reconsideration request

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Tapani,

Regarding the documented processes: it can be proposed by members and
shared for discussion. it will be great if you can suggest some proposals
that can be reviewed by membership and NCSG executive committee. maybe
starting with mapping the type of decisions NCSG has to make.
any issue is always a good opportunity for improvement and moving forward.

Rafik

2014-08-30 15:46 GMT+09:00 Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>:

> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:31:10AM +0300, Avri Doria (avri at ACM.ORG) wrote:
>
> > The NCSG-Executive Committee can define specific processes for each
> > type of decision the PC makes, if it so desires.
>
> Yes. And I think it should, even if the processes themselves
> don't need to be too rigid or formal, depending on the type
> of decision of course, but they should be defined and
> documented.
>
> > These processes need to be reviewed by the members. At this point
> > there are not special processes defined for the PC other than what
> > the charter defined, i.e. rough consensus.
>
> Yes. And that is a bit too vague for my taste.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140830/8f01fad9/attachment.htm>