[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Re: [Gac-leadership] Re: INPUT NEEDED ICANN81 Community Session Topic by Wednesday 07 August 2024
Johan Helsingius
julf at Julf.com
Thu Aug 1 18:28:38 EEST 2024
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Re: [Gac-leadership] Re:
INPUT NEEDED ICANN81 Community Session Topic by Wednesday 07 August 2024
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:47:04 -0400
From: Nicolas Caballero via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
<soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
Reply-To: Nicolas Caballero <nicustkd at gmail.com>
To: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>, Nathalie
Peregrine via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
<soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
Hello Nathalie, dear colleagues,
Thank you for this; I hope this email finds you well.
As regarding proposal nr. 3, please do not include Susan Chalmers (NTIA
and GAC Rep USA) on the list, as according to her, she was never asked
or agreed, and as a matter of fact the US delegation does not support
this proposal.
On the other hand, regarding GAC Switzerland (Jorge Cancio), I haven´t
had the chance to directly talk to him, given the fact that he is still
on vacation (just in case, in order to avoid any confusion) so as to
make sure he:
a) was actually asked about this, for sure; and
b) there is full support from the Swiss Government.
Having said that, I do not mean the GAC officially supports - or not -
any of the proposals kindly sent, until we can get together and decide
on the topic with the respective GAC Representatives.
Thank you again.
Best regards,
Nico
Nicolas G. Caballero
GAC Chair
ICANN
El jue, 1 ago 2024 a las 5:33, Nathalie Peregrine via
SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning via gac-leadership
(<gac-leadership at icann.org <mailto:gac-leadership at icann.org>>) escribió:
Hello all,____
__ __
Thank you to those who provided input!____
__ __
You will be shortly be receiving calendar invitations for a second
Production Call next week. ____
__ __
In order to ensure the Production Call closes on an agreement on the
topic for the Community Session, please find below the proposed
agenda and relevant action items to prepare for the call.____
__ __
*Agenda____*
1. Q&A on Community Topic proposals____
2. Vote via hands raised in Zoom (please note if unable to attend,
it will be possible to vote via the mailing list as suggested in
my previous email).____
__ __
*Action Items for all:____*
* Kindly socialize the below topics to your community members as
soon as possible encouraging them to submit feedback in the form
of comments or questions. ____
* Please circulate the comments and questions ahead of time on the
planning mailing list in order for the Q&A to be as efficient as
possible. ____
__ __
Looking forward to hearing from you all on the this thread as well
as on the call next week!____
__ __
Kind regards,____
__ __
Nathalie____
__ __
*__ __*
1. *ccNSO Proposal____*
The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary session during the ICANN 81
meeting to be held in Istanbul in November 2024, on the topic of the
WSIS+20 Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation)
can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder
model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance
approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in
the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the
role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in
2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy
should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise
the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
The main outcomes of such a session should be that:____
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic
approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual
organisations and communities can play____
* The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play
as part of the Review____
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about
where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the
Geopolitical session.____
__ __
__ __
2. *IPC Proposal____*
_Working Title:_Reviewing ICANN’s Accountability Mechanisms____
____
_Aim:_ To hold a general discussion across the community about the
ICANN Accountability Mechanisms, particularly the Request for
Reconsideration (RFR) and Independent Review Process (IRP) in order
to elicit views on whether:____
* these mechanisms are fit for purpose____
* there are unintended outcomes resulting from the manner in which
these mechanisms are set out in the Bylaws. For example: ____
o do the standing and grounds requirements for either
mechanism serve to exclude legitimate access by those that
the community intended to have access, such as SO, AC, SG
and Cs ____
o Are these mechanisms available to any classes of complainant
who were not intended by the community to have access to
them____
o Is the EC IRP process sufficiently clear and unambiguous.____
* there are concerns sufficient to warrant review and potential
revision of the relevant Bylaws provisions and, if so, whether
there is a sufficient support from the community to convene a
CCWG to work on this.____
____
_Brief Background:_____
On a number of occasions recently, including in meetings with the
GNSO Council, ICANN Board Members have expressed the view that the
IRP, as presently drafted, could be used by classes of potential
claimant who were never intended to have access to this mechanism,
such as an unsuccessful respondent to an ICANN RFP or tender
process. Board Members have expressed the desire for a community
discussion on this.____
____
At the same time, the GNSO’s Intellectual Property Constituency
recently brought a RFR against a proposal by the Board that would
have had the effect of changing a Fundamental Bylaws without
following the Bylaws-mandated process for doing so. The IPC’s RFR
was summarily dismissed as failing to demonstrate that the IPC was
harmed by such a Board action.____
____
The intent of this session would not be to publicly debate the IPC’s
ongoing disagreement with ICANN over the RFR, which is currently in
the Co-Operative Engagement Process. Rather, we believe that both
examples demonstrate that there are concerns, both on ICANN Org’s
side and on the Community side, with these important accountability
mechanisms which were revised as a result of the cross community
work on Accountability in the context of the IANA Transition. We
believe this is an appropriate time for a discussion on whether the
mechanisms meet the community’s expectations, or whether they would
benefit from a more formal review and revision.____
__ __
*__ __*
*3) At-Large/ ALAC Proposal____*
_Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism,
Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_:
To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and
emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping
of the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet
infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference
the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial
for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal
experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Internet
governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure
governance and data management from the end user perspective,
highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in shaping
the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:____
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer
- Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member
- Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at
the Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland
- Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum
- Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of
Commerce, NTIA
- Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of
London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster
- John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:____
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate
new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in
governance?____
2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the
development of new internet infrastructures and governance
models?____
3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act,
and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by
new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?____
_Expected Outcomes_:____
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities
presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift
towards them - MSM implications.
- Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the
MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies.
- Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of
multistakeholder Internet governance.____
4. *RrSG Proposal____*
*__ __*
RrSG Proposal for ICANN81 Plenary Session: The Registrant’s Journey____
____
Follow along with our hero Sophia Exemplar as she begins her
Registrant Journey and encounters ICANN policies in the registration
and use of her new domain name to create a fan website for the 1960s
TV show /Thunderbirds/. Along the way, she’ll encounter choices for
registration data submission and publication, phishing emails and
deceptive notices, and renewal reminders. She’ll consider moving to
a new registrar, or even giving the domain name away to a friend,
and more. Will Sophia’s journey be a success? We’ll poll the meeting
attendees to help her decide what to do at each important step in
the process.____
____
/This session takes attendees through important aspects of the
domain name lifecycle, covering registration data collection
requirements, choices around data masking or publication, contacts
sent to the domain owner, and processes including registrar transfer
and change of ownership data. Attendees will gain a greater
understanding of the industry landscape and domain owner experience.
/____
*__ __*
__ __
_______________________________________________
SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning mailing list --
soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
<mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to
soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-leave at icann.org
<mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-leave at icann.org>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
(https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy
<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of
Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos
<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link
above to change your membership status or configuration, including
unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery
altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so
on._______________________________________________
gac-leadership mailing list -- gac-leadership at icann.org
<mailto:gac-leadership at icann.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to gac-leadership-leave at icann.org
<mailto:gac-leadership-leave at icann.org>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
(https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy
<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of
Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos
<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link
above to change your membership status or configuration, including
unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery
altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning mailing list -- soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-leave at icann.org
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list