Public Comments on IANA proposal
Avri Doria
avri at ACM.ORG
Sun Apr 26 23:21:33 EEST 2015
Hi,
On 26-Apr-15 23:57, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
> I hope that NCSG members will understand the need to push for an
> independent PTI board that contains IETF and RIR representatives as
> well as naming community representatives.
>
>
>
While we can make sure there is room for them, we cannot include them.
Only the ICG can actually bring them in, if they wish to be brought in.
I certainly favor making sure it is possible for them to be as involved
in the PTI as they may decide they are willing to be. One of the ideas
that was dead on arrival was the notion that instead of the Affiliate
being their sole property of ICANN, it would be a shared resource among
the 3 operational communities. That remains possible as an evolutionary
path in the current proposal.
avri
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150426/752ec139/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list