Update: CSCG & IGF Planning Retreat

[Shane Kerr]

William,

At 2016-06-03 11:13:55 +0200
William Drake <wjdrake at GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> > On Jun 3, 2016, at 02:06, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Chatham House style (content w/o attribution)  
> 
> In true bottom up transparent community driven IGF fashion….not.

To be honest, that doesn't seem too horrible. The Chatham House rule is
there for a reason:

    Q. What are the benefits of using the Rule?

    A. It allows people to speak as individuals, and to express views
    that may not be those of their organizations, and therefore it
    encourages free discussion. People usually feel more relaxed if
    they don't have to worry about their reputation or the implications
    if they are publicly quoted.

https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule

Cheers,

--
Shane - speaking only for myself  ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160603/4a4ed6c1/attachment.sig>