From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 11:35:29 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:35:29 +1100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [ACTION REQUIRED] NCSG Draft Contribution to 4th Round Proceeding on AGB In-Reply-To: References: <03d95705-f733-4d96-bfa3-6ea2374cd25b.05b495a4-acd5-4405-a5fb-09b87eaaeafb.ced8b65c-99bb-4a1a-9ac8-d46e31d5bc03@emailsignatures365.codetwo.com> Message-ID: Thank you, Michaela. I will share this with the whole group now for comments. Warmly, Tomslin On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, 02:03 Michaela Nakayama Shapiro, < michaela.shapiro at article19.org> wrote: > INTERNAL > > INTERNAL > > Dear Tomslin and the NCSG Policy Committee Team, > > > > I am writing to share the draft of the NCSG?s contribution to the Fourth > Round Proceeding for proposed language for the next round applicant > guidebook. As a reminder, the deadline for contributions is *2 April*. > > > > More information on the call for contributions can be found here > . > The draft document can be accessed here > > (full link: https://tinyurl.com/bdeu5bas). Please let me know if you have > any questions. > > > > It?s been a pleasure to work on this contribution. I am indebted to @Kathy > Kleiman and @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > for their support and to all those who > attended the call last week to welcome new members and help them navigate > the policy development process. The contribution is stronger thanks to > these new voices! > > > > Best, > > > > Michaela > *Michaela Nakayama Shapiro *(she/her/hers) > Programme Officer - Censorship > [image: Logo.png] Defending freedom of > expression > and information > *www.article19.org* Subscribe to our > Newsletter > > Follow us > [image: Bluesky1x.png] > > > > > > [image: women-journalists-banner.jpeg] > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: newsletter_02744340-c607-4374-8a37-11b8b216096d.png Type: image/png Size: 379 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: x_d21e0607-da5a-44a7-80c7-e2d86bc18a92.png Type: image/png Size: 895 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo_1c766458-35ee-431a-9a22-e00b47cd2091.png Type: image/png Size: 6889 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: facebook_2853baa0-f060-42e6-b448-6a8788c1b5dd.png Type: image/png Size: 670 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bluesky1x_864ef831-9476-4116-88b8-2a3410741630.png Type: image/png Size: 788 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: instagram_05fbcc72-6df2-442b-8c34-146d0e9d8c41.png Type: image/png Size: 840 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: women-journalists-banner_b1cece5c-a86d-452f-b9f8-9e72943680f6.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 15471 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: linkedin_199dc89c-14aa-41cd-b2a7-37b8ae8d667d.png Type: image/png Size: 720 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: youtube_ffe95af1-d962-4acd-ab59-4eb4ea07466e.png Type: image/png Size: 678 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo_1c766458-35ee-431a-9a22-e00b47cd2091.png Type: image/png Size: 6889 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: newsletter_02744340-c607-4374-8a37-11b8b216096d.png Type: image/png Size: 379 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bluesky1x_864ef831-9476-4116-88b8-2a3410741630.png Type: image/png Size: 788 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: facebook_2853baa0-f060-42e6-b448-6a8788c1b5dd.png Type: image/png Size: 670 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: youtube_ffe95af1-d962-4acd-ab59-4eb4ea07466e.png Type: image/png Size: 678 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: linkedin_199dc89c-14aa-41cd-b2a7-37b8ae8d667d.png Type: image/png Size: 720 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: instagram_05fbcc72-6df2-442b-8c34-146d0e9d8c41.png Type: image/png Size: 840 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: x_d21e0607-da5a-44a7-80c7-e2d86bc18a92.png Type: image/png Size: 895 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: women-journalists-banner_b1cece5c-a86d-452f-b9f8-9e72943680f6.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 15471 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Tue Apr 1 16:51:41 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:51:41 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Message-ID: <4A2A1ECA-C6B1-4D9A-A9CE-E133FC191AC2@icann.org> Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 67349 bytes Desc: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Tue Apr 1 16:54:15 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:54:15 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Message-ID: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC Reply-To: Andrea Glandon Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 17:00:42 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:00:42 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC wrote: > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Tue Apr 1 17:04:49 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:04:49 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> Message-ID: <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon Cc: NCSG EC , ncsg-pc Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" >, "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 17:07:02 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:07:02 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi, I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon wrote: > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 17:18:38 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 11:18:38 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, Rafik, It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil . This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > Hi, > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > >> Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. >> Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council >> meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each >> of the constituencies? >> >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Rafik Dammak >> *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 >> *To: *Andrea Glandon >> *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc >> *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule >> >> >> >> Hi Andrea, >> >> >> >> Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days >> if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. >> >> We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a >> "constituency day". >> >> We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> >> Rafik >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >> >> Sorry, one more note. >> >> >> >> I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, >> of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. >> >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea >> Glandon via NCSG-EC >> *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon >> *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 >> *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " >> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" >> *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule >> >> >> >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be >> able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see >> many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I >> will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Andrea Glandon* >> >> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Tue Apr 1 17:22:02 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:22:02 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> Message-ID: <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> Hello! We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also have the NCPH session on Thursday. Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 To: Rafik Dammak Cc: Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc , NCSG EC Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Rafik, It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hi, I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon > Cc: NCSG EC >, ncsg-pc > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" >, "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 69912 bytes Desc: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 20:46:00 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:46:00 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> Message-ID: Oops, I don?t know why I thought Thursday was the only option we had to change dates - moving it to the day before seems, as shown in this updated version, to be a better idea (: Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR ) Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), CC Brasil . Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:22, Andrea Glandon < andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > Hello! > > > > We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min > slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have > attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also > have the NCPH session on Thursday. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 > *To: *Rafik Dammak > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, NCSG EC > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, Rafik, > > > > It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the > Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more > fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julf at Julf.com Tue Apr 1 21:37:24 2025 From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 20:37:24 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [CORRESPONDENCE] Tripti Sinha to Mason Cole and Julf Helsingius - Outcomes of the GNSO NCPH ICANN81 Day Zero Workshop In-Reply-To: <1DE9C414-A8A7-4BC6-8592-70DAAEE66DD3@icann.org> References: <1DE9C414-A8A7-4BC6-8592-70DAAEE66DD3@icann.org> Message-ID: <9b2ca81b-bf46-463f-9908-0a7cde758a87@Julf.com> FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Tripti Sinha to Mason Cole and Julf Helsingius - Outcomes of the GNSO NCPH ICANN81 Day Zero Workshop Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:25:40 +0000 From: Wendy Profit To: Mason Cole , julf at julf.com CC: tripti.sinha at board.icann.org , Rafik Dammak , Paul McGrady , Kurtis Lindqvist , Russ Weinstein , Correspondence , Board Ops Team , Secretary Dear Mason Cole and Julf Helsingius, Please find the attached letter from ICANN Board Chair Tripti Sinha regarding the Outcomes of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Non-Contracted Parties House (NCPH) ICANN81 Day Zero Workshop. Thank you and best regards, Wendy Profit Board Operations Senior Manager ICANN -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2025-04-01 Tripti Sinha-to-Mason-Cole-and-Julf-Helsingius.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 71615 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Wed Apr 2 00:16:56 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:16:56 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Message-ID: <269249DD-DCED-4BE8-936D-60323A6DB1A4@icann.org> Hello all, Please find attached the most updated draft GNSO schedule. I currently have the following sessions scheduled. NCSG PC Session NCSG/C Membership Session NCPH Session NCSG Wrap-up RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) Please let me know if you see any issues with the time slots I have right now. Once these are confirmed I will try to confirm joint sessions with SSAC, GAC & ALAC. These will be hosted in their rooms. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 To: Rafik Dammak Cc: Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc , NCSG EC Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Rafik, It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hi, I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon > Cc: NCSG EC >, ncsg-pc > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" >, "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 70086 bytes Desc: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 07:35:21 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:35:21 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] Request for Applicant Guidebook related sessions at ICANN83 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, Any interest to invite ICANN staff to talk or respond to questions about AGB at iCANN83. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- Dear All, We hope this email finds you well. We are reaching out about our planned ?Next Round Applicant Guidebook roadshow? during ICANN83. As you may know already, we are working towards launching the Public Comment on the whole draft Applicant Guidebook on 30 May at the latest for a period of 50 days. We will have a number of SMEs on the ground for ICANN83 and plan to hold at least one IRT session on the AGB. As noted above, we would also like to offer to present on specific topics to your respective community groups. E.g., this could be in the form of providing details on specific topics or just sitting in on your discussions and clarification or background information, e.g. in case your community group hold a working session on the public comment. We kindly ask that you confer with your community groups if you?d like someone from our team to attend any of your meetings during ICANN83 and if so let us know, off-list, by 30 April 2025. If you have any questions, please reach out at any time. Thank you! Best regards, Elisa P.S.: We have sent a similar message to IRT members and will include a short note in an upcoming Community Digest , too. . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 07:46:13 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:46:13 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <269249DD-DCED-4BE8-936D-60323A6DB1A4@icann.org> References: <269249DD-DCED-4BE8-936D-60323A6DB1A4@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, Thanks for the updated schedule. It is clear, we cannot escape clashing with some working group and standing committee sessions. Best, Rafik On Wed, Apr 2, 2025, 06:17 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC wrote: > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the most updated draft GNSO schedule. I currently > have the following sessions scheduled. > > > > NCSG PC hi NadrezSession > > NCSG/C Membership Session > > NCPH Session > > NCSG Wrap-up > > RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) > > > > Please let me know if you see any issues with the time slots I have right > now. Once these are confirmed I will try to confirm joint sessions with > SSAC, GAC & ALAC. These will be hosted in their rooms. > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 > *To: *Rafik Dammak > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, NCSG EC > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, Rafik, > > > > It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the > Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more > fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Wed Apr 2 16:40:55 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:40:55 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <269249DD-DCED-4BE8-936D-60323A6DB1A4@icann.org> Message-ID: <10ED1270-6C07-409C-81D9-D4CD77254ED2@icann.org> Hello, Yes, conflicts are definitely unavoidable this time around. Next I need final titles and descriptions for each of the sessions. I need this information by Monday, 07 April. NCSG PC Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG/C Membership Session NCPH Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG Wrap-up RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 23:46 To: Andrea Glandon Cc: ncsg-pc , NCSG EC Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the updated schedule. It is clear, we cannot escape clashing with some working group and standing committee sessions. Best, Rafik On Wed, Apr 2, 2025, 06:17 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Hello all, Please find attached the most updated draft GNSO schedule. I currently have the following sessions scheduled. NCSG PC hi NadrezSession NCSG/C Membership Session NCPH Session NCSG Wrap-up RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) Please let me know if you see any issues with the time slots I have right now. Once these are confirmed I will try to confirm joint sessions with SSAC, GAC & ALAC. These will be hosted in their rooms. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 To: Rafik Dammak > Cc: Andrea Glandon >, ncsg-pc >, NCSG EC > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Rafik, It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hi, I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon > Cc: NCSG EC >, ncsg-pc > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" >, "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 04:02:01 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:02:01 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Request for Early Input | GNSO Latin Script Diacritics Policy Development Process Working Group In-Reply-To: References: <85BF13AC-B56A-4C81-9F1B-BADC6DDB65D3@icann.org> Message-ID: hi all, a reminder about this request for input. added Tapani in cc as he is an active participant of this WG. Best, Rafik Le ven. 21 mars 2025 ? 09:48, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > hi all, > > we got this request for input as part of the newly established WG on latin > scripts diacritics. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > Dear SG/C Leaders, > > > > We are writing to you on behalf of the GNSO Latin Script Diacritics (LD) > Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group (WG). This WG is tasked with > providing the GNSO Council policy recommendations on: The limited > circumstances in which a base ASCII gTLD and the Latin script diacritic > version of the gTLD can be simultaneously delegated. The WG held its first > meeting > > on 08 March, 2025. > > > > In accordance with GNSO?s PDP requirements, we are seeking early written > input on the topic from each Supporting Organization, Advisory Committee, > and GNSO?s Stakeholder Group / Constituency. Each group has been invited to > participate in the PDP. Kindly note that the written input is completely > voluntary. > > > > In order to ensure that the WG receives your input in a timely manner and > that your input is incorporated into a summary document for the WG?s > consideration, we are requesting a response *no later than 24 April 2025* > *.* Input received after this date may be introduced into the discussion > separately by your representatives, by ICANN support staff, or by me as the > relevant topic is discussed. > > > > The WG?s scope of work is defined through a series of questions presented > in the WG?s Charter. The list of questions and key issues to consider > soliciting community input are attached for your convenience. To the extent > possible, you are requested to write your responses to the individual > questions in the attached document and return via email to the GNSO > Secretariat *gnso-secs at icann.org *. It is not > necessary to answer every question, and you are also welcome to provide any > other input and/or background information that you deem helpful to the > deliberations. > > > > As with all GNSO PDPs, there will be additional opportunities for > community input as the work progresses. > > > > Thank you very much and we look forward to receiving your input. > > > > On behalf of the LD PDP WG, > > Michael Bauland (LD PDP WG Chair) > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 04:07:53 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:07:53 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] UPDATE: ICANN83 Community Sessions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: hi all, some updates about community session planning for ICANN83. There was no proposal submitted and so staff is proposing 2 different topics instead to use the slots. any concern or comment about those proposals? Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- Hello everyone, As there were no proposals submitted as potential plenary topics for the ICANN83 Policy Forum, we took the liberty of looking at the block schedule in the context of other, ongoing community-wide work. We note that the Initial Report for the ?How We Meet? project will likely be published for Public Comments next week, closing in mid-May (or three weeks before the start of ICANN83). We also note that ICANN83 will take place shortly before the IGF 2025 and a month before the WSIS+20 High Level Event in July. Since we will not be scheduling a Community Session (plenary) for ICANN83, we thought to suggest that the two slots in the original block schedule that were initially earmarked for possible Community Sessions be repurposed as follows: 1. Monday 9 June, 15:30 ? 17:00 (Block 4): A Community Discussion on WSIS+20 (to be co-facilitated by ICANN?s Government Engagement team and members of the community WSIS+20 discussion group) 2. Thursday 12 June, 15:30 ? 17:00 (Block 4): A working session for the ?How We Meet? project group to continue its discussion of the Public Comments submitted and potential refinements to the topics outlined in its Initial Report (open to the community to attend) Of course, neither will be un-conflicted sessions so we are merely offering this suggestion to facilitate your group?s schedule planning. Please let us know if you have concerns or comments about these session ideas, which will need to be requested and planned in the same way as the regular community working sessions by the relevant ICANN staff teams. Thank you! Best regards, Mary & Nathalie Dear all, A reminder of one of the action items from our first ICANN83 Production call: 1. By 1st April 20:00 UTC, please provide potential Community Session topics to the list, with additional desired outcomes of the session, intended target community groups, draft agenda, speaker names. Should topics be received, the *second Production call will be held on the 3rd April 2025.* Staff will send the invitation out shortly. Thank you all! Nathalie Dear all, Thank you for those who joined the ICANN83 Planning Kick Off call today, for those who couldn?t make it, the recording of the session [icann.zoom.us] is available. Please note that the ICANN83 Block Schedule has been updated further to the discussion on the call, the placeholder Community Session has now been removed from Thursday, last block. The decision is yet to be made as to whether the first Community Session, last block on Monday, will be deemed necessary. To that point, please see further information below: *ACTION ITEMS* 1. By 1st April 20:00 UTC, please provide potential Community Session topics to the list, with additional desired outcomes of the session, intended target community groups, draft agenda, speaker names. Should topics be received, the *second Production call will be held on the 3rd April 2025.* Staff will send the invitation out shortly. 2. Feedback from ICANN82 was overall positive, with praise for the size of the venue and rooms, with the caveat that having the meeting held on several floors could hinder networking. Staff will clarify room location information on the schedule, and continue to work on minimizing scheduling conflicts. Please find the updated Block Schedule and the ICANN83 Timeline attached to this email. Thank you all very, very much for your helpful and constructive feedback! Best, Nathalie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 04:26:56 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:26:56 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <10ED1270-6C07-409C-81D9-D4CD77254ED2@icann.org> References: <269249DD-DCED-4BE8-936D-60323A6DB1A4@icann.org> <10ED1270-6C07-409C-81D9-D4CD77254ED2@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, Let me give a try: NCSG/C Membership Session : A session dedicated for NCSG and its constituencies NCUC and NPOC to discuss relevant topics and issues during ICANN83, in addition to sharing updates and reports to the wider membership. NCSG Wrap-up a wrap-up session to review follow-up and next actions for NCSG based on the sessions held during ICANN83 and discussing any improvement for next meetings. Best, Rafik Le mer. 2 avr. 2025 ? 22:40, Andrea Glandon a ?crit : > Hello, > > > > Yes, conflicts are definitely unavoidable this time around. > > > > Next I need final titles and descriptions for each of the sessions. I need > this information by Monday, 07 April. > > > > NCSG PC Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles > and description.) > > NCSG/C Membership Session > > NCPH Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and > description.) > > NCSG Wrap-up > > RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 23:46 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *ncsg-pc , NCSG EC > *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > > > Thanks for the updated schedule. It is clear, we cannot escape clashing > with some working group and standing committee sessions. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2025, 06:17 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the most updated draft GNSO schedule. I currently > have the following sessions scheduled. > > > > NCSG PC hi NadrezSession > > NCSG/C Membership Session > > NCPH Session > > NCSG Wrap-up > > RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) > > > > Please let me know if you see any issues with the time slots I have right > now. Once these are confirmed I will try to confirm joint sessions with > SSAC, GAC & ALAC. These will be hosted in their rooms. > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 > *To: *Rafik Dammak > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, NCSG EC > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, Rafik, > > > > It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the > Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more > fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Thu Apr 3 13:50:05 2025 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> Message-ID: <1132309442.671561.1743677405953@mail.yahoo.com> Hello everyone,?I think that probably the 90 minutes could short time for our NCSG Day. Could we add another?? Also, I was checking that we only will have one PC meeting session. I think we should keep two,? as we did on Seattle.? I am not seeing the slot for NCSG issue forum. Are we going to do it?? So, as Wrap up... I think we should need two NCSG/C sessions, two for PC, and the issue forum. Maybe will be too much because of the thigh agenda, but I prefer we ask that now than later.? Best Regards,?Juan? Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:22, Andrea Glandon wrote: #yiv5810081819 filtered {}#yiv5810081819 filtered {}#yiv5810081819 filtered {}#yiv5810081819 filtered {}#yiv5810081819 p.yiv5810081819MsoNormal, #yiv5810081819 li.yiv5810081819MsoNormal, #yiv5810081819 div.yiv5810081819MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv5810081819 a:link, #yiv5810081819 span.yiv5810081819MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5810081819 span.yiv5810081819EmailStyle18 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv5810081819 .yiv5810081819MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv5810081819 filtered {}#yiv5810081819 div.yiv5810081819WordSection1 {} Hello! ? We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also have the NCPH session on Thursday. ? Kind Regards, Andrea ? ? From:Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 To: Rafik Dammak Cc: Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc , NCSG EC Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule ? Hi Andrea, Rafik, ? It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? ? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @?ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br],?NCUC [ncuc.org]?&?NCSG?(ICANN) and?CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. ? ? Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC escreveu: Hi, ? I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. ? Best, ? Rafik? ? On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon wrote: Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? ? Kind Regards, Andrea ? ? From:Rafik Dammak Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon Cc: NCSG EC , ncsg-pc Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule ? Hi Andrea, ? Thanks for the update. We have to split the? NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint? sessions TBC.? We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day".? We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. ? Best, ? Rafik?? ? On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC wrote: Sorry, one more note. ? I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. ? Kind Regards, Andrea ? ? From:NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC Reply-To: Andrea Glandon Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule ? Hello all, ? Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. ? Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID:? acglandon76 ? ? ? _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 13:59:09 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:59:09 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <1132309442.671561.1743677405953@mail.yahoo.com> References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> <1132309442.671561.1743677405953@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Juan, Yes policy forum is 2 days shorter than usual. In Seattle, we could have several meeting sin the weekend. We also have 3 joint meetings to schedule yet. When we thought about NC day, we were thinking about Tuesday, unfortunately GNSO council already took 2 slots there and messing up the plan We can go with 90min NCSG/C membership session. For NCSG issue forum, we can plan that for ICANN84 and explore topic to discuss. @Andrea Glandon how many slots are available minus council and community sessions? Best, Rafik On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 19:50 Juan Manuel Rojas wrote: > Hello everyone, > I think that probably the 90 minutes could short time for our NCSG Day. > Could we add another? > > Also, I was checking that we only will have one PC meeting session. I > think we should keep two, as we did on Seattle. > > I am not seeing the slot for NCSG issue forum. Are we going to do it? > > So, as Wrap up... I think we should need two NCSG/C sessions, two for PC, > and the issue forum. Maybe will be too much because of the thigh agenda, > but I prefer we ask that now than later. > > Best Regards, > Juan > > Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:22, Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min > slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have > attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also > have the NCPH session on Thursday. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 > *To: *Rafik Dammak > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, NCSG EC > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, Rafik, > > > > It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the > Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more > fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Thu Apr 3 15:44:53 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:44:53 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> <1132309442.671561.1743677405953@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hello all, I will see what I can do. There will be a lot of conflicts. I will change the NCSG/C Membership to 90 min. In order to do this the session can either conflict with RDRS Standing Committee & SubPro IDN IRT or Latin Diacritics, IGO/INGO Curative Rights, RrSG Outreach: DNS Abuse Examples. Which do you prefer? NCSG PC Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG/C Membership Session NCPH Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG Wrap-up RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) I will need to know if any other changes are needed, ASAP. I need the sessions finalized by Monday so they can be entered into our scheduling system. I am attaching the GNSO Schedule as well. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak Date: Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 05:59 To: Juan Manuel Rojas Cc: Andrea Glandon , Pedro de Perdig?o Lana , ncsg-pc , NCSG EC Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Juan, Yes policy forum is 2 days shorter than usual. In Seattle, we could have several meeting sin the weekend. We also have 3 joint meetings to schedule yet. When we thought about NC day, we were thinking about Tuesday, unfortunately GNSO council already took 2 slots there and messing up the plan We can go with 90min NCSG/C membership session. For NCSG issue forum, we can plan that for ICANN84 and explore topic to discuss. @Andrea Glandon how many slots are available minus council and community sessions? Best, Rafik On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 19:50 Juan Manuel Rojas > wrote: Hello everyone, I think that probably the 90 minutes could short time for our NCSG Day. Could we add another? Also, I was checking that we only will have one PC meeting session. I think we should keep two, as we did on Seattle. I am not seeing the slot for NCSG issue forum. Are we going to do it? So, as Wrap up... I think we should need two NCSG/C sessions, two for PC, and the issue forum. Maybe will be too much because of the thigh agenda, but I prefer we ask that now than later. Best Regards, Juan Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer [mail.onelink.me] On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:22, Andrea Glandon > wrote: Hello! We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also have the NCPH session on Thursday. Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 To: Rafik Dammak > Cc: Andrea Glandon >, ncsg-pc >, NCSG EC > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Rafik, It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hi, I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon > Cc: NCSG EC >, ncsg-pc > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" >, "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 71114 bytes Desc: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Thu Apr 3 15:46:50 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:46:50 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <269249DD-DCED-4BE8-936D-60323A6DB1A4@icann.org> <10ED1270-6C07-409C-81D9-D4CD77254ED2@icann.org> Message-ID: Thank you! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 20:27 To: Andrea Glandon Cc: ncsg-pc , NCSG EC Subject: Re: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Let me give a try: NCSG/C Membership Session : A session dedicated for NCSG and its constituencies NCUC and NPOC to discuss relevant topics and issues during ICANN83, in addition to sharing updates and reports to the wider membership. NCSG Wrap-up a wrap-up session to review follow-up and next actions for NCSG based on the sessions held during ICANN83 and discussing any improvement for next meetings. Best, Rafik Le mer. 2 avr. 2025 ? 22:40, Andrea Glandon > a ?crit : Hello, Yes, conflicts are definitely unavoidable this time around. Next I need final titles and descriptions for each of the sessions. I need this information by Monday, 07 April. NCSG PC Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG/C Membership Session NCPH Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG Wrap-up RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 23:46 To: Andrea Glandon > Cc: ncsg-pc >, NCSG EC > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the updated schedule. It is clear, we cannot escape clashing with some working group and standing committee sessions. Best, Rafik On Wed, Apr 2, 2025, 06:17 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Hello all, Please find attached the most updated draft GNSO schedule. I currently have the following sessions scheduled. NCSG PC hi NadrezSession NCSG/C Membership Session NCPH Session NCSG Wrap-up RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) Please let me know if you see any issues with the time slots I have right now. Once these are confirmed I will try to confirm joint sessions with SSAC, GAC & ALAC. These will be hosted in their rooms. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 To: Rafik Dammak > Cc: Andrea Glandon >, ncsg-pc >, NCSG EC > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Rafik, It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hi, I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon > Cc: NCSG EC >, ncsg-pc > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" >, "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 15:52:28 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:52:28 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> <1132309442.671561.1743677405953@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi everyone! I agree we may not need that many sessions for the Policy Forum, but could have a larger number in ICANN84. I won't be able to help the next lead organizers of the Issue Forum for ICANN83, so I'd prefer we leave it for ICANN84 as well. I think those conflicts will take out NCSG people important to the discussions, so I'd go with maintaining it within 75 min instead of 90 min, although I agree 90 min would be ideally better. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil . This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qui., 3 de abr. de 2025 ?s 09:44, Andrea Glandon < andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > Hello all, > > > > I will see what I can do. There will be a lot of conflicts. I will change > the NCSG/C Membership to 90 min. In order to do this the session can either > conflict with RDRS Standing Committee & SubPro IDN IRT or Latin Diacritics, > IGO/INGO Curative Rights, RrSG Outreach: DNS Abuse Examples. Which do you > prefer? > > > > NCSG PC Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles > and description.) > > NCSG/C Membership Session > > NCPH Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and > description.) > > NCSG Wrap-up > > RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) > > > > I will need to know if any other changes are needed, ASAP. I need the > sessions finalized by Monday so they can be entered into our scheduling > system. I am attaching the GNSO Schedule as well. > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 05:59 > *To: *Juan Manuel Rojas > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>, ncsg-pc , NCSG EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Juan, > > > > Yes policy forum is 2 days shorter than usual. In Seattle, we could have > several meeting sin the weekend. We also have 3 joint meetings to schedule > yet. When we thought about NC day, we were thinking about Tuesday, > unfortunately GNSO council already took 2 slots there and messing up the > plan > > > > We can go with 90min NCSG/C membership session. > > > > For NCSG issue forum, we can plan that for ICANN84 and explore topic to > discuss. > > > > @Andrea Glandon how many slots are available > minus council and community sessions? > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 19:50 Juan Manuel Rojas wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I think that probably the 90 minutes could short time for our NCSG Day. > Could we add another? > > > > Also, I was checking that we only will have one PC meeting session. I > think we should keep two, as we did on Seattle. > > > > I am not seeing the slot for NCSG issue forum. Are we going to do it? > > > > So, as Wrap up... I think we should need two NCSG/C sessions, two for PC, > and the issue forum. Maybe will be too much because of the thigh agenda, > but I prefer we ask that now than later. > > > > Best Regards, > > Juan > > > > Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer [mail.onelink.me] > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:22, Andrea Glandon > > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min > slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have > attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also > have the NCPH session on Thursday. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 > *To: *Rafik Dammak > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, NCSG EC > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, Rafik, > > > > It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the > Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more > fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > [lists.ncsg.is] > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Fri Apr 4 14:51:45 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 08:51:45 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] UPDATE: ICANN83 Community Sessions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I liked this change, especially considering we will be in a policy forum - some of the discussions in the previous community session were a tad superficial, and maybe more interesting for newcomers. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil . This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 2 de abr. de 2025 ?s 22:08, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > hi all, > > some updates about community session planning for ICANN83. > There was no proposal submitted and so staff is proposing 2 different > topics instead to use the slots. > > any concern or comment about those proposals? > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > As there were no proposals submitted as potential plenary topics for the > ICANN83 Policy Forum, we took the liberty of looking at the block schedule > in the context of other, ongoing community-wide work. We note that the > Initial Report for the ?How We Meet? project will likely be published for > Public Comments next week, closing in mid-May (or three weeks before the > start of ICANN83). We also note that ICANN83 will take place shortly before > the IGF 2025 and a month before the WSIS+20 High Level Event in July. > > > > Since we will not be scheduling a Community Session (plenary) for ICANN83, > we thought to suggest that the two slots in the original block schedule > that were initially earmarked for possible Community Sessions be repurposed > as follows: > > 1. Monday 9 June, 15:30 ? 17:00 (Block 4): A Community Discussion on > WSIS+20 (to be co-facilitated by ICANN?s Government Engagement team and > members of the community WSIS+20 discussion group) > 2. Thursday 12 June, 15:30 ? 17:00 (Block 4): A working session for > the ?How We Meet? project group to continue its discussion of the Public > Comments submitted and potential refinements to the topics outlined in its > Initial Report (open to the community to attend) > > > > Of course, neither will be un-conflicted sessions so we are merely > offering this suggestion to facilitate your group?s schedule planning. > Please let us know if you have concerns or comments about these session > ideas, which will need to be requested and planned in the same way as the > regular community working sessions by the relevant ICANN staff teams. Thank > you! > > > > Best regards, > > Mary & Nathalie > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > A reminder of one of the action items from our first ICANN83 Production > call: > > 1. By 1st April 20:00 UTC, please provide potential Community Session > topics to the list, with additional desired outcomes of the session, > intended target community groups, draft agenda, speaker names. > > Should topics be received, the *second Production call will be held on > the 3rd April 2025.* Staff will send the invitation out shortly. > > > > Thank you all! > > > > Nathalie > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Thank you for those who joined the ICANN83 Planning Kick Off call today, > for those who couldn?t make it, the recording of the session > [icann.zoom.us] > > is available. > > > > Please note that the ICANN83 Block Schedule has been updated further to > the discussion on the call, the placeholder Community Session has now been > removed from Thursday, last block. > > The decision is yet to be made as to whether the first Community Session, > last block on Monday, will be deemed necessary. To that point, please see > further information below: > > > > *ACTION ITEMS* > > 1. By 1st April 20:00 UTC, please provide potential Community Session > topics to the list, with additional desired outcomes of the session, > intended target community groups, draft agenda, speaker names. > > Should topics be received, the *second Production call will be held on > the 3rd April 2025.* Staff will send the invitation out shortly. > > > > 2. Feedback from ICANN82 was overall positive, with praise for the > size of the venue and rooms, with the caveat that having the meeting held > on several floors could hinder networking. Staff will clarify room location > information on the schedule, and continue to work on minimizing scheduling > conflicts. > > > > Please find the updated Block Schedule and the ICANN83 Timeline attached > to this email. > > > > Thank you all very, very much for your helpful and constructive feedback! > > > > Best, > > > > Nathalie > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Fri Apr 4 17:55:54 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:55:54 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] UPDATE-ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Message-ID: Hello all, Here is the most updated schedule for ICANN83. I have attached the updated GNSO Schedule as well. Monday, 1045-1215 NCSG/C Membership Session Tuesday, 0900-1015 NCSG PC Tuesday, 15:30-17:00 NCSG PC Thursday, 0900-1015 NCPH Session Thursday, 1045-1215 NCSG Wrap Up Thursday, 1530-1700 RDRS HRIA I will work with GAC, SSAC and ALAC to add joint sessions. The above will need to be confirmed on/by Monday, 07 April. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Date: Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 07:53 To: Andrea Glandon Cc: Rafik Dammak , Juan Manuel Rojas , ncsg-pc , NCSG EC Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi everyone! I agree we may not need that many sessions for the Policy Forum, but could have a larger number in ICANN84. I won't be able to help the next lead organizers of the Issue Forum for ICANN83, so I'd prefer we leave it for ICANN84 as well. I think those conflicts will take out NCSG people important to the discussions, so I'd go with maintaining it within 75 min instead of 90 min, although I agree 90 min would be ideally better. Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qui., 3 de abr. de 2025 ?s 09:44, Andrea Glandon > escreveu: Hello all, I will see what I can do. There will be a lot of conflicts. I will change the NCSG/C Membership to 90 min. In order to do this the session can either conflict with RDRS Standing Committee & SubPro IDN IRT or Latin Diacritics, IGO/INGO Curative Rights, RrSG Outreach: DNS Abuse Examples. Which do you prefer? NCSG PC Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG/C Membership Session NCPH Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and description.) NCSG Wrap-up RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) I will need to know if any other changes are needed, ASAP. I need the sessions finalized by Monday so they can be entered into our scheduling system. I am attaching the GNSO Schedule as well. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 05:59 To: Juan Manuel Rojas > Cc: Andrea Glandon >, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >, ncsg-pc >, NCSG EC > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Juan, Yes policy forum is 2 days shorter than usual. In Seattle, we could have several meeting sin the weekend. We also have 3 joint meetings to schedule yet. When we thought about NC day, we were thinking about Tuesday, unfortunately GNSO council already took 2 slots there and messing up the plan We can go with 90min NCSG/C membership session. For NCSG issue forum, we can plan that for ICANN84 and explore topic to discuss. @Andrea Glandon how many slots are available minus council and community sessions? Best, Rafik On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 19:50 Juan Manuel Rojas > wrote: Hello everyone, I think that probably the 90 minutes could short time for our NCSG Day. Could we add another? Also, I was checking that we only will have one PC meeting session. I think we should keep two, as we did on Seattle. I am not seeing the slot for NCSG issue forum. Are we going to do it? So, as Wrap up... I think we should need two NCSG/C sessions, two for PC, and the issue forum. Maybe will be too much because of the thigh agenda, but I prefer we ask that now than later. Best Regards, Juan Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer [mail.onelink.me] On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:22, Andrea Glandon > wrote: Hello! We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also have the NCPH session on Thursday. Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 To: Rafik Dammak > Cc: Andrea Glandon >, ncsg-pc >, NCSG EC > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Rafik, It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]. This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hi, I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each of the constituencies? Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 To: Andrea Glandon > Cc: NCSG EC >, ncsg-pc > Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a "constituency day". We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. Best, Rafik On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Sorry, one more note. I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" >, "ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > Subject: [Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Hello all, Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 71725 bytes Desc: ICANN83 GNSO Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Apr 5 04:06:35 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 10:06:35 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] UPDATE-ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Andrea, Thanks for the update. We made some arrangement: having PC sessions on tuesday one before council meetings then anither after to follow-up on the informal council meeting and prepare for for council meeting on the next day. NCSG membership session will be 90min to have enough time for the groups. NCSG Wrap-up session is still aimed for wrapping up and review the meetings but we can adjust as needed to repurpose it. I checked with CPH leadership but we won't to have session with them this time, however we are exploring another option. We agreed to have session on ICANN meeting. Hope that Andrea can get other sessions with ALAC, SSAC, GAC scheduled since we already contacted them or they reached out to us. Best, Rafik On Fri, Apr 4, 2025, 23:56 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC wrote: > Hello all, > > > > Here is the most updated schedule for ICANN83. I have attached the updated > GNSO Schedule as well. > > > > Monday, 1045-1215 NCSG/C Membership Session > > Tuesday, 0900-1015 NCSG PC > > Tuesday, 15:30-17:00 NCSG PC > > Thursday, 0900-1015 NCPH Session > > Thursday, 1045-1215 NCSG Wrap Up > > Thursday, 1530-1700 RDRS HRIA > > > > I will work with GAC, SSAC and ALAC to add joint sessions. The above will > need to be confirmed on/by Monday, 07 April. > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 07:53 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *Rafik Dammak , Juan Manuel Rojas < > jumaropi at yahoo.com>, ncsg-pc , NCSG EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi everyone! > > > > I agree we may not need that many sessions for the Policy Forum, but could > have a larger number in ICANN84. I won't be able to help the next lead > organizers of the Issue Forum for ICANN83, so I'd prefer we leave it for > ICANN84 as well. > > > > I think those conflicts will take out NCSG people important to the > discussions, so I'd go with maintaining it within 75 min instead of 90 min, > although I agree 90 min would be ideally better. > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em qui., 3 de abr. de 2025 ?s 09:44, Andrea Glandon < > andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > > Hello all, > > > > I will see what I can do. There will be a lot of conflicts. I will change > the NCSG/C Membership to 90 min. In order to do this the session can either > conflict with RDRS Standing Committee & SubPro IDN IRT or Latin Diacritics, > IGO/INGO Curative Rights, RrSG Outreach: DNS Abuse Examples. Which do you > prefer? > > > > NCSG PC Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles > and description.) > > NCSG/C Membership Session > > NCPH Session (I have this information. I will use the previous titles and > description.) > > NCSG Wrap-up > > RDRS HRIA (requested by Farzaneh) > > > > I will need to know if any other changes are needed, ASAP. I need the > sessions finalized by Monday so they can be entered into our scheduling > system. I am attaching the GNSO Schedule as well. > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 05:59 > *To: *Juan Manuel Rojas > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>, ncsg-pc , NCSG EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Juan, > > > > Yes policy forum is 2 days shorter than usual. In Seattle, we could have > several meeting sin the weekend. We also have 3 joint meetings to schedule > yet. When we thought about NC day, we were thinking about Tuesday, > unfortunately GNSO council already took 2 slots there and messing up the > plan > > > > We can go with 90min NCSG/C membership session. > > > > For NCSG issue forum, we can plan that for ICANN84 and explore topic to > discuss. > > > > @Andrea Glandon how many slots are available > minus council and community sessions? > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 19:50 Juan Manuel Rojas wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I think that probably the 90 minutes could short time for our NCSG Day. > Could we add another? > > > > Also, I was checking that we only will have one PC meeting session. I > think we should keep two, as we did on Seattle. > > > > I am not seeing the slot for NCSG issue forum. Are we going to do it? > > > > So, as Wrap up... I think we should need two NCSG/C sessions, two for PC, > and the issue forum. Maybe will be too much because of the thigh agenda, > but I prefer we ask that now than later. > > > > Best Regards, > > Juan > > > > Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer [mail.onelink.me] > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:22, Andrea Glandon > > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min > slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have > attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also > have the NCPH session on Thursday. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 > *To: *Rafik Dammak > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, NCSG EC > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, Rafik, > > > > It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the > Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more > fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 01:36:28 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:36:28 +1000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] REMINDER-Meeting Invitation | NCSG Policy Call | Monday, 07 April 2025 at 11:30 UTC In-Reply-To: References: <59CA4294-D041-4DF0-ACA2-62168024AD5C@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Kathy, Apologies about that. Please find it on the link below: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/gnsocouncilmeetings/pages/111126032/Final+Proposed+Agenda+2025-04-10 Warmly, Tomslin On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 04:13, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > Hi Tomslin and all of our Councilors, > > I see the NCSG Policy Call for tomorrow, but I cannot find the Council > agenda. > > Could someone kindly circulate? > > Best and tx, > Kathy > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: REMINDER-Meeting Invitation | NCSG Policy Call | Monday, 07 > April 2025 at 11:30 UTC > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 15:41:16 +0000 > From: Andrea Glandon > Reply-To: Andrea Glandon > > To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU > > Dear all, > > > > *The next NCSG Policy Committee call will be held on Monday, 07 April 2025 > at 11:30 UTC.* Check your time zone here [timeanddate.com] > > . > > > > Join details are attached and noted below for your convenience. > > > > Join Zoom Meeting: *https://icann.zoom.us/j/98878189584?pwd=ZVpkSVVuaXVqeGRMelNEWW1LMkxQUT09 > [icann.zoom.us]* > > > Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584 > > Passcode: i!y7.qx+11 > > > > One tap mobile > > +16699006833,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (San Jose) > > +12532158782,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (Tacoma) > > > > PHONE ONLY DETAILS: > > Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/ayKmeftWg [icann.zoom.us] > > > Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584 > > Phone only Passcode: 7740925615 > > > > Best, > > Andrea & Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 01:48:42 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:48:42 +1000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <1132309442.671561.1743677405953@mail.yahoo.com> References: <22787907-3420-4104-9858-43FC0151ACFD@icann.org> <4936F37B-309B-4A1B-A946-8C4EB17BD309@icann.org> <08826F78-ECD5-4720-B90E-4CE3FF1EC062@icann.org> <1132309442.671561.1743677405953@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: With how short the policy forum is, I think we can live with having just one PC meeting and Monday should work. On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 21:50, Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC < ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hello everyone, > I think that probably the 90 minutes could short time for our NCSG Day. > Could we add another? > > Also, I was checking that we only will have one PC meeting session. I > think we should keep two, as we did on Seattle. > > I am not seeing the slot for NCSG issue forum. Are we going to do it? > > So, as Wrap up... I think we should need two NCSG/C sessions, two for PC, > and the issue forum. Maybe will be too much because of the thigh agenda, > but I prefer we ask that now than later. > > Best Regards, > Juan > > Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:22, Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We typically have a 90 min slot for the PC meeting and the only 90 min > slot available on Tuesday is after the GNSO informal meeting. I have > attached an updated schedule with some changes to the NCSG sessions. I also > have the NCPH session on Thursday. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:19 > *To: *Rafik Dammak > *Cc: *Andrea Glandon , ncsg-pc < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, NCSG EC > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, Rafik, > > > > It would be interesting to keep the PC one on Tuesday and move the > Membership one to Thursday, right? About the PC one, would it be more > fruitful to have it before or after the informal GNSO Council meeting? > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br] > > , NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN) > and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net] > > . > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 1 de abr. de 2025 ?s 11:07, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I think as discussed with Juan and Wisdom, we want to avoid duplication , > so we can have 1 or 2 session for all. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 23:04 Andrea Glandon > wrote: > > Okay, I will move either the membership or PC session to a different day. > Likely the Membership since the PC needs to be before the GNSO Council > meeting. Should I love forward with separate membership sessions for each > of the constituencies? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Rafik Dammak > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 09:01 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Cc: *NCSG EC , ncsg-pc > *Subject: *Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > Thanks for the update. We have to split the NCSG sessions between 2 days > if possible , in addition to the joint sessions TBC. > > We will have a NCSG day in Muscat meeting instead as Tuesday is a > "constituency day". > > We might not avoid clashing with some PDP sessions too. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:54 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Sorry, one more note. > > > > I have reserved a slot for NCSG Membership and NCSG PC on Tuesday. These, > of course, can be moved, but this is where they worked tentatively. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea > Glandon via NCSG-EC > *Reply-To: *Andrea Glandon > *Date: *Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:52 > *To: *"ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" , " > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" > *Subject: *[Ext] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule > > > > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the draft GNSO schedule for ICANN83. We will not be > able to have all NCSG sessions on Tuesday as was requested. You will see > many PDP, IRT and GNSO Council sessions that will cause many conflicts. I > will need to know ASAP which sessions should be requested. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 12:12:05 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 19:12:05 +1000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Aspirational Statement In-Reply-To: <01010195d8136600-63726551-9f2c-4639-8b63-b3491cd67558-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <36b16b7af4b345aca5ce28f9f760ec75@amazon.com> <01010195d8136600-63726551-9f2c-4639-8b63-b3491cd67558-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Message-ID: FYI Warmly, Tomslin ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: DiBiase, Gregory via council Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025, 01:48 Subject: [council] Aspirational Statement To: Council at icann.org - *Attachment protected by Amazon: * - GNSO Council Aspirational Statement ...raft.docx Amazon has replaced the attachment in this email with a download link. Downloads will be available until April 26, 2025, 14:48 (UTC+00:00). Tell us what you think For more information click here Hello All, Attached is an updated Aspirational Statement for Council?s review. After our SPS session, Sam Demetriou drafted this version taking into account concerns expressed from various councilors (thanks Sam!). To be clear, this statement does not direct Councilors how to vote, it merely clarifies our role in the policy development process. This will be an agenda item in our April meeting, and Leadership is hopeful we can approve this wording. Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council at icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 14:37:35 2025 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:37:35 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Aspirational Statement In-Reply-To: References: <36b16b7af4b345aca5ce28f9f760ec75@amazon.com> <01010195d8136600-63726551-9f2c-4639-8b63-b3491cd67558-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Hi Tomslin I will support this statement. I think it?s a good step. Farzaneh On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:12?AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote: > FYI > > Warmly, > Tomslin > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: DiBiase, Gregory via council > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025, 01:48 > Subject: [council] Aspirational Statement > To: Council at icann.org > > > > - *Attachment protected by Amazon: * > - GNSO Council Aspirational Statement ...raft.docx > > > Amazon has replaced the attachment in this email with a download link. > Downloads will be available until April 26, 2025, 14:48 (UTC+00:00). Tell > us what you think > > For more information click here > > > Hello All, > > > > Attached is an updated Aspirational Statement for Council?s review. After > our SPS session, Sam Demetriou drafted this version taking into account > concerns expressed from various councilors (thanks Sam!). To be clear, this > statement does not direct Councilors how to vote, it merely clarifies our > role in the policy development process. This will be an agenda item in our > April meeting, and Leadership is hopeful we can approve this wording. > > > > Thanks, > > Greg > > > _______________________________________________ > council mailing list -- council at icann.org > To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your > personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance > with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and > the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can > visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or > configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or > disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info Mon Apr 7 16:32:39 2025 From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info (Tapani Tarvainen) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:32:39 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Request for Early Input | GNSO Latin Script Diacritics Policy Development Process Working Group In-Reply-To: References: <85BF13AC-B56A-4C81-9F1B-BADC6DDB65D3@icann.org> Message-ID: Thank you Rafik. I took the liberty of adding myself back to the PC list (it's been customary for former Chairs to be there, but I removed myself from there some years ago). Anyway, following up today's PC call, the Latin Diacritics WG project plan is here: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2025/presentation/project-plan-latin-script-diacritics-26mar25-en.pdf Timeline can be found there even if not in the most readable form. I'll add a quote from the slides presented in WG meeting: "When the Next Round similarity process finds ASCII/diacritic gTLDs to be similar, this WG will provide rules for diacritics." So the intent is to affect the Next Round. (Slide 9 in WG meeting two, the whole slide deck can be found under backround documents here: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/gnsolsdpdp/pages/176029697/2025-04-02+Latin+Script+Diacritics+-+Meeting+02) And as I said I find it odd that the rules will be defined for, e.g., German/Swedish/Finnish/Estonian/Icelandic ? (o with two dots) but not for Norwegian/Danish/Faroese ? (o with stroke). I can imagine a Dane called Sj?berg being annoyed if a Swede gets .sj?berg and an Icelander gets .sj?berg while .sj?berg is being denied because of a technicality. There are other similar cases. I would have preferred including all confusingly similar-looking non-ASCII additions to the Latin script rather than using the technical Unicode definition that users should really not be expected to care of know about. Tapani On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 10:02:01AM +0900, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote: > > hi all, > > a reminder about this request for input. added Tapani in cc as he is an > active participant of this WG. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le ven. 21 mars 2025 ? 09:48, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > > > hi all, > > > > we got this request for input as part of the newly established WG on latin > > scripts diacritics. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > > Dear SG/C Leaders, > > > > > > > > We are writing to you on behalf of the GNSO Latin Script Diacritics (LD) > > Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group (WG). This WG is tasked with > > providing the GNSO Council policy recommendations on: The limited > > circumstances in which a base ASCII gTLD and the Latin script diacritic > > version of the gTLD can be simultaneously delegated. The WG held its first > > meeting > > > > on 08 March, 2025. > > > > > > > > In accordance with GNSO?s PDP requirements, we are seeking early written > > input on the topic from each Supporting Organization, Advisory Committee, > > and GNSO?s Stakeholder Group / Constituency. Each group has been invited to > > participate in the PDP. Kindly note that the written input is completely > > voluntary. > > > > > > > > In order to ensure that the WG receives your input in a timely manner and > > that your input is incorporated into a summary document for the WG?s > > consideration, we are requesting a response *no later than 24 April 2025* > > *.* Input received after this date may be introduced into the discussion > > separately by your representatives, by ICANN support staff, or by me as the > > relevant topic is discussed. > > > > > > > > The WG?s scope of work is defined through a series of questions presented > > in the WG?s Charter. The list of questions and key issues to consider > > soliciting community input are attached for your convenience. To the extent > > possible, you are requested to write your responses to the individual > > questions in the attached document and return via email to the GNSO > > Secretariat *gnso-secs at icann.org *. It is not > > necessary to answer every question, and you are also welcome to provide any > > other input and/or background information that you deem helpful to the > > deliberations. > > > > > > > > As with all GNSO PDPs, there will be additional opportunities for > > community input as the work progresses. > > > > > > > > Thank you very much and we look forward to receiving your input. > > > > > > > > On behalf of the LD PDP WG, > > > > Michael Bauland (LD PDP WG Chair) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Tapani Tarvainen From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Tue Apr 8 14:19:51 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 21:19:51 +1000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Aspirational Statement In-Reply-To: References: <36b16b7af4b345aca5ce28f9f760ec75@amazon.com> <01010195d8136600-63726551-9f2c-4639-8b63-b3491cd67558-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Hi Farzi, Thanks. There was agreement at the PC meeting that it is a good step and we'll framed. So, we should support it. Warmly, Tomslin On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 21:37 farzaneh badii, wrote: > Hi Tomslin > > I will support this statement. I think it?s a good step. > > Farzaneh > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:12?AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar > wrote: > >> FYI >> >> Warmly, >> Tomslin >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: DiBiase, Gregory via council >> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025, 01:48 >> Subject: [council] Aspirational Statement >> To: Council at icann.org >> >> >> >> - *Attachment protected by Amazon: * >> - GNSO Council Aspirational Statement ...raft.docx >> >> >> Amazon has replaced the attachment in this email with a download link. >> Downloads will be available until April 26, 2025, 14:48 (UTC+00:00). Tell >> us what you think >> >> For more information click here >> >> >> Hello All, >> >> >> >> Attached is an updated Aspirational Statement for Council?s review. After >> our SPS session, Sam Demetriou drafted this version taking into account >> concerns expressed from various councilors (thanks Sam!). To be clear, this >> statement does not direct Councilors how to vote, it merely clarifies our >> role in the policy development process. This will be an agenda item in our >> April meeting, and Leadership is hopeful we can approve this wording. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Greg >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> council mailing list -- council at icann.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and >> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You >> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at dnrc.tech Sun Apr 6 21:12:26 2025 From: kathy at dnrc.tech (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 14:12:26 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: REMINDER-Meeting Invitation | NCSG Policy Call | Monday, 07 April 2025 at 11:30 UTC In-Reply-To: <59CA4294-D041-4DF0-ACA2-62168024AD5C@icann.org> References: <59CA4294-D041-4DF0-ACA2-62168024AD5C@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Tomslin and all of our Councilors, I see the NCSG Policy Call for tomorrow, but I cannot find the Council agenda. Could someone kindly circulate? Best and tx, Kathy -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: REMINDER-Meeting Invitation | NCSG Policy Call | Monday, 07 April 2025 at 11:30 UTC Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 15:41:16 +0000 From: Andrea Glandon Reply-To: Andrea Glandon To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Dear all, *The next NCSG Policy Committee call will be held on Monday, 07 April 2025 at 11:30 UTC.*Check your time zone here [timeanddate.com] . Join details are attached and noted below for your convenience. Join Zoom Meeting: *https://icann.zoom.us/j/98878189584?pwd=ZVpkSVVuaXVqeGRMelNEWW1LMkxQUT09 [icann.zoom.us]* Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584 Passcode: i!y7.qx+11 One tap mobile +16699006833,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (Tacoma) PHONE ONLY DETAILS: Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/ayKmeftWg [icann.zoom.us] Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584 Phone only Passcode: 7740925615 Best, Andrea & Dan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG Policy Call 07 April at 11-30 UTC.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 2125 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info Wed Apr 9 17:52:06 2025 From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info (Tapani Tarvainen) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 17:52:06 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Request for Early Input | GNSO Latin Script Diacritics Policy Development Process Working Group In-Reply-To: References: <85BF13AC-B56A-4C81-9F1B-BADC6DDB65D3@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi all, Following up here, as I posted on the discuss list the LD PDP WG met again today and discussed another to me arbitrary-looking limitation of the charter, namely whether the PDP scope includes cases where someone applies for diacritic versions of a string only and not the base ASCII version. It was pretty much agreed that there's no technical or other apparent reason to exclude them except that the language of the charter explicitly talks about base ASCII version being present. It was suggested this may have been an oversight on the part of the council, someone said that it had not even occurred to them that there might be several different diacritic versions of the same character but since it's been agreed that the WG will consider such, it makes no sense to exclude applications for diacritic versions only. It was suggested but not decided that the WG might go back to the council to ask for clarification or extension of the charter to include such cases that could naturally be dealt with at the same time. When the council considers the project plan of the WG (tomorrow unless I'm mistaken) some of our councillors might want to alert the council about the issue. In any case I'm planning to write up all such cases that the PDP charter excludes for no good reason other than that they did not occur to the council at the time the PDP was created. I will then suggest we put them in our response to the early input request. Cheers, Tapani On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:32:39PM +0300, Tapani Tarvainen (ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info) wrote: > > Thank you Rafik. > > I took the liberty of adding myself back to the PC list (it's been > customary for former Chairs to be there, but I removed myself from > there some years ago). > > Anyway, following up today's PC call, the Latin Diacritics WG > project plan is here: > > https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2025/presentation/project-plan-latin-script-diacritics-26mar25-en.pdf > > Timeline can be found there even if not in the most readable form. > > I'll add a quote from the slides presented in WG meeting: > > "When the Next Round similarity process finds ASCII/diacritic gTLDs to > be similar, this WG will provide rules for diacritics." > > So the intent is to affect the Next Round. > > (Slide 9 in WG meeting two, the whole slide deck can be found under > backround documents here: > https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/gnsolsdpdp/pages/176029697/2025-04-02+Latin+Script+Diacritics+-+Meeting+02) > > And as I said I find it odd that the rules will be defined for, e.g., > German/Swedish/Finnish/Estonian/Icelandic ? (o with two dots) but not > for Norwegian/Danish/Faroese ? (o with stroke). > > I can imagine a Dane called Sj?berg being annoyed if a Swede gets > .sj?berg and an Icelander gets .sj?berg while .sj?berg is being > denied because of a technicality. > > There are other similar cases. I would have preferred including all > confusingly similar-looking non-ASCII additions to the Latin script > rather than using the technical Unicode definition that users should > really not be expected to care of know about. > > Tapani > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 10:02:01AM +0900, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote: > > > > hi all, > > > > a reminder about this request for input. added Tapani in cc as he is an > > active participant of this WG. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > > > Le ven. 21 mars 2025 ? 09:48, Rafik Dammak a > > ?crit : > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > we got this request for input as part of the newly established WG on latin > > > scripts diacritics. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Rafik > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > > > > Dear SG/C Leaders, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are writing to you on behalf of the GNSO Latin Script Diacritics (LD) > > > Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group (WG). This WG is tasked with > > > providing the GNSO Council policy recommendations on: The limited > > > circumstances in which a base ASCII gTLD and the Latin script diacritic > > > version of the gTLD can be simultaneously delegated. The WG held its first > > > meeting > > > > > > on 08 March, 2025. > > > > > > > > > > > > In accordance with GNSO?s PDP requirements, we are seeking early written > > > input on the topic from each Supporting Organization, Advisory Committee, > > > and GNSO?s Stakeholder Group / Constituency. Each group has been invited to > > > participate in the PDP. Kindly note that the written input is completely > > > voluntary. > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to ensure that the WG receives your input in a timely manner and > > > that your input is incorporated into a summary document for the WG?s > > > consideration, we are requesting a response *no later than 24 April 2025* > > > *.* Input received after this date may be introduced into the discussion > > > separately by your representatives, by ICANN support staff, or by me as the > > > relevant topic is discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > The WG?s scope of work is defined through a series of questions presented > > > in the WG?s Charter. The list of questions and key issues to consider > > > soliciting community input are attached for your convenience. To the extent > > > possible, you are requested to write your responses to the individual > > > questions in the attached document and return via email to the GNSO > > > Secretariat *gnso-secs at icann.org *. It is not > > > necessary to answer every question, and you are also welcome to provide any > > > other input and/or background information that you deem helpful to the > > > deliberations. > > > > > > > > > > > > As with all GNSO PDPs, there will be additional opportunities for > > > community input as the work progresses. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much and we look forward to receiving your input. > > > > > > > > > > > > On behalf of the LD PDP WG, > > > > > > Michael Bauland (LD PDP WG Chair) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Tapani Tarvainen > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- Tapani Tarvainen From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com Wed Apr 9 18:56:04 2025 From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 11:56:04 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] New gTLD Applicant Guidebook In-Reply-To: References: <85BF13AC-B56A-4C81-9F1B-BADC6DDB65D3@icann.org> Message-ID: <2a41d9d2-1bff-41de-8cc0-c4bcdd1cf448@KathyKleiman.com> Hi All, Following in Tapani's footsteps, I want to send an update as well. /Our NCSG Comments to the SubPro IRT about the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook were long and comprehensive, and are making an impact! / While not everything we recommended in being incorporated, many, many of our comments are resulting in changes that make the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook more readable, fairer, and more reflective of real balance between Applicants and those who might raise questions about their New gTLD applications (including Noncommercial Communities). Here are a few of the changes that resulted recently: - Privacy and ensuring that the need for ICANN, as the revealer of information about Applicants, to consider the needs of the Applicant in addition to the requestor - extensive edits*.? Tx you Michaela!* - Many changes and modifications to the Objections Procedure (a long and expensive arbitration used for Community Objections, Legal Rights Objections, and String Confusion Objections -- no automatic consolidation of objections, allowing of extra evidence and hearings if necessary and reasonable, and more being discussed. ----------- I'll continue to send updates. If anyone can join me in the SubPro IRT meetings, it would be very useful as they are twice a week now, and I can only attend once a week. Best, Kathy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Thu Apr 10 01:41:26 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 22:41:26 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ICANN83 Joint meeting with ALAC Message-ID: Hello all! ALAC has 1 time slot available that would work for NCSG, Wednesday, 0900-1015. This is against Latin Diacritics and PPSAI IRT. As I have noted, it?s impossible to not be conflicting with something. Please let me know if you would like to accept this time slot. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 02:02:09 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:02:09 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Joint meeting with ALAC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Andrea, I think we can go with the timeslot. Best, Rafik On Thu, Apr 10, 2025, 07:41 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hello all! > > > > ALAC has 1 time slot available that would work for NCSG, Wednesday, > 0900-1015. This is against Latin Diacritics and PPSAI IRT. As I have noted, > it?s impossible to not be conflicting with something. Please let me know if > you would like to accept this time slot. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Thu Apr 10 15:38:20 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:38:20 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Joint meeting with ALAC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Great! I will inform Gisella. Next step, SSAC! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 18:02 To: Andrea Glandon Cc: NCSG EC , ncsg-pc Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 Joint meeting with ALAC Hi Andrea, I think we can go with the timeslot. Best, Rafik On Thu, Apr 10, 2025, 07:41 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > wrote: Hello all! ALAC has 1 time slot available that would work for NCSG, Wednesday, 0900-1015. This is against Latin Diacritics and PPSAI IRT. As I have noted, it?s impossible to not be conflicting with something. Please let me know if you would like to accept this time slot. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Thu Apr 10 19:32:02 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:32:02 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Breakfast with Board Members Message-ID: A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Apr 16 22:34:24 2025 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 15:34:24 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Please comment /GAC Communique HRIA Message-ID: Hi all This is what we wrote on GAC communique and human rights. Can the PC look over this and decide on whether Rafik should send it to GAC's chair? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ApT0BcojnWQ4otJYFotan2M0pxsxbJQSdbkhIdXX4E8/edit?tab=t.0 Best regards, Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Apr 17 11:28:08 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:28:08 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Please comment /GAC Communique HRIA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I am in favor of sending this. Best, Rafik On Wed, Apr 16, 2025, 20:35 farzaneh badii wrote: > Hi all > > This is what we wrote on GAC communique and human rights. Can the PC look > over this and decide on whether Rafik should send it to GAC's chair? > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ApT0BcojnWQ4otJYFotan2M0pxsxbJQSdbkhIdXX4E8/edit?tab=t.0 > > Best regards, > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com Thu Apr 17 16:01:32 2025 From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:01:32 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Please comment /GAC Communique HRIA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <30097ff8-4b9e-4015-a966-d06ed978e123@KathyKleiman.com> Tx Farzi, the analysis is sharp, clear, and expert! /Question: Should there be more information in a header as to who did this HRIA analysis and their background?/ This doc is a great new addition to ICANN's review of the GAC communique! Best, Kathy On 4/16/2025 3:34 PM, farzaneh badii wrote: > Hi all > > This is what we wrote on GAC communique and human rights. Can the PC > look over this and decide on whether Rafik should send it to GAC's chair? > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ApT0BcojnWQ4otJYFotan2M0pxsxbJQSdbkhIdXX4E8/edit?tab=t.0 > > Best regards, > > Farzaneh > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Thu Apr 17 21:50:06 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:50:06 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] UPDATED ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule Message-ID: <30CA3D87-1820-42EA-AC6C-EAC7D1BD35FC@icann.org> Hello all, Please find attached the most updated ICANN83 GNSO schedule. You will see that NCSG was able to schedule some time with ALAC and SSAC leaders. Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ICANN83 GNSO-NCSG Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 72275 bytes Desc: ICANN83 GNSO-NCSG Draft Schedule & Community requests - Draft tab.pdf URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Apr 17 23:08:22 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:08:22 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] UPDATED ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: <30CA3D87-1820-42EA-AC6C-EAC7D1BD35FC@icann.org> References: <30CA3D87-1820-42EA-AC6C-EAC7D1BD35FC@icann.org> Message-ID: Thanks Andrea, I think we are all set. Rafik On Thu, Apr 17, 2025, 19:50 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hello all, > > > > Please find attached the most updated ICANN83 GNSO schedule. You will see > that NCSG was able to schedule some time with ALAC and SSAC leaders. > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > Rafik Dammak @rafik "fight for the users" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Fri Apr 18 19:13:40 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:13:40 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] UPDATED ICANN83 Draft GNSO Schedule In-Reply-To: References: <30CA3D87-1820-42EA-AC6C-EAC7D1BD35FC@icann.org> Message-ID: Great! Thanks, Andrea (: Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR ) Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), CC Brasil . Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro. Em qui., 17 de abr. de 2025 ?s 17:08, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > Thanks Andrea, > I think we are all set. > > Rafik > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025, 19:50 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> Please find attached the most updated ICANN83 GNSO schedule. You will see >> that NCSG was able to schedule some time with ALAC and SSAC leaders. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Andrea Glandon* >> >> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > Rafik Dammak > @rafik > "fight for the users" > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Apr 19 23:37:28 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:37:28 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Day 0 in Oman proposal Message-ID: Hi all, Please find attached the draft proposal for day 0 to submit to ICANN to get the funding. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. It is built on the previous proposal and we might tweak it more . We have deadline for submission to be on time for Oman. Best, Rafik Rafik Dammak @rafik "fight for the users" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Proposal for 2025 CSG-NCSG Intersessional Meeting.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 2568301 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Sun Apr 20 01:15:55 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 19:15:55 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Day 0 in Oman proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik, Nothing to add on my side. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN) and CC Brazil . This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em s?b., 19 de abr. de 2025 ?s 17:37, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > Hi all, > > Please find attached the draft proposal for day 0 to submit to ICANN to > get the funding. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. It is > built on the previous proposal and we might tweak it more . > We have deadline for submission to be on time for Oman. > > Best, > > Rafik > Rafik Dammak > @rafik > "fight for the users" > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julf at Julf.com Sun Apr 20 09:39:58 2025 From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 08:39:58 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Day 0 in Oman proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1c4cdf39-877a-4bc6-bcf7-7f5baa7ae34b@Julf.com> Looks good to me! Julf On 19/04/2025 22:37, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find attached the draft proposal for day 0 to submit to ICANN to > get the funding. Let me?know if you have any questions or concerns. It > is built on the previous proposal and we might tweak it more . > We have deadline for submission to be on time for Oman. > > Best, > > Rafik > Rafik Dammak > @rafik > "fight for the users" > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc From wisdom.dk at gmail.com Sun Apr 20 12:06:05 2025 From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 09:06:05 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Day 0 in Oman proposal In-Reply-To: <1c4cdf39-877a-4bc6-bcf7-7f5baa7ae34b@Julf.com> References: <1c4cdf39-877a-4bc6-bcf7-7f5baa7ae34b@Julf.com> Message-ID: Tes looks good. *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) President & CEO Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. agdic.info Tel: +233 20 812 8851 Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Specialization: E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, Event Planning & Management, On Sun, 20 Apr 2025, 6:40?am Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC, < ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Looks good to me! > > Julf > > > On 19/04/2025 22:37, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please find attached the draft proposal for day 0 to submit to ICANN to > > get the funding. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. It > > is built on the previous proposal and we might tweak it more . > > We have deadline for submission to be on time for Oman. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > Rafik Dammak > > @rafik > > "fight for the users" > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-PC mailing list > > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Sun Apr 20 22:36:43 2025 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 19:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-PC] Day 0 in Oman proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <231408687.2024466.1745177803848@mail.yahoo.com> Thanks, RafikNothing to add at this point. I imagine the discussion topics will be explored further. Just a quick clarification?is it the NCPH session, or specifically a CSG and NCSG meeting? I believe they?re the same, but if applicable, it might be clearer to refer to it as the NCPH session. Best regards, JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc. Director - MINKA DIGITAL ColombiaNPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO M.Sc. Information Technology Registered Linux User No.533108. http://www.jmanurojas.com Cel. +57 301 743 56 00 Instagram: jmanurojas -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? El s?bado, 19 de abril de 2025, 03:37:52 p.m. GMT-5, Rafik Dammak escribi?: Hi all, Please find attached the draft proposal for day 0 to submit to ICANN to get the funding. Let me?know if you have any questions or concerns. It is built on the previous proposal and we might tweak it more .We have deadline for submission to be on time for Oman. Best, RafikRafik Dammak at rafik"fight for the users"_______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 19:27:33 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:27:33 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Public Comments] IANA Functions Review 2 Draft Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Greetings everyone. Letting you know that this draft comment Google document that I was working on is now available for your review. Submission is on Monday next week. So, if you can review it before the weekend, it would be greatly appreciated. Remain blessed, Tomslin On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 at 18:22, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote: > Hi Rafik, > > Thanks for sharing. Can I request that anyone who is interested in > volunteering to review and draft the public comment to please let me know? > I have created a working Google document > > for the purposes of drafting the comment. So, please feel free to start > working on it. > > Warmly, > Tomslin > > > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 12:36, Rafik Dammak wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> The IFR2 draft report was posted for public comment , you can find more >> details below: >> >> - >> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/second-iana-naming-function-review-team-ifr2-initial-report-20-03-2025 >> >> - >> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/second-iana-naming-function-review-team-requests-feedback-on-initial-report-20-03-2025-en >> >> >> I am the NCSG representative to the IFR and as I shared last week at the >> ICANN meeting, I don't believe there is any concerning point in what is >> proposed as recommendations. However, I would like to ask our members who >> were involved in the IANA stewardship transition, PTI and CSC to chime in >> and review the report in order to assist with the NCSG comment. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 19:45:25 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:45:25 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Please comment /GAC Communique HRIA In-Reply-To: <30097ff8-4b9e-4015-a966-d06ed978e123@KathyKleiman.com> References: <30097ff8-4b9e-4015-a966-d06ed978e123@KathyKleiman.com> Message-ID: Yes, Let's send it with the suggested addition about who did the HRIA analysis that Kathy mentioned. Remain blessed, Tomslin On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 09:01, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > Tx Farzi, the analysis is sharp, clear, and expert! * Question: Should > there be more information in a header as to who did this HRIA analysis and > their background?* > > This doc is a great new addition to ICANN's review of the GAC communique! > > Best, Kathy > On 4/16/2025 3:34 PM, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Hi all > > This is what we wrote on GAC communique and human rights. Can the PC look > over this and decide on whether Rafik should send it to GAC's chair? > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ApT0BcojnWQ4otJYFotan2M0pxsxbJQSdbkhIdXX4E8/edit?tab=t.0 > > Best regards, > > Farzaneh > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com Thu Apr 24 22:15:52 2025 From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:15:52 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Please comment /GAC Communique HRIA In-Reply-To: References: <30097ff8-4b9e-4015-a966-d06ed978e123@KathyKleiman.com> Message-ID: Feel free to say reviewed and endorsed by NCSG & Farzi (if all agree)! On 4/24/2025 12:45 PM, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote: > Yes, Let's send it with the suggested addition about who did the HRIA > analysis that Kathy mentioned. > > Remain blessed, > Tomslin > > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 09:01, Kathy Kleiman > wrote: > > Tx Farzi, the analysis is sharp, clear, and expert! /Question: > Should there be more information in a header as to who did this > HRIA analysis and their background?/ > > This doc is a great new addition to ICANN's review of the GAC > communique! > > Best, Kathy > > On 4/16/2025 3:34 PM, farzaneh badii wrote: >> Hi all >> >> This is what we wrote on GAC communique and human rights. Can the >> PC look over this and decide on whether Rafik should send it to >> GAC's chair? >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ApT0BcojnWQ4otJYFotan2M0pxsxbJQSdbkhIdXX4E8/edit?tab=t.0 >> >> Best regards, >> >> Farzaneh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 04:06:18 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:18 +1000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Next steps for the Whois Accuracy Implementation Advisory Group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: FYI team. I am keen to hear any thoughts on the questions posed below on the steps for the Whois Accuracy Implementation Advisory Group. @Stephanie E Perrin looking to you for some guidance as well being our WHOIS expert then. Remain blessed, Tomslin ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: DiBiase, Gregory via council Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 02:28 Subject: [council] Next steps for the Whois Accuracy Implementation Advisory Group To: Council at icann.org Dear Councilors, During our April meeting , we discussed potential next steps for the Whois Accuracy Implementation Advisory Group. Background and potential options are below (the meeting recording includes additional). Please discuss with your SGs and provide feedback by *Friday, 2 May.* *What is this procedure?* ICANN?s Procedure For Handling Registration Data Directory Services Conflicts with Privacy Law is a procedure that allows Contracted Parties to demonstrate when they are prevented by local laws from fully complying with the provisions of ICANN contracts regarding personal data in RDDS. After receiving a recommendation from the 2003 Whois Task Force, the GNSO launched a PDP on this topic in 2005, and ICANN org implemented a procedure in 2006. The procedure was updated in 2017 to include an alternative trigger. *Why is the Council considering this now? * Following the addition of the new alternative trigger to the procedure in 2017, the GNSO Council was set to review the procedure by launching a PDP. However, because the EPDP on the Temporary Specification was engaged in parallel work, the GNSO Council decided to pause the call for volunteers until the EPDP Team delivered its report. Following the publication of the Final Report, ICANN org and Contracted Parties agreed to prioritize their work on the Data Processing Specification prior to revisiting the Conflicts Procedure. ICANN org published the Data Processing Specification (DPS) in January 2025. Now that the DPS is complete, the Council is considering if/how it should proceed on reviewing the Conflicts Procedure. *Questions to consider?* As discussed during the Council meeting and brought up councilors, some of the factors to consider in determining how to proceed include: - Do Contracted Parties (the parties who would use the procedure) believe this is an urgent need as no Contracted Parties have used the procedure in years? - Does the new Registration Data Policy, which becomes effective in August, obviate the need for a modification to the procedure? - Does the Council believe this should be a priority, which would require other work to be de-prioritized? *Potential Options* 1. *Defer/Leave procedure as is* - If Councilors (particularly Contracted Parties) do not believe this procedure needs an urgent modification, further work could be: 1. *Deferred indefinitely* until the Community communicates a need to review (in other words, leave the procedure alone until the Community informs Council it needs to be reviewed.) 2. *Deferred for a finite amount of time* (1 year, 2 years, etc.) to revisit if updates may be needed 2. *Proceed with original plan - ICANN org to draft modification in consultation with CPs* - If Councilors (particularly Contracted Parties) believe this work is urgent and important, the Council *could request ICANN org to draft a modification* to the procedure in consultation with Contracted Parties before sharing with the Council. (As noted above, due to resource constraints, the Council would need to determine what work can be de-prioritized in order to prioritize this work.) 3. *Terminate/Retire procedure* - During the meeting, some councilors noted it may be worth terminating/retiring this procedure due to flaws. It is important to note that the termination/retirement of the procedure *would require further policy work* as this procedure is the product of GNSO policy recommendations. If the Council does not want to extend resources on this procedure at this time, it may be worth exploring Option 1. *Deadline for Feedback?* Please socialize with your respective SG/Cs and let the Council know how you think it should proceed by *Friday, 2 May.* Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council at icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 14:53:41 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:53:41 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Day 0 in Oman proposal In-Reply-To: <231408687.2024466.1745177803848@mail.yahoo.com> References: <231408687.2024466.1745177803848@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thanks everyone, the proposal was submitted by the deadline to ICANN org. Rafik On Mon, Apr 21, 2025, 04:37 Juan Manuel Rojas wrote: > Thanks, Rafik > Nothing to add at this point. I imagine the discussion topics will be > explored further. Just a quick clarification?is it the NCPH session, or > specifically a CSG and NCSG meeting? I believe they?re the same, but if > applicable, it might be clearer to refer to it as the NCPH session. > > Best regards, > > *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* > Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia > NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO > M.Sc. Information Technology > > Registered Linux User No.*533108.* > http://www.jmanurojas.com > > > *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ > PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > > > > > > El s?bado, 19 de abril de 2025, 03:37:52 p.m. GMT-5, Rafik Dammak < > rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escribi?: > > > Hi all, > > Please find attached the draft proposal for day 0 to submit to ICANN to > get the funding. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. It is > built on the previous proposal and we might tweak it more . > We have deadline for submission to be on time for Oman. > > Best, > > Rafik > Rafik Dammak > @rafik > "fight for the users" > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Proposal for 2025 NCPH Intersessional Meeting.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 99100 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 15:06:12 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:06:12 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Request for Early Input | GNSO Latin Script Diacritics Policy Development Process Working Group In-Reply-To: References: <85BF13AC-B56A-4C81-9F1B-BADC6DDB65D3@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi all, The deadline for submitting input passed few days ago but I am wondering if we should send something anyway based on what Tapani shared. @Tapani Tarvainen the WG is able to accommodate a late submission if any? Best, Rafik On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, 23:52 Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up here, as I posted on the discuss list the LD PDP WG met > again today and discussed another to me arbitrary-looking limitation > of the charter, namely whether the PDP scope includes cases where > someone applies for diacritic versions of a string only and not the > base ASCII version. > > It was pretty much agreed that there's no technical or other apparent > reason to exclude them except that the language of the charter > explicitly talks about base ASCII version being present. It was > suggested this may have been an oversight on the part of the council, > someone said that it had not even occurred to them that there might be > several different diacritic versions of the same character but since > it's been agreed that the WG will consider such, it makes no sense to > exclude applications for diacritic versions only. > > It was suggested but not decided that the WG might go back to > the council to ask for clarification or extension of the charter > to include such cases that could naturally be dealt with at > the same time. > > When the council considers the project plan of the WG (tomorrow > unless I'm mistaken) some of our councillors might want to alert > the council about the issue. > > In any case I'm planning to write up all such cases that the PDP > charter excludes for no good reason other than that they did not occur > to the council at the time the PDP was created. I will then suggest we > put them in our response to the early input request. > > Cheers, > > Tapani > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:32:39PM +0300, Tapani Tarvainen ( > ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info) wrote: > > > > Thank you Rafik. > > > > I took the liberty of adding myself back to the PC list (it's been > > customary for former Chairs to be there, but I removed myself from > > there some years ago). > > > > Anyway, following up today's PC call, the Latin Diacritics WG > > project plan is here: > > > > > https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2025/presentation/project-plan-latin-script-diacritics-26mar25-en.pdf > > > > Timeline can be found there even if not in the most readable form. > > > > I'll add a quote from the slides presented in WG meeting: > > > > "When the Next Round similarity process finds ASCII/diacritic gTLDs to > > be similar, this WG will provide rules for diacritics." > > > > So the intent is to affect the Next Round. > > > > (Slide 9 in WG meeting two, the whole slide deck can be found under > > backround documents here: > > > https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/gnsolsdpdp/pages/176029697/2025-04-02+Latin+Script+Diacritics+-+Meeting+02 > ) > > > > And as I said I find it odd that the rules will be defined for, e.g., > > German/Swedish/Finnish/Estonian/Icelandic ? (o with two dots) but not > > for Norwegian/Danish/Faroese ? (o with stroke). > > > > I can imagine a Dane called Sj?berg being annoyed if a Swede gets > > .sj?berg and an Icelander gets .sj?berg while .sj?berg is being > > denied because of a technicality. > > > > There are other similar cases. I would have preferred including all > > confusingly similar-looking non-ASCII additions to the Latin script > > rather than using the technical Unicode definition that users should > > really not be expected to care of know about. > > > > Tapani > > > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 10:02:01AM +0900, Rafik Dammak ( > rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > a reminder about this request for input. added Tapani in cc as he is an > > > active participant of this WG. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Rafik > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 21 mars 2025 ? 09:48, Rafik Dammak a > > > ?crit : > > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > > > we got this request for input as part of the newly established WG on > latin > > > > scripts diacritics. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Rafik > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > > > > > > Dear SG/C Leaders, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are writing to you on behalf of the GNSO Latin Script Diacritics > (LD) > > > > Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group (WG). This WG is > tasked with > > > > providing the GNSO Council policy recommendations on: The limited > > > > circumstances in which a base ASCII gTLD and the Latin script > diacritic > > > > version of the gTLD can be simultaneously delegated. The WG held its > first > > > > meeting > > > > < > https://icann82.sched.com/event/1vpYP/gnso-latin-script-diacritics-pdp-working-group > > > > > > on 08 March, 2025. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In accordance with GNSO?s PDP requirements, we are seeking early > written > > > > input on the topic from each Supporting Organization, Advisory > Committee, > > > > and GNSO?s Stakeholder Group / Constituency. Each group has been > invited to > > > > participate in the PDP. Kindly note that the written input is > completely > > > > voluntary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to ensure that the WG receives your input in a timely > manner and > > > > that your input is incorporated into a summary document for the WG?s > > > > consideration, we are requesting a response *no later than 24 April > 2025* > > > > *.* Input received after this date may be introduced into the > discussion > > > > separately by your representatives, by ICANN support staff, or by me > as the > > > > relevant topic is discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The WG?s scope of work is defined through a series of questions > presented > > > > in the WG?s Charter. The list of questions and key issues to consider > > > > soliciting community input are attached for your convenience. To the > extent > > > > possible, you are requested to write your responses to the individual > > > > questions in the attached document and return via email to the GNSO > > > > Secretariat *gnso-secs at icann.org *. It is not > > > > necessary to answer every question, and you are also welcome to > provide any > > > > other input and/or background information that you deem helpful to > the > > > > deliberations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As with all GNSO PDPs, there will be additional opportunities for > > > > community input as the work progresses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much and we look forward to receiving your input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On behalf of the LD PDP WG, > > > > > > > > Michael Bauland (LD PDP WG Chair) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tapani Tarvainen > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-PC mailing list > > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- > Tapani Tarvainen > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 15:09:08 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:09:08 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Topics for joint meeting with ALAC Message-ID: Hi all, ALAC reached out asking about topics we want to discuss with them. Please share your suggestion and/or if you want to volunteer to lead the topic. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 15:13:39 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:13:39 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Kickoff discussion about GNSO council chair and vice-chair Message-ID: Hi all, Mason from CSG reached out to initiate discussion about GNSO council chair election and vice chair appointment. CSG might propose a candidate for GNSO chair and for they would propose Lawrence for vice chair position. We need to confirm if we have or not a candidate from our side. For their candidate which would need nomination from NCPH they will have to be interviewed by us and vetted. I will also check in CPH side about their plan too. I will discuss with Mason, feel free to share your thoughts about the direction to take. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 17:59:58 2025 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:59:58 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Kickoff discussion about GNSO council chair and vice-chair In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik We will interview them but I think we should be clear that we can't have both nominations to the council to come from CSG. If we agree on one of their candidates, the other has to come from NSCG. from our side, I heard from Peter that he would like to also be nominated for the vice chair position. But at the moment I haven't heard anyone volunteering for the Chair. Best regards, Farzaneh On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 8:13?AM Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > Mason from CSG reached out to initiate discussion about GNSO council chair > election and vice chair appointment. CSG might propose a candidate for GNSO > chair and for they would propose Lawrence for vice chair position. > We need to confirm if we have or not a candidate from our side. For their > candidate which would need nomination from NCPH they will have to be > interviewed by us and vetted. > I will also check in CPH side about their plan too. > I will discuss with Mason, feel free to share your thoughts about the > direction to take. > > Best, > > Rafik > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com Wed Apr 30 22:31:14 2025 From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:31:14 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Topics for joint meeting with ALAC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <78415269-be5a-4e57-981e-82b7cb75abc1@KathyKleiman.com> Independent reviews, Applicant Support, and similar issues that received a lot of interest at our meeting in Seattle. On 4/30/2025 8:09 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > ALAC reached out asking about topics we want to discuss with them. > Please share your suggestion and/or if you want to volunteer to lead > the topic. > > Best, > > Rafik > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc