[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Sun Mar 22 01:24:37 EET 2020 

Hi all,

hope you are coping well with the current situation.
if I don't hear any strong objection, I will submit the comment by Monday
(that gives more than 24 hours last chance to review)


Best,

Rafik

Le ven. 20 mars 2020 à 08:20, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Thanks Farell, James,
> @PC member please review asap.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le jeu. 19 mars 2020 à 18:50, Farell FOLLY <farell at benin2point0.org> a
> écrit :
>
>> Thanks James for your input. I have no objection.
>>
>>  I reviewed it again and added a couple of comments. I think we now have
>> covered the most essential ones.
>>
>>
>> @__f_f__
>>
>> Best Regards
>> ____________________________________
>>
>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
>> GNSO Councillor
>> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:08, James Gannon <lists at icann.guru> wrote:
>>
>> Made some edits, happy with it now.
>>
>> ---
>> *James Gannon*
>>
>> *From: *NCSG-PC <ncsg-pc-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> on behalf of Rafik
>> Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 22:53
>> *To: *ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>> *Subject: *[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments]
>> Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and
>> Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already
>> extended and Friday is the deadline.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Rafik
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> De : *Farell FOLLY* <farell at benin2point0.org>
>> Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 à 05:23
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for
>> Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency
>> (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report
>> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public
>> comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted
>> our comment that you could find here
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit>
>> .
>>
>> Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in
>> time (2 days left).
>>
>> Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it
>> very quickly.
>>
>>
>>
>> @__f_f__
>>
>> Best Regards
>> ____________________________________
>>
>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
>> GNSO Councillor
>> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY <farell at benin2point0.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share
>> some inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and
>> perhaps also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft
>> the response to the PC.
>>
>>
>> Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board
>> to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c))  in line
>> with its commitment to enhance the operational stability, reliability,
>> resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and
>> processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are
>> affected by the Internet’s system of unique identifiers that ICANN
>> coordinates.
>>
>> This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30
>> recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment.
>>
>> Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking
>> whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are
>> three specific groups of issues covered by the review:
>>
>>
>>    1.  security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both
>>    physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet’s system
>>    of unique identifiers;
>>    2. conformance with appropriate security contingency planning
>>    framework for the Internet’s system of unique identifiers;
>>    3. maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes
>>    for those portions of the Internet’s system of unique identifiers that
>>    ICANN coordinates.
>>
>>
>> The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many
>> interesting things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to -
>> could draw our attention:
>>
>>
>>    1. The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9)
>>     regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security
>>    Certifications - that ICANN should use  industry security standards (e.g.,
>>    ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in
>>    line with ISO 27031
>>    2. #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency
>>    3. #Rec 6 to Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and
>>    Tactical Security and Risk Management.
>>    4. #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and
>>    Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions
>>    5. #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS
>>    Data
>>    6. #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain
>>    Abuse Activity Reporting Program
>>    7. #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to
>>    Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse
>>    8. #Rec 16  to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to
>>    Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats
>>    9. #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073
>>    and Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers
>>    10. #Rec 26 6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes,
>>    11. #Rec 30 1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP
>>
>>
>> With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the
>> report that we have to comment on.
>>
>> I wish you all a nice week.
>>
>> Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine….Working at home
>> for 6 weeks.
>>
>> @__f_f__
>>
>> Best Regards
>> ____________________________________
>>
>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
>> GNSO Councillor
>> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY <farell at benin2point0.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Regarding this public comment,  I suggest you watch this zoom recording
>> for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven’t attended it.
>> It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as
>> the details about each recommendation.
>>
>> If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go
>> to the webinar page
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Webinar:+SSR2+Draft+Report> and
>> choose whatever recording that suits your needs.
>>
>>
>> https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> @__f_f__
>>
>> Best Regards
>> ____________________________________
>>
>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
>> GNSO Councillor
>> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this
>> important public comment.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 à 07:45, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join
>> the drafting of NCSG comment.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 04:20, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> ICANN published the new public consultation on Second Security,
>> Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some
>> issue and was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first
>> report for review. We should comment on this and share our input.
>>
>> For more background and explanation you can find more info here:
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en
>>
>> I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible
>> to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit>
>>
>> Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting
>> the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to
>> SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations.
>>
>> You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and
>> listing those who drafted them.
>>
>> Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year!
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik Dammak
>>
>> NCSG Policy Committee Chair
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20200322/89bc56dd/attachment.htm>

More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list