Comments from the CWG proposal

[Seun Ojedeji]

But the argument in the CWG proposal are so strong, that it's test case
cannot be staged without asking several fundamental questions relating to
it's operational stamina. The point for me is, if you want contracting then
please do the right thing. Which is simply to find an entirely independent
contractor (similar to NTIA). Until we proof that with the CWG proposal, I
am afraid we will only be creating content that could drive us to a state
of no return when it's implementation is attempted.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 22 Dec 2014 20:39, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Seun, the arguments in Google’s submission are so weak, and so unrelated
> to Google’s interest as a business, that one can only explain them as part
> of an individual’s influence within Google.
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On Behalf Of
> *Seun Ojedeji
> *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 2:32 PM
> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Comments from the CWG proposal
>
>
>
> Hi Milton,
>
> Do we need to associate a global organisation's post to an individual?
> perhaps we can also say because i was once ICANN fellow hence the reasons
> for my view or maybe we also trace associates of IGP and connect to dot to
> Milton Mueller :-)
>
> Overall i think the content is what should matter most in all these.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
>  Seun
>
> We all know that Vint Cerf, former board chair of ICANN, is associated
> with Google and Google’s views on these matters tend to reflect his views.
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On Behalf Of
> *Seun Ojedeji
> *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 2:10 PM
> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* [NCSG-Discuss] Comments from the CWG proposal
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Maybe i have not been communicating my concerns effectively, perhaps the
> recent submission by google could help further explain some of the concern
> i personally have about the current cwg proposal, which the NCSG supported
> without any much specific details that are actually critical to making a
> test scenario for the proposal.
>
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdfdwiXFUTBY7.pdf
>
> Happy reading...
>
>    Cheers!
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> **Mobile:
> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> **Mobile:
> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141223/e64e1e8d/attachment.htm>