Fwd: [council] Summary of IPC Comments on "The Protection of Geographic Names in the New gTLDs Process"

David Cake dave at DIFFERENCE.COM.AU
Wed Oct 15 12:55:03 EEST 2014


	I think many of us will be interested in the IPC comments on this issue. While NCSG members have differing opinions on the policy priority that should be given to trademarks, it is worth noting that much of the IPCs reasoning holds for whether government interest in geographic domain names should trump free expression and other rights. 
	Regards

		David

Begin forwarded message:


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141015/d5584478/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Summary of IPC Comments on Geo Names Proposal 14 Oct 2014.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 119601 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141015/d5584478/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141015/d5584478/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141015/d5584478/attachment.sig>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list