avri
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Kris Seeburn
seeburn.k at gmail.com
www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170706/4f856276/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list