Preparation for ICANN LA meeting starting / LA HIGH-INTEREST TOPIC SESSION

[Olévié Kouami]

Hi Rafik !
Please do add my voice on 1, 9 and 11.
Thank you.
Cheers !
-Olevie-


2014-09-15 11:35 GMT+00:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:

> Hi,
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> BTW, who came up with the original list.  Did I miss the time when we
> did that in a so-called bottom-up manner?
>
> avri
>
>
> On 15-Sep-14 06:57, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > thanks for sending your selections for the top 3 topics.
> > Regarding Avri suggestions, they were shared but no response from other
> > groups. we will have to make selection for topics to discuss with the
> > NCSG-Board in the LA meeting and those can be  definitely candidate topic
> > since there are a lot of support.
> >
> > the result of the polling is above and the top 3  (that I will send) are:
> > 9; 1; 6, 11(ex-aequo)
> >
> > 1. 7 votes
> >
> > 2. 1 votes
> >
> > 3. 0 votes
> >
> > 4. 1 votes
> >
> > 5. 1 votes
> >
> > 6. 6 votes
> >
> > 7. 4 votes
> >
> > 8. 5 votes
> >
> > 9. 8 votes
> >
> > 10. 0 votes
> >
> > 11. 6 votes
> >
> > 12. 4 votes
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> > 2014-09-10 23:02 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> as you may know already, there were several topic proposed for the
> >> high-interest topic session which should be held on the monday of ICANN
> >> meeting in LA.
> >> there is list below of several topics and we should select top 3 among
> >> them .
> >> please share you thoughts and choose 3 topics that should be discussed
> in
> >> that session.
> >> we need to get our list by next monday so I can sent it Tuesday.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Rafik
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>
> >> Date: 2014-09-10 16:01 GMT+09:00
> >> Subject: LA HIGH-INTEREST TOPIC SESSION
> >> To:
> >>
> >>
> >>  Dear Community Leaders:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you  very much for the feedback on potential High Interest Topics
> >> for your Monday session at the ICANN Public Meeting in Los Angeles.
> Based
> >> on all your feedback, we've now got a list of 12 potential topics.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Given time constraints and many different panel participants, you will
> all
> >> recall that for the Buenos Aires meeting we focused on just two primary
> >> topics.  I think, if possible, that should be your target again this
> time
> >> for the Los Angeles session.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Between now and early next week, please share with me your "top three"
> >> topics from the list below.  I will compile the results and hope that
> the
> >> feedback will narrow the topic choice to just a few topics that we can
> then
> >> confirm on next week's CEO call with Fadi.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Here's the list we have to work from based on all your input:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ·      *1. NetMundial Initiative and Hand-off*
> >>
> >> ·      *2. Affirmation Review of gTLD Expansion*
> >>
> >> ·      *3. Planning for Next Round of New gTLDs*
> >>
> >> ·      *4. NomCom Improvements*
> >>
> >> ·      *5. Universal acceptance of new gTLDs* (Two separate suggestions)
> >>
> >> ·      *6. Disposition of Excess New gTLD Fees and Auction Proceeds.*
> >>
> >> ·      *7. Integration of the GAC into the GNSO policy process* (also
> see
> >> GNSO Council suggestion - number 11 below)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> GNSO Council collected topics submitted by Jonathan:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *      *8. Trust In ICANN* - A perception exists (real or imagined) that
> >> big decisions are made that exclude or disregard community input.  What
> >> causes for mistrust can be eliminated, and how? How do we see ICANN
> >> accountability as functional and effective? How should government
> influence
> >> work, where are its limits? Perhaps instead of focusing on one narrow
> topic
> >> we should initiate a series of bottom-up debates on how the community
> would
> >> like to see ICANN develop in the next years -- an "Agenda 2020" if you
> will.
> >>
> >> *      *9. Legitimacy in Internet governance* - The Internet today
> >> resembles a country where 1% of the population governs 99% of the
> >> population, and most don't even know that the 1% exists! Legitimate
> >> democratic governance depends on the awareness and participation of the
> >> populous. Legitimacy in Internet governance requires greater awareness
> and
> >> participation of stakeholders. Civil society is the most disenfranchised
> >> part of the whole processes, and it has the most to loose.
> >>
> >> *      *10. Future of the Internet* - Is ICANN too focused on a circa
> >> 2000 Internet model, where human-driven Internet action and URLs
> >> dominated.  That is not true today, and will bring some even more
> profound
> >> changes in the future.  Two examples include machine to machine traffic
> and
> >> "in application" services. How can ICANN address these issues?
> >>
> >> *      *11. Future role of the GAC *-  There is a sliver of "public
> >> policy" in everything at ICANN, and the nature of government
> participation
> >> makes governments reluctant to accept anything short of immediate and
> total
> >> adoption of their advice. Where do we go from here?  Can the relevance
> of
> >> the SO/ACs be preserved, or is every topic or material issue destined to
> >> become a GAC/Board negotiation?  What limitations or backstops can check
> >> government influence, while still allowing for full consideration of
> their
> >> advice?
> >>
> >> *      *12. What is the essence of ICANN?*"  Is ICANN the corporation,
> is
> >> ICANN the community, or is it both? (this could capture both the trust
> and
> >> future role of the GAC topics.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> For your information, it seems that a few of the suggested topics listed
> >> above will already be covered by other sessions that are in the planning
> >> stages including a session on Universal acceptance, GAC-GNSO in the
> joint
> >> meeting, Netmundial in a separate update, a new gTLD session or two and
> a
> >> Board discussion on the Review of the Nominating Committee.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> With that in mind, please provide your feedback to this list by close of
> >> business next Tuesday and I will consolidate/compile the feedback. Its
> >> sufficient to send me a note listing BY NUMBER the three topics that are
> >> your top choices.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Looking forward to talking with you all next week.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
Responsable projet CERGI-Education (http://www.cergibs.com)
CEO de INTIC4DEV (http://www.intic4dev.org)
SG de ESTETIC  (http://www.estetic.tg)
Membre de ISoc (www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org/>) & du FOSSFA (
www.fossfa.net)
ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et
http://www.npoc.org/)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140915/3e60521c/attachment.htm>