new statement on IANA

[Heather Leson]

Thank you.

I've reviewed and look forward to the next steps.

Heather

Heather Leson
heather at textontechs.com
Twitter: HeatherLeson
Blog: textontechs.com


On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Nicolas Adam <nickolas.adam at gmail.com>wrote:

> I am with McTim on this one.
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> On 2014-03-23 1:47 PM, McTim wrote:
>
>> It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition:
>>> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was
>>> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting.
>>> - this version was circulated  by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours
>>> for
>>> comments.
>>> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties.
>>> hope that is much more clear.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:
>>>
>>>> Visible here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_
>>>> 4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140323/9394bf72/attachment.htm>