[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Request for Input: Public Comment on RDRS Standing Committee Report

[Tomslin Samme-Nlar]

FYI

Remain blessed,
Tomslin


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: DiBiase, Gregory via council <council at icann.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 02:45
Subject: [council] Request for Input: Public Comment on RDRS Standing
Committee Report
To: Council at icann.org <council at icann.org>


Dear Councilors,



Following the recent update
<https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/i39NWFbE8i-ZP49d_oWAL2MoCyDGmPto7z5fs6WbJWphlsYtBbNp5jsupBJtRQrTVr5If5oUEFXp2ftK.YBeQ1j9evHUUqOe-?accessLevel=meeting&canPlayFromShare=true&from=share_recording_detail&startTime=1744318875000&componentName=rec-play&originRequestUrl=https%3A%2F%2Ficann.zoom.us%2Frec%2Fshare%2F1BdJrVMYICLOfeH4W7CEh-q9Udop0TZrUmaQ47ekzkZxRkwQ1GOzSHEEEIEUHhU.YVb3zS-ocr9VoJ41%3FstartTime%3D1744318875000>on
the work of the Standing Committee (SC) on the Registration Data Request
Service (RDRS), a procedural question was brought before Council: whether
there should be a public comment on the RDRS SC Report.



*Background:*



The SC is nearing completion of its final findings report, which is
structured around its assignment
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/draft/draft-rdrs-standing-committee-08sep23-en.pdf>
from the GNSO Council, which includes information on the usage trends,
system enhancements, lessons learned (particularly in light of SSAD
recommendations), and suggestions to Council as it approaches its dialogue
with the ICANN Board.



As described in its Charter
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/draft/draft-rdrs-standing-committee-08sep23-en.pdf>,
the SC should consult with the GNSO Council on whether this report, which
is intended as a factual account of their work, not a policy document,
should be published for public comment prior to the submission of the
report to the Council?



When considering this question, please note that all GNSO SGs are
represented
<https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EOTSFGRD/pages/115682448/RDRS+Standing+Committee+Team+Members+Mailing+Lists>in
the Standing Committee. In addition, the RDRS Sc benefits from active
participation by representatives from GAC, SSAC and ALAC, and it has
already received community input during ICANN public sessions.



While the Council always retains the option to initiate its public comment
period prior to engaging with the ICANN Board, the SC would appreciate
clarity whether it should initiate a public comment at this stage - prior
to submitting their report to Council.



Please consult with your stakeholder groups and be prepared to provide
feedback at the upcoming Council meeting in May. Your input will help
inform how the Standing Committee proceeds as it finalizes its work.





Thanks,

Greg


_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council at icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20250508/387ffcf0/attachment.htm>