DIDP Analysis

[Nicolas Adam]

yeah, great work, Thx!

IMO there's problems with exceptions:

1, 6 (partly) and 2, 3,  12 (wholly).

Nicolas

On 06/10/2015 12:02 PM, Padmini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> No, there are always reasons given in the DIDPs. The main one usually 
> is that such-an-such activity does not actually come within the 
> purview of ICANN's operations. There's also "there is no existing 
> documentation, and we won't create fresh ones", and most often one or 
> the other of the 12 non- disclosure clauses that I've tabulated at the 
> side.
>
> Regards
>
> Padmini Baruah
> V Year, B.A.LL.B. (Hons.)
> NLSIU, Bangalore
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Nicolas Adam <nickolas.adam at gmail.com 
> <mailto:nickolas.adam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     In Canada, when it is, you just have to pay the extra work load
>     and/or material to get it, and they offer you to refine your
>     search instead and work with you on your request. There is no way
>     that a no is acceptable.
>
>     Big item for transparency and accountability IMO.
>
>     Nicolas
>
>
>
>     On 06/10/2015 9:47 AM, Karel Douglas wrote:
>
>         In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate reason for
>         denial if the request is too burdensome.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20151006/65918ce0/attachment.htm>