[NCSG-PC] NCSG and representation on DNS Abuse PDP

[Johan Helsingius]

Thanks for putting together the draft - I fully support it.
This is a fight where we can't give in. If Lawrence succeeds,
it will be used against us forever.

	Julf


On 19/12/2025 5:35 am, farzaneh badii via NCSG-PC wrote:
> Dear PC,
> 
> Unfortunately, this issue has resurfaced, with the CSG again arguing 
> that it should be allocated more slots than NCSG for the DNS Abuse PDP. 
>  From our perspective, the core principle remains structural parity. The 
> number of constituencies within a stakeholder group should not, on its 
> own, determine representation. Despite ongoing discussions, we have not 
> seen movement on this point.
> 
> Jen recently circulated a proposal that, as drafted, would allocate four 
> seats to NCSG while allocating six to CSG. That outcome is difficult for 
> us to accept.
> 
> In response, I have drafted an alternative compromise that would result 
> in equal slots across the two groups. While it is not ideal, it reflects 
> a good-faith effort to move the conversation forward. The draft is 
> attached.But we will not have a conversation about this in the future. 
> allocation of seats has to happen based on GNSO council stakeholder 
> division.
> 
> We plan to present this proposal to the drafting team tomorrow to gauge 
> reactions. At the same time, we want to be clear that equitable 
> representation is a foundational issue for us and not something we can 
> set aside.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> 
> Farzaneh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc