DIDP Analysis

[Tamir Israel]

Yes, but even in Canada, this tool is sometimes [mis]-used to force
people to narrow their requests unnecessarily.

I don't think it's unreasonable to go one step further and make ICANN
shoulder a high degree of the cost here unless it becomes truly
unreasonable, in which case tailoring the request or offering to let the
requestor pay should be the remedy. They get all these revenues from
DNS, may as well put them to good use.

Best,
Tamir

On 10/6/2015 12:03 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> In Canada, when it is, you just have to pay the extra work load and/or
> material to get it, and they offer you to refine your search instead
> and work with you on your request. There is no way that a no is
> acceptable.
>
> Big item for transparency and accountability IMO.
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> On 06/10/2015 9:47 AM, Karel Douglas wrote:
>> In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate reason for denial if
>> the request is too burdensome. 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20151006/1151c9bc/attachment.sig>