[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Action Items from ICANN82 Production call #1 and Doodle next call
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Mon Dec 2 07:30:20 EET 2024
thanks Pedo and Farzaneh for your comments. looking to hear from others.
Rafik
Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 00:49, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I think my only real discomfort was that the community session on emerging
> technologies seemed very superficial, and quite a few people commented on
> this. We do need to be sure that the people who speak in those spaces are
> real experts on the themes, to avoid delegitimizing these spaces.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>, Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
> Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
> YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>, IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> e CC
> Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
> engano, favor responder informando o erro.
>
>
> Em qui., 28 de nov. de 2024 às 02:11, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <
> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu:
>
>> Thanks Rafik.
>>
>> It was a very well organized meeting and I appreciated the brewed tea
>> instead of a terrible tea bag!
>> I have to first thank Andrea for all the support for the HRIA session.
>> She went above and beyond to provide us with our last minute requests.
>>
>> The geopolitical forum is always a monologue. I don't know why. so
>> I support the suggestion to have a webinar before and just have Q&A but I
>> also think we don't need Q&A we need issues that need to be addressed and
>> give the community a chance to express it at the mic.
>>
>> For the community sessions, I don't know what we want to do with these
>> cross community sessions but they are so time intensive that you have to
>> attend all the organizing calls to be able to put the name of a
>> noncommercial in. Also the topics, they were not very up to date I have to
>> say. Can we invite some external experts as well to talk about
>> geopolitics.They need a total revamp otherwise each session every meeting
>> is going to have the same representative covering the same talking points.
>>
>> I liked the half an hour/an hour reception after each day in
>> other meetings, it really allows us to hang out with other members of the
>> community before we go to our receptions, dinners etc and we can have
>> informal policy conversations. Is that something that we do only during
>> Community or policy forum? If too hard to have a reception, maybe we can do
>> networking breakfasts? They don't have to do the catering, I just think we
>> can get more chances to talk to other community members.
>>
>> I didn't know they had switched the public forum to the morning and I
>> missed it. Well my fault for not checking the agenda carefully but then the
>> switch didn't make sense, it always made better sense to have it right
>> before the Board AGM. But I don't know how others felt about it.
>>
>> This is again my bad, but our session on human rights and dns abuse was
>> packed. So if we want to do some similar stuff we should specify a larger
>> capacity.
>>
>> The transcription of this meeting was a bit off. Maybe I just paid more
>> attention. Also I don't know if it's my ears or the equipment, but I
>> sometimes had difficulty hearing people and others told me that audio
>> quality has been poor in the rooms in recent ICANN meetings (so it's not
>> venue related).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:49 PM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC <
>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Those are points from the ICANN planning meeting.
>>> Any comment/feedback would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: Nathalie Peregrine via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning <
>>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
>>> Date: Tue, Nov 26, 2024, 20:08
>>> Subject: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Action Items from ICANN82
>>> Production call #1 and Doodle next call
>>> To: soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org <
>>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for attending the ICANN82 Production call held today on Monday
>>> 25 November 2024. For those of you unable to attend, please find the
>>> Zoom recording.
>>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/8T35m0TfR__yA7AMW6Gd6MTBWohYihNwuh8Z83xBpX26ti8jCGbAHS6O7ZXZgPjmMVTCXumEWsHn4mRi.JEDmOcygROqh-Pec?autoplay=true&startTime=1732557795000>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ⚠️ Please complete the Doodle poll for a next call next week:
>>> https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/dGzny05b ⚠️
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *ICANN81 Feedback:*
>>>
>>> The feedback from ICANN81 was mainly positive. The venue location with
>>> hotels close by, as well as restaurants and cafés, was appreciated. The
>>> abundance of seating areas allowed for additional conversations. Having
>>> food stalls available at the venue was extremely helpful. However, certain
>>> room sizes and seating were deemed insufficient as several sessions were
>>> held with standing room only given high attendance. The height of speaker
>>> screens in the GAC room will need adjusting to avoid speaker discomfort.
>>> The issue of session conflicts whilst improved upon, needs continued focus.
>>> The suggestion was made to add a Zoom poll at the end of the Community
>>> Session to gather immediate feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here are the main items raised for consideration for ICANN82:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Areas needing improvement based on ICANN81 feedback: *
>>>
>>> 1. room size information,
>>> 2. speaker screen height,
>>> 3. session conflicts,
>>> 4. adding a Zoom poll to the end of the Community Session.
>>>
>>> These items have been duly noted as action items for staff support.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *ICANN83 Block schedule:*
>>>
>>> - The geopolitical forum is well attended, but lacking in
>>> interaction opportunities. The suggestion was made to hold the update
>>> section of the session during Prep Week, and a shorter, interactive section
>>> during the ICANN meeting. This would also free up a 90-min slot which will
>>> assist with SO/AC scheduling.
>>> - Most on the call were in favour of keeping the Community Session,
>>> but agreed that the topic decision would need to be made closer to the
>>> time.
>>> - The Q&A with the ICANN Executive team is a useful session,
>>> especially in the light of the new CEO coming onboard in the next few
>>> weeks. Sally will confirm the format of the community/CEO exchange with
>>> Kurtis and will come back to the group.
>>> - The joint ccNSO/ ICANN Board session will ideally take place on
>>> Tuesday or Wednesday, instead of the current slot on Thursday.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If community leaders would be so kind as to socialize these points with
>>> their members ahead of the call next week, this would be extremely helpful.
>>> An updated Block Schedule will be circulated ahead of the call
>>> incorporating the input received.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you all!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nathalie
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning mailing list --
>>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-leave at icann.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
>>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
>>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
>>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos).
>>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
>>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20241202/e4c3aeef/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list