[NCSG-PC] Fwd: INVITATION/REQUEST: ICANN82 Community Dialogue Session on draft Code of Conduct on SOIs

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi all,

I will propose Manju as discussant  for the session.

See you all in Seattle.

Rafik


On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, 18:19 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> if there is no other volunteer or objection, I will send Manju name ,
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le mar. 4 mars 2025 à 17:43, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Thanks  Manju for volunteering.
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, 09:24 Manju <manju4icann at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafik,
>>>
>>> I’d like to volunteer. I was chairing the effort in CCOICI and know the
>>> context of this issue. It’d nice to finally be able to speak as the NCSG
>>> rep instead of being the neutral chair…
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Manju
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 06:53 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We should suggest a name to be discussant  for this session. I assume
>>>> from those who helped to draft the public comment and/or participated in
>>>> the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> Dear community leaders,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are reaching out to you as each of your community groups provided
>>>> input during the Public Comment period on the draft ICANN Community
>>>> Participant Code of Conduct on Statements of Interest. We would like to
>>>> invite you to nominate a member of your community to participate as a
>>>> discussant during the upcoming ICANN82 Community Dialogue session on this
>>>> topic. The Community Dialogue has been scheduled for *Monday 10 March,
>>>> from 16:30 – 17:30* local time in Seattle.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As highlighted in the Public Comment proceeding, “[b]road community
>>>> engagement and dialogue on the Code is essential before the Code (amended
>>>> as needed) can be adopted”. To maximize the time available during ICANN82,
>>>> we are proposing that the Community Dialogue session focus on the question
>>>> of enforceability and enforcement, including the respective roles of the
>>>> ICANN Board, the community, and the ICANN Ombuds. We hope you agree that
>>>> this is a fundamentally important topic for which broader community
>>>> discussion and feedback can be invaluable, and we will share a list of
>>>> suggested questions with you that the community discussants can use to
>>>> frame their comments during the session.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We understand that there are strong demands on everyone’s time during
>>>> an ICANN Public Meeting, whether one is attending in person or virtually.
>>>> Nevertheless, we hope that you will be able to nominate one of your members
>>>> to participate in this discussion. Please let us know if that is the case,
>>>> and we will proceed to work directly with the nominated participants to
>>>> ensure that the dialogue is productive and optimizes the hybrid time
>>>> available at ICANN82.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Sam & Mary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rafik Dammak
>>>> @rafik
>>>> "fight for the users"
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20250306/bb6963e6/attachment.htm>