<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
Hi,<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26-Apr-15 23:57, Milton L Mueller
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:52d55e75da0c43c19c5b572ce85e4ac7@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu"
type="cite">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">
I hope that NCSG members will understand the need to push for
an independent PTI board that contains IETF and RIR
representatives as well as naming community representatives.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
While we can make sure there is room for them, we cannot include
them. Only the ICG can actually bring them in, if they wish to be
brought in. <br>
<br>
I certainly favor making sure it is possible for them to be as
involved in the PTI as they may decide they are willing to be. One
of the ideas that was dead on arrival was the notion that instead of
the Affiliate being their sole property of ICANN, it would be a
shared resource among the 3 operational communities. That remains
possible as an evolutionary path in the current proposal.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
<tr>
<td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
<a href="http://www.avast.com/">
<img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" alt="Avast logo" />
</a>
</td>
<td>
<p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
<br><a href="http://www.avast.com/">www.avast.com</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>