Election rules: None-of-the-Above, abstention

[Olévié Kouami]

Thank you for this clarification, Tapani.
Cheers !
Olevie

Le 1 août 2017 07:54, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> a
écrit :

> Dear all,
>
> Following the confusion about None of the Above option in the ballot,
> the matter was discussed at some length in the election-reform list
> and even legal advice sought, and consequently NCSG EC agreed that
> there shall be no explicit NotA choice in the ballot, but abstaining,
> that is voting for fewer candidates than there're available slots,
> will not invalidate the ballot.
>
> That is, the ballot will look somewhat like this:
>
> Chair:
>
> [ ] X
> [ ] Y
> [ ] Z
>
> Council:
>
> [ ] A
> [ ] B
> [ ] C
> [ ] D
> [ ] E
> [ ] F
>
> and you must mark at most one of the Chair candidates
> and at most four of the council candidates.
>
>
> You can find the discussion in two threads in election-reform list:
>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/election-reform/2017-June/thread.html
> https://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/election-reform/2017-July/thread.html
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170801/157ab898/attachment.htm>