[Igf-team] Global IGF 2017 - NCSG

[Tapani Tarvainen]

I took one more look and I think it's just fine.

Thank you James for taking the lead on this and
all who've helped.

Tapani

On May 03 08:52, James Gannon (james at netgov.ch) wrote:

> Just had a final look at this, this is excellent everyone. I have put some last minute into the document.
> I will submit this at 19:00 UTC so consider this a final call for comments.
> 
> -James
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igf-team [mailto:igf-team-bounces at lists.ncsg.is] On Behalf Of Robert Guerra
> Sent: 03 May 2017 04:15
> To: Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>
> Cc: igf-team at lists.ncsg.is
> Subject: Re: [Igf-team] Global IGF 2017 - NCSG
> 
> Martin and others - thanks for the collaborate effort to put together the proposal! I’ve updated my info and added comments for Bedser (also from SSAC) in case you would like a private sector/Law enforcement perspective as well.
> 
> regards
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Robert Guerra
> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org
> PGP Keys : https://keybase.io/rguerra
> 
> On 2 May 2017, at 20:47, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> > 	The Proposal is almost finished, of course we could improve every 
> > last word of it, but it has the basics things to be submitted. As it 
> > is now, James should put the proposal in with his IGF account, and 
> > once there add at least the speakers que have confirmed. I reached out 
> > to many other candidates, I know several of you have too, which will 
> > likely be confirming in the next days or weeks, so the work is far 
> > from over. Since we put the proposal in we still can improve 
> > everything and make it better and better. So don’t put your arm down.
> > 	The deadline for submission is Wednesday, 3 May 2017 23:59 UTC-11. I 
> > will let James, or who ever submits the proposal, arrange the exact 
> > time of the submitting (if James can’t, I can do it and even Tapani 
> > proposed to submit it eventually).
> > 	The main thing to add and improve is the co-organaziers and speakers 
> > that will ultimately give shape and will make the roundtable a 
> > success. To engage them and keep them engaged, maybe even have some 
> > prep talk about what they are login to talk, just they all arrive with 
> > some previous idea. I am sure that the most we get them to participate 
> > beforehand the better will be able to organize something more 
> > substantial. So feel free to keep doing outreach and communication the 
> > workshop.
> > 	Thank you all already for the work, the time was very narrow, let’s 
> > go the MAG give us one more chance at building something interesting, 
> > past years were always good experiences.
> > 	
> > Link to the google doc: 
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/10YJE8rT_yXNgtMDONb8tf4GMYMdmCIdcBI
> > N6XOQSwo0/edit?usp=sharing 
> > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10YJE8rT_yXNgtMDONb8tf4GMYMdmCIdcB
> > IN6XOQSwo0/edit?usp=sharing>
> >
> > Cheers to all,
> > Martín Silva
> >
> >> On May 2, 2017, at 6:08 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi from the train to Zurich
> >>
> >> A number of people have had questions about the workshop submission 
> >> process so just in case this is helpful to the submitting person 
> >> here’s a little info.  Where you have to add panelists the form says
> >>
> >> Step 1: Please add your speakers to the system (a new window with 
> >> form appears). Fill a form for each of them to create speaker 
> >> profiles, ensuring the Biography and Speciality fields are completed.
> >>
> >> The proposer does not see for sure that the speaker has been added to 
> >> the proposal. The new window closes and you just have to trust 
> >> they’re in there.  The form also says,
> >>
> >> Important Note: If when adding your speaker, the system says that 
> >> their email address already exists (the speaker might have been added 
> >> by another proposer, for example), you can skip filling out a form 
> >> for them and move on to the next speaker, or go directly to the next 
> >> step if all speaker profiles have been provided.
> >>
> >> The system did not actually say someone is in the system already 
> >> until you completely insert all the information about the person and 
> >> click enter, so in fact you can’t skip anything.
> >>
> >> Further down the form you have to enter the email addresses of the 
> >> speakers and then they will get a confirmation message when you press 
> >> Submit.  After you’ve entered them into the system, you can tell them 
> >> to go to http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/user/register
> >> <http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/user/register> and tweak 
> >> their info to taste, upload a photo, and add a biography.
> >>
> >> If you have any problems send a note to Luis at the secretariat, nice 
> >> guy and ready to help.  He’s LBOBOGARCIA at unog.ch 
> >> <mailto:LBOBOGARCIA at unog.ch>.
> >>
> >> Best of luck
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>> On May 2, 2017, at 10:29, James Gannon <james at netgov.ch 
> >>> <mailto:james at netgov.ch>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I will try and finalise something this afternoon for an overnnnight 
> >>> review by everyone.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Igf-team [mailto:igf-team-bounces at lists.ncsg.is
> >>> <mailto:igf-team-bounces at lists.ncsg.is>] On Behalf Of Tapani 
> >>> Tarvainen
> >>> Sent: 02 May 2017 08:08
> >>> To: igf-team at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:igf-team at lists.ncsg.is>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Igf-team] Global IGF 2017 - NCSG
> >>>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> My apologies for not contributing much yet, and even now just a 
> >>> quick reply to the question below:
> >>>
> >>> I will not be NCSG Chair in December, but I do plan to go to the IGF 
> >>> and I'm fine with having my name in the form just to make it look 
> >>> more convincing as NCSG submission, and I hope to contribute to the 
> >>> workshop as well (if it is approved).
> >>>
> >>> This is regardless of who gets the travel slots, but I would assume 
> >>> work done on the proposal would weigh heavily in the decision, and 
> >>> as of now James looks like an excellent candidate. (I will not ask 
> >>> one for myself, I don't need ICANN funding to attend the IGF.)
> >>>
> >>> Tapani
> >>>
> >>> On May 01 14:12, Martin Pablo Silva Valent (mpsilvavalent at gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> James,
> >>>> 	There several hand as I see, they just come in in different time 
> >>>> frames. I am going to be the whole day updating it. Let’s continue 
> >>>> doing it. I am speaking with several people for extra speakers and 
> >>>> co-organizer, but isn’t Tapani as NCSG supposed to be on of the 
> >>>> co-organizers to make it NCSG? or you are going as the NCSG rep?
> >>>> (just
> >>>> to know if we have there already two or one proposer)
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Martín
> >>>>
> >>>>> On May 1, 2017, at 1:21 PM, James Gannon <james at netgov.ch 
> >>>>> <mailto:james at netgov.ch>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK guys we have numerous people on this list, but absolutely no 
> >>>>> one is actually contributing anything to the document other than 
> >>>>> me.
> >>>>> I am not willing to write this proposal single handed as to be 
> >>>>> honest I have no idea what the topic is even supposed to be.
> >>>>>