[Comment] NCSG draft statement for CCWG on IANA transition proposal
Seun Ojedeji
seun.ojedeji at GMAIL.COM
Wed Dec 17 13:06:50 EET 2014
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, avri doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>
> I do not believe that it is possible that icann could achieve a level of
> accountability that obviates the need for separability
>
If what you've said above is the also the believe of the entire NCSG then i
rest my case. However i will note that implying that ICANN will never
achieve that level of accountability should not be the reason for
contracting but should be a reason to start a new organisation that will.
Perhaps the new gTLD is the reason why we think there is enough resources
to maintain contracting of the proposed structure....however i would have
preferred larger part of those resources (if indeed they will last) to be
used towards contributing to improving the development of the Internet
Regards
>
>
>
> avri
>
> Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at GMAIL.COM>
> Date:12/17/2014 12:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Comment] NCSG draft statement for CCWG on
> IANA transition proposal
>
> Hello Avri,
>
> Thanks i understand that the ICANN accountability implementation process
> may take some time, however i see think this transition could be an
> opportunity to expedite the process and it is with that motives that i
> added those text.
>
> I will like to believe that everyone here is insisting on separability
> simply because there is no adequate accountability within the organisation.
> So my text is simply trying to say ".....we believe an internal to ICANN
> will be more efficient however due to the lack of adequate accountability
> we will support the current proposal"
>
> I don't want to believe that we all don't see the complications that will
> be introduced by the implementation of the current cwg-stewardship
> proposal?
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think your edits are incompatible with the previous sense of the
>> statement.
>>
>> I would not be able to support a statement that supported ICANN gaining
>> permanent unreversable and inseparable control of the IANA contract as you
>> seem to be suggesting. I do not beleive there is any change the
>> Accountabilty effort could make that would give the degree of accountabilty
>> that separability bring. There is much to be done in ICANN accountability
>> to make sure it is and stays fit for holding the contract, but that will
>> not be enough for permanent merging of the IANA function into ICANN.
>>
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 17-Dec-14 11:01, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>
>> Hello Rafik,
>>
>> Thanks for your mail. Although i don't necessarily agree with all the
>> wordings in that draft(and i have noticed reluctance for re-wording),
>> however i think i can roughly agree with it with the few edits i just made.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> we discussed in yesterday call (find the recordings and transcripts
>>> beloww) the IANA transition working group proposal and the draft NCSG
>>> comment (
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14mDNLW17CJ_7rHSprzSAW90jhzPjlMiJf8qkbRM_Lek/edit?usp=sharing)
>>> .
>>> The NCSG statement was sent previously to the NCSG members list and
>>> several comments were added and resolved. the current version was sent to
>>> NCSG policy committee for review and endorsement. we have to submit the
>>> comment by 22nd Dec.
>>> Thanks to those who worked in the comment and supported it.
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> 2014-12-17 21:13 GMT+09:00 Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached and below the AC chat, transcript and MP3
>>>> recording of the NCSG Open call (Update on CCWG on IANA Transition) held
>>>> on Tuesday, 16 December 2014.
>>>>
>>>> *MP3 recording: *
>>>> https://icann.box.com/shared/static/me2byrhudtqk36n3j0c4.mp3
>>>>
>>>> *Attendance:* Rafik Dammak, Avri Doria, Stephanie Perrin, Milton
>>>> Mueller, Amr Elsadr, Matthieu Camus, Robin Gross, David Cake, Bill Drake,
>>>> Matthew Shears, Akinremi Peter Taiwo, Marilia Maciel, Robert Njathika
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can also find the recordings/info of this meeting and others at
>>>> this link on the wiki:
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/NCSG+Open+%28Update%29+Meetings
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Maryam Bakoshi
>>>>
>>>> *Secretariat – NCSG, NCUC, NPOC*
>>>>
>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Email:* maryam.bakoshi at icann.org
>>>>
>>>> *Mobile:* +44 7737 698036 <%2B44%207737%20698036>
>>>>
>>>> *Skype:* maryam.bakoshi.icann
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:
>> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535 **alt
>> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>
>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141217/1e92af7d/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list