[NCSG-PC] [NCSG EPDP] draft comments on the EPDP final report
stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca
Tue Mar 30 00:53:54 EEST 2021
Thanks, i will go have a look...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 14:26, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
> Really appreciate the work involved in the first draft.
> I am commenting on the doc and I want to alert everyone in NCSG that I think it is a major strategic error for our comments to reinforce the IPC/BC's attacks on the financial viability of the SSAD. The SSAD is viable if the users (e.g., Facebook, Markmonitor, etc) pay for it. When the surveillance caucus says it is too costly they are just angling for free access and our having registrars and registrants pay for it. When you reinforce the false argument that this will be too expensive, you are advancing their agenda. Not deliberately, of course, but you seem to be unaware of how your argument shoots us in the foot.
> During the negotiations over the SSAD, NCSG's position was that users pay for their own accreditation costs, and that usage of the system should be tiered to differentiate between light and heavy users. Also, the existence of an SSAD helps us argue for keeping the private data redacted.
> So I have suggested various changes and deletions in the comments to reflect this perspective.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EPDP <epdp-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> On Behalf Of Stephanie E Perrin
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 4:20 PM
> To: NCSG PC <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>; 'epdp (epdp at lists.ncsg.is)' <epdp at lists.ncsg.is>; kathy at dnrc.tech
> Subject: [NCSG EPDP] draft comments on the EPDP final report
> Here is the link to the draft comment
> Please let me know if you have trouble editing
> cheers Stephanie Perrin
> EPDP mailing list
> EPDP at lists.ncsg.is
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
More information about the NCSG-PC