new statement on IANA

[Nuno Garcia]

This is a good document, congratulations!


On 23 March 2014 19:21, Heather Leson <heather at textontechs.com> wrote:

> Thank you.
>
> I've reviewed and look forward to the next steps.
>
> Heather
>
> Heather Leson
> heather at textontechs.com
> Twitter: HeatherLeson
> Blog: textontechs.com
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Nicolas Adam <nickolas.adam at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am with McTim on this one.
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>> On 2014-03-23 1:47 PM, McTim wrote:
>>
>>> It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition:
>>>> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was
>>>> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting.
>>>> - this version was circulated  by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours
>>>> for
>>>> comments.
>>>> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties.
>>>> hope that is much more clear.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:
>>>>
>>>>> Visible here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_
>>>>> 4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140323/367d67ba/attachment.htm>