[NCSG-PC] Discussion with CSG leadership

[Rafik Dammak]

hi all,

any concerns with the proposed topics listed below?

Best,

Rafik


Le sam. 18 juil. 2026 à 06:38, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> I really need feedback about the topics other we will go with what is
> proposed.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026, 13:18 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> a reminder, any feedback/input regarding the board meeting agenda in day
>> 0?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le ven. 10 juil. 2026 à 08:05, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I had a call with Mason who is chairing CSG for this turn and we
>>> discussed Day 0 agenda and GNSO chair election.
>>>
>>> For day 0, we agreed on a meeting with the board , asking to be at the
>>> end of the day and to have a cocktail with them. In a more substantial
>>> matter, they asked our feedback about this draft agenda for the meeting
>>> with the board;
>>>
>>> A.  State of the DNS from the Non-Contract Parties' view
>>> 1. Accuracy of Registrant Data
>>> 2. Access to Registration Data
>>> 3. Registrar non-compliance with RDP
>>> 4. DNS Abuse
>>> B.  Future issues impacting the DNS
>>> 1. Artificial Intelligence (from the NCPH perspective)
>>> 2. ICANN structural review requirements
>>> 3. Government intervention
>>>
>>> I was clear that we are not necessarily supporting all those topics.
>>> They want us to present as NCPH but share the different views from each
>>> side. So the questions :
>>> - what we want to keep, what we want to drop from above
>>> - what we want to amend and change
>>> - what we want to add instead
>>> - what will be your idea for presenting those topics
>>>
>>> Let me know what you think and if you have any other suggestions for the
>>> day 0 agenda. I suggested we can shape the day to discuss the topics we
>>> want to share with the board and other admin topics like board seat 14.
>>>
>>> Regarding the second topic, for the GNSO chair election, CSG has a
>>> candidate and is asking if we can nominate and support him for
>>> election, knowing that CPH has 2 interested candidates. I made clear that
>>> nomination and voting are 2 separate matters.
>>>
>>> The proposed candidate is Vivek and I said that we will have an
>>> interview with him as we do like for any candidate. So we will schedule
>>> that in the coming days.
>>>
>>> On other hand, I brought concerns about the supposed "gentlemen
>>> agreement" for alternance between CPH and NCPH as NCSG was never part of it
>>> and neither got a NCSG chair. I want to discuss this with CSG and CPH as it
>>> should be changed and formalized.
>>>
>>> Let me know your thoughts.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20260721/e8689c88/attachment.htm>