[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Final Question Set 4 and Update
Tomslin Samme-Nlar
mesumbeslin at gmail.com
Sun Aug 7 00:01:19 EEST 2022
FYI
Warmly,
Tomslin
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Jeff Neuman <jeff at jjnsolutions.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 at 02:01
Subject: Final Question Set 4 and Update
To: philippe.fouquart at orange.com <philippe.fouquart at orange.com>,
Sebastien at registry.godaddy <sebastien at registry.godaddy>, Tomslin Samme-Nlar
(mesumbeslin at gmail.com) <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <
julie.hedlund at icann.org>, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
Dear Council Leadership,
Please let the Council know that the responses to Question Set 4 have been
submitted. A big thank you to the small team of Councilors that helped me
with the responses including Paul, Justine, Desiree, Flip and of course
ICANN support.
First, just a reminder that the responses to Question Set 5 are due on
Wednesday next week. Justine and Paul have weighed in on it, so thanks to
them again!
Second, I had a call this week with the ICANN SubPro Team (minus Karen who
was on a well deserved vacation). In addition to discussing the Question
Sets, I wanted to relay the following:
1. The ODP Team informed me that the SO/AC leaders did not seem to have
any interest in a SubPro session at ICANN 75 in KL. I wanted to verify
that this was the case since I had not heard anything from the SO/AC
leaders on this. I also wanted to say that this could be an important
missed opportunity for us to start some of the needed discussions including
on the complete set of ODP Assumptions (See next item). There is a lot of
work ahead of us, so I just wanted to verify that the community did or did
not want a SubPro session.
1. At some point in August, ICANN will publish its final set of
assumptions that will be included in the Operational Design Analysis
(ODA). This sets the basis for setting the budget and dictating the
resources that will be needed to implement and Launch the next round(s).
As this would be timely, I do believe it may be worth discussing with the
Community at ICANN 75 if that is something the community were interested in.
1. Whether or not there is a session at ICANN 75, the ODP Team has
reminded me to let you all know that they are available to meet with any
constituency, SG or AC at ICANN 75 to discuss the status of the project.
1. At this point Question Set 5 is the last set of questions that the
ODP team has. This does not mean that there will not be other questions
later, but they believe they have a handle on all of the Outputs of the
GNSO Final Report, the Recommendations and Implementation Guidance.
1. However, there is still a lot of work ahead of us as the GNSO
Community. We need to start planning for the Implementation Review Team
and additional work. To do this, I would propose:
1. Having this is a discussion item at the GNSO Council SPS since there
will be some new Councilors and it will likely have an impact on the work
that the Council is going to be responsible for starting next Calendar
Year. The F2F session in LA in December is a great time to discuss the
impacts of this on the Council work load.
2. If the ODA is delivered in December, the Board could likely vote
on it in February or March, which means that the ICANN staff
could kick off
an IRT shortly thereafter. The Council should determine whether this IRT
will be like normal IRTs that are completely open or whether it will be a
limited representative group. If the later, then I would
propose starting
off the discussion on the composition of this group in January
so that when
it is approved, we do not lose a month or two discussing this and getting
the logistics set up.
3. Although we are likely kicking off the GGP on Applicant Support in
August (hopefully), there are going to be other discreet topics that will
need to be addressed and they may be a lot for a single IRT.
This includes:
i. Finalizing the structure and rules for the SPIRT
ii. Implementing the Pre-Evaluation Program for
Back-End Registry Service Providers
iii. Finalizing and implementing the Outreach and
Communication Strategy
iv. Drafting the Applicant Guidebook
v. Finalize the Process/Procedures for
Private/Specialized Domain Names (SSAC 113)
vi. Confirm Maximum Delegation Rate of TLDs
(Affirmation/Recommendations in Section 26 of Final Report)
vii. Challenge / Appeals Mechanisms for Evaluations /
Objections (Section 32 of the Final Report)
1. There are a lot of external Dependencies that can also impact the
next round, including:
i. IDN ePDP Work
ii. Implementation of the Revisions to the RPMs
iii. Name Collision work by the NCAP / SSAC
1. All of this is a reminder to state that once the ODA is done and the
Board votes on approving the policies, even assuming they approve it in
March 2023, there is still a ton of things for the community to do before
an application window can open. I personally believe planning should begin
ASAP, but it is up to the Council and the Community to determine what
happened and when.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jeff
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Founder & CEO
JJN Solutions, LLC
p: +1.202.549.5079
E: jeff at jjnsolutions.com
http://jjnsolutions.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20220807/a67333bc/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 67520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20220807/a67333bc/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SubPro ODP_Question Set 4.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 285149 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20220807/a67333bc/attachment.pdf>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list