CCWG-IG/ Do we want a CCWG on Internet Governance?

[Shreedeep Rayamajhi]

+111111

Cheers to Life
Shreedeep Rayamajhi

[image: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shreedeeprayamajhi]
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/shreedeeprayamajhi>

+1(301)485-9395(US)


*DISCLAIMER:* This message is intended only for the recipient. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:35 PM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> The kind of outreach Wolfgang speaks of is exactly why the CCW-IG has
> organized sessions on these topics at the last few years’ WSIS Forums and
> IGFs, including this years’ meetings--
>
> https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2017/Agenda/Session/298#intro
>
> http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-
> ws-76-multistakeholder-governance-of-the-domain-name-
> system-lessons-learned-for
>
> But it’s not entirely obvious one needs a formal CCW to do these.  Indeed,
> the reality has been that we usually end up with a half dozen people
> rushing to get a proposal in during the three days before the deadlines,
> with staff getting stuck doing the submission mechanics.
>
> On the other hand, since NETmundial every proposal to prepare materials
> about even something anodyne like the glory of the ICANN multistakeholder
> model has been blocked by certain reps saying oh that’s a risky idea, oh
> I’d have to get sigh off from my constituency, etc etc etc, so we never did
> anything. Folks who want to try again would have to figure out how to jump
> such hurdles.
>
> Cheers
>
> Bill
>
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 15:23, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@
> medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
>
> One point I see of even growing importance is that such a CCWG-IG can
> prepare material for presentation in other (UN and non-UN) bodies to
> explain to them how the multistakeholder Internet Governance model works
> within ICANN and what are the "lessons learned" from the IANA transition.
> Such an outreach to non-ICANN communities seems to me an important aspect
> to enhance the understanding of the multistakeholder model among groups
> which have been pulled into the global Internet debate only recently. It is
> also needed to avoid new efforts by un-informed or bad-intended governments
> to re-open a discussion on governmental oversight over ICANN.
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170703/d6d8cbc6/attachment.htm>