Update: CSCG & IGF Planning Retreat

[William Drake]

Hi

Thanks Shane.  I’m familiar with the rule.  We don’t use it in the IGF, for various reasons, at least not since the early tense days of the MAG.

Bill


> On Jun 3, 2016, at 12:13, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:
> 
> William,
> 
> At 2016-06-03 11:13:55 +0200
> William Drake <wjdrake at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> 
>>> On Jun 3, 2016, at 02:06, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Chatham House style (content w/o attribution)  
>> 
>> In true bottom up transparent community driven IGF fashion….not.
> 
> To be honest, that doesn't seem too horrible. The Chatham House rule is
> there for a reason:
> 
>    Q. What are the benefits of using the Rule?
> 
>    A. It allows people to speak as individuals, and to express views
>    that may not be those of their organizations, and therefore it
>    encourages free discussion. People usually feel more relaxed if
>    they don't have to worry about their reputation or the implications
>    if they are publicly quoted.
> 
> https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Shane - speaking only for myself  ;)


*************************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
The Working Group on Internet Governance - 10th Anniversary Reflections
New book at http://amzn.to/22hWZxC
*************************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160603/fbe2f2fc/attachment.htm>