[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] RPMs Comment

Tatiana Tropina tatiana.tropina at gmail.com
Mon May 4 19:28:01 EEST 2020


Same as James. Looks fine but I haven’t followed RPM much.
Cheers
Tanya

On Mon 4. May 2020 at 18:25, lists at icann.guru <lists at icann.guru> wrote:

> ihavent been following RPMs enough to comment on the substance so fine by
> me.
>
> *---*
> *James Gannon*
>
> On 5/4/2020 5:14:34 PM, Olga Kyryliuk <olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net> wrote:
> It looks quite comprehensive. Nohing to add from my side.
>
> Best,
> Olga
>
>
> *4 мая 2020, 16:30:43, от "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:*
>
> For reminder, the deadline for submission is today.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020, 12:05 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> my first email sent to PC list was blocked because the size of the file.
> we have a draft for review for the public comments on RPMs initial report.
> while the document might look long , that is due to the formatting i.e.
> google form but it is in fact shorter.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> De : *Michael Karanicolas* <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
> Date: ven. 1 mai 2020 à 23:50
> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] RPMs Comment
> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As some of you may know, the RPMs Working Group has a comment period
> which is currently open, and with a deadline of Monday noon for
> submissions. Unfortunately,
> the submission structure is not very user friendly - it's a long
> Google form, rather than an open end call for responses, which makes
> it tough to develop drafts.
>
> Nonetheless, a few NCSG participants in the working group were able to
> put together the attached as a proposed NCSG response. If you have
> feedback or comments, we'll ask that you provide it by Sunday at 1600
> UTC, so we can have 24 hours to incorporate them into the final draft.
>
> Again, apologies for the short timeframe - the comment period itself
> was relatively short, and the convoluted nature of the response
> process led to challenges in putting this together. Still, I think
> this is an important process for our constituency to engage with, and
> hope we can put something in.
>
> Best,
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20200504/a9c21288/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list