From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Tue Apr  2 06:02:33 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:02:33 +1100
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Applicant Support Handbook - Comments due tomorrow
In-Reply-To: <CAPMQrP8hGvHCxZ0SK_s1VpYGkg=y-1kiXZAKZLCPqxycHa0XXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3adf18cf-ba38-41f3-8c5e-567a81521493@KathyKleiman.com>
 <18591F1F-C761-463D-A3D0-79F317616D29@gmail.com>
 <3da8f594-15e8-4ca0-b122-46bade47482a@KathyKleiman.com>
 <2ee01120-c5c0-4d40-860b-3ace032d483a@kathykleiman.com>
 <CAPMQrP8hGvHCxZ0SK_s1VpYGkg=y-1kiXZAKZLCPqxycHa0XXA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeXnsYti5mC_m2uR7LHE-BD-zfoDAQ=vqOMiJx9-sDT5mA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi team,

Bolu had kindly volunteered to help to hold the pen for this comment and it
is now ready for your urgent review.

Here is the link to the initial draft:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LwuZfcvtEfpzEnMjKd3g-8KeI5NSL3ybKX-HrSyxI4Q/edit?usp=sharing

Warmly,
Tomslin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240402/e72bd4f3/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Tue Apr  2 22:59:54 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:59:54 +1100
Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] ICANN80 Session Planning
In-Reply-To: <CAM8DdeXMe9Pc4Vq+cCJguaO6NOD-ZqtxBBuxKj9vDD9XuZ1rLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <B6C2E29A-A4F1-4D9C-818C-C12C63176770@icann.org>
 <c7fb8281-36d9-4a0a-a6ef-89f2380be85c@Julf.com>
 <CAM8DdeV0apUDYBtnqPovcpdnGXVXv7W_tX5OmZ8z4FT1SygkQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN1qJvDfPf4pog1P3x2w+qTPyEvmpBABCg3TA7hsNA2HNaM1=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeXMe9Pc4Vq+cCJguaO6NOD-ZqtxBBuxKj9vDD9XuZ1rLw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeXM59XY4hubHNiDVOrE_AoLN2+U=3KrSJVw034c0-Q8Ww@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

Is the proposal to move the PC meeting and put it against the TPR on
Tuesday agreeable to everyone?

Warmly,
Tomslin



On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 07:42, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hhmm...True. Tough one. RDRS is more problematic than TPR so maybe we go
> with Andrea's suggestion.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 02:06, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Are you sure you want an NCSG PC meeting at the same time as RDRS SC?
>> Stephanie will miss out on it and while it is not that consequential it can
>> be a hotbed of bad ideas that must be put out!
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 9:38?AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar via NCSG-EC <
>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Warmly,
>>> Tomslin
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, 00:26 Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC, <
>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Latest draft schedule for ICANN80, with NCSG/NCUC/NPOC sessions
>>>> tentatively assigned.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections?
>>>>
>>>>         Julf
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240403/3e4c1bb5/attachment.htm>

From julf at julf.com  Wed Apr  3 09:59:10 2024
From: julf at julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 08:59:10 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] ICANN80 Session Planning
In-Reply-To: <CAM8DdeXM59XY4hubHNiDVOrE_AoLN2+U=3KrSJVw034c0-Q8Ww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <B6C2E29A-A4F1-4D9C-818C-C12C63176770@icann.org>
 <c7fb8281-36d9-4a0a-a6ef-89f2380be85c@Julf.com>
 <CAM8DdeV0apUDYBtnqPovcpdnGXVXv7W_tX5OmZ8z4FT1SygkQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN1qJvDfPf4pog1P3x2w+qTPyEvmpBABCg3TA7hsNA2HNaM1=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeXMe9Pc4Vq+cCJguaO6NOD-ZqtxBBuxKj9vDD9XuZ1rLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeXM59XY4hubHNiDVOrE_AoLN2+U=3KrSJVw034c0-Q8Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0d78cb6d-c2e4-4cf1-ac05-5331e485f492@julf.com>

OK with me.

	Julf


On 02/04/2024 21:59, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Is the proposal to move the PC meeting and put it against the TPR on 
> Tuesday agreeable to everyone?
> 
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 07:42, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com 
> <mailto:mesumbeslin at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hhmm...True. Tough one. RDRS is more problematic than TPR so maybe
>     we go with Andrea's suggestion.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 02:06, farzaneh badii
>     <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Are you sure you want an NCSG PC meeting at the same time as
>         RDRS SC? Stephanie will miss out on it and while it is not that
>         consequential it can be a hotbed of bad ideas that must be put out!
> 
>         Farzaneh
> 
> 
>         On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 9:38?AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar via NCSG-EC
>         <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>> wrote:
> 
>             Looks?good to me.
> 
>             Warmly,
>             Tomslin
> 
>             On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, 00:26 Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC,
>             <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>> wrote:
> 
>                 Latest draft schedule for ICANN80, with NCSG/NCUC/NPOC
>                 sessions
>                 tentatively assigned.
> 
>                 Any objections?
> 
>                  ? ? ? ? Julf
> 
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 NCSG-EC mailing list
>                 NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>
>                 https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>                 <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec>
> 
>             _______________________________________________
>             NCSG-EC mailing list
>             NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>
>             https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>             <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec>
> 


From andrea.glandon at icann.org  Wed Apr  3 16:08:51 2024
From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:08:51 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re:  [NCSG-EC] ICANN80 Session Planning
In-Reply-To: <0d78cb6d-c2e4-4cf1-ac05-5331e485f492@julf.com>
References: <B6C2E29A-A4F1-4D9C-818C-C12C63176770@icann.org>
 <c7fb8281-36d9-4a0a-a6ef-89f2380be85c@Julf.com>
 <CAM8DdeV0apUDYBtnqPovcpdnGXVXv7W_tX5OmZ8z4FT1SygkQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN1qJvDfPf4pog1P3x2w+qTPyEvmpBABCg3TA7hsNA2HNaM1=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeXMe9Pc4Vq+cCJguaO6NOD-ZqtxBBuxKj9vDD9XuZ1rLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeXM59XY4hubHNiDVOrE_AoLN2+U=3KrSJVw034c0-Q8Ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <0d78cb6d-c2e4-4cf1-ac05-5331e485f492@julf.com>
Message-ID: <A646BA73-E923-4E12-82EC-B8D8441A8BCD@icann.org>

Thank you!

I have moved it to Tuesday, 15:30-17:00 local time against the Transfer Policy Review session.

Kind Regards, 
Andrea 




?On 4/3/24, 02:04, "NCSG-PC on behalf of Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC" <ncsg-pc-bounces at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> on behalf of ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>> wrote:


OK with me.


Julf




On 02/04/2024 21:59, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Is the proposal to move the PC meeting and put it against the TPR on 
> Tuesday agreeable to everyone?
> 
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 07:42, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com <mailto:mesumbeslin at gmail.com> 
> <mailto:mesumbeslin at gmail.com <mailto:mesumbeslin at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> 
> Hhmm...True. Tough one. RDRS is more problematic than TPR so maybe
> we go with Andrea's suggestion.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 02:06, farzaneh badii
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> 
> Are you sure you want an NCSG PC meeting at the same time as
> RDRS SC? Stephanie will miss out on it and while it is not that
> consequential it can be a hotbed of bad ideas that must be put out!
> 
> Farzaneh
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 9:38 AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar via NCSG-EC
> <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>> wrote:
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
> 
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, 00:26 Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC,
> <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>> wrote:
> 
> Latest draft schedule for ICANN80, with NCSG/NCUC/NPOC
> sessions
> tentatively assigned.
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> Julf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]>
> 
_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9I-1kDj7g$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9I-1kDj7g$> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]




From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Thu Apr  4 02:50:36 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 10:50:36 +1100
Subject: [NCSG-PC] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_=5BExt=5D_Extension_Request=3A_Review?=
	=?utf-8?q?_of_the_Draft_Applicant_Support_Program_=28ASP=29_Handbo?=
	=?utf-8?q?ok_=E2=80=93_New_gTLD_Program?=
In-Reply-To: <7B7B68AC-1294-49F0-A2E0-DAFEC3B98A90@icann.org>
References: <CAM8DdeU42V1Hb-XJPHh=5s8MG1Zobp7bwZ4+YAnwSPtLr0=QpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <407C0DD6-FAF5-49F3-9CC2-0A4C539E25B9@icann.org>
 <CAM8DdeUtyNwTY=2maxjrQoCHHNE75T6C0=HM46J5X--wbhb0yA@mail.gmail.com>
 <7B7B68AC-1294-49F0-A2E0-DAFEC3B98A90@icann.org>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeVjs1LTP+i74dXk7Ktat79tO=0KrzZNNTBy70bX19vg0w@mail.gmail.com>

FYI

Warmly,
Tomslin

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Samantha Mancia <samantha.mancia at icann.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 02:08
Subject: Re: [Ext] Extension Request: Review of the Draft Applicant Support
Program (ASP) Handbook ? New gTLD Program
To: Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
Cc: Leon Grundmann <leon.grundmann at icann.org>, Kristy Buckley <
kristy.buckley at icann.org>, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>


Hi Tomslin,



Thank you for sending through the submission. The NCSG comment will be
added to the summary report which will be posted on the public comment page
once available. Our goal for publishing the summary report is 15 April.



We will also of course review the NCSG comment along with the others
received in our public comment analysis.



Kind Regards,



Samantha Mancia

Project Manager, New gTLD Program Team

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Office Telephone: +1 310 301 5800

www.icann.org





*From: *Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
*Date: *Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 6:26?PM
*To: *Samantha Mancia <samantha.mancia at icann.org>
*Cc: *Leon Grundmann <leon.grundmann at icann.org>, Kristy Buckley <
kristy.buckley at icann.org>, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
*Subject: *Re: [Ext] Extension Request: Review of the Draft Applicant
Support Program (ASP) Handbook ? New gTLD Program



Dear Samantha,



Please find attached the NCSG submission. Can I check, will the comment be
publicly available as well on the website?



Warmly,

Tomslin







On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 01:41, Samantha Mancia <samantha.mancia at icann.org>
wrote:

Hello Tomslin,



Many thanks for reaching out with this request. As you may be aware, we are
working with tight timelines all around and especially for the ASP since it
launches at the end of this year.



If ICANN org officially extends the public comment timeline this could risk
other ASP Handbook public comment submissions coming in late, delaying our
ability to analyze those and integrate feedback into the ASP Handbook
in-line with our project schedule. Therefore, we cannot officially extend
the public comment period deadline past 2 April without risking the ASP
timeline.



However, if the NCSG submits its comments within a few days of the public
comment period closing, those comments will of course be considered
alongside the other public comments received. My understanding is that
comments submitted after the deadline can be shared directly with the
project team and that we can append the NCSG?s submission to our public
comment report once it's published.



Does this sound like a reasonable path forward? We very much appreciate the
NCSG?s enthusiasm for the ASP and we look forward to receiving the NCSG?s
submission on the draft ASP Handbook. Please let us know if you have any
questions or if you'd like to discuss.



Kind Regards,



Samantha Mancia

Project Manager, New gTLD Program Team

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Office Telephone: +1 310 301 5800

www.icann.org





*From: *Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
*Date: *Monday, April 1, 2024 at 6:11?PM
*To: *Leon Grundmann <leon.grundmann at icann.org>, Kristy Buckley <
kristy.buckley at icann.org>, Samantha Mancia <samantha.mancia at icann.org>
*Cc: *Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
*Subject: *[Ext] Extension Request: Review of the Draft Applicant Support
Program (ASP) Handbook ? New gTLD Program



Dear team,



Our community (NCSG) was not able to finish reviewing our comment due to
the Easter holidays. Is it possible to allow an extension till the end of
this week to allow for folks to come back on Tuesday and finish its review?



Warmly,

Tomslin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240404/f6cf7fa1/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Thu Apr  4 03:33:43 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:33:43 +1100
Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re:  [NCSG-EC] ICANN80 Session Planning
In-Reply-To: <A646BA73-E923-4E12-82EC-B8D8441A8BCD@icann.org>
References: <B6C2E29A-A4F1-4D9C-818C-C12C63176770@icann.org>
 <c7fb8281-36d9-4a0a-a6ef-89f2380be85c@Julf.com>
 <CAM8DdeV0apUDYBtnqPovcpdnGXVXv7W_tX5OmZ8z4FT1SygkQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN1qJvDfPf4pog1P3x2w+qTPyEvmpBABCg3TA7hsNA2HNaM1=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeXMe9Pc4Vq+cCJguaO6NOD-ZqtxBBuxKj9vDD9XuZ1rLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeXM59XY4hubHNiDVOrE_AoLN2+U=3KrSJVw034c0-Q8Ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <0d78cb6d-c2e4-4cf1-ac05-5331e485f492@julf.com>
 <A646BA73-E923-4E12-82EC-B8D8441A8BCD@icann.org>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeW_8bavcz_qcgmyeWLuvXwoNZJih=QqQmwuJvwtwiHcQA@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks, Andrea.

Warmly,
Tomslin

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 00:08 Andrea Glandon, <andrea.glandon at icann.org> wrote:

> Thank you!
>
> I have moved it to Tuesday, 15:30-17:00 local time against the Transfer
> Policy Review session.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
> ?On 4/3/24, 02:04, "NCSG-PC on behalf of Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC" <
> ncsg-pc-bounces at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> on
> behalf of ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>> wrote:
>
>
> OK with me.
>
>
> Julf
>
>
>
>
> On 02/04/2024 21:59, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is the proposal to move the PC meeting and put it against the TPR on
> > Tuesday agreeable to everyone?
> >
> > Warmly,
> > Tomslin
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 07:42, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com
> <mailto:mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:mesumbeslin at gmail.com <mailto:mesumbeslin at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hhmm...True. Tough one. RDRS is more problematic than TPR so maybe
> > we go with Andrea's suggestion.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 02:06, farzaneh badii
> > <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> <mailto:
> farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Are you sure you want an NCSG PC meeting at the same time as
> > RDRS SC? Stephanie will miss out on it and while it is not that
> > consequential it can be a hotbed of bad ideas that must be put out!
> >
> > Farzaneh
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 9:38 AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar via NCSG-EC
> > <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:
> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>> wrote:
> >
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Warmly,
> > Tomslin
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, 00:26 Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC,
> > <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:
> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>> wrote:
> >
> > Latest draft schedule for ICANN80, with NCSG/NCUC/NPOC
> > sessions
> > tentatively assigned.
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> > Julf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCSG-EC mailing list
> > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>>
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$>
> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]
> > <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$>
> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCSG-EC mailing list
> > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is> <mailto:
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>>
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$>
> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]
> > <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9LN8x6DWg$>
> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9I-1kDj7g$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc__;!!PtGJab4!5tXKKwRmNspcomTysxETEkeJc2nTu_WPakZUn55rdsO6G7VFFftiplsHyNL_j9RgBYtnu8MJh451K763PdbMw9I-1kDj7g$>
> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is]
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240404/c234ad06/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Tue Apr  9 04:20:00 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:20:00 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] On leave
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeV7SsuqxvhXidd=TnxzEWdJNV4EsWNcBQmPLvRtEU5P-A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi team, @Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> ,

I forgot to inform you that I will be on leave this week till Friday 12th,
busy moving houses.

If there is any urgent request, please let @Johan Helsingius
<julf at julf.com> know,
to see if he can help.

Warmly,
Tomslin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240409/c4a38940/attachment.htm>

From julf at Julf.com  Tue Apr  9 14:19:23 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:19:23 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] On leave
In-Reply-To: <CAM8DdeV7SsuqxvhXidd=TnxzEWdJNV4EsWNcBQmPLvRtEU5P-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM8DdeV7SsuqxvhXidd=TnxzEWdJNV4EsWNcBQmPLvRtEU5P-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8881352f-1646-475c-8753-ab111995057d@Julf.com>

Good luck with the house move, Tomslin - it is always
a challenge!

	Julf


On 09/04/2024 03:20, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> Hi team, @Johan Helsingius <mailto:julf at julf.com>?,
> 
> I forgot to inform you that I will be on leave this week till Friday 
> 12th, busy moving houses.
> 
> If there is any urgent request,?please let @Johan Helsingius 
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>?know, to see if he can help.
> 
> Warmly,
> Tomslin


From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca  Tue Apr  9 16:00:06 2024
From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:00:06 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] On leave
In-Reply-To: <8881352f-1646-475c-8753-ab111995057d@Julf.com>
References: <CAM8DdeV7SsuqxvhXidd=TnxzEWdJNV4EsWNcBQmPLvRtEU5P-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <8881352f-1646-475c-8753-ab111995057d@Julf.com>
Message-ID: <A149873C-09C8-46D2-8BAA-B85968CA765F@mail.utoronto.ca>

Especially with kids!  Don't lose THEIR stuff, even if the stove and fridge fall off the truck!  Good luck and happy landing!
Steph

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 9, 2024, at 07:19, Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
> 
> ?Good luck with the house move, Tomslin - it is always
> a challenge!
> 
>    Julf
> 
> 
>> On 09/04/2024 03:20, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
>> Hi team, @Johan Helsingius <mailto:julf at julf.com> ,
>> I forgot to inform you that I will be on leave this week till Friday 12th, busy moving houses.
>> If there is any urgent request, please let @Johan Helsingius <mailto:julf at julf.com> know, to see if he can help.
>> Warmly,
>> Tomslin
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com  Tue Apr  9 22:22:00 2024
From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:22:00 -0400
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
Message-ID: <25db56be-e685-4a76-b6d6-78404b3e4b3f@KathyKleiman.com>

Hi All,

We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks to Bolutife, 
Emmanuel) and have another one coming up: *Review of the Draft Registry 
Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program 
<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
*

This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they right and are they 
understandable?

*Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have already worked 
on.? Would you like to start the comments here?? Is there a draft or 
outline you would like to share? *

Who would like to work with Bolutife?

This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert in the 
upcoming New gTLD process!

Best, Kathy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240409/97081d08/attachment.htm>

From emmanuelvitus at gmail.com  Wed Apr 10 11:15:37 2024
From: emmanuelvitus at gmail.com (Emmanuel Vitus)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:15:37 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <CAGSP6RQk6k3P2MTwHcrpkno7fkoru8nP+xFAYPT-VRYmUqYg3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25db56be-e685-4a76-b6d6-78404b3e4b3f@KathyKleiman.com>
 <CAGSP6RQk6k3P2MTwHcrpkno7fkoru8nP+xFAYPT-VRYmUqYg3g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGKde+3E7-TYO7DMXX1pVqNqL9XXR+KooC0gdnr9sKkq4oKq=A@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
@Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.

Kind regards

Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.


On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you again) after
> April 16th, if it would still be useful. Particularly, if Adisa can direct
> me to a certain section or a certain task that could be particularly
> helpful to his work, that'd work perfectly.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks to Bolutife,
>> Emmanuel) and have another one coming up:
>> *Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD
>> Program
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>> *
>>
>> This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they right and are they
>> understandable?
>>
>> *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have already worked
>> on.  Would you like to start the comments here?  Is there a draft or
>> outline you would like to share?  *
>>
>> Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>
>> This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert in the upcoming
>> New gTLD process!
>>
>> Best, Kathy
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240410/265efdd1/attachment.htm>

From julf at Julf.com  Thu Apr 11 12:24:04 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:24:04 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Travel slot for ICANN80
In-Reply-To: <7b067554-7555-41ff-89f3-26f61eeee975@dnrc.tech>
References: <7b067554-7555-41ff-89f3-26f61eeee975@dnrc.tech>
Message-ID: <f8ac0b3b-74c0-4ef5-9581-9763a039e2c4@Julf.com>




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Travel slot for ICANN80
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:39:35 -0400
From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy at dnrc.tech>
To: Johan Helsingius <julf at JULF.COM>
CC: Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>

Dear Julf and Andrea,

I hereby submit my Motivation Statement to NCSG to attend ICANN80. 
Please find it attached.

Best regards,

Kathy

On 4/10/2024 10:18 AM, Johan Helsingius wrote:
> Seems Stephanie Perrin can't make it to Kigali.
>
> According to our operating procedures I am hereby asking interested
> persons to send me their motivation statements, copying Andrea
> (andrea.glandon at icann.org).
>
> Here is the relevant part from the NCSG operating procedures:
>
> If a Council member or a funded NCSG Executive Committee cannot attend 
> the meeting, the following process should be invoked to decide upon 
> the travel slot transfer:
>
> ??? The NCSG chair announces the opportunity on the NCSG-Discuss list 
> and requests that the interested members send their Motivation 
> Statement privately to the Chair and copy in ICANN support staff.
>
> ??? The Motivation Statement must explain in detail why the applicant 
> would like to attend the meeting, provide evidence of full and 
> verifiable engagement in Domain Name System policy deliberations, 
> proof that the applicant has previously attended calls and contributed 
> to PDPs, NCSG Policy Committee meetings and other relevant policy and 
> related meetings, and explain why their physical presence is important 
> for this meeting, mentioning specific tasks they commit to carry out 
> on behalf of the NCSG. The tasks must be related to the NCSG and 
> advance the NCSG?s interests at that specific ICANN meeting.
>
> ??? If the applicant is to be an alternate to a GNSO Councillor, he or 
> she should have an understanding of how the Council works and have 
> observed their meetings beforehand. They must provide a letter of 
> recommendation from either a) the Chair of the NCSG Policy Committee, 
> or (b) a serving member of the Council in his or her second term.
>
> ??? While Execeutive Committee? travel slots may be allocated to 
> newcomers, newcomers should commit to attending? sessions of the NCSG 
> leading up to the ICANN meeting, as well as undertaking revision and 
> background reading on at least one internal governance document and a 
> PDP.
>
> ??? The applicant must commit to attending the ICANN meeting fully, be 
> at the meeting venue every day, and be present to the greatest extent 
> possible at all NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO Council 
> meetings, and PDP sessions for which they have expressed interest in 
> their Motivation Statement. If the selected applicant does not appear 
> to be present at the venue without justification, s/he will not be 
> eligible to be allocated a travel slot in the future. The decision of 
> such ineligibility will be made by the NCSG Executive Committee (in 
> the evaluation of at least two members).
>
> ????Julf

-- 
Kathy Kleiman
Past President, Domain Name Rights Coalition
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Kleiman Motivation Statement ICANN80.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 235736 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240411/2174f653/attachment.pdf>

From julf at Julf.com  Thu Apr 11 12:25:31 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:25:31 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Travel slot for ICANN80
In-Reply-To: <CAAU+vPFR+_VCDodWXBgJvqRODGxsxL7XvJQcu_8ceZXEatL_Ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAU+vPFR+_VCDodWXBgJvqRODGxsxL7XvJQcu_8ceZXEatL_Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7ba9dc01-65cb-4cf3-ab4e-126bd9d61cf3@Julf.com>




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Travel slot for ICANN80
Date: 	Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:24:46 +0000
From: 	Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com>
To: 	Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>



I will propose Farzaneh Badii for this slot

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, 2:19?pm Johan Helsingius, 
<00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu 
<mailto:00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> wrote:

     Seems Stephanie Perrin can't make it to Kigali.

     According to our operating procedures I am hereby asking interested
     persons to send me their motivation statements, copying Andrea
     (andrea.glandon at icann.org <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org>).

     Here is the relevant part from the NCSG operating procedures:

     If a Council member or a funded NCSG Executive Committee cannot attend
     the meeting, the following process should be invoked to decide upon the
     travel slot transfer:

      ? ? ?The NCSG chair announces the opportunity on the NCSG-Discuss list
     and requests that the interested members send their Motivation
     Statement
     privately to the Chair and copy in ICANN support staff.

      ? ? ?The Motivation Statement must explain in detail why the applicant
     would like to attend the meeting, provide evidence of full and
     verifiable engagement in Domain Name System policy deliberations, proof
     that the applicant has previously attended calls and contributed to
     PDPs, NCSG Policy Committee meetings and other relevant policy and
     related meetings, and explain why their physical presence is important
     for this meeting, mentioning specific tasks they commit to carry out on
     behalf of the NCSG. The tasks must be related to the NCSG and advance
     the NCSG?s interests at that specific ICANN meeting.

      ? ? ?If the applicant is to be an alternate to a GNSO Councillor,
     he or
     she should have an understanding of how the Council works and have
     observed their meetings beforehand. They must provide a letter of
     recommendation from either a) the Chair of the NCSG Policy
     Committee, or
     (b) a serving member of the Council in his or her second term.

      ? ? ?While Execeutive Committee? travel slots may be allocated to
     newcomers, newcomers should commit to attending? sessions of the NCSG
     leading up to the ICANN meeting, as well as undertaking revision and
     background reading on at least one internal governance document and
     a PDP.

      ? ? ?The applicant must commit to attending the ICANN meeting
     fully, be
     at the meeting venue every day, and be present to the greatest extent
     possible at all NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO Council
     meetings, and PDP sessions for which they have expressed interest in
     their Motivation Statement. If the selected applicant does not
     appear to
     be present at the venue without justification, s/he will not be
     eligible
     to be allocated a travel slot in the future. The decision of such
     ineligibility will be made by the NCSG Executive Committee (in the
     evaluation of at least two members).

      ? ? ? ? Julf



From julf at Julf.com  Thu Apr 11 12:26:02 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:26:02 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: APPLICATION FOR NCSG SPONSORSHIP TO ICANN80 MEETING
 AS A NEWCOMMER
In-Reply-To: <CAD+v076z3g2RXLgesuTQoKwhsWokh+Z=K+ff0UFa7T5aFre1og@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD+v076z3g2RXLgesuTQoKwhsWokh+Z=K+ff0UFa7T5aFre1og@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <69734610-b352-4ce6-89c4-9130962c65d3@Julf.com>




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	APPLICATION FOR NCSG SPONSORSHIP TO ICANN80 MEETING AS A NEWCOMMER
Date: 	Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:46:29 +1200
From: 	James Olorundare <olorundarek at gmail.com>
To: 	00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu
CC: 	andrea.glandon at icann.org



Dear Ma/Sir,

Below is my motivation Statement

As a recent addition to the NCSG community, I wish to apply for the 
above which will allow me to contribute more directly. The chance to be 
sponsored for the vacant slot at ICANN80 would allow me to put my skills 
and enthusiasm to work, representing the NCSG and furthering our goals.

My journey began with a keen interest in internet governance, leading me 
to become an ICANN79 Fellow and the Paul Muchene Award winner. This 
recognition fueled my desire to get involved and I have been attending 
some of the NCSG engagements. Few amongst them are the following:

Transfer Policy Review Preliminary Recommendations (April 4, 2024)

SubPro IRT Working Group: Applicant Freedom of Expression (July 26, 2023)

I have also been present at key meetings, including but not limited to:

NCUC ICANN79 readout (March 20, 2024)

Africa Domain Name Industry Study Draft Final Report Public Comment 
Period (January 23, 2024) (I can provide screenshots as evidence of my 
participation.)

  ?I plan to be a strong voice for the NCSG at ICANN80, ensuring full 
participation in all relevant meetings. As the ISOC Chapter President in 
Nigeria and coordinator of the Nigerian School on IG, I possess the 
skills to effectively lead discussions, moderate sessions, and even act 
as a rapporteur if needed.

  ?During ICANN79Fellowship, I attended PDPs and NCSG Policy Committee 
meetings, constantly learning and expanding my knowledge base. My 
dedication extends to ongoing revision of internal governance documents 
and PDPs, and I actively participated in the African Engagement on IG 
today (April 11, 2024).

Attending ICANN80 in its entirety is a priority. I'll be there every 
day, actively involved in NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO 
Council meetings, and relevant PDP sessions.

This sponsorship opportunity is not just about attending a meeting; it 
is about bringing a new member's fresh perspective and unwavering 
commitment to the table. I am confident that my skills and dedication 
will make me a valuable asset to the NCSG at ICANN80.

Thank you.

*Engr. Olorundare James Kunle, SMIEEE*

*CLAISO22301;9001; Scrum Master Cert.*


-- 

+2348036551591


From julf at Julf.com  Thu Apr 11 12:28:59 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:28:59 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Plenary session
 for ICANN80
In-Reply-To: <DF6EC956-1175-43F2-9858-9B535CDCF834@icann.org>
References: <DF6EC956-1175-43F2-9858-9B535CDCF834@icann.org>
Message-ID: <41d60ed2-d11b-47a6-ae3c-1554cdf7728b@Julf.com>

FYI.
	
	Julf



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Plenary session for ICANN80
Date: 	Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:47:44 +0000
From: 	Carlos Reyes via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning 
<soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
Reply-To: 	Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes at icann.org>
To: 	Nathalie Peregrine via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning 
<soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>



Hello, all.

There is a 90-minute plenary session about the WSIS+20 review process 
scheduled for 15:30?17:00 local time in Kigali, Rwanda on Monday, 10 
June 2024. In response to your feedback, it is time to begin the 
community planning process.

The first step is to convene a planning team. *Please let me know by 
Monday, 15 April, if you would like to be part of the planning 
team.*?The goal is to have 6 to 8 planning calls in the coming weeks.

Building on previous plenary session experiences, my colleagues and I 
will facilitate your planning efforts. The ICANN organization Government 
and International Governmental Organization Engagement team will also 
provide subject matter expertise.

We look forward to working with you.

Best,
Carlos and the ICANN80 plenary session planning support team

Carlos Reyes

Senior Policy Director

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

Washington, D.C. Engagement Center



From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com  Thu Apr 11 12:33:06 2024
From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:33:06 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning]
 Plenary session for ICANN80
In-Reply-To: <41d60ed2-d11b-47a6-ae3c-1554cdf7728b@Julf.com>
References: <DF6EC956-1175-43F2-9858-9B535CDCF834@icann.org>
 <41d60ed2-d11b-47a6-ae3c-1554cdf7728b@Julf.com>
Message-ID: <CADAEEV0SroLa+6RaMxok-A6BKF0WBu4+F2YnO9j1oTbZW2YkCQ@mail.gmail.com>

You can add me to the planning team, Julf! But only if you'd like to (:

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:29?AM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC <
ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:

> FYI.
>
>         Julf
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:        [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Plenary session for
> ICANN80
> Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:47:44 +0000
> From:   Carlos Reyes via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
> <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
> Reply-To:       Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes at icann.org>
> To:     Nathalie Peregrine via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
> <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Hello, all.
>
> There is a 90-minute plenary session about the WSIS+20 review process
> scheduled for 15:30?17:00 local time in Kigali, Rwanda on Monday, 10
> June 2024. In response to your feedback, it is time to begin the
> community planning process.
>
> The first step is to convene a planning team. *Please let me know by
> Monday, 15 April, if you would like to be part of the planning
> team.* The goal is to have 6 to 8 planning calls in the coming weeks.
>
> Building on previous plenary session experiences, my colleagues and I
> will facilitate your planning efforts. The ICANN organization Government
> and International Governmental Organization Engagement team will also
> provide subject matter expertise.
>
> We look forward to working with you.
>
> Best,
> Carlos and the ICANN80 plenary session planning support team
>
> Carlos Reyes
>
> Senior Policy Director
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
> Washington, D.C. Engagement Center
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>


-- 

*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

Global Campaigns Manager | Digital Action <http://digitalaction.co>

German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander von
Humboldt Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>

Member | Coaliz?o Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  <https://igcaucus.org/>

Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
bruna.martinsantos
Email: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240411/319eff9f/attachment.htm>

From julf at Julf.com  Thu Apr 11 12:56:05 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:56:05 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning]
 Plenary session for ICANN80
In-Reply-To: <CADAEEV0SroLa+6RaMxok-A6BKF0WBu4+F2YnO9j1oTbZW2YkCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DF6EC956-1175-43F2-9858-9B535CDCF834@icann.org>
 <41d60ed2-d11b-47a6-ae3c-1554cdf7728b@Julf.com>
 <CADAEEV0SroLa+6RaMxok-A6BKF0WBu4+F2YnO9j1oTbZW2YkCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4100f229-9226-4153-b3fb-48e5a2382c91@Julf.com>

Great! You are definitely the preferred choice, but I guess it is
a PC call. My only question is if this is open to anyone we want
to assign, or if the "you" in "if you would like to be part" is
only directed to the original recipients - SO/AC leaders. We should
try in any case.
	
	Julf



On 11/04/2024 11:33, Bruna Martins dos Santos wrote:
> You can add me to the planning team, Julf! But only?if you'd like to (:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:29?AM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC 
> <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>> wrote:
> 
>     FYI.
> 
>      ? ? ? ? Julf
> 
> 
> 
>     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     Subject:? ? ? ? [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Plenary session
>     for ICANN80
>     Date:? ?Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:47:44 +0000
>     From:? ?Carlos Reyes via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>     <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>     <mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>>
>     Reply-To:? ? ? ?Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes at icann.org
>     <mailto:carlos.reyes at icann.org>>
>     To:? ? ?Nathalie Peregrine via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>     <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>     <mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>>
> 
> 
> 
>     Hello, all.
> 
>     There is a 90-minute plenary session about the WSIS+20 review process
>     scheduled for 15:30?17:00 local time in Kigali, Rwanda on Monday, 10
>     June 2024. In response to your feedback, it is time to begin the
>     community planning process.
> 
>     The first step is to convene a planning team. *Please let me know by
>     Monday, 15 April, if you would like to be part of the planning
>     team.*?The goal is to have 6 to 8 planning calls in the coming weeks.
> 
>     Building on previous plenary session experiences, my colleagues and I
>     will facilitate your planning efforts. The ICANN organization
>     Government
>     and International Governmental Organization Engagement team will also
>     provide subject matter expertise.
> 
>     We look forward to working with you.
> 
>     Best,
>     Carlos and the ICANN80 plenary session planning support team
> 
>     Carlos Reyes
> 
>     Senior Policy Director
> 
>     Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> 
>     Washington, D.C. Engagement Center
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-EC mailing list
>     NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> /*
> 
> Global Campaigns Manager | Digital Action <http://digitalaction.co>
> 
> German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander 
> von Humboldt Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
> 
> Member | Coaliz?o Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> Co-Coordinator?| Internet Governance Caucus <https://igcaucus.org/>
> 
> Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins>?// Skype: 
> bruna.martinsantos
> Email: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>


From julf at Julf.com  Thu Apr 11 15:00:36 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:00:36 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: NCSG Travel slot for ICANN80
In-Reply-To: <CALUKJaWa-AQH0VG6WrwYHDdAqOTqDt3xZXjd8hS0=txzKjzVjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALUKJaWa-AQH0VG6WrwYHDdAqOTqDt3xZXjd8hS0=txzKjzVjw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2787fac6-cfe7-4850-8598-2b2109253958@Julf.com>




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	NCSG Travel slot for ICANN80
Date: 	Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:38:52 +0300
From: 	Amin Hacha <aminhacha at gmail.com>
To: 	Johan Helsingius <00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>
CC: 	Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>



Dear Johan,
I hope this email finds you well.
I am writing to express my strong interest in attending the upcoming 
ICANN meeting and to request the NCSG travel support slot for ICANN80 
(published lately). I believe that my participation will be highly 
beneficial to the NCSG's goals, as well as to the NCUC's, and I am 
committed to actively participating and contributing to the success of 
the NCSG meetings during the ICANN80.

The Domain name policy development has become a cornerstone of my 
interest. Over the past year, I involved myself in the inner workings of 
the GNSO Council by joining the mailing list as an observer and 
following every discussion & contribution. I have insights on Privacy 
topics which I made a speech about during a previous NCUC membership 
meeting. Furthermore, I make it a priority to participate in both 
in-person and virtual NCSG Policy Committee meetings, consistently 
revisiting the records to ensure I absorb every new knowledge. The 
intricate nuances of Policy Development Processes (PDPs) are a focal 
point of my reach to learn, which I care to attendance and engagement at 
ICANN meetings and forums. In addition to my participation on several 
topics and occasions. And, I keep learning.

  ?Moreover, if I am accepted, I will be fully committed to representing 
the interests of the NCSG at the upcoming ICANN 80 policy meeting. I 
confirm that I will present after meetings, a professional valuable 
report and blog to be published where NCSG finds it necessary.

My physical presence is essential as it allows me to engage directly 
with participants, and build knowledge. By being present at the meeting, 
I aim to advance the NCSG's interests by actively participating in 
working groups, facilitating discussions, and collaborating to develop 
effective policy recommendations.

Thank you for considering my application. If accepted, I am committed to 
fulfilling the responsibilities outlined above and am eager to make 
meaningful contributions to the success of the upcoming meeting.
I am at your disposal for any questions.
Respectfully,
Amin Hacha


From julf at Julf.com  Thu Apr 11 20:57:47 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:57:47 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Motivation Statement for NCSG-Travel slot for
 ICANN80 by Remmy Nweke
In-Reply-To: <CAMc__orh60v4NuGXyAFezeLa_JUvNYh2S8bjgiBjGSzeCiAXaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMc__orh60v4NuGXyAFezeLa_JUvNYh2S8bjgiBjGSzeCiAXaA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f9d258bf-831f-49af-b469-054be5566a9c@Julf.com>




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Motivation Statement for NCSG-Travel slot for ICANN80 by Remmy 
Nweke
Date: 	Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:52:00 +0100
From: 	Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com>
To: 	Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
CC: 	Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>



Hi Johan and Andrea
Hope this meets you well
Kindly find attached my Motivation Statement for the slot on ICANN80 
travel support, slated for June 2024 in Kigali, Rwanda, Africa.

Thanks in anticipation for your kind consideration.

___________________
REMMY NWEKE, /mNUJ,?mNGE, mGOCOP/
Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
*ITREALMS?Media*?group [/Multiple-award winning medium/]
(ITREALMS <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, DigitalSENSE Business Magazine 
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; NaijaAgroNet 
<http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>)
No. 36 Afariogun Street, Oshodi-Lagos
M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, T: @ITRealms
<http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
@DigitalSENSEng
2023 *Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D*, Thursday June 8 
<https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
2023 *ITREALMS*?e-Waste Dialogue, Thursday December 7 
<https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
@Welcome Center Hotels, Int'l Airport Road, Lagos-Nigeria 
<http://welcomecentrehotels.com/>
Former Vice President, African Civil Society on Information Society (ACSIS)
______________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Motivation Statement - NCSG Travel Slot for ICANN80 by Remmy Nweke.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 37213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240411/1cc23622/attachment.pdf>

From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca  Fri Apr 12 03:28:54 2024
From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:28:54 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Apologies for cancelling the trip to Kigali
Message-ID: <1D0D56ED-C69C-4123-8E43-531726B7CB56@mail.utoronto.ca>

I am sorry that I am unable to attend the ICANN meeting at Kigali.  I have gone back to work nearly full-time, and I just cannot take this week off to travel to Rwanda.  

For what it is worth, I think we should give the travel slot to Kathy, who has worked tirelessly on subpro, and has also been mentoring new recruits.  This is something that should be rewarded, in my view.  I also think that we should make sure we get our money?s worth out of the travel slot?.I see that Arsene has applied, but since he does not have to travel very far, it would in my opinion be better to take someone from overseas.

Kind regards, 
Stephanie

From wisdom.dk at gmail.com  Fri Apr 12 08:59:06 2024
From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 05:59:06 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Apologies for cancelling the trip to Kigali
In-Reply-To: <1D0D56ED-C69C-4123-8E43-531726B7CB56@mail.utoronto.ca>
References: <1D0D56ED-C69C-4123-8E43-531726B7CB56@mail.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <CAAU+vPHKkF_UfyCMfuqtdpa6ynbDMUvjtuDoA_Fyvp_4czfL3A@mail.gmail.com>

+1 Stephanie

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, 12:29?am Stephanie Perrin, <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I am sorry that I am unable to attend the ICANN meeting at Kigali.  I have
> gone back to work nearly full-time, and I just cannot take this week off to
> travel to Rwanda.
>
> For what it is worth, I think we should give the travel slot to Kathy, who
> has worked tirelessly on subpro, and has also been mentoring new recruits.
> This is something that should be rewarded, in my view.  I also think that
> we should make sure we get our money?s worth out of the travel slot?.I see
> that Arsene has applied, but since he does not have to travel very far, it
> would in my opinion be better to take someone from overseas.
>
> Kind regards,
> Stephanie
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240412/2516e15e/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Sun Apr 14 23:32:50 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:32:50 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Proposed Agenda | GNSO Council Meeting |
 Thursday, 18 April 2024
In-Reply-To: <AAA382A6-7F4C-4B8B-8464-875181407CB9@icann.org>
References: <AAA382A6-7F4C-4B8B-8464-875181407CB9@icann.org>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeV-H0p02wq-xok_TRLQR8+Q6DhUVMA-oQQ9ZW+WD+kmKg@mail.gmail.com>

Here below is next week's council meeting agenda for your information.

Warmly,
Tomslin



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Terri Agnew via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 02:35
Subject: [council] Proposed Agenda | GNSO Council Meeting | Thursday, 18
April 2024
To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>,
liaison6c at gnso.icann.org <liaison6c at gnso.icann.org>
Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>


Dear all,



Please find below the final proposed agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting
taking place on Thursday, 18 April 2024 at 21:00 UTC for 2 hours This has
been posted on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/_oAvEQ>.



Thank you.



Kind regards,



Terri

Policy Team Supporting the GNSO



*Draft GNSO Council Agenda:*



Please note that all documents referenced in the agenda have been gathered
on a Wiki page for convenience and easier access:
https://community.icann.org/x/A4DyEg.



This agenda was established according to the GNSO Operating Procedures
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/op-procedures-15mar23-en.pdf>
v3.5, updated on 15 March 2023.

For convenience:

   - An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is
   provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
   - An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
   voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.



GNSO Council meeting on Thursday, 18 April 2024 at 21:00 UTC:
https://tinyurl.com/2xcnuymd



14:00 Los Angeles; 17:00 Washington DC; 22:00 London; 23:00 Paris; 00:00
Moscow (Friday); 07:00 Melbourne (Friday)



*GNSO Council Meeting Remote Participation:*
*https://icann.zoom.us/j/92283565389?pwd=QnlHK1JSbzdiSFFZSjRjamxMTkNGdz09*
<https://icann.zoom.us/j/92283565389?pwd=QnlHK1JSbzdiSFFZSjRjamxMTkNGdz09>

Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if they will not
be able to attend and/or need a dial out call.

___________________________________

*Item 1: Administrative Matters (5 minutes)*

1.1 - Roll Call

1.2 - Updates to Statements of Interest

1.3 - Review / Amend Agenda

1.4 - Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meetings per the
GNSO Operating Procedures:

Minutes
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2024/minutes/minutes-gnso-council-15feb23-en.pdf>
of the GNSO Council Meeting on 15 February 2024 were posted on  02 March
2024

Minutes
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2024/minutes/minutes-gnso-council-06mar24-en.pdf>
of the GNSO Council Meeting on 06 March 2024 were posted on 23 March 2024.



*Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (0 minutes)*

2.1 - Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes /
topics, to include review of Projects List
<https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project> and Action Item List.
<https://community.icann.org/x/RgZlAg>



*Item 3: Consent Agenda (5 minutes)*

   - GNSO Council Review of the GAC Communiqu?
   <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2024/correspondence/dibiase-to-sinha-04apr24-en.pdf>
   - GNSO Council Small Team Guidance Document
   <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2024/draft/updated-small-team-guidelines-05apr24.pdf>
   - Confirmation of Standing Predictability Implementation Review Team
   (SPIRT) Charter Drafting Team Leadership (Chair - Nitan Walia; Vice-chair -
   Alan Greenberg; GNSO Council liaison - Anne Aikman-Scalese)

*Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Deferral of Policy Status Report Request -
Expiration Policies (10 minutes)*

The GNSO Council previously considered when to request a Policy Status
Report (?PSR?) for the purpose of conducting a review of the two Expiration
Policies, the Expired Domain Name Deletion Policy (?EDDP?) and the Expired
Registration Recovery Policy (?ERRP?). In November 2020, given concerns
about its capacity and no known issues with the policies, the Council
agreed to delay the request for the Policy Status Report (PSR) for a period
of 24 months. After 24 months had passed, the Council reconsidered whether
it was an appropriate time to request a Policy Status Report.

To that end, in July 2022, the Council agreed that it would be helpful to
consult with both registrars and ICANN org to help determine if there are
any known issues or concerns with either of the two Expiration Policies
which could warrant requesting a PSR.

In making its decision whether to request to a PSR at this time, the
Council consulted:



   1. Registrars, who were asked to flag substantial issues with the
   policies that would warrant a near team request for policy status report
   and did not note any issues
   2. ICANN Compliance, who provided a write-up
   <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2022-November/026164.html>, noting
   confusion with key terms in the policy and persistent registrant confusion
   with the auto-renew grace period and aftermarket activities, et.al.
   3. ICANN org Registrant Program, which provided a catalog of the
   available educational resources on domain name expiration and renewal
   (Brian Gutterman?s update at Council)

In reviewing these materials, the Council determined that the EDDP and ERRP
seem to have been implemented as intended and imminent policy work is not
needed at this time. Accordingly, the GNSO Council will reconsider a PSR on
the Expiration Policies in five years time, or earlier, if requested.

Here, the Council will vote to consider a PSR on the Expiration Policies in
five years.

4.1 - Presentation of motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+2024-04-18>
(Greg DiBiase, Chair)

4.2 - Council Discussion

4.3 - Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority)



*Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Diacritics in Latin Script (20 minutes)*

Several parties raised an issue to the GNSO Council?s attention with regard
to the challenge affecting future applied-for strings in the Latin script
containing diacritics that may be confusingly similar to ASCII strings, and
are non-variants.

For background, an applied-for IDN gTLD string in the Latin script
containing diacritics, which is NOT an allocatable variant label of the
base ASCII string (existing or applied-for) according to RZ-LGR, are
sometimes seen as equivalents. In some instances however, the base ASCII
string is seen as a workaround and not necessarily ?correct?. The base
ASCII string and the Latin diacritic string  may be determined to be
confusingly similar (i.e., in which case, the strings would be placed in a
contention set or if an existing gTLD is involved, the applied-for label
would not pass the String Similarity Review).

During the GNSO Council Meeting at ICANN78 in Hamburg on 25 October 2023
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/minutes/minutes-gnso-council-part1-25oct23-en.pdf>,
the GNSO Council received a detailed briefing on this issue and agreed to
request a study from ICANN org to help inform the GNSO Council on the issue
of diacritics in Latin Script. Prior to the request being made to ICANN
org, the org volunteered to investigate what mechanism or mechanisms might
be appropriate to address this issue.



Here, the Council will receive an update from ICANN org on the status of
the research and analysis.

5.1 - Introduction of Topic (Greg DiBiase, GNSO Chair)

5.2 - Council Discussion

5.3 - Next Steps



*Item 6: COUNCIL VOTE - SubPro Supplemental Recommendations (20 minutes)*

In March 2023, the ICANN Board approved the majority of the recommendations
contained in the Final Report on the new gTLD Subsequent PDP, but also
placed some recommendations into a pending status. The Council convened a
small team that worked collaboratively with the ICANN Board to resolve all
pending recommendations. While the majority of the pending recommendations
were able to be adopted by the ICANN Board, recommendations across six
Topics were non adopted by the ICANN Board.

With the primary task of addressing the pending recommendations now
complete, the Council tasked the Small Team Plus with an updated assignment
form
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yDgWIwKZqKk0WY0q7CS2pf7aD4VupCWV/edit>.
The Small Team Plus has committed to a work plan
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IhxKi0dvkS-a3ot7w8YG0iFxw4LiZuLz/edit> to
address the recommendations not adopted by the Board. Following that plan,
the Small Team agreed to Supplemental Recommendations
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2024/agenda/new-gtld-subpro-supplemental-recommendations-2apr24-en.pdf>
on five of the six Topics, e.g., Registry Voluntary Commitments / Public
Interest Commitments, Applicant Support, Terms and Conditions, String
Similarity Evaluations, and Limited Challenge/Appeal Mechanisms. Based on
the expected implementation as it relates to the Continued Operations
Instrument (COI), the Small Team Plus determined it was unnecessary to
develop a Supplemental Recommendation for Topic 22: Registrant Protections.
On 1 April, an ?Explainer? document
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2024/agenda/new-gtld-subpro-supplemental-recommendations-2apr24-en.pdf>was
shared with the Council that consolidates all of the Supplemental
Recommendations and provides a brief explanation for each of them.



Here, the Council will vote on the SubPro Supplemental Recommendations
developed by the Small Team Plus.

6.1 - Presentation of motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+2024-04-18>
(Paul McGrady, Small Team Plus Lead)

6.2 - Council Discussion

6.3 - Council vote (voting threshold: GNSO Supermajority in order to
trigger the threshold that ?the Board shall adopt the recommendation unless
more than two-thirds (2/3) of the Board determines that such policy is not
in the interests of the ICANN community or ICANN.?)



*Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community
Working Group - Auction Proceeds (CCWG-AP) - Proposed Update to
Recommendation 7 (20 minutes) *



The CCWG-AP?s Recommendation 7 sets out limitations on the use of ICANN
accountability mechanisms (namely, the Independent Review Process, IRP, and
Reconsideration process) to challenge decisions made on individual
applications within the Grant Program. The CCWG-AP offered this
recommendation to minimize use of the proceeds for purposes other than
grants, such as administrative costs or legal fees. The Board has noted it
continues to support the CCWG-AP?s goal in making this recommendation.



Recommendation 7 currently provides, ?Existing ICANN accountability
mechanisms such as IRP or other appeal mechanisms cannot be used to
challenge a decision *from the Independent Project Applications Evaluation
Panel *to approve or not approve an application. Applicants not selected
should receive further details about where information can be found about
the next round of applications as well as any educational materials that
may be available to assist applicants. The CCWG recognizes that there will
need to be an amendment to the Fundamental Bylaws to eliminate the
opportunity to use the Request for Reconsideration and Independent Review
Panel to challenge grant decisions.? (emphasis added)



In its 2 March 2024 letter, the Board notes it ?has been considering
whether there are further ways to meet the community?s broader intention
with Recommendation 7. If the phrase ?from the Independent Project
Applications Panel? is removed from Recommendation 7, many of the Board?s
concerns that supported the October 2023 action would be addressed. The
Board also notes that removal of that phrase would support what it has
always understood to be the intention of the CCWG-AP in making
Recommendation 7 - to preserve the auction proceeds for funding projects,
not challenges. Therefore, the Board asks for the Chartering Organizations?
support in considering an update to the recommendation. Specifically, the
Board asks for each Chartering Organization to the CCWG-AP to approve an
update to Recommendation 7 that would remove the phrase ?*from the
Independent Project Applications Evaluation Panel*? from the text of the
recommendation. If the Chartering Organizations approve this update, the
Board believes that there is a path to full implementation of the CCWG-AP?s
Recommendation 7, including the ability to apply the restriction to third
parties.?



The Board is asking for feedback by 17 May 2024. It may be helpful to
consider this requested amendment to Recommendation 7 separately from
the public
comment
<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-bylaws-updates-to-limit-access-to-accountability-mechanisms-27-02-2024>
on the Proposed Bylaws Updates to Limit Access to Accountability Mechanisms.



Here, the Council will discuss the proposed update to CCWG-AP
Recommendation 7.

7.1 - Introduction of Topic (Greg DiBiase, GNSO Chair)

7.2 - Council Discussion

7.3 - Next Steps



*Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Review of Action Decision Radar (15 minutes)*

During the GNSO Council?s most recent strategic planning session, the
Council discussed the topic of how to be an effective manager of the GNSO?s
Policy Development Process (PDP). In recognition of the importance of
regularly reviewing the Council?s portfolio of work, the Council agreed to
the following action item, ?During a session at ICANN79, Council to prepare
for a careful review of the work captured in the Program Management Tool
(PMT) that will conclude or initiate prior to the next AGM, or continue
beyond the next AGM[.]?

The Council conducted this inaugural review of the Projects List
during its Working
Session at ICANN79
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/GNSO+Council+Working+Session+1+of+3+-+ICANN79>
on Sunday, 3 March 2024. The review also intended to include an overview of
the Action Decision Radar
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Decision+Radar>
(?ADR?); however, due to timing constraints, the Council agreed to review
the ADR at an upcoming Council meeting.

The ADR is a tool designed to assist the Council by highlighting imminent
decisions or actions that need to be taken by the GNSO Council. The ADR
contains a series of range markers, e.g., 0-1 month, 1-3 months, etc., to
alert the Council to the timing of the upcoming action or decision.



Here, the Council will review the contents of the ADR and discuss next
steps.

8.1 - Introduction of Topic (Greg DiBiase, GNSO Chair)

8.2 - Council Discussion

8.3 - Next Steps



*Item 9: Update on Status of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation
Implementation (15 minutes)*



The Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP achieved full
consensus on its recommendations and delivered its Final Report
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/filefield_48305/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf>
on 8 December 2015, with subsequent Council adoption
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201601> of the Final Report
on 21 January 2016. On 9 August 2016, the ICANN Board adopted
<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-08-09-en#2.e>
all recommendations of the PPSAI PDP, directing ICANN org to begin
implementation. After some initial preparatory work, the Implementation
Review Team (IRT) first met on 18 October 2016.



Subsequently, as a result of potential conflicts and/or overlap of work
between the PPSAI IRT and GDPR-related work, especially the EPDP on the
Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data, ICANN org, in its
letter to the GNSO Council, proposed to delay the implementation of PPSAI
until the EPDP completes.



In its 4 March 2019 letter
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/namazi-to-drazek-et-al-04mar19-en.pdf>
to GNSO Council leadership, ICANN org posed the following question to the
GNSO Council, ?whether ICANN org should continue to delay public comment
and implementation of PPSAI or take additional steps pending completion of
the EPDP in consultation with the PPSAI Implementation Review Team (IRT).?
GNSO Council Leadership responded, ?given the divergent views among
Councilors and considering the respective roles of ICANN Org in leading
implementation work of consensus policy recommendations and the PPSAI IRT
in overseeing the implementation work, the GNSO Council considers it
appropriate to defer the decision on this issue to ICANN org and the PPSAI
IRT, taking into account the various views of the SOs and ACs.?



On 2 March 2021, ICANN org delivered the Wave 1.5 Report
<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2021-March/024506.html> to the GNSO
Council, which included a detailed analysis of the extent to which the EPDP
Phase 1 recommendations may require modification to the PPSAI and
Translation & Transliteration policies, which are in the policy
implementation phase. Following review of the Wave 1.5 Report, the Council
observed the following in its 1 July 2021 letter
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/fouquart-to-lentz-01jul21-en.pdf>
:




   - The decision to pause the implementation of the PPSAI and Translation
   & Transliteration policy recommendations was a decision that was made by
   ICANN org, not the GNSO Council. As such, the Council is of the view that a
   decision to restart the implementation activities is not within the remit
   of the GNSO Council but for ICANN org to make. The Council would also like
   to point to its letter of February 2019 in which it also concluded that
   ?considering the respective roles of ICANN Org in leading implementation
   work of consensus policy recommendations and the PPSAI IRT in overseeing
   the implementation work, the GNSO Council considers it appropriate to defer
   the decision on this issue to ICANN org and the PPSAI IRT, taking into
   account the various views of the SOs and ACs?.
   - Should any policy issues arise during the implementation of these
   policy recommendations, there are processes and procedures that allow the
   Council to further consider these, but the Council is of the view that the
   respective Implementation Review Teams (IRTs) will be best placed to
   identify such possible issues.
   - The Council would also like to point to the letter
   <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/namazi-to-drazek-et-al-05sep19-en.pdf>
   that was sent to the Council in September 2019 in which it was noted that
   ?following the completion of relevant EPDP work, ICANN org will reassess
   the existing draft PP materials in consultation with the PPSAI IRT and
   determine how to proceed with implementation of the Privacy and Proxy
   Services Accreditation Program?. From a Council?s perspective this still
   seems a relevant and timely next step.



During its wrap-up session at ICANN79
<https://icann79.sched.com/event/1a1Cl/gnso-council-wrap-up>, the GNSO
Council appointed two liaisons, Paul McGrady and Stephanie Perrin, to serve
as GNSO Council liaisons to the PPSAI IRT.



Here, the Council will receive an update on the recent meeting.

9.1 - Introduction of Topic (Greg DiBiase, GNSO Chair)

9.2 - Council Discussion

9.3 - Next Steps



*Item 10: Any Other Business (10 minutes)*

10.1 - Update on ICANN80 planning and GNSO Draft schedule
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2024/draft/icann80-gnso-draft-schedule-04apr24-en.pdf>

10.2 - Replacement of Council representative to the Continuous Improvement
Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)

10.3 - Upcoming Sessions/Updates on the Registration Data Request System
(RDRS)

 _______________________________

Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article 11,
Section 11.3(i))

See https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article11.

Appendix 2: GNSO Council Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating
Procedures, Section 4.4)

See
https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/op-procedures-15mar23-en.pdf




*References for Coordinated Universal Time of 21:00 UTC*

Local time between March and November in the NORTHERN hemisphere

See https://www.timeanddate.com/time/change/ for Dates for Daylight Saving
Time and Clock Changes

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

California, USA (PDT) UTC-7  14:00

San Jos?, Costa Rica (CST) UTC-6  15:00

New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-4  17:00

Buenos Aires, Argentina (ART) UTC-3  18:00

Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (WAT) UTC+1 22:00

Paris, France (CEST) UTC+2  23:00

Moscow, Russia (MSK) UTC+3  00:00 (Friday)

Singapore (SGT) UTC+8   05:00 (Friday)

Melbourne, Australia (AEST) UTC+10 07:00 (Friday)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com and
https://tinyurl.com/2xcnuymd








_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240415/6cbc9650/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Mon Apr 15 01:04:40 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:04:40 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Time Sensitive] Update on Mechanism(s) to Address Latin
 Diacritics and Question
In-Reply-To: <4EC64683-C439-4A25-853B-AECE350C9F1B@icann.org>
References: <4EC64683-C439-4A25-853B-AECE350C9F1B@icann.org>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeVUz8xUP3PEeyGekUdjBVh9P4pUnGxzJknubZHg2krNag@mail.gmail.com>

Hi NCSG,

Below is an important matter that needs your input and guidance. This is
related to diacritics, which I believe @Tapani Tarvainen
<ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> and @Stephanie Perrin
<stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> have opinions about. But there is an
additional procedural issue surrounding how the diacritics issue is
potentially resolved that needs our attention.

For a brief background for those who've not followed the diacritics issue,
an applied-for IDN gTLD string in the Latin script containing diacritics
(e.g .Qu?bec versus .Quebec), which is NOT an allocatable variant label of
the base ASCII string (existing or applied-for) according to RZ-LGR, are
sometimes seen as equivalents. In some instances however, the base ASCII
string is seen as a workaround and not necessarily ?correct?. The base
ASCII string and the Latin diacritic string  may be determined to be
confusingly similar (i.e., in which case, the strings would be placed in a
contention set or if an existing gTLD is involved, the applied-for label
would not pass the String Similarity Review and therefore be rejected - the
case of .Quebec).

As you may also be aware, the Council Small Team Plus has been working to
address some SubPro recommendations not adopted by the Board and one of
them is Recommendation 24 - which relates to string similarity singular and
plurals and this is up for council vote on April 18.

ICANN staff is suggesting that the Council delays that vote and modify that
recommendation to allow the same entity to apply for (and obtain) a
visually similar string if the similarity is diacritic base (case of Qu?bec
and .Quebe).  What this means is that if the council accepts this approach,
it may need to task the current Small Team + on SubPro to study this
diacritic issue and propose a recommendation on diacritics as part of
Recommendation 24.

My question to you is:

   1. Should our councillors vote to allow SubPro Rec 24 to be used to
   address the diacritics issue?
   2. Should the Small team Plus be tasked with this additional work of
   developing a proposed supplemental recommendation that addresses the
   diacritics issue?


Warmly,
Tomslin



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Steve Chan via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 07:15
Subject: [council] Interim Update on Mechanism(s) to Address Latin
Diacritics
To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>


Dear Councilors,



As you may have seen, the April Council meeting is scheduled to have an
update on the research and analysis ICANN org has performed to understand
the mechanism(s) that might be available to progress the work related to
Latin diacritics. While we will provide a more comprehensive update during
the Council meeting, we wanted to share an early preview of the update, as
it may have implications on the Council?s vote on a subset of the SubPro
Supplemental Recommendations. In brief, our recommended approach is for the
Council to consider modifying/amending the non-adopted recommendations
related to string similarity (i.e., Recommendations 24.3 and 24.5) if it
wants to take up the issue of Latin diacritics. Under the ICANN Bylaws and
GNSO Operating Procedures, there are two avenues to pursue this path, which
are either Section 16 of the PDP Manual
<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/annex-2-pdp-manual-15mar23-en_0.pdf#page=10>
 (see page 10) or the Supplemental Recommendation process, as employed by
the Small Team Plus.



With the Council?s consideration and potential adoption of Supplemental
Recommendations 24.3A, 24.3B, and 24.3C during its April meeting, there may
be challenges to using either Section 16 or the Supplemental Recommendation
process to progress the Latin diacritics issues:

   1. Section 16: The PDP Manual states that, ?approved GNSO Council
   policies may be modified or amended by the GNSO Council at any time prior
   to the final approval by the ICANN Board??. If the Council approves
   Supplemental Recommendations 24.3A, 24.3B, and 24.3C AND they are adopted
   by the ICANN Board, this option would no longer be available (i.e., ?final
   approval? will have occurred).
   2. Supplemental Recommendations: If the Council approves Supplemental
   Recommendations 24.3A, 24.3B, and 24.3C, the Council would not be able to
   develop further Supplemental Recommendations related to Latin diacritics.



We understand the Council has committed to taking action on the
Supplemental Recommendations during its April meeting, so we believe it is
important to provide you with this information in advance of your meeting
for effective planning and decision-making. Please let us know if you have
any questions.



Best,

Steve





*Steven Chan*

VP, Policy Development Support & GNSO Relations



Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300

Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536



Email: steve.chan at icann.org

Skype: steve.chan55

Mobile: +1.310.339.4410



Find out more about the GNSO by visiting: https://learn.icann.org/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__learn.icann.org_&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=jLNFXvpu9gNdUeHi-G6sjWNCF9w4_AwhzzUDFZy2elE&s=o7Auz997kA-HPv9PHJCjFVZw7Pgo8krw4MxfqCwBrIU&e=>

Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANN-5FGNSO&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=jLNFXvpu9gNdUeHi-G6sjWNCF9w4_AwhzzUDFZy2elE&s=kWw4fQPNjw2lVKy1UjTxS2F0BmjEAzaDFWNmsYywbmE&e=>

Transcripts and recordings of GNSO Working Group and Council events are
located on the GNSO Master Calendar
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group-2Dactivities_calendar&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=jLNFXvpu9gNdUeHi-G6sjWNCF9w4_AwhzzUDFZy2elE&s=-L6chFfv0OperrXHHpTF722WnH3FZIutn4cS16IvpOg&e=>
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240415/0a2f904b/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Mon Apr 15 01:31:42 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:31:42 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <CAGKde+3E7-TYO7DMXX1pVqNqL9XXR+KooC0gdnr9sKkq4oKq=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25db56be-e685-4a76-b6d6-78404b3e4b3f@KathyKleiman.com>
 <CAGSP6RQk6k3P2MTwHcrpkno7fkoru8nP+xFAYPT-VRYmUqYg3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGKde+3E7-TYO7DMXX1pVqNqL9XXR+KooC0gdnr9sKkq4oKq=A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeURZ4vSF0c9Sn75nAaWjeLfVnTUfU8hzFqbzBDOM0fxcg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi star team,

We are only one week out to deadline, how are we going with the draft @Bolutife
Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> ?


Warmly,
Tomslin



On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:15, Emmanuel Vitus <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
> @Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>
>
> On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana <
> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you again) after
>> April 16th, if it would still be useful. Particularly, if Adisa can direct
>> me to a certain section or a certain task that could be particularly
>> helpful to his work, that'd work perfectly.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
>> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
>> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
>> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
>> mistake, please reply informing it.
>>
>>
>> Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman <
>> Kathy at kathykleiman.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks to Bolutife,
>>> Emmanuel) and have another one coming up:
>>> *Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD
>>> Program
>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>>> *
>>>
>>> This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they right and are they
>>> understandable?
>>>
>>> *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have already worked
>>> on.  Would you like to start the comments here?  Is there a draft or
>>> outline you would like to share?  *
>>>
>>> Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>>
>>> This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert in the
>>> upcoming New gTLD process!
>>>
>>> Best, Kathy
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240415/a6cc86e0/attachment.htm>

From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com  Mon Apr 15 11:38:57 2024
From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:38:57 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <CAM8DdeURZ4vSF0c9Sn75nAaWjeLfVnTUfU8hzFqbzBDOM0fxcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM8DdeURZ4vSF0c9Sn75nAaWjeLfVnTUfU8hzFqbzBDOM0fxcg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <E5C7111D-2540-4B64-8FE7-FAFE49510499@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240415/a8aefd9e/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Wed Apr 17 14:20:45 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:20:45 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <E5C7111D-2540-4B64-8FE7-FAFE49510499@gmail.com>
References: <CAM8DdeURZ4vSF0c9Sn75nAaWjeLfVnTUfU8hzFqbzBDOM0fxcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <E5C7111D-2540-4B64-8FE7-FAFE49510499@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeV39nEUwPFnC=KhmcJmcw0EoZ8tk-C03ovTjj2j2uePJw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Bolu,

Sorry to hear you were sick. I am glad to hear you are well now.




On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 18:39, Bolutife Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com>
wrote:

> My apologies to everyone, I?ve been on sick leave for a week now. I am
> better now and I will work on delivering the first draft today.
>
> Best,
> Bolu.
>
> On 15. Apr 2024, at 00:31, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> ?
> Hi star team,
>
> We are only one week out to deadline, how are we going with the draft @Bolutife
> Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> ?
>
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:15, Emmanuel Vitus <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
>> @Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>>
>> On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana <
>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you again) after
>>> April 16th, if it would still be useful. Particularly, if Adisa can direct
>>> me to a certain section or a certain task that could be particularly
>>> helpful to his work, that'd work perfectly.
>>>
>>> Cordially,
>>>
>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
>>> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
>>> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
>>> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman <
>>> Kathy at kathykleiman.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks to Bolutife,
>>>> Emmanuel) and have another one coming up:
>>>> *Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New
>>>> gTLD Program
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they right and are they
>>>> understandable?
>>>>
>>>> *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have already worked
>>>> on.  Would you like to start the comments here?  Is there a draft or
>>>> outline you would like to share?  *
>>>>
>>>> Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>>>
>>>> This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert in the
>>>> upcoming New gTLD process!
>>>>
>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240417/cd917610/attachment.htm>

From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com  Thu Apr 18 22:20:52 2024
From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:20:52 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <CAM8DdeURZ4vSF0c9Sn75nAaWjeLfVnTUfU8hzFqbzBDOM0fxcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM8DdeURZ4vSF0c9Sn75nAaWjeLfVnTUfU8hzFqbzBDOM0fxcg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9A9612DF-C6B0-45D8-9B92-D36B517EB1FC@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240418/5d4dbd09/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AHkbwyIv_r5XEFJIp03L-RETEbClnXQJRUgVWCK59WK9exi97ZTDyfGQ2E5DmLy_cpKqyUf0RmzJIa-vKBN3PNQ5cuZsiOyj2oLKIXLOxD877z7SytLgJ9bC=w1200-h630-p.png
Type: image/png
Size: 326975 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240418/5d4dbd09/attachment.png>

From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com  Fri Apr 19 00:06:46 2024
From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 17:06:46 -0400
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <9A9612DF-C6B0-45D8-9B92-D36B517EB1FC@gmail.com>
References: <CAM8DdeURZ4vSF0c9Sn75nAaWjeLfVnTUfU8hzFqbzBDOM0fxcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9A9612DF-C6B0-45D8-9B92-D36B517EB1FC@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1ad8b412-a387-4af7-82a7-b15bb276d091@KathyKleiman.com>

Tx you, Bolu!? Is this posted in a Google doc for? us to work with?

On 4/18/2024 3:20 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> Here is my initial draft - open for your edits and comments.
> AHkbwyIv_r5XEFJIp03L-RETEbClnXQJRUgVWCK59WK9exi97ZTDyfGQ2E5DmLy_cpKqyUf0RmzJIa-vKBN3PNQ5cuZsiOyj2oLKIXLOxD877z7SytLgJ9bC=w1200-h630-p.png 
>
> RSP public comment 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
> docs.google.com 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>
> I will ensure to collate all comments right after to enable us get our 
> submission in before deadline.
>
> Best regards,
> Bolu.
>
>> On 15. Apr 2024, at 00:31, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>> Hi star team,
>>
>> We are only one week out to deadline, how are we going with the draft 
>> @Bolutife Adisa <mailto:adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> ?
>>
>>
>> Warmly,
>> Tomslin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:15, Emmanuel Vitus 
>> <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
>>     @Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.
>>
>>     Kind regards
>>
>>     Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>>
>>     On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana
>>     <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi everyone,
>>
>>         I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you
>>         again) after April 16th, if it would still be useful.
>>         Particularly, if Adisa can direct me to a certain section or
>>         a certain task that could be particularly helpful to his
>>         work, that'd work perfectly.
>>
>>         Cordially,
>>
>>         *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
>>         Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
>>         <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
>>         PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>         Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>,
>>         ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>>         This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If
>>         received by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>
>>
>>         Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman
>>         <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> escreveu:
>>
>>             Hi All,
>>
>>             We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks
>>             to Bolutife, Emmanuel) and have another one coming up:
>>             *Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
>>             Handbook - New gTLD Program
>>             <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>>             *
>>
>>             This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they
>>             right and are they understandable?
>>
>>             *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have
>>             already worked on. Would you like to start the comments
>>             here?? Is there a draft or outline you would like to share? *
>>
>>             Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>
>>             This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert
>>             in the upcoming New gTLD process!
>>
>>             Best, Kathy
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240418/d3a8a287/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AHkbwyIv_r5XEFJIp03L-RETEbClnXQJRUgVWCK59WK9exi97ZTDyfGQ2E5DmLy_cpKqyUf0RmzJIa-vKBN3PNQ5cuZsiOyj2oLKIXLOxD877z7SytLgJ9bC=w1200-h630-p.png
Type: image/png
Size: 326975 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240418/d3a8a287/attachment.png>

From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com  Fri Apr 19 00:11:36 2024
From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:11:36 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <1ad8b412-a387-4af7-82a7-b15bb276d091@KathyKleiman.com>
References: <1ad8b412-a387-4af7-82a7-b15bb276d091@KathyKleiman.com>
Message-ID: <0FD6A841-568F-4A0E-A5B6-3C410B788EF0@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240418/2a5fd06a/attachment.htm>

From julf at Julf.com  Fri Apr 19 18:28:50 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:28:50 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Second rep on RDRS
Message-ID: <7f0d69d3-53f5-451f-b58b-aa0cb003e3ec@Julf.com>

I propose we appoint Farzaneh as a second rep in the RDRS
group along with Stephanie. Other constituencies have
multiple reps...

	Julf



From jumaropi at yahoo.com  Sat Apr 20 20:34:06 2024
From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Second rep on RDRS
In-Reply-To: <7f0d69d3-53f5-451f-b58b-aa0cb003e3ec@Julf.com>
References: <7f0d69d3-53f5-451f-b58b-aa0cb003e3ec@Julf.com>
Message-ID: <662695931.903226.1713634446530@mail.yahoo.com>

Hi all, 
I second Julf's idea. I think Farzaneh would be good if she accepts. 
Best Regards, 

JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P.
Director - MINKA DIGITAL ColombiaNPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO
MSc. Information Technology
Registered Linux User No.533108.
http://www.jmanurojas.com 

Cel. +57 301 743 56 00
Instagram/Twitter:?@JmanuRojas

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------




? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 

    El viernes, 19 de abril de 2024, 10:28:58 a.?m. GMT-5, Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> escribi?:  
 
 I propose we appoint Farzaneh as a second rep in the RDRS
group along with Stephanie. Other constituencies have
multiple reps...

??? Julf

_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240420/c376c10e/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Sun Apr 21 00:25:05 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 07:25:05 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Second rep on RDRS
In-Reply-To: <7f0d69d3-53f5-451f-b58b-aa0cb003e3ec@Julf.com>
References: <7f0d69d3-53f5-451f-b58b-aa0cb003e3ec@Julf.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeUt6aPQXYym5EJ5wfoTAuQMi07p=Nrz2dXF-ZDhMMSz2A@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for bringing this up, Julf. I support appointing Farzi as a second
rep to RDRS to allow us effectively follow the work there.

Warmly,
Tomslin

On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, 01:28 Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC, <
ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:

> I propose we appoint Farzaneh as a second rep in the RDRS
> group along with Stephanie. Other constituencies have
> multiple reps...
>
>         Julf
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240421/d6f2aadb/attachment.htm>

From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com  Mon Apr 22 16:01:01 2024
From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:01:01 -0400
Subject: [NCSG-PC] DUE TODAY Re: Review of the Draft Registry Service
 Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program - DUE TODAY
In-Reply-To: <0FD6A841-568F-4A0E-A5B6-3C410B788EF0@gmail.com>
References: <1ad8b412-a387-4af7-82a7-b15bb276d091@KathyKleiman.com>
 <0FD6A841-568F-4A0E-A5B6-3C410B788EF0@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <26458f6c-5d8b-4f24-b37d-3f74f10e6a26@KathyKleiman.com>

Hi Bolu,

Nice job!? I have followed Pedro in adding some comments and edits - 
mostly for readable and flow.? Tx to you both and Emmanuel!!

*To Tomslin and PC, I believe this comment is due _today._ Once the 
edits are incorporated, this is ready for submission!*

*Best, Kathy
*

On 4/18/2024 5:11 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
> Hi Kathy,
>
> Yes, if you click on it, it links to the google doc.
>
> Best,
> Bolu.
>
>> On 18. Apr 2024, at 23:06, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Tx you, Bolu!? Is this posted in a Google doc for? us to work with?
>>
>> On 4/18/2024 3:20 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
>>> Hello team,
>>>
>>> Here is my initial draft - open for your edits and comments.
>>> <AHkbwyIv_r5XEFJIp03L-RETEbClnXQJRUgVWCK59WK9exi97ZTDyfGQ2E5DmLy_cpKqyUf0RmzJIa-vKBN3PNQ5cuZsiOyj2oLKIXLOxD877z7SytLgJ9bC=w1200-h630-p.png>
>>> RSP public comment 
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>>> docs.google.com 
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>>>
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>>>
>>> I will ensure to collate all comments right after to enable us get 
>>> our submission in before deadline.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bolu.
>>>
>>>> On 15. Apr 2024, at 00:31, Tomslin Samme-Nlar 
>>>> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>> Hi star team,
>>>>
>>>> We are only one week out to deadline, how are we going with the 
>>>> draft @Bolutife Adisa <mailto:adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warmly,
>>>> Tomslin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:15, Emmanuel Vitus 
>>>> <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
>>>>     @Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.
>>>>
>>>>     Kind regards
>>>>
>>>>     Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana
>>>>     <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>>         I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you
>>>>         again) after April 16th, if it would still be useful.
>>>>         Particularly, if Adisa can direct me to a certain section
>>>>         or a certain task that could be particularly helpful to his
>>>>         work, that'd work perfectly.
>>>>
>>>>         Cordially,
>>>>
>>>>         *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
>>>>         Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
>>>>         <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
>>>>         PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>>>         Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>,
>>>>         ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>>>>         This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s).
>>>>         If received by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman
>>>>         <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>             Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>             We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and
>>>>             thanks to Bolutife, Emmanuel) and have another one
>>>>             coming up: *Review of the Draft Registry Service
>>>>             Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program
>>>>             <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>>>>             *
>>>>
>>>>             This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they
>>>>             right and are they understandable?
>>>>
>>>>             *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have
>>>>             already worked on.? Would you like to start the
>>>>             comments here?? Is there a draft or outline you would
>>>>             like to share? *
>>>>
>>>>             Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>>>
>>>>             This is fun work - and a great way to become in an
>>>>             expert in the upcoming New gTLD process!
>>>>
>>>>             Best, Kathy
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240422/2a1ce7ac/attachment.htm>

From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com  Mon Apr 22 14:42:46 2024
From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:42:46 -0300
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP)
 Handbook - New gTLD Program
In-Reply-To: <0FD6A841-568F-4A0E-A5B6-3C410B788EF0@gmail.com>
References: <1ad8b412-a387-4af7-82a7-b15bb276d091@KathyKleiman.com>
 <0FD6A841-568F-4A0E-A5B6-3C410B788EF0@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGSP6RTi0ZocqqZJKRXmvVXd-D7GG7sTUcdoRvWnHqaDdFq5PQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi everyone, just left my contributions there.

I did not analyze the Appendix thoroughly - gave a quick read to the "Main
RSP" questions to see if there was something that was of particular
importance, but nothing that warranted any major concern stood out (and the
other questions related to other services seemed to follow the same lines,
but these I just passed the eyes through and jumped to Appendix B and C).

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
<https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em qui., 18 de abr. de 2024 ?s 18:11, Bolutife Adisa <
adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Kathy,
>
> Yes, if you click on it, it links to the google doc.
>
> Best,
> Bolu.
>
> On 18. Apr 2024, at 23:06, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>
> ?
>
> Tx you, Bolu!  Is this posted in a Google doc for  us to work with?
> On 4/18/2024 3:20 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
>
> Hello team,
>
> Here is my initial draft - open for your edits and comments.
>
> <AHkbwyIv_r5XEFJIp03L-RETEbClnXQJRUgVWCK59WK9exi97ZTDyfGQ2E5DmLy_cpKqyUf0RmzJIa-vKBN3PNQ5cuZsiOyj2oLKIXLOxD877z7SytLgJ9bC=w1200-h630-p.png>
> RSP public comment
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
> docs.google.com
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>
> I will ensure to collate all comments right after to enable us get our
> submission in before deadline.
>
> Best regards,
> Bolu.
>
> On 15. Apr 2024, at 00:31, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ?
> Hi star team,
>
> We are only one week out to deadline, how are we going with the draft @Bolutife
> Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> ?
>
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:15, Emmanuel Vitus <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
>> @Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>>
>> On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana <
>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you again) after
>>> April 16th, if it would still be useful. Particularly, if Adisa can direct
>>> me to a certain section or a certain task that could be particularly
>>> helpful to his work, that'd work perfectly.
>>>
>>> Cordially,
>>>
>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
>>> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
>>> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
>>> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman <
>>> Kathy at kathykleiman.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks to Bolutife,
>>>> Emmanuel) and have another one coming up:
>>>> *Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New
>>>> gTLD Program
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they right and are they
>>>> understandable?
>>>>
>>>> *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have already worked
>>>> on.  Would you like to start the comments here?  Is there a draft or
>>>> outline you would like to share?  *
>>>>
>>>> Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>>>
>>>> This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert in the
>>>> upcoming New gTLD process!
>>>>
>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240422/486a4e09/attachment.htm>

From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com  Mon Apr 22 19:24:41 2024
From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 18:24:41 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] DUE TODAY Re: Review of the Draft Registry Service
 Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program - DUE TODAY
In-Reply-To: <26458f6c-5d8b-4f24-b37d-3f74f10e6a26@KathyKleiman.com>
References: <26458f6c-5d8b-4f24-b37d-3f74f10e6a26@KathyKleiman.com>
Message-ID: <2695C373-C4E5-495F-80CD-AEC9271A7014@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240422/c8323eb6/attachment.htm>

From emmanuelvitus at gmail.com  Mon Apr 22 22:08:51 2024
From: emmanuelvitus at gmail.com (Emmanuel Vitus)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:08:51 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] DUE TODAY Re: Review of the Draft Registry Service
 Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program - DUE TODAY
In-Reply-To: <2695C373-C4E5-495F-80CD-AEC9271A7014@gmail.com>
References: <26458f6c-5d8b-4f24-b37d-3f74f10e6a26@KathyKleiman.com>
 <2695C373-C4E5-495F-80CD-AEC9271A7014@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGKde+11D3rD6o9h+kmTcCA3g789kOqSGSYoTWpcJKgiL_=xKg@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks to you all!

Bolu, you?ve officially been appointed  as our non official go-to guru for
all things Handbook :). Handle it with care (and maybe a little swagger)!

Cheers to more great comments ahead!

Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.


On Mon 22 Apr 2024 at 16:24, Bolutife Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Kathy,
>
> Thanks for your contribution to this draft (Kathy & Pedro). I believe it
> now looks great for submission. I have incorporated all the comments from
> you and Pedro.
>
> @tomslin please proceed with submitting our draft comment.
>
> Thanks again all!
>
> Best regards,
> Bolu.
>
> On 22. Apr 2024, at 15:01, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>
> ?
>
> Hi Bolu,
>
> Nice job!  I have followed Pedro in adding some comments and edits -
> mostly for readable and flow.  Tx to you both and Emmanuel!!
>
> *To Tomslin and PC, I believe this comment is due today.  Once the edits
> are incorporated, this is ready for submission!*
>
>
> *Best, Kathy *
> On 4/18/2024 5:11 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
>
> Hi Kathy,
>
> Yes, if you click on it, it links to the google doc.
>
> Best,
> Bolu.
>
> On 18. Apr 2024, at 23:06, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>
> ?
>
> Tx you, Bolu!  Is this posted in a Google doc for  us to work with?
> On 4/18/2024 3:20 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
>
> Hello team,
>
> Here is my initial draft - open for your edits and comments.
>
> <AHkbwyIv_r5XEFJIp03L-RETEbClnXQJRUgVWCK59WK9exi97ZTDyfGQ2E5DmLy_cpKqyUf0RmzJIa-vKBN3PNQ5cuZsiOyj2oLKIXLOxD877z7SytLgJ9bC=w1200-h630-p.png>
> RSP public comment
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
> docs.google.com
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>
> I will ensure to collate all comments right after to enable us get our
> submission in before deadline.
>
> Best regards,
> Bolu.
>
> On 15. Apr 2024, at 00:31, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ?
> Hi star team,
>
> We are only one week out to deadline, how are we going with the draft @Bolutife
> Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> ?
>
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:15, Emmanuel Vitus <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
>> @Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>>
>> On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana <
>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you again) after
>>> April 16th, if it would still be useful. Particularly, if Adisa can direct
>>> me to a certain section or a certain task that could be particularly
>>> helpful to his work, that'd work perfectly.
>>>
>>> Cordially,
>>>
>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
>>> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
>>> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
>>> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman <
>>> Kathy at kathykleiman.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks to Bolutife,
>>>> Emmanuel) and have another one coming up:
>>>> *Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New
>>>> gTLD Program
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they right and are they
>>>> understandable?
>>>>
>>>> *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have already worked
>>>> on.  Would you like to start the comments here?  Is there a draft or
>>>> outline you would like to share?  *
>>>>
>>>> Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>>>
>>>> This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert in the
>>>> upcoming New gTLD process!
>>>>
>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240422/937527c3/attachment.htm>

From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com  Mon Apr 22 22:52:10 2024
From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 21:52:10 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] DUE TODAY Re: Review of the Draft Registry Service
 Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program - DUE TODAY
In-Reply-To: <CAGKde+11D3rD6o9h+kmTcCA3g789kOqSGSYoTWpcJKgiL_=xKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGKde+11D3rD6o9h+kmTcCA3g789kOqSGSYoTWpcJKgiL_=xKg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <23DDF82F-989D-4F6E-A30C-F7EEE202B4EB@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240422/ac975662/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Tue Apr 23 01:24:31 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:24:31 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] DUE TODAY Re: Review of the Draft Registry Service
 Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program - DUE TODAY
In-Reply-To: <23DDF82F-989D-4F6E-A30C-F7EEE202B4EB@gmail.com>
References: <CAGKde+11D3rD6o9h+kmTcCA3g789kOqSGSYoTWpcJKgiL_=xKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <23DDF82F-989D-4F6E-A30C-F7EEE202B4EB@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeU7rZw=2Ob2m6c2d3272Ww5pQo38n8JHkGt_nfLCUvOEQ@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you all. I will submit now

Warmly,
Tomslin
@LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomslin/


On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 05:52, Bolutife Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Haha,
>
> Thanks Emmanuel. I?ve always had a lot of help from Kathy and you all. It
> is always a joint effort.
>
> Looking forward to contributing to something that is not a handbook next
> time ?.
>
> Best regards,
> Bolu.
>
> On 22. Apr 2024, at 21:09, Emmanuel Vitus <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ?
> Thanks to you all!
>
> Bolu, you?ve officially been appointed  as our non official go-to guru for
> all things Handbook :). Handle it with care (and maybe a little swagger)!
>
> Cheers to more great comments ahead!
>
> Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>
>
> On Mon 22 Apr 2024 at 16:24, Bolutife Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kathy,
>>
>> Thanks for your contribution to this draft (Kathy & Pedro). I believe it
>> now looks great for submission. I have incorporated all the comments from
>> you and Pedro.
>>
>> @tomslin please proceed with submitting our draft comment.
>>
>> Thanks again all!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bolu.
>>
>> On 22. Apr 2024, at 15:01, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Hi Bolu,
>>
>> Nice job!  I have followed Pedro in adding some comments and edits -
>> mostly for readable and flow.  Tx to you both and Emmanuel!!
>>
>> *To Tomslin and PC, I believe this comment is due today.  Once the edits
>> are incorporated, this is ready for submission!*
>>
>>
>> *Best, Kathy *
>> On 4/18/2024 5:11 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kathy,
>>
>> Yes, if you click on it, it links to the google doc.
>>
>> Best,
>> Bolu.
>>
>> On 18. Apr 2024, at 23:06, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com>
>> <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Tx you, Bolu!  Is this posted in a Google doc for  us to work with?
>> On 4/18/2024 3:20 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote:
>>
>> Hello team,
>>
>> Here is my initial draft - open for your edits and comments.
>>
>> <AHkbwyIv_r5XEFJIp03L-RETEbClnXQJRUgVWCK59WK9exi97ZTDyfGQ2E5DmLy_cpKqyUf0RmzJIa-vKBN3PNQ5cuZsiOyj2oLKIXLOxD877z7SytLgJ9bC=w1200-h630-p.png>
>> RSP public comment
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>> docs.google.com
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>>
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MEtVhGZGwqNvOLnoC86DeO5zR2xqSe7ay33k-RD33-Y/edit>
>>
>> I will ensure to collate all comments right after to enable us get our
>> submission in before deadline.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bolu.
>>
>> On 15. Apr 2024, at 00:31, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
>> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>> Hi star team,
>>
>> We are only one week out to deadline, how are we going with the draft @Bolutife
>> Adisa <adisabolutifeo at gmail.com> ?
>>
>>
>> Warmly,
>> Tomslin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:15, Emmanuel Vitus <emmanuelvitus at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Kathy. Let?s do it!
>>> @Bolu please share the Google doc of the work in progress.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue 9 Apr 2024 at 22:53, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana <
>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I can help (btw, Bolu, it would be great to work with you again) after
>>>> April 16th, if it would still be useful. Particularly, if Adisa can direct
>>>> me to a certain section or a certain task that could be particularly
>>>> helpful to his work, that'd work perfectly.
>>>>
>>>> Cordially,
>>>>
>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana*
>>>> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
>>>> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>>> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
>>>> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em ter., 9 de abr. de 2024 ?s 16:22, Kathy Kleiman <
>>>> Kathy at kathykleiman.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> We made one deadline on New gTLD work (hooray and thanks to Bolutife,
>>>>> Emmanuel) and have another one coming up:
>>>>> *Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New
>>>>> gTLD Program
>>>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-registry-service-provider-rsp-handbook-new-gtld-program-13-03-2024>
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the rules for the New gTLD process. Are they right and are
>>>>> they understandable?
>>>>>
>>>>> *Bolutife, I think this is the comment period you have already worked
>>>>> on.  Would you like to start the comments here?  Is there a draft or
>>>>> outline you would like to share?  *
>>>>>
>>>>> Who would like to work with Bolutife?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is fun work - and a great way to become in an expert in the
>>>>> upcoming New gTLD process!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240423/f5b068c9/attachment.htm>

From julf at Julf.com  Tue Apr 23 17:55:39 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:55:39 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] ACTION REQUEST: Doodle for RFR Decision on Rec 7 of
 Auction Proceeds
In-Reply-To: <45D28770-C477-4CAC-A844-18CD354755E2@icann.org>
References: <45D28770-C477-4CAC-A844-18CD354755E2@icann.org>
Message-ID: <49be54c4-d23f-4709-8dab-1667d8640244@Julf.com>

This is for discussing joining in with a CSG RFR on recommendation 7
of Auction Proceeds. While the invitation is for the EC, I think this
is really a PC issue, so those of you who are interested, please fill
in your availability.

	Julf



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[NCSG-EC] ACTION REQUEST: Doodle for RFR Decision on Rec 7 of 
Auction Proceeds
Date: 	Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:39:38 +0000
From: 	Brenda Brewer via NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>
Reply-To: 	Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
To: 	CSG ExComm <csg-excomm at icann.org>, NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>



Dear CSG ExComm and NCSG ExComm,

Please see doodle 
poll,*https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/epX2VK6e 
<https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/epX2VK6e>*, and select your 
available times for CSG & NCSG Executive Committees to discuss RFR 
Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds. There are many options, please 
scroll to see them all! Poll will close on Thursday, 25 April at 18:00 
UTC. Thank you.

Best,

Brenda
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
NCSG-EC mailing list
NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec


From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com  Wed Apr 24 20:13:34 2024
From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:13:34 -0400
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Count of LEA requests per country
Message-ID: <CAN1qJvCv1UEGXu-PfvE13y3Avp0POWeUZNPpY4+cJC9xqjFZEw@mail.gmail.com>

Dear PC,

As you know, we are putting a document together to ask the RDRS SC to
consider reporting on the count of LEA requests per country. I raised this
on the NCSG mailing list which received support, also we discussed it at
the SC. Here is the link to the request we have drafted, mentioning
standard practice:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lyj-g5y8JLBSf-dHm81Cf_bFDRBEeZ-KgYYy44atlfg/edit?usp=sharing
 we can send to the Public Safety Working Group and the RDRS SC. We should
do this pretty soon so that if the group decides we actually make it
technically possible to collect the data on the country of LEAs.
Please have a look and let me know what you think. I am planning to send
this document to the PSWG and the RDRS SC next week. If you have comments
on the text or objections please let me know.

Best regards,
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240424/7cb9dd2d/attachment.htm>

From brenda.brewer at icann.org  Wed Apr 24 22:54:28 2024
From: brenda.brewer at icann.org (Brenda Brewer)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:54:28 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] REMINDER ACTION REQUEST: Doodle for RFR Decision on Rec 7
 of Auction Proceeds
Message-ID: <89864E59-6356-438B-9715-6CBD23850041@icann.org>

Hi all,

Thank you to those who have already responded to the Doodle for RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds. If you?ve not filled in your availability, please do at your earliest convenience.  Thank you!

https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/epX2VK6e

Best,
Brenda

From: Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 7:39?AM
To: CSG ExComm <csg-excomm at icann.org>, NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>
Subject: ACTION REQUEST: Doodle for RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds

Dear CSG ExComm and NCSG ExComm,

Please see doodle poll, https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/epX2VK6e, and select your available times for CSG & NCSG Executive Committees to discuss RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds. There are many options, please scroll to see them all! Poll will close on Thursday, 25 April at 18:00 UTC. Thank you.

Best,
Brenda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240424/acea3b97/attachment.htm>

From manju at nii.org.tw  Fri Apr 26 12:08:44 2024
From: manju at nii.org.tw (=?UTF-8?B?6Zmz5pu86Iy5IE1hbmp1IENoZW4=?=)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:08:44 +0800
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Count of LEA requests per country
In-Reply-To: <CAN1qJvCv1UEGXu-PfvE13y3Avp0POWeUZNPpY4+cJC9xqjFZEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN1qJvCv1UEGXu-PfvE13y3Avp0POWeUZNPpY4+cJC9xqjFZEw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMeQZi1OgfAUATOy393hL-uF0N1Y-R6HbKqH0KBNTnU=5KQDpw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Farzi,

Thanks for the great initiative, just one small comment.

I'd suggest to change 'country' to 'economy'. Some 'countries' are not
recognized by ICANN and they might be counted wrongly (e.g. be included to
another country or simply omitted) if we stick with the word. I would
advise against using the ISO3166 list for country names, too.

Thanks!

Best,
Manju

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:41?AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear PC,
>
> As you know, we are putting a document together to ask the RDRS SC to
> consider reporting on the count of LEA requests per country. I raised this
> on the NCSG mailing list which received support, also we discussed it at
> the SC. Here is the link to the request we have drafted, mentioning
> standard practice:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lyj-g5y8JLBSf-dHm81Cf_bFDRBEeZ-KgYYy44atlfg/edit?usp=sharing
>  we can send to the Public Safety Working Group and the RDRS SC. We should
> do this pretty soon so that if the group decides we actually make it
> technically possible to collect the data on the country of LEAs.
> Please have a look and let me know what you think. I am planning to send
> this document to the PSWG and the RDRS SC next week. If you have comments
> on the text or objections please let me know.
>
> Best regards,
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240426/41d2a9e7/attachment.htm>

From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com  Fri Apr 26 15:14:48 2024
From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:14:48 -0400
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Count of LEA requests per country
In-Reply-To: <CAMeQZi1OgfAUATOy393hL-uF0N1Y-R6HbKqH0KBNTnU=5KQDpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN1qJvCv1UEGXu-PfvE13y3Avp0POWeUZNPpY4+cJC9xqjFZEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMeQZi1OgfAUATOy393hL-uF0N1Y-R6HbKqH0KBNTnU=5KQDpw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAN1qJvCOwn6Vc1QHkNEfDL_G2GagJqc0F8N+WBLc6pS5ROQEOA@mail.gmail.com>

That's a great idea Manju. I am gonna change it to countries and economies.




Farzaneh


On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:08?AM ??? Manju Chen <manju at nii.org.tw> wrote:

> Hi Farzi,
>
> Thanks for the great initiative, just one small comment.
>
> I'd suggest to change 'country' to 'economy'. Some 'countries' are not
> recognized by ICANN and they might be counted wrongly (e.g. be included to
> another country or simply omitted) if we stick with the word. I would
> advise against using the ISO3166 list for country names, too.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Manju
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:41?AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear PC,
>>
>> As you know, we are putting a document together to ask the RDRS SC to
>> consider reporting on the count of LEA requests per country. I raised this
>> on the NCSG mailing list which received support, also we discussed it at
>> the SC. Here is the link to the request we have drafted, mentioning
>> standard practice:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lyj-g5y8JLBSf-dHm81Cf_bFDRBEeZ-KgYYy44atlfg/edit?usp=sharing
>>  we can send to the Public Safety Working Group and the RDRS SC. We
>> should do this pretty soon so that if the group decides we actually make it
>> technically possible to collect the data on the country of LEAs.
>> Please have a look and let me know what you think. I am planning to send
>> this document to the PSWG and the RDRS SC next week. If you have comments
>> on the text or objections please let me know.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Farzaneh
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240426/b8c1f812/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Sat Apr 27 01:49:46 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:49:46 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Count of LEA requests per country
In-Reply-To: <CAN1qJvCOwn6Vc1QHkNEfDL_G2GagJqc0F8N+WBLc6pS5ROQEOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN1qJvCv1UEGXu-PfvE13y3Avp0POWeUZNPpY4+cJC9xqjFZEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMeQZi1OgfAUATOy393hL-uF0N1Y-R6HbKqH0KBNTnU=5KQDpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN1qJvCOwn6Vc1QHkNEfDL_G2GagJqc0F8N+WBLc6pS5ROQEOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeWXKbCViHi_OOR4UFHo4p9RdznCBjApKqf384HObVGg-A@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the proposal, Farzi.

It looks good and simple. Happy for it to be sent with Manju's suggestion.




On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 22:21, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> That's a great idea Manju. I am gonna change it to countries and
> economies.
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:08?AM ??? Manju Chen <manju at nii.org.tw> wrote:
>
>> Hi Farzi,
>>
>> Thanks for the great initiative, just one small comment.
>>
>> I'd suggest to change 'country' to 'economy'. Some 'countries' are not
>> recognized by ICANN and they might be counted wrongly (e.g. be included to
>> another country or simply omitted) if we stick with the word. I would
>> advise against using the ISO3166 list for country names, too.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Best,
>> Manju
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:41?AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear PC,
>>>
>>> As you know, we are putting a document together to ask the RDRS SC to
>>> consider reporting on the count of LEA requests per country. I raised this
>>> on the NCSG mailing list which received support, also we discussed it at
>>> the SC. Here is the link to the request we have drafted, mentioning
>>> standard practice:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lyj-g5y8JLBSf-dHm81Cf_bFDRBEeZ-KgYYy44atlfg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>  we can send to the Public Safety Working Group and the RDRS SC. We
>>> should do this pretty soon so that if the group decides we actually make it
>>> technically possible to collect the data on the country of LEAs.
>>> Please have a look and let me know what you think. I am planning to send
>>> this document to the PSWG and the RDRS SC next week. If you have comments
>>> on the text or objections please let me know.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Farzaneh
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240427/63d525c7/attachment.htm>

From wisdom.dk at gmail.com  Sat Apr 27 13:15:27 2024
From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:15:27 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Count of LEA requests per country
In-Reply-To: <CAN1qJvCOwn6Vc1QHkNEfDL_G2GagJqc0F8N+WBLc6pS5ROQEOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN1qJvCv1UEGXu-PfvE13y3Avp0POWeUZNPpY4+cJC9xqjFZEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMeQZi1OgfAUATOy393hL-uF0N1Y-R6HbKqH0KBNTnU=5KQDpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN1qJvCOwn6Vc1QHkNEfDL_G2GagJqc0F8N+WBLc6pS5ROQEOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAU+vPEeEsrHNsmczdb6pJzzWBtMeARog-OhAHh_Jk3-2D5EiQ@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Farzi
You proposal looks good, +1 also to Manju's suggestion.

Regards,



On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, 12:21?pm farzaneh badii, <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> That's a great idea Manju. I am gonna change it to countries and
> economies.
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:08?AM ??? Manju Chen <manju at nii.org.tw> wrote:
>
>> Hi Farzi,
>>
>> Thanks for the great initiative, just one small comment.
>>
>> I'd suggest to change 'country' to 'economy'. Some 'countries' are not
>> recognized by ICANN and they might be counted wrongly (e.g. be included to
>> another country or simply omitted) if we stick with the word. I would
>> advise against using the ISO3166 list for country names, too.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Best,
>> Manju
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:41?AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear PC,
>>>
>>> As you know, we are putting a document together to ask the RDRS SC to
>>> consider reporting on the count of LEA requests per country. I raised this
>>> on the NCSG mailing list which received support, also we discussed it at
>>> the SC. Here is the link to the request we have drafted, mentioning
>>> standard practice:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lyj-g5y8JLBSf-dHm81Cf_bFDRBEeZ-KgYYy44atlfg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>  we can send to the Public Safety Working Group and the RDRS SC. We
>>> should do this pretty soon so that if the group decides we actually make it
>>> technically possible to collect the data on the country of LEAs.
>>> Please have a look and let me know what you think. I am planning to send
>>> this document to the PSWG and the RDRS SC next week. If you have comments
>>> on the text or objections please let me know.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Farzaneh
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240427/3b5495fb/attachment.htm>

From PolicyCalendar at icann.org  Mon Apr 29 20:43:21 2024
From: PolicyCalendar at icann.org (ICANN Policy Calendar)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:43:21 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds | 7 May at
 12:00 UTC
Message-ID: <5ace9c644d53480d853d5ba122e3a462@icann.org>

Please join CSG ExComm and NCSG ExComm and Policy Committee call to discuss RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds on Tuesday, 7 May at 12:00 UTC.  Additional time zones here<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=RFR+Decision+on+Rec+7+of+Auction+Proceeds&iso=20240507T12&p1=1440&ah=1>.

Join Zoom Meeting: https://icann.zoom.us/j/97047206603?pwd=UnMwcXJyNG1zT1N4ZEJFU21TbHNqdz09

Meeting ID: 970 4720 6603
Passcode: d8fYA0YJ5*
One tap mobile
&#43;16699006833,,97047206603#,,,,,,0#,,2972341880# US (San Jose)
&#43;13462487799,,97047206603#,,,,,,0#,,2972341880# US (Houston)

PHONE ONLY DETAILS:
Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/ayCuBeM7M
Meeting ID: 970 4720 6603
Phone only passcode: 2972341880

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240429/ce63102a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/calendar
Size: 2760 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240429/ce63102a/attachment.ics>

From brenda.brewer at icann.org  Mon Apr 29 21:24:28 2024
From: brenda.brewer at icann.org (Brenda Brewer)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:24:28 +0000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds | 7 May at
 12:00 UTC
Message-ID: <1E878137-38E5-4D42-9DFC-975C583204F2@icann.org>

Please join CSG ExComm and NCSG ExComm and NCSG Policy Committee call to discuss RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds on Tuesday, 7 May at 12:00 UTC.  Additional time zones here<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=RFR+Decision+on+Rec+7+of+Auction+Proceeds&iso=20240507T12&p1=1440&ah=1>.  Calendar invite is sent, dial-in details are below, and .ics attached for your convenience.

Join Zoom Meeting: https://icann.zoom.us/j/97047206603?pwd=UnMwcXJyNG1zT1N4ZEJFU21TbHNqdz09

Meeting ID: 970 4720 6603
Passcode: d8fYA0YJ5*
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,97047206603#,,,,,,0#,,2972341880# US (San Jose)
+13462487799,,97047206603#,,,,,,0#,,2972341880# US (Houston)

PHONE ONLY DETAILS:
Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/ayCuBeM7M
Meeting ID: 970 4720 6603
Phone only passcode: 2972341880

Kind regards,
Brenda
--
Brenda Brewer
Policy Operations Coordinator
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240429/55dc0977/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds  7 May at 12-00 UTC.ics
Type: text/calendar
Size: 2768 bytes
Desc: RFR Decision on Rec 7 of Auction Proceeds  7 May at 12-00 UTC.ics
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240429/55dc0977/attachment.ics>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Mon Apr 29 23:32:46 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 06:32:46 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
In-Reply-To: <5ec7137177ed4abeafc8303bc7b8f8c3@amazon.com>
References: <5ec7137177ed4abeafc8303bc7b8f8c3@amazon.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeUB+Arkjaa3LOM1xoEVLsViOeHwm-3fxnADAOBX0qw-qQ@mail.gmail.com>

Are we okay with this?

Warmly,
Tomslin



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: DiBiase, Gregory via council <council at icann.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 05:29
Subject: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>


Dear Councilors,



At our April meeting we adopted all supplemental recommendations except for
those related to Topic 24: String Similarity Evaluation. Due to time
constraints, we did not decide how to proceed with further evaluation of
Topic 24.



In the interest of sustaining momentum, Leadership is proposing the we add
the new work re: Topic 24 to the small team assignment form (see attached),
then allow the small team to consider a strawman proposal developed by
Staff.  After evaluation of the proposal, the small team will return to
Council with its conclusions on whether this proposal is viable, and if so,
provide draft language for the Council to consider.



We do not believe amendment to the assignment form requires a vote, and the
Small Team can start their work as soon as the strawman proposal is
delivered by Staff. If any Councilors disagree, please respond on list and
we can discuss at our May meeting.



Thanks,

Greg
_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council at icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240430/d2a104cc/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Updated Small Team Assignment - SubPro Non-Adopted Recs - 26April2024.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 68777 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240430/d2a104cc/attachment.docx>

From manju at nii.org.tw  Tue Apr 30 05:02:44 2024
From: manju at nii.org.tw (=?UTF-8?B?6Zmz5pu86Iy5IE1hbmp1IENoZW4=?=)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:02:44 +0800
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
In-Reply-To: <CAM8DdeUB+Arkjaa3LOM1xoEVLsViOeHwm-3fxnADAOBX0qw-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5ec7137177ed4abeafc8303bc7b8f8c3@amazon.com>
 <CAM8DdeUB+Arkjaa3LOM1xoEVLsViOeHwm-3fxnADAOBX0qw-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMeQZi04_xCbGEDd4pSFN1OQGqRY2JJqTaqhaAdssdU9oyAfUA@mail.gmail.com>

Yes as long as it doesn?t involve diacritics.


On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 04:33 Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Are we okay with this?
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: DiBiase, Gregory via council <council at icann.org>
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 05:29
> Subject: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
> To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> At our April meeting we adopted all supplemental recommendations except
> for those related to Topic 24: String Similarity Evaluation. Due to time
> constraints, we did not decide how to proceed with further evaluation of
> Topic 24.
>
>
>
> In the interest of sustaining momentum, Leadership is proposing the we add
> the new work re: Topic 24 to the small team assignment form (see attached),
> then allow the small team to consider a strawman proposal developed by
> Staff.  After evaluation of the proposal, the small team will return to
> Council with its conclusions on whether this proposal is viable, and if so,
> provide draft language for the Council to consider.
>
>
>
> We do not believe amendment to the assignment form requires a vote, and
> the Small Team can start their work as soon as the strawman proposal is
> delivered by Staff. If any Councilors disagree, please respond on list and
> we can discuss at our May meeting.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list -- council at icann.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240430/d749ce80/attachment.htm>

From mesumbeslin at gmail.com  Tue Apr 30 12:37:54 2024
From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:37:54 +1000
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
In-Reply-To: <CAMeQZi04_xCbGEDd4pSFN1OQGqRY2JJqTaqhaAdssdU9oyAfUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5ec7137177ed4abeafc8303bc7b8f8c3@amazon.com>
 <CAM8DdeUB+Arkjaa3LOM1xoEVLsViOeHwm-3fxnADAOBX0qw-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMeQZi04_xCbGEDd4pSFN1OQGqRY2JJqTaqhaAdssdU9oyAfUA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM8DdeVAqjFFgmqDEqMYMeZGfHg+4ppm=fV6FXphEv+Y-BKFCA@mail.gmail.com>

Great, thank you.

Warmly,
Tomslin

On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, 12:02 ??? Manju Chen, <manju at nii.org.tw> wrote:

> Yes as long as it doesn?t involve diacritics.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 04:33 Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Are we okay with this?
>>
>> Warmly,
>> Tomslin
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: DiBiase, Gregory via council <council at icann.org>
>> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 05:29
>> Subject: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
>> To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>
>>
>> Dear Councilors,
>>
>>
>>
>> At our April meeting we adopted all supplemental recommendations except
>> for those related to Topic 24: String Similarity Evaluation. Due to time
>> constraints, we did not decide how to proceed with further evaluation of
>> Topic 24.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the interest of sustaining momentum, Leadership is proposing the we
>> add the new work re: Topic 24 to the small team assignment form (see
>> attached), then allow the small team to consider a strawman proposal
>> developed by Staff.  After evaluation of the proposal, the small team will
>> return to Council with its conclusions on whether this proposal is viable,
>> and if so, provide draft language for the Council to consider.
>>
>>
>>
>> We do not believe amendment to the assignment form requires a vote, and
>> the Small Team can start their work as soon as the strawman proposal is
>> delivered by Staff. If any Councilors disagree, please respond on list and
>> we can discuss at our May meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Greg
>> _______________________________________________
>> council mailing list -- council at icann.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
>> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You
>> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240430/bcb87b5c/attachment.htm>

From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com  Tue Apr 30 16:02:19 2024
From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:02:19 -0400
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
In-Reply-To: <CAMeQZi04_xCbGEDd4pSFN1OQGqRY2JJqTaqhaAdssdU9oyAfUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5ec7137177ed4abeafc8303bc7b8f8c3@amazon.com>
 <CAM8DdeUB+Arkjaa3LOM1xoEVLsViOeHwm-3fxnADAOBX0qw-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMeQZi04_xCbGEDd4pSFN1OQGqRY2JJqTaqhaAdssdU9oyAfUA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <09d1bf52-e1ff-44b1-822f-2a768914e739@KathyKleiman.com>

Hi Tomslin,

Tx for circulating. I specifically endorse the idea of using the "Small 
Team Plus."? This expands the group from GNSO Council members to include 
Stakeholder Group Subject Matter experts.

This issue definitely needs Subject Matter Experts with a wide variety 
of language skills. I'm not sure if the GAC is included, but it should 
it be (it was on the earlier Small Team Plus). Could we check?

Is Paul McGrady still on Council?

Best, Kathy

On 4/29/2024 10:02 PM, ??? Manju Chen wrote:
> Yes as long as it doesn?t involve diacritics.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 04:33 Tomslin Samme-Nlar 
> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Are we okay with this?
>
>     Warmly,
>     Tomslin
>
>
>
>     ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>     From: *DiBiase, Gregory via council* <council at icann.org>
>     Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 05:29
>     Subject: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
>     To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
>     Dear Councilors,
>
>     At our April meeting we adopted all supplemental recommendations
>     except for those related to Topic 24: String Similarity
>     Evaluation. Due to time constraints, we did not decide how to
>     proceed with further evaluation of Topic 24.
>
>     In the interest of sustaining momentum, Leadership is proposing
>     the we add the new work re: Topic 24 to the small team assignment
>     form (see attached), then allow the small team to consider a
>     strawman proposal developed by Staff.? After evaluation of the
>     proposal, the small team will return to Council with its
>     conclusions on whether this proposal is viable, and if so, provide
>     draft language for the Council to consider.
>
>     We do not believe amendment to the assignment form requires a
>     vote, and the Small Team can start their work as soon as the
>     strawman proposal is delivered by Staff. If any Councilors
>     disagree, please respond on list and we can discuss at our May
>     meeting.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Greg
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     council mailing list -- council at icann.org
>     To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>     your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing
>     list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
>     and so on.
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240430/5e5a2ef7/attachment.htm>

From Kathy at KathyKleiman.com  Tue Apr 30 16:12:27 2024
From: Kathy at KathyKleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:12:27 -0400
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
In-Reply-To: <CAM8DdeVAqjFFgmqDEqMYMeZGfHg+4ppm=fV6FXphEv+Y-BKFCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5ec7137177ed4abeafc8303bc7b8f8c3@amazon.com>
 <CAM8DdeUB+Arkjaa3LOM1xoEVLsViOeHwm-3fxnADAOBX0qw-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMeQZi04_xCbGEDd4pSFN1OQGqRY2JJqTaqhaAdssdU9oyAfUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM8DdeVAqjFFgmqDEqMYMeZGfHg+4ppm=fV6FXphEv+Y-BKFCA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bc2ff6fb-73ed-4680-a3d4-d79f3d210c2c@KathyKleiman.com>

p.s. I would ask that the Council inform all former members of the 
Subpro Small Team PLUS group of what is happening... everyone who has 
been part of this process in the past should know about the next steps. 
Tx, Kathy

On 4/30/2024 5:37 AM, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> Great, thank you.
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, 12:02 ??? Manju Chen, <manju at nii.org.tw> wrote:
>
>     Yes as long as it doesn?t involve diacritics.
>
>
>     On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 04:33 Tomslin Samme-Nlar
>     <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>         Are we okay with this?
>
>         Warmly,
>         Tomslin
>
>
>
>         ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>         From: *DiBiase, Gregory via council* <council at icann.org>
>         Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 05:29
>         Subject: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
>         To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
>         Dear Councilors,
>
>         At our April meeting we adopted all supplemental
>         recommendations except for those related to Topic 24: String
>         Similarity Evaluation. Due to time constraints, we did not
>         decide how to proceed with further evaluation of Topic 24.
>
>         In the interest of sustaining momentum, Leadership is
>         proposing the we add the new work re: Topic 24 to the small
>         team assignment form (see attached), then allow the small team
>         to consider a strawman proposal developed by Staff.? After
>         evaluation of the proposal, the small team will return to
>         Council with its conclusions on whether this proposal is
>         viable, and if so, provide draft language for the Council to
>         consider.
>
>         We do not believe amendment to the assignment form requires a
>         vote, and the Small Team can start their work as soon as the
>         strawman proposal is delivered by Staff. If any Councilors
>         disagree, please respond on list and we can discuss at our May
>         meeting.
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Greg
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         council mailing list -- council at icann.org
>         To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         By submitting your personal data, you consent to the
>         processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing
>         to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>         (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms
>         of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit
>         the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>         configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>         delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a
>         vacation), and so on.
>         _______________________________________________
>         NCSG-PC mailing list
>         NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>         https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240430/9ce8a596/attachment.htm>

From julf at Julf.com  Tue Apr 30 18:00:47 2024
From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:00:47 +0200
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Topic 24 Supplemental Recommendations
In-Reply-To: <09d1bf52-e1ff-44b1-822f-2a768914e739@KathyKleiman.com>
References: <5ec7137177ed4abeafc8303bc7b8f8c3@amazon.com>
 <CAM8DdeUB+Arkjaa3LOM1xoEVLsViOeHwm-3fxnADAOBX0qw-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMeQZi04_xCbGEDd4pSFN1OQGqRY2JJqTaqhaAdssdU9oyAfUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <09d1bf52-e1ff-44b1-822f-2a768914e739@KathyKleiman.com>
Message-ID: <657450c5-eea5-43ed-b4bd-fe71aafcbff2@Julf.com>

On 30/04/2024 15:02, Kathy Kleiman wrote:

> Is Paul McGrady still on Council?

Most definitely - current appointment until AGM 2025.

	Julf