From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Mar 2 02:35:39 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:35:39 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up Message-ID: Hi all, as you know we had last week our PC meeting to discuss several items regarding election, improvements etc. We got already some action item to follow-up 1- PC chair Election: there was agreement to go with the idea of having chair and 2 vice-chairs. The point was also to have proper open process (that can be documented for future). so the action here is to agree on timeline and process (nomination, vote). it shouldn't be complicated. I believe we can get this done in this month e.g. 1 week for nomination and 1 week for voting. 2- Having a regular PC call, hopefully monthly call and coordinating more with our NCSG reps to council. The action would be to agree on regular day/time. I think that can be 2 weeks after NCSG Policy. 3- Regarding documentation and development of workflow, I believe that can be done with reworking again on PC operating procedure and documenting previous activities. I am sharing here the PC operating procedures draft being worked on before https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G_M4wBGVEyXm30m79olplfF0RNkJnDwaVBBeldDfO8U/edit . For anything missing, we can start first to identify that and have volunteers to draft it. For Chair job description, I can use what I presented and develop a draft. 4- Sharing here the slides I presented in last call: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SnpMYmb6lTw1FqO6tvSqCdpgL-QMg1DJXIJGrx8vB6A/edit#slide=id.p 5- for NCSG Policy call improvements, we will have the NCSG Policy call in coming days and I will try to make some adjustments to extent of possible. It might be shorter than usual as we will have NCSG meeting next week. From April NCSG Policy call, we can start identifying other topics we would like to cover other than council meeting and usual policy updates. One activity we will need to do soon and follow-up is to work about prioritization. GNSO Council will discuss the GNSO future work soon and we need to be ready and align our work around that. That also aligns with the discussion we had about prioritizing our work and it starts with identifying what is in the pipeline. let me know if I missed anything. Best. Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Mar 2 03:15:18 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:15:18 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with Board in virtual Cancun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Stephanie, some comments below: Le sam. 29 f?vr. 2020 ? 05:45, Stephanie E Perrin < stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> a ?crit : > As you are no doubt aware, we have had two planning meetings for virtual > cancun this, week, and it is clear we have very little time and a much > shrunken agenda. However, we do have to get topics to discuss with the > Board. Nobody has responded on the list to my call for input, and it is due > today. > it will be one hour call and the board having several calls in row so no idea how productive it will be :) however, I am usually for keeping the discussion focused on few topics and not going around too many. I will support keeping to 1 or 2 topics since the board already suggested some too. > > How about this. the NCSG, reflecting the views of civil society > generally, would like to comment on a few recent events at ICANN that have > raised alarm bells in terms of the ongoing affordability and sustainability > of an open, free, and vigorous DNS. The first of these is the impending > sale of .ORG. We did not raise our concerns about the removal of price > caps, although a significant proportion of our community were dead against > this action. Many others had faith in .ORG, and trusted their commitments, > We were disappointed to learn of the sale in the manner in which we did, > so soon after the removal of the price caps. > > The second issue is the removal of price caps for .com. Since .com still > accounts for 80% of GTLD registrations, how can ICANN justify the removal > of price caps for such a monopoly registry? > I guess the question of removing cap has many aspects. It is about the whole process of agreement renewal and how it is used to add for example other RPMs like URS. We responded to those public comments before and we missed others. Many questioned if the comments have any impact which is a legit question. Regarding the affordability and access, board can easily point that the market has more competition and choice than before for users. The issue of access to domain name in developing countries has less to do with registries than access to registrars that can respond to that market needs. > The third issue we want to highlight is the cost of the impending SSAD > being developed by the EPDP, bearing in mind that the benefits of this > system have not been balanced against costs, and many of the decisions > which are driving the high volumes of requests CANNOT be automated. Is the > cost of this white elephant [you tell me if that is still an acceptable > expression, actually I should check that with my most culturally aware kid, > since after all for a non-english speaker it must be hard to keep up with > our political correctness.....] driving ICANN to permit wholesale price > increases in the industry? > I assume the board and Goran will point that they communicated to EPDP before about the costing and they cannot give any numbers till EPDP team finish its work. I think we need to double check first in the ICANN 5 years strategy and budget about what was planned in term funding. > Another topic we wish to raise is the ongoing sustainability of the MS > model. You have hinted in the past that travel costs and concern about our > carbon footprint may dictate fewer face to face meetings. Given the > growing complexity of the policy work (cf. the EPDP, which comes on the > heels of the RDS working group, an exhausting debate highlighted by limited > progress and much disagreement) we doubt that we can produce good results > without face to face meetings. We applaud staff and the community for > responding quickly to the crisis precipitated by the cancellation of the > CANCUN meeting, but it is very clear that this meting is a pale shadow of a > normal ICANN public meeting. Given the strong possibility that ICANN68 > will also have to be cancelled due to the Corona virus situation, may we > suggest that a study group be struck to make recommendations about how to > improve these virtual meeting and make them more accessible to all global > players? > I think that is reasonable idea and to think carefully about all those meetings in holistic manner (one concern among others I have is that meetings become milestones and drive all the work) . I have personally some doubts about F2F meetings and their effects would impact us in long run. We need to find the balance. Circling back to board suggestions: - Key priorities for action of ICANN constituencies in 2020 (e.g. prioritization of recommendations, streamlining of reviews, improve effectiveness of ICANN?s multistakeholder model, ...) - Specific developments coming up that ICANN constituencies feel need to be addressed when updating the ICANN Strategic Plan. I guess we can highlight that we are supporting PDP 3.0 improvements. with regard MSM evolution, we probably need to understand how we will be to get involved when the different tracks are assigned to SO/AC. for prioritization of recommendations, I assume that is about those coming from review teams and I am . I don't think we discussed that throughly within NCSG and I am not sure what we can respond with confidence other than what I mentioned in the beginning or that we are working GNSO future work. This is something for PC to manage this month and work with NCSG members regarding our priorities. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca Wed Mar 4 20:24:33 2020 From: stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca (Stephanie E Perrin) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:24:33 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: ICANN67 One World One Internet session Wed. March 11th, 13:45-15:15 Cancun / 18:45-20:15 UTC In-Reply-To: <8ef0cded-7b81-5365-eb25-9569feee9dc3@gmail.com> References: <8ef0cded-7b81-5365-eb25-9569feee9dc3@gmail.com> Message-ID: Who do we want on this panel? Thanks Steph -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: ICANN67 One World One Internet session Wed. March 11th, 13:45-15:15 Cancun / 18:45-20:15 UTC Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:14:44 +0100 From: Joanna Kulesza To: Stephanie E Perrin CC: Gisella Gruber , ICANN At-Large Staff Dear Stephanie, now that the final programme is out I was wondering if you might be able to give Gisella the name of the NCUC speaker for the "One World One Internet" webinar? Please kindly see the agenda details here: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Meetings+-+Wednesday%2C+11+March+2020. We're scheduled for 13:45-15:15 Cancun time / 18:45-20:15 UTC on Wednesday, March 11th. Thanks! Kind regards, Joanna Kulesza ------------------- Joanna Kulesza, PhD University of Lodz, Poland ICANN ALAC Vice Chair SOI:https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Joanna+Kulesza+SOI TT: @KuleszaJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Wed Mar 4 21:22:21 2020 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 20:22:21 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E41723F-F75D-4323-B9C9-FF6C68978FA7@benin2point0.org> Hello All, Thanks Rafik for organizing this. I am sorry to have missed.. Something went wrong?. I have listened to the audio and I am glad to note all that have been discussed is wonderful. I would be open to apply for any vice - chair position (it appears that most of the experienced members are currently term-limited) or as a liaison to council. Also, with my project management background, I could help on managing and following tasks, identifying risks and setting priorities. I would also like to recommend that the terms of the vice chairs are set in a way that chair and vice chairs could all leave their seats after one election? I mean that it should never happen the terms of the VC and chair come to end at the same time. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 2 Mar 2020, at 01:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > as you know we had last week our PC meeting to discuss several items regarding election, improvements etc. We got already some action item to follow-up > > 1- PC chair Election: there was agreement to go with the idea of having chair and 2 vice-chairs. The point was also to have proper open process (that can be documented for future). so the action here is to agree on timeline and process (nomination, vote). it shouldn't be complicated. I believe we can get this done in this month e.g. 1 week for nomination and 1 week for voting. > 2- Having a regular PC call, hopefully monthly call and coordinating more with our NCSG reps to council. The action would be to agree on regular day/time. I think that can be 2 weeks after NCSG Policy. > 3- Regarding documentation and development of workflow, I believe that can be done with reworking again on PC operating procedure and documenting previous activities. I am sharing here the PC operating procedures draft being worked on before https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G_M4wBGVEyXm30m79olplfF0RNkJnDwaVBBeldDfO8U/edit . For anything missing, we can start first to identify that and have volunteers to draft it. For Chair job description, I can use what I presented and develop a draft. > 4- Sharing here the slides I presented in last call: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SnpMYmb6lTw1FqO6tvSqCdpgL-QMg1DJXIJGrx8vB6A/edit#slide=id.p > 5- for NCSG Policy call improvements, we will have the NCSG Policy call in coming days and I will try to make some adjustments to extent of possible. It might be shorter than usual as we will have NCSG meeting next week. From April NCSG Policy call, we can start identifying other topics we would like to cover other than council meeting and usual policy updates. > > One activity we will need to do soon and follow-up is to work about prioritization. GNSO Council will discuss the GNSO future work soon and we need to be ready and align our work around that. That also aligns with the discussion we had about prioritizing our work and it starts with identifying what is in the pipeline. > > let me know if I missed anything. > > Best. > > Rafik > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Mar 5 00:22:36 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:22:36 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Agenda for NCSG Monthly Policy Call 6th March In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, I am sharing the draft agenda for the next NCSG Policy call this Friday. I asked Maryam to schedule it in Friday because the ICANN67 virtual meeting scheduling. For future NCSG Policy and PC meetings, I will work with Maryam to prepare a draft schedule of meetings till AGM. As we will also have a NCSG public meeting next week, I don't think our policy call will be more than 60 or 90 min. No big change in the usual agenda but there should be some changes starting from April meeting based on what discussed in the last PC meeting. The focus would be council agenda which is focused on 2 items mainly: project list to review the status of GNSO activities i.e PDP and GNSO future work. We can go through the documents during the call as prep for the council meeting and also for NCSG members to get better idea about the current status. That will also help us to think about NCSG priorities. We can also use some time to prepare for next week meeting like joint meeting with board, at least going through board proposals. Please let me know if you have any comments or amendment for the agenda: I. Introduction II. GNSO Council Call Preparation - Council agenda: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/agenda/agenda-gnso-council-11mar20-en.pdf - Review of GNSO future work and Project list . NCSG priorities III. ICANN67 meeting - Meeting Schedule: https://67.schedule.icann.org/ - NCSG meeting: joint meeting with Board IV. Policy Update - Policy topics: * PDPs & Review Teams Update : EPDP, Subpro, RPM - Public comments status: https://www.icann.org/public-comments#open-public & list of volunteers https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 V. AOB Best Regards, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Mar 5 00:50:46 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:50:46 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up In-Reply-To: <4E41723F-F75D-4323-B9C9-FF6C68978FA7@benin2point0.org> References: <4E41723F-F75D-4323-B9C9-FF6C68978FA7@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: Thanks Farell, looking to hear from others too. it is possible to have staggered terms but need to think how to implement that since it is the beginning and according to chater it is 1 year term. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 ? 04:22, Farell FOLLY a ?crit : > Hello All, > > Thanks Rafik for organizing this. I am sorry to have missed.. Something > went wrong?. > > I have listened to the audio and I am glad to note all that have been > discussed is wonderful. > > I would be open to apply for any vice - chair position (it appears that > most of the experienced members are currently term-limited) or as a liaison > to council. Also, with my project management background, I could help on > managing and following tasks, identifying risks and setting priorities. > > I would also like to recommend that the terms of the vice chairs are set > in a way that chair and vice chairs could all leave their seats after one > election? I mean that it should never happen the terms of the VC and chair > come to end at the same time. > > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > On 2 Mar 2020, at 01:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > as you know we had last week our PC meeting to discuss several items > regarding election, improvements etc. We got already some action item to > follow-up > > 1- PC chair Election: there was agreement to go with the idea of having > chair and 2 vice-chairs. The point was also to have proper open process > (that can be documented for future). so the action here is to agree on > timeline and process (nomination, vote). it shouldn't be complicated. I > believe we can get this done in this month e.g. 1 week for nomination and 1 > week for voting. > 2- Having a regular PC call, hopefully monthly call and coordinating more > with our NCSG reps to council. The action would be to agree on regular > day/time. I think that can be 2 weeks after NCSG Policy. > 3- Regarding documentation and development of workflow, I believe that can > be done with reworking again on PC operating procedure and documenting > previous activities. I am sharing here the PC operating procedures draft > being worked on before > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G_M4wBGVEyXm30m79olplfF0RNkJnDwaVBBeldDfO8U/edit . > For anything missing, we can start first to identify that and have > volunteers to draft it. For Chair job description, I can use what I > presented and develop a draft. > 4- Sharing here the slides I presented in last call: > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SnpMYmb6lTw1FqO6tvSqCdpgL-QMg1DJXIJGrx8vB6A/edit#slide=id.p > 5- for NCSG Policy call improvements, we will have the NCSG Policy call in > coming days and I will try to make some adjustments to extent of possible. > It might be shorter than usual as we will have NCSG meeting next week. From > April NCSG Policy call, we can start identifying other topics we would like > to cover other than council meeting and usual policy updates. > > One activity we will need to do soon and follow-up is to work about > prioritization. GNSO Council will discuss the GNSO future work soon and we > need to be ready and align our work around that. That also aligns with the > discussion we had about prioritizing our work and it starts with > identifying what is in the pipeline. > > let me know if I missed anything. > > Best. > > Rafik > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Mar 16 09:06:35 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:06:35 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up In-Reply-To: References: <4E41723F-F75D-4323-B9C9-FF6C68978FA7@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: Hi all, sending reminder to ask for input. if there is no objection, we can start quickly the NCSG PC chair election and vice-chairs selection. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 ? 07:50, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Thanks Farell, > looking to hear from others too. it is possible to have staggered terms > but need to think how to implement that since it is the beginning and > according to chater it is 1 year term. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 ? 04:22, Farell FOLLY a > ?crit : > >> Hello All, >> >> Thanks Rafik for organizing this. I am sorry to have missed.. Something >> went wrong?. >> >> I have listened to the audio and I am glad to note all that have been >> discussed is wonderful. >> >> I would be open to apply for any vice - chair position (it appears that >> most of the experienced members are currently term-limited) or as a liaison >> to council. Also, with my project management background, I could help on >> managing and following tasks, identifying risks and setting priorities. >> >> I would also like to recommend that the terms of the vice chairs are set >> in a way that chair and vice chairs could all leave their seats after one >> election? I mean that it should never happen the terms of the VC and chair >> come to end at the same time. >> >> >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2 Mar 2020, at 01:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> as you know we had last week our PC meeting to discuss several items >> regarding election, improvements etc. We got already some action item to >> follow-up >> >> 1- PC chair Election: there was agreement to go with the idea of having >> chair and 2 vice-chairs. The point was also to have proper open process >> (that can be documented for future). so the action here is to agree on >> timeline and process (nomination, vote). it shouldn't be complicated. I >> believe we can get this done in this month e.g. 1 week for nomination and 1 >> week for voting. >> 2- Having a regular PC call, hopefully monthly call and coordinating more >> with our NCSG reps to council. The action would be to agree on regular >> day/time. I think that can be 2 weeks after NCSG Policy. >> 3- Regarding documentation and development of workflow, I believe that >> can be done with reworking again on PC operating procedure and documenting >> previous activities. I am sharing here the PC operating procedures draft >> being worked on before >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G_M4wBGVEyXm30m79olplfF0RNkJnDwaVBBeldDfO8U/edit . >> For anything missing, we can start first to identify that and have >> volunteers to draft it. For Chair job description, I can use what I >> presented and develop a draft. >> 4- Sharing here the slides I presented in last call: >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SnpMYmb6lTw1FqO6tvSqCdpgL-QMg1DJXIJGrx8vB6A/edit#slide=id.p >> 5- for NCSG Policy call improvements, we will have the NCSG Policy call >> in coming days and I will try to make some adjustments to extent of >> possible. It might be shorter than usual as we will have NCSG meeting next >> week. From April NCSG Policy call, we can start identifying other topics we >> would like to cover other than council meeting and usual policy updates. >> >> One activity we will need to do soon and follow-up is to work about >> prioritization. GNSO Council will discuss the GNSO future work soon and we >> need to be ready and align our work around that. That also aligns with the >> discussion we had about prioritizing our work and it starts with >> identifying what is in the pipeline. >> >> let me know if I missed anything. >> >> Best. >> >> Rafik >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lizorembo at gmail.com Mon Mar 16 09:08:54 2020 From: lizorembo at gmail.com (Liz Orembo) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:08:54 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up In-Reply-To: References: <4E41723F-F75D-4323-B9C9-FF6C68978FA7@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: No objection here. On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 10:06 Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > sending reminder to ask for input. if there is no objection, we can start > quickly the NCSG PC chair election and vice-chairs selection. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 ? 07:50, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Thanks Farell, >> looking to hear from others too. it is possible to have staggered terms >> but need to think how to implement that since it is the beginning and >> according to chater it is 1 year term. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 ? 04:22, Farell FOLLY a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> Thanks Rafik for organizing this. I am sorry to have missed.. Something >>> went wrong?. >>> >>> I have listened to the audio and I am glad to note all that have been >>> discussed is wonderful. >>> >>> I would be open to apply for any vice - chair position (it appears that >>> most of the experienced members are currently term-limited) or as a liaison >>> to council. Also, with my project management background, I could help on >>> managing and following tasks, identifying risks and setting priorities. >>> >>> I would also like to recommend that the terms of the vice chairs are set >>> in a way that chair and vice chairs could all leave their seats after one >>> election? I mean that it should never happen the terms of the VC and chair >>> come to end at the same time. >>> >>> >>> >>> @__f_f__ >>> >>> Best Regards >>> ____________________________________ >>> >>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >>> GNSO Councillor >>> linkedin.com/in/farellf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2 Mar 2020, at 01:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> as you know we had last week our PC meeting to discuss several items >>> regarding election, improvements etc. We got already some action item to >>> follow-up >>> >>> 1- PC chair Election: there was agreement to go with the idea of having >>> chair and 2 vice-chairs. The point was also to have proper open process >>> (that can be documented for future). so the action here is to agree on >>> timeline and process (nomination, vote). it shouldn't be complicated. I >>> believe we can get this done in this month e.g. 1 week for nomination and 1 >>> week for voting. >>> 2- Having a regular PC call, hopefully monthly call and coordinating >>> more with our NCSG reps to council. The action would be to agree on regular >>> day/time. I think that can be 2 weeks after NCSG Policy. >>> 3- Regarding documentation and development of workflow, I believe that >>> can be done with reworking again on PC operating procedure and documenting >>> previous activities. I am sharing here the PC operating procedures draft >>> being worked on before >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G_M4wBGVEyXm30m79olplfF0RNkJnDwaVBBeldDfO8U/edit . >>> For anything missing, we can start first to identify that and have >>> volunteers to draft it. For Chair job description, I can use what I >>> presented and develop a draft. >>> 4- Sharing here the slides I presented in last call: >>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SnpMYmb6lTw1FqO6tvSqCdpgL-QMg1DJXIJGrx8vB6A/edit#slide=id.p >>> 5- for NCSG Policy call improvements, we will have the NCSG Policy call >>> in coming days and I will try to make some adjustments to extent of >>> possible. It might be shorter than usual as we will have NCSG meeting next >>> week. From April NCSG Policy call, we can start identifying other topics we >>> would like to cover other than council meeting and usual policy updates. >>> >>> One activity we will need to do soon and follow-up is to work about >>> prioritization. GNSO Council will discuss the GNSO future work soon and we >>> need to be ready and align our work around that. That also aligns with the >>> discussion we had about prioritizing our work and it starts with >>> identifying what is in the pipeline. >>> >>> let me know if I missed anything. >>> >>> Best. >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Mar 19 00:52:54 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:52:54 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already extended and Friday is the deadline. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : Farell FOLLY Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 05:23 Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report To: Dear All, As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted our comment that you could find here . Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in time (2 days left). Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it very quickly. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY wrote: Dear All, Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share some inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and perhaps also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft the response to the PC. Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c)) in line with its commitment to enhance the operational stability, reliability, resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are affected by the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30 recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment. Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are three specific groups of issues covered by the review: 1. security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; 2. conformance with appropriate security contingency planning framework for the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; 3. maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes for those portions of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many interesting things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to - could draw our attention: 1. The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9) regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security Certifications - that ICANN should use industry security standards (e.g., ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in line with ISO 27031 2. #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency 3. #Rec 6 to Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and Tactical Security and Risk Management. 4. #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions 5. #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS Data 6. #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain Abuse Activity Reporting Program 7. #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse 8. #Rec 16 to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats 9. #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073 and Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers 10. #Rec 26 6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes, 11. #Rec 30 1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the report that we have to comment on. I wish you all a nice week. Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine?.Working at home for 6 weeks. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY wrote: Dear All, Regarding this public comment, I suggest you watch this zoom recording for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven?t attended it. It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as the details about each recommendation. If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go to the webinar page and choose whatever recording that suits your needs. https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0 @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak wrote: hi all, please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this important public comment. Best, Rafik Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 ? 07:45, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi all, > > resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join > the drafting of NCSG comment. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > > Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 ? 04:20, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi all >> >> ICANN published the new public consultation on Second Security, >> Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some >> issue and was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first >> report for review. We should comment on this and share our input. >> >> For more background and explanation you can find more info here: >> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en >> >> I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible >> to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit >> >> >> Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting >> the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to >> SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations. >> >> You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page >> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and >> listing those who drafted them. >> >> Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year! >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Rafik Dammak >> >> NCSG Policy Committee Chair >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lists at icann.guru Thu Mar 19 01:08:00 2020 From: lists at icann.guru (James Gannon) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:08:00 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ?Made some edits, happy with it now. --- James Gannon From: NCSG-PC on behalf of Rafik Dammak Date: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 22:53 To: ncsg-pc Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report Hi all, please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already extended and Friday is the deadline. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : Farell FOLLY > Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 05:23 Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report To: > Dear All, As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted our comment that you could find here. Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in time (2 days left). Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it very quickly. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY > wrote: Dear All, Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share some inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and perhaps also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft the response to the PC. Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c)) in line with its commitment to enhance the operational stability, reliability, resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are affected by the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30 recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment. Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are three specific groups of issues covered by the review: 1. security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; 2. conformance with appropriate security contingency planning framework for the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; 3. maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes for those portions of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many interesting things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to - could draw our attention: 1. The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9) regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security Certifications - that ICANN should use industry security standards (e.g., ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in line with ISO 27031 2. #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency 3. #Rec 6 to Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and Tactical Security and Risk Management. 4. #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions 5. #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS Data 6. #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain Abuse Activity Reporting Program 7. #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse 8. #Rec 16 to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats 9. #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073 and Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers 10. #Rec 26 6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes, 11. #Rec 30 1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the report that we have to comment on. I wish you all a nice week. Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine?.Working at home for 6 weeks. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY > wrote: Dear All, Regarding this public comment, I suggest you watch this zoom recording for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven?t attended it. It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as the details about each recommendation. If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go to the webinar page and choose whatever recording that suits your needs. https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0 @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak > wrote: hi all, please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this important public comment. Best, Rafik Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 ? 07:45, Rafik Dammak > a ?crit : Hi all, resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join the drafting of NCSG comment. Best Regards, Rafik Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 ? 04:20, Rafik Dammak > a ?crit : Hi all ICANN published the new public consultation on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some issue and was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first report for review. We should comment on this and share our input. For more background and explanation you can find more info here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations. You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and listing those who drafted them. Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year! Best Regards, Rafik Dammak NCSG Policy Committee Chair -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Thu Mar 19 11:50:38 2020 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:50:38 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <004FDE1C-E60F-4A51-BC1C-31BCDDB9C66E@benin2point0.org> Thanks James for your input. I have no objection. I reviewed it again and added a couple of comments. I think we now have covered the most essential ones. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:08, James Gannon wrote: > > ?Made some edits, happy with it now. > > --- > James Gannon > > From: NCSG-PC on behalf of Rafik Dammak > Date: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 22:53 > To: ncsg-pc > Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report > > Hi all, > > please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already extended and Friday is the deadline. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > De : Farell FOLLY > > Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 05:23 > Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report > To: > > > > Dear All, > > As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted our comment that you could find here . > > Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in time (2 days left). > > Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it very quickly. > > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY > wrote: > > Dear All, > > Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share some inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and perhaps also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft the response to the PC. > > > Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c)) in line with its commitment to enhance the operational stability, reliability, resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are affected by the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. > > This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30 recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment. > > Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are three specific groups of issues covered by the review: > > security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; > conformance with appropriate security contingency planning framework for the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; > maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes for those portions of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. > > The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many interesting things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to - could draw our attention: > > The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9) regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security Certifications - that ICANN should use industry security standards (e.g., ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in line with ISO 27031 > #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency > #Rec 6 to Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and Tactical Security and Risk Management. > #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions > #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS Data > #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain Abuse Activity Reporting Program > #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse > #Rec 16 to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats > #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073 and Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers > #Rec 26 6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes, > #Rec 30 1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP > > With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the report that we have to comment on. > > I wish you all a nice week. > > Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine?.Working at home for 6 weeks. > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY > wrote: > > Dear All, > > Regarding this public comment, I suggest you watch this zoom recording for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven?t attended it. It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as the details about each recommendation. > > If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go to the webinar page and choose whatever recording that suits your needs. > > https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0 > > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak > wrote: > > hi all, > > please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this important public comment. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 ? 07:45, Rafik Dammak > a ?crit : > Hi all, > > resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join the drafting of NCSG comment. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > > Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 ? 04:20, Rafik Dammak > a ?crit : > Hi all > > ICANN published the new public consultation on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some issue and was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first report for review. We should comment on this and share our input. > > For more background and explanation you can find more info here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en > > I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit? > > Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations. > > You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and listing those who drafted them. > > Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year! > > Best Regards, > > Rafik Dammak > > NCSG Policy Committee Chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net Thu Mar 19 21:06:13 2020 From: olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net (Olga Kyryliuk) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:06:13 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up In-Reply-To: References: <4E41723F-F75D-4323-B9C9-FF6C68978FA7@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: <1584644768.209537000.w24hbddb@frv50.fwdcdn.com> Hi Rafik, Sounds good. No objection from my side. Best, Olga 16 ????? 2020, 09:06:54, ?? "Rafik Dammak" : Hi all, sending reminder to ask for input. if there is? no objection, we can start quickly the NCSG PC chair election and vice-chairs selection. Best, Rafik Le?jeu. 5 mars 2020 ??07:50, Rafik Dammak a ?crit?: Thanks Farell, looking to hear from others too. it is possible to have staggered terms but need to think how to implement that since it is the beginning and according to chater it is 1 year term. Best, Rafik Le?jeu. 5 mars 2020 ??04:22, Farell FOLLY a ?crit?: Hello All, Thanks Rafik for organizing this. I am sorry to have missed.. Something went wrong?. I have listened to the audio and I am glad to note all that have been discussed is wonderful. I would be open to apply for any vice - chair position (it appears that most of the experienced members are currently term-limited) or as a liaison to council. Also, with my project management background, I could help on managing and following tasks, identifying risks and setting priorities. I would also like to recommend that the terms of the vice chairs are set in a way that chair and vice chairs could all leave their seats after one election? I mean that it should never happen the terms of the VC and chair come to end at the same time. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf? On 2 Mar 2020, at 01:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: Hi all, as you know we had last week our PC meeting to discuss several items regarding election, improvements etc. We got already some action item to follow-up 1- PC chair Election: there was agreement to go with?the idea of having chair and 2 vice-chairs. The point was also to have proper open process (that can be documented for future). so the action here is? to agree on timeline and process (nomination, vote). it shouldn't be complicated. I believe?we can get this done in this month e.g. 1 week for nomination and 1 week for voting. 2- Having a regular PC call, hopefully monthly call and coordinating more with our NCSG reps to council. The action would be to agree on regular day/time. I think that can be 2 weeks after NCSG Policy. 3- Regarding documentation and development of workflow, I believe that can be done with reworking again on PC operating?procedure?and documenting previous activities. I am sharing here the PC operating?procedures?draft being worked on before?https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G_M4wBGVEyXm30m79olplfF0RNkJnDwaVBBeldDfO8U/edit . For anything missing, we can start first to identify that and have volunteers to draft it. For Chair job description, I can use what I presented and develop a draft. 4- Sharing here the slides I presented in last call:?https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SnpMYmb6lTw1FqO6tvSqCdpgL-QMg1DJXIJGrx8vB6A/edit#slide=id.p 5- for NCSG Policy call improvements, we will have the NCSG Policy call in coming days and I will try to make some adjustments to extent of possible. It might be shorter than usual as we will have NCSG meeting next week. From April NCSG Policy call, we can start identifying other topics we would like to cover other than council meeting and usual policy updates. One activity we will need to do soon and follow-up is to work about prioritization. GNSO Council will discuss the GNSO future work soon and we need to be ready and align our work around that. That also aligns with the discussion we had about prioritizing our work and it starts with identifying what is in the pipeline. let me know if I missed anything. Best. Rafik _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From oreoluwa at wtec.org.ng Thu Mar 19 22:34:24 2020 From: oreoluwa at wtec.org.ng (oreoluwa) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:34:24 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up In-Reply-To: <1584644768.209537000.w24hbddb@frv50.fwdcdn.com> Message-ID: Hi Rafik and everyone,?I have no objections.?Kind regards??Ore--Oreoluwa Lesi Executive Director, Women's Technology Empowerment Centre (W.TEC)www.wtec.org.ng | @wteconlineSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: Olga Kyryliuk Date: 19/03/2020 20:07 (GMT+01:00) To: Rafik Dammak Cc: ncsg-pc Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Policy Committee meeting follow-up Hi Rafik, Sounds good. No objection from my side. Best, Olga 16 ????? 2020, 09:06:54, ?? "Rafik Dammak" : Hi all, sending reminder to ask for input. if there is? no objection, we can start quickly the NCSG PC chair election and vice-chairs selection. Best, Rafik Le?jeu. 5 mars 2020 ??07:50, Rafik Dammak a ?crit?: Thanks Farell, looking to hear from others too. it is possible to have staggered terms but need to think how to implement that since it is the beginning and according to chater it is 1 year term. Best, Rafik Le?jeu. 5 mars 2020 ??04:22, Farell FOLLY a ?crit?: Hello All, Thanks Rafik for organizing this. I am sorry to have missed.. Something went wrong?. I have listened to the audio and I am glad to note all that have been discussed is wonderful. I would be open to apply for any vice - chair position (it appears that most of the experienced members are currently term-limited) or as a liaison to council. Also, with my project management background, I could help on managing and following tasks, identifying risks and setting priorities. I would also like to recommend that the terms of the vice chairs are set in a way that chair and vice chairs could all leave their seats after one election? I mean that it should never happen the terms of the VC and chair come to end at the same time. @__f_f__Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf? On 2 Mar 2020, at 01:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: Hi all, as you know we had last week our PC meeting to discuss several items regarding election, improvements etc. We got already some action item to follow-up 1- PC chair Election: there was agreement to go with?the idea of having chair and 2 vice-chairs. The point was also to have proper open process (that can be documented for future). so the action here is? to agree on timeline and process (nomination, vote). it shouldn't be complicated. I believe?we can get this done in this month e.g. 1 week for nomination and 1 week for voting. 2- Having a regular PC call, hopefully monthly call and coordinating more with our NCSG reps to council. The action would be to agree on regular day/time. I think that can be 2 weeks after NCSG Policy. 3- Regarding documentation and development of workflow, I believe that can be done with reworking again on PC operating?procedure?and documenting previous activities. I am sharing here the PC operating?procedures?draft being worked on before?https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G_M4wBGVEyXm30m79olplfF0RNkJnDwaVBBeldDfO8U/edit . For anything missing, we can start first to identify that and have volunteers to draft it. For Chair job description, I can use what I presented and develop a draft. 4- Sharing here the slides I presented in last call:?https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SnpMYmb6lTw1FqO6tvSqCdpgL-QMg1DJXIJGrx8vB6A/edit#slide=id.p 5- for NCSG Policy call improvements, we will have the NCSG Policy call in coming days and I will try to make some adjustments to extent of possible. It might be shorter than usual as we will have NCSG meeting next week. From April NCSG Policy call, we can start identifying other topics we would like to cover other than council meeting and usual policy updates. One activity we will need to do soon and follow-up is to work about prioritization. GNSO Council will discuss the GNSO future work soon and we need to be ready and align our work around that. That also aligns with the discussion we had about prioritizing our work and it starts with identifying what is in the pipeline. let me know if I missed anything. Best. Rafik _______________________________________________NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Mar 20 01:20:57 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:20:57 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report In-Reply-To: <004FDE1C-E60F-4A51-BC1C-31BCDDB9C66E@benin2point0.org> References: <004FDE1C-E60F-4A51-BC1C-31BCDDB9C66E@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: Thanks Farell, James, @PC member please review asap. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 18:50, Farell FOLLY a ?crit : > Thanks James for your input. I have no objection. > > I reviewed it again and added a couple of comments. I think we now have > covered the most essential ones. > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:08, James Gannon wrote: > > ?Made some edits, happy with it now. > > --- > *James Gannon* > > *From: *NCSG-PC on behalf of Rafik Dammak > > *Date: *Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 22:53 > *To: *ncsg-pc > *Subject: *[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call > for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and > Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report > > Hi all, > > please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already > extended and Friday is the deadline. > > Best, > > > Rafik > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > De : *Farell FOLLY* > Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 05:23 > Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for > Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency > (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report > To: > > > Dear All, > > As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public > comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted > our comment that you could find here > > . > > Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in > time (2 days left). > > Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it > very quickly. > > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY wrote: > > Dear All, > > Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share some > inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and perhaps > also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft the > response to the PC. > > > Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board > to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c)) in line > with its commitment to enhance the operational stability, reliability, > resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and > processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are > affected by the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN > coordinates. > > This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30 > recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment. > > Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking > whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are > three specific groups of issues covered by the review: > > > 1. security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both > physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet?s system > of unique identifiers; > 2. conformance with appropriate security contingency planning > framework for the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; > 3. maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes for > those portions of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN > coordinates. > > > The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many interesting > things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to - could draw our > attention: > > > 1. The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9) > regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security > Certifications - that ICANN should use industry security standards (e.g., > ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in > line with ISO 27031 > 2. #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency > 3. #Rec 6 to Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and > Tactical Security and Risk Management. > 4. #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and > Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions > 5. #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS > Data > 6. #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain > Abuse Activity Reporting Program > 7. #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to > Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse > 8. #Rec 16 to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to > Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats > 9. #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073 and > Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers > 10. #Rec 26 6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes, > 11. #Rec 30 1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP > > > With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the > report that we have to comment on. > > I wish you all a nice week. > > Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine?.Working at home > for 6 weeks. > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY wrote: > > Dear All, > > Regarding this public comment, I suggest you watch this zoom recording > for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven?t attended it. > It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as > the details about each recommendation. > > If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go to > the webinar page > and > choose whatever recording that suits your needs. > > > https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0 > > > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this important > public comment. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 ? 07:45, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > > Hi all, > > resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join > the drafting of NCSG comment. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > > Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 ? 04:20, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > > Hi all > > ICANN published the new public consultation on Second Security, Stability, > and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some issue and > was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first report > for review. We should comment on this and share our input. > > For more background and explanation you can find more info here: > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en > > I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to > all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit > > > Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting > the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to > SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations. > > You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and > listing those who drafted them. > > Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year! > > Best Regards, > > Rafik Dammak > > NCSG Policy Committee Chair > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 01:24:37 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 08:24:37 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report In-Reply-To: References: <004FDE1C-E60F-4A51-BC1C-31BCDDB9C66E@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: Hi all, hope you are coping well with the current situation. if I don't hear any strong objection, I will submit the comment by Monday (that gives more than 24 hours last chance to review) Best, Rafik Le ven. 20 mars 2020 ? 08:20, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Thanks Farell, James, > @PC member please review asap. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 18:50, Farell FOLLY a > ?crit : > >> Thanks James for your input. I have no objection. >> >> I reviewed it again and added a couple of comments. I think we now have >> covered the most essential ones. >> >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:08, James Gannon wrote: >> >> ?Made some edits, happy with it now. >> >> --- >> *James Gannon* >> >> *From: *NCSG-PC on behalf of Rafik >> Dammak >> *Date: *Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 22:53 >> *To: *ncsg-pc >> *Subject: *[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] >> Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and >> Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report >> >> Hi all, >> >> please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already >> extended and Friday is the deadline. >> >> Best, >> >> >> Rafik >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> De : *Farell FOLLY* >> Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 05:23 >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for >> Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency >> (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report >> To: >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public >> comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted >> our comment that you could find here >> >> . >> >> Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in >> time (2 days left). >> >> Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it >> very quickly. >> >> >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share >> some inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and >> perhaps also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft >> the response to the PC. >> >> >> Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board >> to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c)) in line >> with its commitment to enhance the operational stability, reliability, >> resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and >> processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are >> affected by the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN >> coordinates. >> >> This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30 >> recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment. >> >> Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking >> whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are >> three specific groups of issues covered by the review: >> >> >> 1. security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both >> physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet?s system >> of unique identifiers; >> 2. conformance with appropriate security contingency planning >> framework for the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; >> 3. maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes >> for those portions of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that >> ICANN coordinates. >> >> >> The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many >> interesting things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to - >> could draw our attention: >> >> >> 1. The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9) >> regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security >> Certifications - that ICANN should use industry security standards (e.g., >> ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in >> line with ISO 27031 >> 2. #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency >> 3. #Rec 6 to Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and >> Tactical Security and Risk Management. >> 4. #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and >> Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions >> 5. #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS >> Data >> 6. #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain >> Abuse Activity Reporting Program >> 7. #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to >> Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse >> 8. #Rec 16 to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to >> Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats >> 9. #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073 >> and Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers >> 10. #Rec 26 6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes, >> 11. #Rec 30 1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP >> >> >> With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the >> report that we have to comment on. >> >> I wish you all a nice week. >> >> Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine?.Working at home >> for 6 weeks. >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> Regarding this public comment, I suggest you watch this zoom recording >> for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven?t attended it. >> It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as >> the details about each recommendation. >> >> If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go >> to the webinar page >> and >> choose whatever recording that suits your needs. >> >> >> https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0 >> >> >> >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> hi all, >> >> please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this >> important public comment. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 ? 07:45, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >> Hi all, >> >> resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join >> the drafting of NCSG comment. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 ? 04:20, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >> Hi all >> >> ICANN published the new public consultation on Second Security, >> Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some >> issue and was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first >> report for review. We should comment on this and share our input. >> >> For more background and explanation you can find more info here: >> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en >> >> I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible >> to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit >> >> >> Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting >> the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to >> SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations. >> >> You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page >> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and >> listing those who drafted them. >> >> Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year! >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Rafik Dammak >> >> NCSG Policy Committee Chair >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net Sun Mar 22 17:23:17 2020 From: olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net (Olga Kyryliuk) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:23:17 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report In-Reply-To: References: <004FDE1C-E60F-4A51-BC1C-31BCDDB9C66E@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: <1584890578.124663000.o5h1zxzi@frv50.fwdcdn.com> Hi Rafik and All, I did some stylistic revision of the text. Don't have any other suggestions from my side. Best, Olga 22 ????? 2020, 01:24:56, ?? "Rafik Dammak" : Hi all, hope you are coping well with the current situation.? if I don't hear any strong objection, I will submit the comment by Monday? (that gives more than 24 hours last chance to review) Best, Rafik Le?ven. 20 mars 2020 ??08:20, Rafik Dammak a ?crit?: Thanks Farell, James, @PC member please review asap. Best, Rafik Le?jeu. 19 mars 2020 ??18:50, Farell FOLLY a ?crit?: Thanks James for your input.?I have no objection. ?I reviewed it again and added a couple of comments. I think we now have covered the most essential ones. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf? On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:08, James Gannon wrote: Made?some edits, happy with it now. ? --- James?Gannon ? From:?NCSG-PC on behalf of Rafik Dammak Date:?Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 22:53 To:?ncsg-pc Subject:?[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report ? Hi all,? ? please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already extended and Friday is the deadline. ? Best, ? Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- De?:?Farell FOLLY? Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 ??05:23 Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report To: ? Dear All,? ? As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted our comment that you could find?here. ? Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in time (2 days left).? ? Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it very quickly. ? ? @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ ? (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf? ? ? ? On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY wrote: ? Dear All,? ? Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share some inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and perhaps also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft the response to the PC. ? ? Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c)) ?in line with its commitment to enhance?the operational stability, reliability, resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are affected by the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. ? This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30 recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment.? ? Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are three specific groups of issues covered by the review: ? ?security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers;? conformance with appropriate security contingency planning framework for the Internet?s system of unique identifiers;? maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes for those portions of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN coordinates. ? The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many interesting things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to - could draw our attention: ? The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9) ?regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security Certifications - that ICANN should use? industry security standards?(e.g., ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in line with ISO 27031? #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency #Rec 6 to?Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and Tactical Security and Risk Management. #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS Data #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain Abuse Activity Reporting Program #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse #Rec 16 ?to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073 and Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers #Rec 26?6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes,? #Rec 30?1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP ? With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the report that we have to comment on.? ? I wish you all a nice week. ? Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine?.Working at home for 6 weeks. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ ? (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf? ? ? ? On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY wrote: ? Dear All,? ? Regarding this public comment, ?I suggest you watch this zoom recording for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven?t attended it. It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as the details about each recommendation. ? If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go to the?webinar page?and choose whatever recording that suits your needs. ? https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0 ? ? @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ ? (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf? ? ? ? On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak wrote: ? hi all, ? please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this important public comment. ? Best, ? Rafik ? Le?lun. 27 janv. 2020 ??07:45, Rafik Dammak a ?crit?: Hi all, ? resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join the drafting of NCSG comment. ? Best Regards, ? Rafik ? ? Le?sam. 25 janv. 2020 ??04:20, Rafik Dammak a ?crit?: Hi all ? ICANN published the new public consultation on?Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some issue and was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first report for review. We should comment on this and share our input. ? For more background and explanation you can find more info here:?https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en ? I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments:?https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit ? Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations. ? You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page?https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and listing those who drafted them.?? ? Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year! ? Best Regards, ? Rafik Dammak ? NCSG Policy Committee Chair? ? ? ? _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Mar 23 15:56:35 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 22:56:35 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report In-Reply-To: <1584890578.124663000.o5h1zxzi@frv50.fwdcdn.com> References: <004FDE1C-E60F-4A51-BC1C-31BCDDB9C66E@benin2point0.org> <1584890578.124663000.o5h1zxzi@frv50.fwdcdn.com> Message-ID: thanks Olga, I will submit the comment. please all take care and stay safe. Rafik Le lun. 23 mars 2020 ? 00:23, Olga Kyryliuk a ?crit : > Hi Rafik and All, > > I did some stylistic revision of the text. Don't have any other > suggestions from my side. > > Best, > Olga > > > *22 ????? 2020, 01:24:56, ?? "Rafik Dammak" >:* > > Hi all, > > hope you are coping well with the current situation. > if I don't hear any strong objection, I will submit the comment by Monday > (that gives more than 24 hours last chance to review) > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le ven. 20 mars 2020 ? 08:20, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > > Thanks Farell, James, > @PC member please review asap. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 18:50, Farell FOLLY a > ?crit : > > Thanks James for your input. I have no objection. > > I reviewed it again and added a couple of comments. I think we now have > covered the most essential ones. > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:08, James Gannon wrote: > > Made some edits, happy with it now. > > --- > *James Gannon* > > *From: *NCSG-PC on behalf of Rafik Dammak > > *Date: *Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 22:53 > *To: *ncsg-pc > *Subject: *[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call > for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and > Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report > > Hi all, > > please review this as urgent request. the public comment was already > extended and Friday is the deadline. > > Best, > > Rafik > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > De : *Farell FOLLY* > Date: jeu. 19 mars 2020 ? 05:23 > Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for > Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency > (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report > To: > > Dear All, > > As I saw no one had volunteered to be the penholder for this public > comment and after discussion with Rafik, I went through and quickly drafted > our comment that you could find here > > . > > Please review it and let your comments and suggestions. We are short in > time (2 days left). > > Also, please excuse all the typos and incoherences if any. I drafted it > very quickly. > > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 15 Mar 2020, at 21:44, Farell FOLLY wrote: > > Dear All, > > Following the zoom recording that I had shared, I would like to share some > inputs that could help those who are inter to get a glance view and perhaps > also give clues regarding how the volunteers will approach to draft the > response to the PC. > > > Most importantly, It is important to recall that is the role of the board > to conduct such a periodic review (under Bylaws section 4.6(c)) in line > with its commitment to enhance the operational stability, reliability, > resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the systems and > processes, both internal and external, that directly affect and/or are > affected by the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN > coordinates. > > This second review (SSR2) follows a previous (SSR1) and proposes 30 > recommendations that are subjected to the current call for public comment. > > Of course, among those, there are recommendations that aim at checking > whether ICANN followed the recommendations of the SSR1. Then there are > three specific groups of issues covered by the review: > > > 1. security, operational stability and resiliency matters, both > physical and network, relating to the coordination of the Internet?s system > of unique identifiers; > 2. conformance with appropriate security contingency planning > framework for the Internet?s system of unique identifiers; > 3. maintaining clear and globally interoperable security processes for > those portions of the Internet?s system of unique identifiers that ICANN > coordinates. > > > The Review Team, throughout its recommendations, suggests many interesting > things, and in my opinion, the following -not limited to - could draw our > attention: > > > 1. The RT outlines in its #Rec 2 (which was suggested in SSR1 #Rec 9) > regarding - Information Security Management Systems and Security > Certifications - that ICANN should use industry security standards (e.g., > ITIL, ISO 27001, SSAE-18), specifically that the Root Zone Management be in > line with ISO 27031 > 2. #Rec 4 deals with Budget Transparency > 3. #Rec 6 to Create a Position Responsible for Both Strategic and > Tactical Security and Risk Management. > 4. #Rec 11 to Lead Efforts to Evolve Definitions Around Abuse and > Enable Reporting Against Those Definitions > 5. #Rec 12 to Create Legal and Appropriate Access Mechanisms to WHOIS > Data > 6. #Recc 13 to Improve the Completeness and Utility of the Domain > Abuse Activity Reporting Program > 7. #Rec 15 to Enhance Contracts with Registrars and Registries to > Incent the Mitigation of DNS Abuse > 8. #Rec 16 to Create Pricing Incentives for Contracted Parties to > Mitigate Abuse and Security Threats > 9. #Rec 21 to Implement the Recommendations from SAC063 and SAC073 and > Establish Formal Procedures for Key Rollovers > 10. #Rec 26 6 Document, Improve, and Test the EBERO Processes, > 11. #Rec 30 1 Clarify the SSR Implications of DNS-over-HTTP > > > With that in mind, I hope to have highlighted some important faces of the > report that we have to comment on. > > I wish you all a nice week. > > Stay healthy. We here in Germany are all in quarantine?.Working at home > for 6 weeks. > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb 2020, at 08:48, Farell FOLLY wrote: > > Dear All, > > Regarding this public comment, I suggest you watch this zoom recording > for the webinar that was held on February 10th, if you haven?t attended it. > It is very insightful and give a detailed history of the work as well as > the details about each recommendation. > > If you click on the link, the download will start, otherwise you can go to > the webinar page > and > choose whatever recording that suits your needs. > > > https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/uJMlJumtrTk3GIfGtwSDVqN4W465LaKs0yBL_fBcyBrmACMANAD3MrFHY-IxFjykyjSOhyWX4gf1oju0 > > > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > > On 5 Feb 2020, at 22:41, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > please let me know offlist if you want to join drafting for this important > public comment. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 ? 07:45, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > > Hi all, > > resending the call for volunteers, please let me know if you want to join > the drafting of NCSG comment. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > > Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 ? 04:20, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > > Hi all > > ICANN published the new public consultation on Second Security, Stability, > and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report. The SSR had some issue and > was paused for some time but it was able now to deliver its first report > for review. We should comment on this and share our input. > > For more background and explanation you can find more info here: > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ssr2-rt-draft-report-2020-01-24-en > > I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to > all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OgStOzDmumwWrKMJZtAvdhWESeLlNrsqQHFS1oS9sVE/edit > > > Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting > the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. We can leverage our rep to > SSR2 Naveed for guidance and insight about the proposed recommendations. > > You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 > and listing those who drafted them. > > Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new year! > > Best Regards, > > Rafik Dammak > > NCSG Policy Committee Chair > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Mar 24 15:49:11 2020 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. cheers Steph -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 From: Heather Forrest To: Stephanie Perrin , Bruna Martins dos Santos , Joan Kerr , Carlos Raul Dear NCSG colleagues, Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to submit to the online application form by Friday. Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, Heather Forrest ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Heather Forrest > Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman To: Austin, Donna Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >, Selli, Claudia >, Stephanie Perrin >, Graeme Bunton > Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): * RySG supports joint nomination * Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination * ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to nominate him individually. * BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now and then. * Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. Best wishes to all, be healthy, Heather On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna wrote: I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve his chances. I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its nomination of Jeff. From: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM To: Heather Forrest > Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >; Selli, Claudia >; Stephanie Perrin >; Austin, Donna ; Graeme Bunton > Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman Thanks Heather, I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the members to file support personally before the 27th. We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding capability of cooperation. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest >: Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing on. The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. Best wishes to all, Heather -- Wolf-Ulrich Knoben Am Steinringer Berg 19 D-53639 K?nigswinter Tel: +49 2244 873999 Mob: 0151 14525867 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Joint nomination of Jeff Neuman for ICANN Community Excellence Award 2020.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 17684 bytes Desc: Joint nomination of Jeff Neuman for ICANN Community Excellence Award 2020.docx URL: From rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com Tue Mar 24 15:51:56 2020 From: rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com (Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:51:56 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Honestly, I don't know him and looking at his CV online would not be very meaningful, so I'll leave it to others to chime in. Take care all On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Stephanie Perrin via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? My > apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. > > cheers Steph > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 > From: Heather Forrest > To: Stephanie Perrin > , Bruna Martins dos Santos > , Joan Kerr > , Carlos Raul > > > Dear NCSG colleagues, > > Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, > but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly > called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate > him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this > momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. > > Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to > submit to the online application form by Friday. > > Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, > > Heather Forrest > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Heather Forrest > Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM > Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > To: Austin, Donna > Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben < > wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Selli, Claudia < > claudia.selli at intl.att.com>, Stephanie Perrin < > stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Graeme Bunton > > > Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. > Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): > > - RySG supports joint nomination > - Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination > - ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to > nominate him individually. > - BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all > flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one > more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now > and then. > - Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions > from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. > > Best wishes to all, be healthy, > > Heather > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna > wrote: > >> I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of >> Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve >> his chances. >> >> >> >> I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its >> nomination of Jeff. >> >> >> >> *From:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM >> *To:* Heather Forrest >> *Cc:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, >> Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin < >> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>; Austin, Donna >> ; Graeme Bunton < >> gbunton at tucows.com> >> *Subject:* Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> >> Thanks Heather, >> >> I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our >> call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their >> agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the >> members to file support personally before the 27th. >> >> We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to >> improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting >> ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, >> chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the >> related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding >> capability of cooperation. >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Wolf-Ulrich >> >> >> >> Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest < >> haforrestesq at gmail.com>: >> >> Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, >> >> >> >> I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. >> >> >> >> I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The >> IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun >> madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, >> now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft >> form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership >> meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, >> and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this >> isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at >> least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing >> on. >> >> >> >> The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. >> >> >> >> Best wishes to all, >> >> >> >> Heather >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> *Wolf-Ulrich Knoben* >> >> *Am Steinringer Berg 19* >> >> *D-53639 K?nigswinter* >> >> *Tel: +49 2244 873999* >> >> *Mob: 0151 14525867* >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carlosraul at gutierrez.se Tue Mar 24 16:02:21 2020 From: carlosraul at gutierrez.se (carlosraul at gutierrez.se) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:02:21 -0600 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lists at icann.guru Tue Mar 24 16:02:42 2020 From: lists at icann.guru (James Gannon) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:02:42 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <749A7388-0C84-4261-8694-E77CDF48B695@icann.guru> No objection Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Mar 2020, at 14:01, Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix wrote: > > ? > Honestly, I don't know him and looking at his CV online would not be very meaningful, so I'll leave it to others to chime in. > > Take care all > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Stephanie Perrin via NCSG-EC wrote: >> Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. >> >> cheers Steph >> >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 >> From: Heather Forrest >> To: Stephanie Perrin , Bruna Martins dos Santos , Joan Kerr , Carlos Raul >> >> >> Dear NCSG colleagues, >> >> Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. >> >> Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to submit to the online application form by Friday. >> >> Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, >> >> Heather Forrest >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Heather Forrest >> Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM >> Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> To: Austin, Donna >> Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Selli, Claudia , Stephanie Perrin , Graeme Bunton >> >> >> Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): >> RySG supports joint nomination >> Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination >> ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to nominate him individually. >> BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now and then. >> Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. >> Best wishes to all, be healthy, >> >> Heather >> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna wrote: >>> I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve his chances. >>> >>> >>> >>> I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its nomination of Jeff. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM >>> To: Heather Forrest >>> Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin ; Austin, Donna ; Graeme Bunton >>> Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks Heather, >>> >>> I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the members to file support personally before the 27th. >>> >>> We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding capability of cooperation. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich >>> >>> >>> >>> Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest : >>> >>> Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, >>> >>> >>> >>> I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. >>> >>> >>> >>> I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing on. >>> >>> >>> >>> The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best wishes to all, >>> >>> >>> >>> Heather >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >>> >>> Am Steinringer Berg 19 >>> >>> D-53639 K?nigswinter >>> >>> Tel: +49 2244 873999 >>> >>> Mob: 0151 14525867 >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at kathykleiman.com Tue Mar 24 16:10:06 2020 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:10:06 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <070e7ef7578c6be66e900963d5b6271e621d91c7@gmmn-6gkh.accessdomain.com> While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not joining it.? Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or endorsement. Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and overexpansion of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter of the private Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" for a registry world in which registrants have no rights. He has fought, as co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded in the New gTLD applicant guidebook, and these now are.? I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not alone -- I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has not been particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed slowly. We don't need to support this nomination.? We can applaud politely when he wins. Best, Kathy? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephanie Perrin" To:"NCSG PC" , "NCSG EC" Cc: Sent:Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 Subject:[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter?? My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. cheers Steph -------- Forwarded Message -------- SUBJECT: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman DATE: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 FROM: Heather Forrest [1] TO: Stephanie Perrin [2], Bruna Martins dos Santos [3], Joan Kerr [4], Carlos Raul [5] Dear NCSG colleagues, Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to submit to the online application form by Friday. Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, Heather Forrest ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: HEATHER FORREST Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman To: Austin, Donna [7] Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Selli, Claudia , Stephanie Perrin , Graeme Bunton Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): * RySG supports joint nomination * Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination * ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to nominate him individually. * BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now and then * Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. Best wishes to all, be healthy, Heather On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna [13] wrote: I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve his chances. ? I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its nomination of Jeff. ? FROM: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com [14]] SENT: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM TO: Heather Forrest CC: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin ; Austin, Donna [19]; Graeme Bunton SUBJECT: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman ? Thanks Heather, I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the members to file support personally before the 27th. We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding capability of cooperation. ? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ? Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34?Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest : Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, ? I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. ? I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never The IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing on.? ? The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time.? ? Best wishes to all, ? Heather ? -- ? _WOLF-ULRICH KNOBEN_ _AM STEINRINGER BERG 19_ _D-53639 K?NIGSWINTER_ _TEL: +49 2244 873999_ _MOB: 0151 14525867_ Links: ------ [1] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com [2] mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [3] mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com [4] mailto:joankerr at fbsc.org [5] mailto:carlosraulg at gmail.com [6] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com [7] mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar [8] mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com [9] mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de [10] mailto:claudia.selli at intl.att.com [11] mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [12] mailto:gbunton at tucows.com [13] mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar [14] mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com [15] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com [16] mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de [17] mailto:claudia.selli at intl.att.com [18] mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [19] mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar [20] mailto:gbunton at tucows.com [21] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca Tue Mar 24 19:26:05 2020 From: stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca (Stephanie E Perrin) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:26:05 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: <070e7ef7578c6be66e900963d5b6271e621d91c7@gmmn-6gkh.accessdomain.com> References: <070e7ef7578c6be66e900963d5b6271e621d91c7@gmmn-6gkh.accessdomain.com> Message-ID: <6261781b-9afb-79f2-cd28-dd90dc49560f@digitaldiscretion.ca> Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or Don Blumenthal. On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: > > While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not > joining it.? Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or > endorsement. > > Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and > overexpansion of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter > of the private Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term > "Walled Gardens" for a registry world in which registrants have no > rights. He has fought, as co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded > in the New gTLD applicant guidebook, and these now are. > > I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not > alone -- I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has > not been particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made > and he changed slowly. > > We don't need to support this nomination.? We can applaud politely > when he wins. > > Best, Kathy > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > "Stephanie Perrin" > > To: > "NCSG PC" , "NCSG EC" > Cc: > > Sent: > Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 > Subject: > [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate > Jeff Neuman > > > Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this > matter?? My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been > preoccupied with the virus. > > cheers Steph > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 > From: Heather Forrest > To: Stephanie Perrin , Bruna > Martins dos Santos , Joan Kerr > , Carlos Raul > > > > Dear NCSG colleagues, > > Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the > madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff > for the (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back > in February to nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and > perhaps RrSG also. With this momentum going, I was hoping it might > be across the board for the GNSO. > > Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will > need to submit to the online application form by Friday. > > Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, > > Heather Forrest > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *Heather Forrest* > > Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM > Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > To: Austin, Donna > Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben > >, Selli, Claudia > >, > Stephanie Perrin >, Graeme Bunton > > > > > Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your > responses. Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if > I'm wrong): > > * RySG supports joint nomination > * Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination > * ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose > to nominate him individually. > * BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're > all flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke > you again one more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I > don't hear back between now and then. > * Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent > suggestions from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in > yellow - as attached. > > Best wishes to all, be healthy, > > Heather > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna > wrote: > > I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional > aspects of Jeff?s long standing participation in the community > would likely improve his chances. > > I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in > its nomination of Jeff. > > *From:*Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com > ] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM > *To:* Heather Forrest > > *Cc:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >; Selli, Claudia > >; Stephanie Perrin > >; Austin, Donna > ; Graeme Bunton > > *Subject:* Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff > Neuman > > Thanks Heather, > > I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our > constituency at our call today. Those participating in the > conversation expressed their agreement to Jeff being > nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the members to > file support personally before the 27th. > > We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may > help to improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of > his long lasting ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg > Vicechair term on GNSO Council, chair of the WG who drafted > the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the related Manual in > the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding capability > of cooperation. > > Best regards > > Wolf-Ulrich > > Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34?Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest > >: > > Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, > > I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. > > I should have thought of this sooner but... better late > than never. The IPC proposed in its February meeting (now > over a month ago, but Cancun madness intervened) to > nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, now > Community Excellence Award. We have the attached > nomination in draft form, and I had intended to submit it > after next Wednesay's IPC membership meeting. I understand > that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, and so > the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if > perhaps this isn't one of those rare moments in history > for an all-GNSO action? Or at least to ask if there are > other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing on. > > The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an > eye on time. > > Best wishes to all, > > Heather > > > -- > > */Wolf-Ulrich Knoben/* > > */Am Steinringer Berg 19/* > > */D-53639 K?nigswinter/* > > */Tel: +49 2244 873999/* > > */Mob: 0151 14525867/* > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Tue Mar 24 22:42:58 2020 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:42:58 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: References: <070e7ef7578c6be66e900963d5b6271e621d91c7@gmmn-6gkh.accessdomain.com> <6261781b-9afb-79f2-cd28-dd90dc49560f@digitaldiscretion.ca> Message-ID: While I acknowledge Jeff's leadership in the Subpro, I would agree with Kathy that if thats the pre-requisite we should also nominate previous chairs for this position and so on. On the other hand, I would absolutely support Joly for this award. Adding to the list, I would say that any of us whos been part of the EPDP would also be deserving of such award in the recent past. Hope everyone is safe ;) Le mar. 24 mars 2020 ? 17:37, Raoul Plommer via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : > I agree on nominating someone else than anyone on IPC.. > > -Raoul > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 13:26, Stephanie E Perrin via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or Don >> Blumenthal. >> On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: >> >> While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not >> joining it. Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or >> endorsement. >> >> Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and overexpansion >> of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter of the private >> Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" for >> a registry world in which registrants have no rights. He has fought, as >> co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded in the New gTLD applicant >> guidebook, and these now are. >> >> I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not alone >> -- I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has not been >> particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed >> slowly. >> >> We don't need to support this nomination. We can applaud politely when >> he wins. >> >> Best, Kathy >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: >> "Stephanie Perrin" >> >> >> To: >> "NCSG PC" , "NCSG EC" >> >> Cc: >> >> Sent: >> Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 >> Subject: >> [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? >> My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the >> virus. >> >> cheers Steph >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 >> From: Heather Forrest >> To: Stephanie Perrin >> , Bruna Martins dos Santos >> , Joan Kerr >> , Carlos Raul >> >> >> Dear NCSG colleagues, >> >> Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the >> madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the >> (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to >> nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With >> this momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. >> >> Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to >> submit to the online application form by Friday. >> >> Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, >> >> Heather Forrest >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Heather Forrest >> Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM >> Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> To: Austin, Donna >> Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben < >> wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Selli, Claudia < >> claudia.selli at intl.att.com >, Stephanie >> Perrin , Graeme Bunton < >> gbunton at tucows.com> >> >> >> Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. >> Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): >> >> - RySG supports joint nomination >> - Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination >> - ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to >> nominate him individually. >> - BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all >> flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one >> more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now >> and then. >> - Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions >> from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. >> >> Best wishes to all, be healthy, >> >> Heather >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna >> wrote: >> >>> I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of >>> Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve >>> his chances. >>> >>> >>> >>> I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its >>> nomination of Jeff. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM >>> *To:* Heather Forrest >>> *Cc:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, >>> Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin < >>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>; Austin, Donna >>> ; Graeme Bunton < >>> gbunton at tucows.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks Heather, >>> >>> I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our >>> call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their >>> agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the >>> members to file support personally before the 27th. >>> >>> We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to >>> improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting >>> ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, >>> chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the >>> related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding >>> capability of cooperation. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich >>> >>> >>> >>> Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest < >>> haforrestesq at gmail.com>: >>> >>> Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, >>> >>> >>> >>> I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. >>> >>> >>> >>> I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The >>> IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun >>> madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, >>> now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft >>> form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership >>> meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, >>> and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this >>> isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at >>> least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing >>> on. >>> >>> >>> >>> The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best wishes to all, >>> >>> >>> >>> Heather >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> *Wolf-Ulrich Knoben* >>> >>> *Am Steinringer Berg 19* >>> >>> *D-53639 K?nigswinter* >>> >>> *Tel: +49 2244 873999* >>> >>> *Mob: 0151 14525867* >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dgdorothydg at gmail.com Wed Mar 25 00:48:55 2020 From: dgdorothydg at gmail.com (dorothy g) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:48:55 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: <6261781b-9afb-79f2-cd28-dd90dc49560f@digitaldiscretion.ca> References: <070e7ef7578c6be66e900963d5b6271e621d91c7@gmmn-6gkh.accessdomain.com> <6261781b-9afb-79f2-cd28-dd90dc49560f@digitaldiscretion.ca> Message-ID: I would totally support a Joly nomination. Also I agree with Kathy we do not need to support the other candidate given some of the positions they have taken in the past. best regards Dorothy On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:26 PM Stephanie E Perrin < stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> wrote: > Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or Don Blumenthal. > On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: > > While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not > joining it. Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or > endorsement. > > Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and overexpansion > of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter of the private > Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" for > a registry world in which registrants have no rights. He has fought, as > co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded in the New gTLD applicant > guidebook, and these now are. > > I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not alone -- > I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has not been > particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed > slowly. > > We don't need to support this nomination. We can applaud politely when he > wins. > > Best, Kathy > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > "Stephanie Perrin" > > > To: > "NCSG PC" , "NCSG EC" > > Cc: > > Sent: > Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 > Subject: > [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > > > Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? My > apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. > > cheers Steph > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 > From: Heather Forrest > To: Stephanie Perrin > , Bruna Martins dos Santos > , Joan Kerr > , Carlos Raul > > > Dear NCSG colleagues, > > Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, > but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly > called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate > him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this > momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. > > Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to > submit to the online application form by Friday. > > Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, > > Heather Forrest > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Heather Forrest > Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM > Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > To: Austin, Donna > Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben < > wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Selli, Claudia < > claudia.selli at intl.att.com >, Stephanie Perrin > , Graeme Bunton > > > Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. > Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): > > - RySG supports joint nomination > - Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination > - ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to > nominate him individually. > - BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all > flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one > more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now > and then. > - Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions > from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. > > Best wishes to all, be healthy, > > Heather > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna > wrote: > >> I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of >> Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve >> his chances. >> >> >> >> I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its >> nomination of Jeff. >> >> >> >> *From:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM >> *To:* Heather Forrest >> *Cc:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, >> Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin < >> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>; Austin, Donna >> ; Graeme Bunton < >> gbunton at tucows.com> >> *Subject:* Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> >> Thanks Heather, >> >> I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our >> call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their >> agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the >> members to file support personally before the 27th. >> >> We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to >> improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting >> ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, >> chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the >> related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding >> capability of cooperation. >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Wolf-Ulrich >> >> >> >> Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest < >> haforrestesq at gmail.com>: >> >> Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, >> >> >> >> I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. >> >> >> >> I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The >> IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun >> madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, >> now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft >> form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership >> meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, >> and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this >> isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at >> least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing >> on. >> >> >> >> The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. >> >> >> >> Best wishes to all, >> >> >> >> Heather >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> *Wolf-Ulrich Knoben* >> >> *Am Steinringer Berg 19* >> >> *D-53639 K?nigswinter* >> >> *Tel: +49 2244 873999* >> >> *Mob: 0151 14525867* >> > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- Dorothy Gordon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at kathykleiman.com Wed Mar 25 01:49:29 2020 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:49:29 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I would certainly support Joly or Don Blumenthal.? Don, for those who didn't know him, was a former law enforcement/regulator who believed passionately in the rule of law and civil liberties/human rights.? He was exactly who we want as a law enforcement/cybersecurity leader -- and he was a member of SSAC at the end of his life. He passed away in the Fall. Joly is a great nominee too!? Best, Kathy ----- Original Message ----- From: "dorothy g" To:"Stephanie E Perrin" Cc:"ncsg-pc" , "NCSG EC" , "Kathy Kleiman" Sent:Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:48:55 +0000 Subject:Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman I would totally support a Joly nomination.? Also I agree with Kathy we do not need to support the other candidate given some of the positions they have taken in the past. best regardsDorothy On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:26 PM Stephanie E Perrin wrote: Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or Don Blumenthal. On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not joining it.? Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or endorsement. Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and overexpansion of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter of the private Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" for a registry world in which registrants have no rights. He has fought, as co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded in the New gTLD applicant guidebook, and these now are.? I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not alone -- I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has not been particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed slowly. We don't need to support this nomination.? We can applaud politely when he wins. Best, Kathy ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephanie Perrin" [2] To: "NCSG PC" [3], "NCSG EC" [4] Cc: Sent: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter?? My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. cheers Steph -------- Forwarded Message -------- SUBJECT: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman DATE: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 FROM: Heather Forrest [5] TO: Stephanie Perrin [6], Bruna Martins dos Santos [7], Joan Kerr [8], Carlos Raul [9] Dear NCSG colleagues, Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to submit to the online application form by Friday. Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, Heather Forrest ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: HEATHER FORREST Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman To: Austin, Donna [11] Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Selli, Claudia , Stephanie Perrin , Graeme Bunton Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): * RySG supports joint nomination * Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination * ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to nominate him individually. * BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now and then. * Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. Best wishes to all, be healthy, Heather On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna [17] wrote: I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve his chances. ? I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its nomination of Jeff. ? FROM: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com [18]] SENT: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM TO: Heather Forrest CC: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin ; Austin, Donna [23]; Graeme Bunton SUBJECT: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman ? Thanks Heather, I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the members to file support personally before the 27th. We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding capability of cooperation. ? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ? Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34?Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest : Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, ? I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. ? I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing on.? ? The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time.? ? Best wishes to all, ? Heather ? -- ? _WOLF-ULRICH KNOBEN_ _AM STEINRINGER BERG 19_ _D-53639 K?NIGSWINTER_ _TEL: +49 2244 873999_ _MOB: 0151 14525867_ _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is [26] https://lists.ncsgis/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc [27] _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is [28] https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc [29] -- Dorothy Gordon Links: ------ [1] mailto:stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca [2] mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [3] mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is [4] mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is [5] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com [6] mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [7] mailto:brunamrtns at gmail.com [8] mailto:joankerr at fbsc.org [9] mailto:carlosraulg at gmail.com [10] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com [11] mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar [12] mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com [13] mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de [14] mailto:claudiaselli at intl.att.com [15] mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [16] mailto:gbunton at tucows.com [17] mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar [18] mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com [19] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com [20] mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de [21] mailto:claudia.selli at intl.att.com [22] mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [23] mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar [24] mailto:gbunton at tucows.com [25] mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com [26] mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is [27] https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc [28] mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is [29] https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dave at davecake.net Wed Mar 25 05:42:50 2020 From: dave at davecake.net (David Cake) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:42:50 +0800 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would strongly support the nomination of Don Blumenthal. Someone who truly embodied the multistakeholder spirit, actively participating in ways that went well beyond simply representing his constituency. I also think it is in the spirit of the award for groups to nominate someone who is not one of their own advocates. And the realistic truth is that the deceased are most likely to be successful within a year of their passing. Now is the time. Thank you for the suggestion, Stephanie. David > On 25 Mar 2020, at 7:49 am, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > > I would certainly support Joly or Don Blumenthal. Don, for those who didn't know him, was a former law enforcement/regulator who believed passionately in the rule of law and civil liberties/human rights. He was exactly who we want as a law enforcement/cybersecurity leader -- and he was a member of SSAC at the end of his life. He passed away in the Fall. > > Joly is a great nominee too! > Best, Kathy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > "dorothy g" > > To: > "Stephanie E Perrin" > Cc: > "ncsg-pc" , "NCSG EC" , "Kathy Kleiman" > Sent: > Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:48:55 +0000 > Subject: > Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > > > I would totally support a Joly nomination. Also I agree with Kathy we do not need to support the other candidate given some of the positions they have taken in the past. > > best regards > Dorothy > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:26 PM Stephanie E Perrin > wrote: > Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or Don Blumenthal. > > On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: > While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not joining it. Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or endorsement. > > Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and overexpansion of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter of the private Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" for a registry world in which registrants have no rights. He has fought, as co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded in the New gTLD applicant guidebook, and these now are > > I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not alone -- I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has not been particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed slowly. > > We don't need to support this nomination. We can applaud politely when he wins. > > Best, Kathy > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > "Stephanie Perrin" > To: > "NCSG PC" , "NCSG EC" > Cc: > > Sent: > Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 > Subject: > [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > > > Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. > > cheers Steph > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 > From: Heather Forrest > To: Stephanie Perrin , Bruna Martins dos Santos , Joan Kerr , Carlos Raul > > Dear NCSG colleagues, > > Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. > > Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to submit to the online application form by Friday. > > Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, > > Heather Forrest > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Heather Forrest > > Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM > Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > To: Austin, Donna > Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >, Selli, Claudia >, Stephanie Perrin >, Graeme Bunton > > > > Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): > RySG supports joint nomination > Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination > ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to nominate him individually. > BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now and then. > Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. > Best wishes to all, be healthy, > > Heather > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna wrote: > I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve his chances. > > > I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its nomination of Jeff. > > > From: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com ] > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM > To: Heather Forrest > > Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >; Selli, Claudia >; Stephanie Perrin >; Austin, Donna ; Graeme Bunton > > Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > > > Thanks Heather, > > I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the members to file support personally before the 27th. > > We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding capability of cooperation. > > > Best regards > > Wolf-Ulrich > > > Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest >: > > Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, > > > I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. > > > I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing on. > > > The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. > > > Best wishes to all, > > > Heather > > > > > -- > > > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben > > Am Steinringer Berg 19 > > D-53639 K?nigswinter > > Tel: +49 2244 873999 > > Mob: 0151 14525867 > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > -- > Dorothy Gordon > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Tue Mar 24 21:37:14 2020 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:37:14 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: <6261781b-9afb-79f2-cd28-dd90dc49560f@digitaldiscretion.ca> References: <070e7ef7578c6be66e900963d5b6271e621d91c7@gmmn-6gkh.accessdomain.com> <6261781b-9afb-79f2-cd28-dd90dc49560f@digitaldiscretion.ca> Message-ID: I agree on nominating someone else than anyone on IPC.. -Raoul On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 13:26, Stephanie E Perrin via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or Don Blumenthal. > On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: > > While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not > joining it. Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or > endorsement. > > Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and overexpansion > of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter of the private > Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" for > a registry world in which registrants have no rights. He has fought, as > co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded in the New gTLD applicant > guidebook, and these now are. > > I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not alone -- > I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has not been > particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed > slowly. > > We don't need to support this nomination. We can applaud politely when he > wins. > > Best, Kathy > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > "Stephanie Perrin" > > > To: > "NCSG PC" , "NCSG EC" > > Cc: > > Sent: > Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 > Subject: > [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > > > Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? My > apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. > > cheers Steph > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 > From: Heather Forrest > To: Stephanie Perrin > , Bruna Martins dos Santos > , Joan Kerr > , Carlos Raul > > > Dear NCSG colleagues, > > Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the madness, > but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly > called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to nominate > him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this > momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. > > Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to > submit to the online application form by Friday. > > Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, > > Heather Forrest > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Heather Forrest > Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM > Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman > To: Austin, Donna > Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben < > wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Selli, Claudia < > claudia.selli at intl.att.com >, Stephanie Perrin > , Graeme Bunton > > > Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. > Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): > > - RySG supports joint nomination > - Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination > - ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to > nominate him individually. > - BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all > flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one > more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now > and then. > - Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions > from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. > > Best wishes to all, be healthy, > > Heather > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna > wrote: > >> I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of >> Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve >> his chances. >> >> >> >> I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its >> nomination of Jeff. >> >> >> >> *From:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM >> *To:* Heather Forrest >> *Cc:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, >> Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin < >> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>; Austin, Donna >> ; Graeme Bunton < >> gbunton at tucows.com> >> *Subject:* Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> >> Thanks Heather, >> >> I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our >> call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their >> agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the >> members to file support personally before the 27th. >> >> We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to >> improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting >> ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, >> chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the >> related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding >> capability of cooperation. >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Wolf-Ulrich >> >> >> >> Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest < >> haforrestesq at gmail.com>: >> >> Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, >> >> >> >> I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. >> >> >> >> I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The >> IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun >> madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, >> now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft >> form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership >> meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, >> and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this >> isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at >> least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing >> on. >> >> >> >> The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. >> >> >> >> Best wishes to all, >> >> >> >> Heather >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> *Wolf-Ulrich Knoben* >> >> *Am Steinringer Berg 19* >> >> *D-53639 K?nigswinter* >> >> *Tel: +49 2244 873999* >> >> *Mob: 0151 14525867* >> > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca Wed Mar 25 16:18:40 2020 From: stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca (Stephanie E Perrin) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:18:40 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for the support David!? I really miss Don, he was a mensch and really did demonstrate the MS spirit!? well said.? I also really really think it is time to recognize Joly as well, he works tirelessly for us! Steph On 2020-03-24 11:42 p.m., David Cake wrote: > I would strongly support the nomination of Don Blumenthal. Someone who > truly embodied the multistakeholder spirit, actively participating in > ways that went well beyond simply representing his constituency. > > I also think it is in the spirit of the award for groups to nominate > someone who is not one of their own advocates. > > And the realistic truth is that the deceased are most likely to be > successful within a year of their passing. Now is the time. > > Thank you for the suggestion, Stephanie. > > David > >> On 25 Mar 2020, at 7:49 am, Kathy Kleiman > > wrote: >> >> I would certainly support Joly or Don Blumenthal.? Don, for those who >> didn't know him, was a former law enforcement/regulator who believed >> passionately in the rule of law and civil liberties/human rights.? He >> was exactly who we want as a law enforcement/cybersecurity leader -- >> and he was a member of SSAC at the end of his life. He passed away in >> the Fall. >> >> Joly is a great nominee too! >> Best, Kathy >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: >> "dorothy g" > >> >> To: >> "Stephanie E Perrin" > > >> Cc: >> "ncsg-pc" >, >> "NCSG EC" >, >> "Kathy Kleiman" > > >> Sent: >> Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:48:55 +0000 >> Subject: >> Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will >> nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> I would totally support a Joly nomination.? Also I agree with >> Kathy we do not need to support the other candidate given some of >> the positions they have taken in the past. >> >> best regards >> Dorothy >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:26 PM Stephanie E Perrin >> > > wrote: >> >> Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or >> Don Blumenthal. >> >> On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: >> >> While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly >> recommend not joining it.? Jeff Neuman may win, but he >> does not need our help or endorsement. >> >> Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries >> and overexpansion of intellectual property rights. He was >> a huge supporter of the private Public Interest >> Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" >> for a registry world in which registrants have no rights. >> He has fought, as co-chair, for registry rights to be >> embedded in the New gTLD applicant guidebook, and these >> now are >> >> I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but >> he's not alone -- I've done that, Phil Corwin has done >> that, others too. He has not been particularly fair or >> neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed slowly. >> >> We don't need to support this nomination.? We can applaud >> politely when he wins. >> >> Best, Kathy >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: >> "Stephanie Perrin" >> >> >> >> To: >> "NCSG PC" >> , "NCSG EC" >> >> Cc: >> >> Sent: >> Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 >> Subject: >> [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will >> nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a >> decision on this matter?? My apologies for the delay >> in acting, I have been preoccupied with the virus. >> >> cheers Steph >> >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will >> nominate Jeff Neuman >> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 >> From: Heather Forrest >> >> To: Stephanie Perrin >> >> , Bruna >> Martins dos Santos >> , Joan Kerr >> , >> Carlos Raul >> >> >> >> >> Dear NCSG colleagues, >> >> Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all >> fighting the madness, but the deadline is rapidly >> approaching to nominate Jeff for the (formerly >> called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in >> February to nominate him, and now RySG is keen to >> join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With this momentum >> going, I was hoping it might be across the board for >> the GNSO. >> >> Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, >> which I will need to submit to the online application >> form by Friday. >> >> Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe >> and sane, >> >> Heather Forrest >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: *Heather Forrest* > > >> Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM >> Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will >> nominate Jeff Neuman >> To: Austin, Donna >> >> Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben > >, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >> > >, Selli, >> Claudia > >, Stephanie Perrin >> > >, Graeme >> Bunton > >> >> >> Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for >> your responses. Here's where I understand the >> situation (correct me if I'm wrong): >> >> * RySG supports joint nomination >> * Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint >> nomination >> * ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members >> may choose to nominate him individually. >> * BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, >> when we're all flat out dealing with pandemic >> arrangements),so I'll poke you again one more >> time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't >> hear back between now and then. >> * Nomination draft revised to incorporate the >> excellent suggestions from ISPCP - I have >> highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. >> >> Best wishes to all, be healthy, >> >> Heather >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna >> >> wrote: >> >> I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of >> additional aspects of Jeff?s long standing >> participation in the community would likely >> improve his chances. >> >> >> I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support >> the IPC in its nomination of Jeff. >> >> >> *From:*Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >> [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com >> ] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM >> *To:* Heather Forrest > > >> *Cc:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben >> > >; Selli, >> Claudia > >; Stephanie >> Perrin > >; >> Austin, Donna >> ; Graeme Bunton >> > >> *Subject:* Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will >> nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> Thanks Heather, >> >> I've brought your suggestion to the attention of >> our constituency at our call today. Those >> participating in the conversation expressed their >> agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we >> decided to leave it up to the members to file >> support personally before the 27th. >> >> We also discussed the rationale for the >> nomination. It may help to improve the chances >> for Jeff if additional aspects of his long >> lasting ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg >> Vicechair term on GNSO Council, chair of the WG >> who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) >> and the related Manual in the GNSO Procedures >> where he has shown outstanding capability of >> cooperation. >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Wolf-Ulrich >> >> >> Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34?Uhr schrieb >> Heather Forrest > >: >> >> Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, >> Stephanie, >> >> >> I hope this message finds you all well and >> out of harm's way. >> >> >> I should have thought of this sooner but... >> better late than never. The IPC proposed in >> its February meeting (now over a month ago, >> but Cancun madness intervened) to nominate >> Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, now >> Community Excellence Award. We have the >> attached nomination in draft form, and I had >> intended to submit it after next Wednesay's >> IPC membership meeting. I understand that >> RySG has also been discussing nominating >> Jeff, and so the thought arose to circulate >> our draft and ask if perhaps this isn't one >> of those rare moments in history for an >> all-GNSO action? Or at least to ask if there >> are other SG/Cs who would be interested in >> signing on. >> >> >> The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we >> need to keep an eye on time. >> >> >> Best wishes to all, >> >> >> Heather >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> */Wolf-Ulrich Knoben/* >> >> */Am Steinringer Berg 19/* >> >> */D-53639 K?nigswinter/* >> >> */Tel: +49 2244 873999/* >> >> */Mob: 0151 14525867/* >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> >> -- >> Dorothy Gordon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Mar 26 01:28:27 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:28:27 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: <1585147678.743911000.2ee97ruc@frv50.fwdcdn.com> References: <1585147678.743911000.2ee97ruc@frv50.fwdcdn.com> Message-ID: hi all, we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. the deadline for submission is the 31st March. Best. Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : Olga Kyryliuk Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ? 00:23 Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements To: Dear All, We have prepared a draft NCSG comment to the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements. The deadline for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for the PC to approve the comment. Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments in track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your contributions *till Friday, 27 March, end of the day*. Thanks in advance! Best, Olga -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Wed Mar 25 15:32:50 2020 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:32:50 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'd prefer nominating a living candidate. It seems more useful. I think posthumous awards should be in their own category or made exceptional/additional. -Raoul On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 10:18, Stephanie E Perrin via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Thanks for the support David! I really miss Don, he was a mensch and > really did demonstrate the MS spirit! well said. I also really really > think it is time to recognize Joly as well, he works tirelessly for us! > > Steph > On 2020-03-24 11:42 p.m., David Cake wrote: > > I would strongly support the nomination of Don Blumenthal. Someone who > truly embodied the multistakeholder spirit, actively participating in ways > that went well beyond simply representing his constituency. > > I also think it is in the spirit of the award for groups to nominate > someone who is not one of their own advocates. > > And the realistic truth is that the deceased are most likely to be > successful within a year of their passing. Now is the time. > > Thank you for the suggestion, Stephanie. > > David > > On 25 Mar 2020, at 7:49 am, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > > I would certainly support Joly or Don Blumenthal. Don, for those who > didn't know him, was a former law enforcement/regulator who believed > passionately in the rule of law and civil liberties/human rights. He was > exactly who we want as a law enforcement/cybersecurity leader -- and he was > a member of SSAC at the end of his life. He passed away in the Fall. > > Joly is a great nominee too! > Best, Kathy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > "dorothy g" > > To: > "Stephanie E Perrin" > Cc: > "ncsg-pc" , "NCSG EC" , > "Kathy Kleiman" > Sent: > Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:48:55 +0000 > Subject: > Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff > Neuman > > > I would totally support a Joly nomination. Also I agree with Kathy we do > not need to support the other candidate given some of the positions they > have taken in the past. > > best regards > Dorothy > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:26 PM Stephanie E Perrin < > stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> wrote: > >> Personally I would rather we nominate someone, like Joly or Don >> Blumenthal. >> On 2020-03-24 10:10 a.m., Kathy Kleiman wrote: >> >> While we can't block this nomination, I would strongly recommend not >> joining it. Jeff Neuman may win, but he does not need our help or >> endorsement. >> >> Jeff is an unapologetic support of New gTLD registries and overexpansion >> of intellectual property rights. He was a huge supporter of the private >> Public Interest Commitments -- the creator of the term "Walled Gardens" for >> a registry world in which registrants have no rights. He has fought, as >> co-chair, for registry rights to be embedded in the New gTLD applicant >> guidebook, and these now are >> >> I appreciate his many years of chairing of a PDP WG, but he's not alone >> -- I've done that, Phil Corwin has done that, others too. He has not been >> particularly fair or neutral -- until complaints were made and he changed >> slowly. >> >> We don't need to support this nomination. We can applaud politely when >> he wins. >> >> Best, Kathy >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: >> "Stephanie Perrin" >> >> >> To: >> "NCSG PC" , "NCSG EC" >> >> Cc: >> >> Sent: >> Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:49:11 +0000 >> Subject: >> [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> >> >> Folks ,could we get a 48 hour turnaround on a decision on this matter? >> My apologies for the delay in acting, I have been preoccupied with the >> virus. >> >> cheers Steph >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: Fwd: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:16:41 +1100 >> From: Heather Forrest >> To: Stephanie Perrin >> , Bruna Martins dos Santos >> , Joan Kerr >> , Carlos Raul >> >> >> Dear NCSG colleagues, >> >> Sorry to throw this into your inboxes when we're all fighting the >> madness, but the deadline is rapidly approaching to nominate Jeff for the >> (formerly called) "Ethos Award". The IPC had decided back in February to >> nominate him, and now RySG is keen to join on, and perhaps RrSG also. With >> this momentum going, I was hoping it might be across the board for the GNSO. >> >> Would the NCSG like to join? Nomination attached, which I will need to >> submit to the online application form by Friday. >> >> Very best wishes to you all, hope you're keeping safe and sane, >> >> Heather Forrest >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Heather Forrest >> Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:09 PM >> Subject: Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >> To: Austin, Donna >> Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben , Wolf-Ulrich Knoben < >> wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Selli, Claudia < >> claudia.selli at intl.att.com >, Stephanie >> Perrin , Graeme Bunton < >> gbunton at tucows.com> >> >> >> Thanks very much to Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich and Donna for your responses. >> Here's where I understand the situation (correct me if I'm wrong): >> >> - RySG supports joint nomination >> - Graeme to confirm whether RrSG supports joint nomination >> - ISPCP will not join joint nomination, but members may choose to >> nominate him individually. >> - BC and NCSG - no response as yet (understandable, when we're all >> flat out dealing with pandemic arrangements),so I'll poke you again one >> more time tomorrow after the IPC meeting if I don't hear back between now >> and then. >> - Nomination draft revised to incorporate the excellent suggestions >> from ISPCP - I have highlighted major changes in yellow - as attached. >> >> Best wishes to all, be healthy, >> >> Heather >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:56 PM Austin, Donna >> wrote: >> >>> I agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the inclusion of additional aspects of >>> Jeff?s long standing participation in the community would likely improve >>> his chances. >>> >>> >>> I can confirm that the RySG is willing to support the IPC in its >>> nomination of Jeff. >>> >>> >>> *From:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben [mailto:wuknoben at gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:57 AM >>> *To:* Heather Forrest >>> *Cc:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ; Selli, >>> Claudia ; Stephanie Perrin < >>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>; Austin, Donna >>> ; Graeme Bunton < >>> gbunton at tucows.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: ICANN Excellence award - IPC will nominate Jeff Neuman >>> >>> >>> Thanks Heather, >>> >>> I've brought your suggestion to the attention of our constituency at our >>> call today. Those participating in the conversation expressed their >>> agreement to Jeff being nominated. Finally we decided to leave it up to the >>> members to file support personally before the 27th. >>> >>> We also discussed the rationale for the nomination. It may help to >>> improve the chances for Jeff if additional aspects of his long lasting >>> ICANN engagement could be appreciated: eg Vicechair term on GNSO Council, >>> chair of the WG who drafted the GNSO PDP (Annex A to the Bylaws) and the >>> related Manual in the GNSO Procedures where he has shown outstanding >>> capability of cooperation. >>> >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich >>> >>> >>> Am Fr., 20. M?rz 2020 um 23:34 Uhr schrieb Heather Forrest < >>> haforrestesq at gmail.com>: >>> >>> Dear Donna, Graeme, Wolf-Ulrich, Claudia, Stephanie, >>> >>> >>> I hope this message finds you all well and out of harm's way. >>> >>> >>> I should have thought of this sooner but... better late than never. The >>> IPC proposed in its February meeting (now over a month ago, but Cancun >>> madness intervened) to nominate Jeff for the formerly ICANN Ethos Award, >>> now Community Excellence Award. We have the attached nomination in draft >>> form, and I had intended to submit it after next Wednesay's IPC membership >>> meeting. I understand that RySG has also been discussing nominating Jeff, >>> and so the thought arose to circulate our draft and ask if perhaps this >>> isn't one of those rare moments in history for an all-GNSO action? Or at >>> least to ask if there are other SG/Cs who would be interested in signing >>> on. >>> >>> >>> The deadline is next week, the 27th, so we need to keep an eye on time. >>> >>> >>> Best wishes to all, >>> >>> >>> Heather >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> *Wolf-Ulrich Knoben* >>> >>> *Am Steinringer Berg 19* >>> >>> *D-53639 K?nigswinter* >>> >>> *Tel: +49 2244 873999* >>> >>> *Mob: 0151 14525867* >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > > > -- > Dorothy Gordon > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Fri Mar 27 08:34:26 2020 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:34:26 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: References: <1585147678.743911000.2ee97ruc@frv50.fwdcdn.com> Message-ID: <38FD79CD-944B-4B5D-B470-222C1480CBD1@benin2point0.org> Dear All, Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the current content addresses all the very important point around the Next-Gen program. Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is good shape to be submitted part from typos or minors. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. > the deadline for submission is the 31st March. > > Best. > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > De : Olga Kyryliuk > > Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ? 00:23 > Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements > To: > > > > Dear All, > > We have prepared a draft NCSG comment to the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements. The deadline for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for the PC to approve the comment. > > Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments in track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your contributions till Friday, 27 March, end of the day. > > Thanks in advance! > > Best, > Olga > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Fri Mar 27 17:37:17 2020 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: <38FD79CD-944B-4B5D-B470-222C1480CBD1@benin2point0.org> References: <1585147678.743911000.2ee97ruc@frv50.fwdcdn.com> <38FD79CD-944B-4B5D-B470-222C1480CBD1@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: <1784932474.3120245.1585323437190@mail.yahoo.com> Dear all,?I have read the comment and I have no objections to being sent.? JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. Presidente?-?AGEIA DENSI?ColombiaGNSO Councilor - ICANNCluster Orinoco TIC memberMaster IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes Cel. +57 3017435600 Twitter:?@JmanuRojas ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? El viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020 01:34:45 a.?m. GMT-5, Farell FOLLY escribi?: Dear All, Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the current content addresses all the very important point around the Next-Gen program. Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is good shape to be submitted part from typos or minors. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLYGNSO Councillorlinkedin.com/in/farellf? On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak wrote: hi all, we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement.the deadline for submission is the 31st March. Best. Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- De?: Olga Kyryliuk Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ??00:23 Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements To: Dear All, We have prepared a draft NCSG comment to the?Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN?Program Improvements. The deadline for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for the PC to approve the comment.? Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments in track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your contributions till Friday, 27 March, end of the day. Thanks in advance! Best,Olga_______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lizorembo at gmail.com Fri Mar 27 17:52:21 2020 From: lizorembo at gmail.com (Liz Orembo) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:52:21 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: <1784932474.3120245.1585323437190@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1585147678.743911000.2ee97ruc@frv50.fwdcdn.com> <38FD79CD-944B-4B5D-B470-222C1480CBD1@benin2point0.org> <1784932474.3120245.1585323437190@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Me too. No major objections. On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:37 PM Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC < ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Dear all, > I have read the comment and I have no objections to being sent. > > JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. > Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia > GNSO Councilor - ICANN > Cluster Orinoco TIC member > Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes > > Cel. +57 3017435600 > Twitter: @JmanuRojas > > > > > > > > > El viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020 01:34:45 a. m. GMT-5, Farell FOLLY < > farell at benin2point0.org> escribi?: > > > Dear All, > > Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the current > content addresses all the very important point around the Next-Gen program. > Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is good shape to be submitted > part from typos or minors. > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. > the deadline for submission is the 31st March. > > Best. > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > De : *Olga Kyryliuk* > Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ? 00:23 > Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft > Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements > To: > > > Dear All, > > We have prepared a draft NCSG comment > to > the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements. The deadline > for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for the PC to > approve the comment. > > Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments in > track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your > contributions *till Friday, 27 March, end of the day*. > > Thanks in advance! > > Best, > Olga > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- Best regards. Liz. PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lists at icann.guru Fri Mar 27 18:18:45 2020 From: lists at icann.guru (James Gannon) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:18:45 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: No objection here too Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Mar 2020, at 15:52, Liz Orembo wrote: > > ? > Me too. No major objections. > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:37 PM Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC wrote: >> Dear all, >> I have read the comment and I have no objections to being sent. >> >> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. >> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia >> GNSO Councilor - ICANN >> Cluster Orinoco TIC member >> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes >> >> Cel. +57 3017435600 >> Twitter: @JmanuRojas >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> El viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020 01:34:45 a. m. GMT-5, Farell FOLLY escribi?: >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the current content addresses all the very important point around the Next-Gen program. Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is good shape to be submitted part from typos or minors. >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak wrote: >>> >>> hi all, >>> >>> we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. >>> the deadline for submission is the 31st March. >>> >>> Best. >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> De : Olga Kyryliuk >>> Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ? 00:23 >>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements >>> To: >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> We have prepared a draft NCSG comment to the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements. The deadline for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for the PC to approve the comment. >>> >>> Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments in track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your contributions till Friday, 27 March, end of the day. >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Best, >>> Olga >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > -- > > Best regards. > Liz. > > PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From oreoluwa at wtec.org.ng Fri Mar 27 19:00:05 2020 From: oreoluwa at wtec.org.ng (Oreoluwa Somolu Lesi) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:00:05 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This is a nicely put-together comment and I have no objection to it. Kind regards, Ore -- Oreoluwa Lesi Executive Director, Women's Technology Empowerment Centre (W.TEC) +234.803.621.1307, +234.813.339.9999 | www.wtec.org.ng | @wteconline On 27/03/2020 5:18 pm, James Gannon wrote: > No objection here too > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 27 Mar 2020, at 15:52, Liz Orembo wrote: >> >> ? >> Me too. No major objections. >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:37 PM Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC >> > wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> I have read the comment and I have no objections to being sent. >> >> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. >> Presidente?- AGEIA DENSI?Colombia >> GNSO Councilor - ICANN >> Cluster Orinoco TIC member >> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes >> >> Cel. +57 3017435600 >> Twitter: @JmanuRojas >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> El viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020 01:34:45 a.?m. GMT-5, Farell >> FOLLY > >> escribi?: >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the >> current content addresses all the very important point around the >> Next-Gen program. Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is >> good shape to be submitted part from typos or minors. >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak >> > wrote: >>> >>> hi all, >>> >>> we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. >>> the deadline for submission is the 31st March. >>> >>> Best. >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> De?: *Olga Kyryliuk* >> > >>> Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ??00:23 >>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on >>> Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements >>> To: >> > >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> We have prepared a draft NCSG comment >>> to >>> the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN?Program Improvements. The >>> deadline for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some >>> time for the PC to approve the comment. >>> >>> Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your >>> edits/comments in track changes for easier reference. We will be >>> waiting for your contributions *till Friday, 27 March, end of >>> the day*. >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Best, >>> Olga >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards. >> Liz. >> >> PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tatiana.tropina at gmail.com Fri Mar 27 19:06:59 2020 From: tatiana.tropina at gmail.com (Tatiana Tropina) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:06:59 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: No objection from me either -- thanks Olga! Warm regards, Tanya On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 18:00, Oreoluwa Somolu Lesi wrote: > This is a nicely put-together comment and I have no objection to it. > > Kind regards, > Ore > -- > Oreoluwa Lesi > Executive Director, Women's Technology Empowerment Centre (W.TEC) > +234.803.621.1307, +234.813.339.9999 | www.wtec.org.ng > | @wteconline > > > On 27/03/2020 5:18 pm, James Gannon wrote: > > No objection here too > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 27 Mar 2020, at 15:52, Liz Orembo > wrote: > > ? > Me too. No major objections. > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:37 PM Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC < > ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> I have read the comment and I have no objections to being sent. >> >> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. >> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia >> GNSO Councilor - ICANN >> Cluster Orinoco TIC member >> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes >> >> Cel. +57 3017435600 >> Twitter: @JmanuRojas >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> El viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020 01:34:45 a. m. GMT-5, Farell FOLLY < >> farell at benin2point0.org> escribi?: >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the current >> content addresses all the very important point around the Next-Gen program. >> Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is good shape to be submitted >> part from typos or minors. >> >> @__f_f__ >> >> Best Regards >> ____________________________________ >> >> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >> GNSO Councillor >> linkedin.com/in/farellf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> hi all, >> >> we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. >> the deadline for submission is the 31st March. >> >> Best. >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> De : *Olga Kyryliuk* >> Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ? 00:23 >> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft >> Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements >> To: >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> We have prepared a draft NCSG comment >> to >> the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements. The deadline >> for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for the PC to >> approve the comment. >> >> Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments >> in track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your >> contributions *till Friday, 27 March, end of the day*. >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Best, >> Olga >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > > > -- > > Best regards. > Liz. > > PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Mar 30 02:44:51 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:44:51 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: thanks all, just reminder that deadline for submission is 31st Marc, last change to review the draft and express any concern. Best, Rafik Le sam. 28 mars 2020 ? 02:07, Tatiana Tropina a ?crit : > No objection from me either -- thanks Olga! > Warm regards, > Tanya > > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 18:00, Oreoluwa Somolu Lesi > wrote: > >> This is a nicely put-together comment and I have no objection to it. >> >> Kind regards, >> Ore >> -- >> Oreoluwa Lesi >> Executive Director, Women's Technology Empowerment Centre (W.TEC) >> +234.803.621.1307, +234.813.339.9999 | www.wtec.org.ng >> | @wteconline >> >> >> On 27/03/2020 5:18 pm, James Gannon wrote: >> >> No objection here too >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 27 Mar 2020, at 15:52, Liz Orembo >> wrote: >> >> ? >> Me too. No major objections. >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:37 PM Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC < >> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> I have read the comment and I have no objections to being sent. >>> >>> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. >>> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia >>> GNSO Councilor - ICANN >>> Cluster Orinoco TIC member >>> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes >>> >>> Cel. +57 3017435600 >>> Twitter: @JmanuRojas >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> El viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020 01:34:45 a. m. GMT-5, Farell FOLLY < >>> farell at benin2point0.org> escribi?: >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the >>> current content addresses all the very important point around the Next-Gen >>> program. Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is good shape to be >>> submitted part from typos or minors. >>> >>> @__f_f__ >>> >>> Best Regards >>> ____________________________________ >>> >>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >>> GNSO Councillor >>> linkedin.com/in/farellf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak wrote: >>> >>> hi all, >>> >>> we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. >>> the deadline for submission is the 31st March. >>> >>> Best. >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> De : *Olga Kyryliuk* >>> Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ? 00:23 >>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft >>> Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements >>> To: >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> We have prepared a draft NCSG comment >>> to >>> the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements. The deadline >>> for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for the PC to >>> approve the comment. >>> >>> Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments >>> in track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your >>> contributions *till Friday, 27 March, end of the day*. >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Best, >>> Olga >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards. >> Liz. >> >> PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Mar 30 16:49:53 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:49:53 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 In-Reply-To: <96FA7067-0C34-4DD4-A710-E84348CB278A@benin2point0.org> References: <96FA7067-0C34-4DD4-A710-E84348CB278A@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: Hi all, We have this draft comment for your review. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Farell FOLLY Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2020, 03:51 Subject: Re: [Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 To: Rafik Dammak Cc: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu Dear all, Due to the approaching deadline, Rafik and I worked to propose a draft response to this Public comment and would like to gather your inputs for the draft report published by the contractor (Karen Scarfone, Scarfone Cybersecurity) for Study 1 for the Name Collision Analysis Project. Please note that there are only 2 days (even less) lefts for the PC to be closed. The report is very brief, one page long. What is needed from you: 1. Do you think that this study (Study 1 of 3) was broad enough to include all prior works related to the Name Collisions related issues? 2. According to you, is the approach used efficient? For a quick background on the topic: 1) In October 2018 the BTC asked for OCTO?s assessment of the NCAP proposal, which OCTO provided on 27 November 2018. Subsequently, OCTO and SSAC had discussions that provided additional information and further clarification to OCTO on the details of the proposal. OCTO provided its assessment on all three studies that comprise the NCAP proposal. In that assessment, OCTO expressed concerns about the scope of Study 1, that the goals of Studies 2 and 3 might not be achievable, and that the overall project might not ultimately provide the necessary information to the Board to make decisions on whether or not a TLD is a ?collision string? and can be safely delegated. OCTO also noted the high cost and long duration of the overall project. (Source) 2) Study 1 (subjected to this call for Public Comment) is focused on performing a survey of all the research that has been undertaken in the area of name collision since 2014 and evaluating if this work could meet, or assist in meeting, the objectives set out in the Board resolutions. The study includes a decision on if the project should proceed based on the results of the survey and the availability of data necessary to perform Studies 2 and 3. Study 1 also calls for creating a data repository and associated policies and processes to store data necessary for use in subsequent studies. (Source) 3) In July 2019, ICANN publishes a call for applications to select a contractor to conduct Study 1. Details can be found here . 4) The RFC for proposal that outline the requirements that the contractor in 3) should meet is available here . 5) Our draft response is available through this link . That is all?.by now ;) @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY GNSO Councillor linkedin.com/in/farellf On 14 Feb 2020, at 02:52, Rafik Dammak wrote: Hi all ICANN just published a consultation on Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1. You can find here all the details here https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ncap-study-1-2020-02-13-en . We preciously commented on NCAP plan and so this is an opportunity to comment on the study and follow-up. I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_27iFmqrAnVJ7Aq1jedo9CmBlb6MbBFq-roaMpb-xGU/edit Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. For those interested by the policy and technology discussion, this is a good topic to review and work on drafting a comment. You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and listing those who drafted them. Best Regards, Rafik Dammak NCSG Policy Committee Chair -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Mar 31 14:25:35 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:25:35 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 In-Reply-To: References: <96FA7067-0C34-4DD4-A710-E84348CB278A@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: hi all, reminder to review the draft comment. Best, Rafik Le lun. 30 mars 2020 ? 22:49, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > > Hi all, > > We have this draft comment for your review. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Farell FOLLY > Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2020, 03:51 > Subject: Re: [Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on > Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 > To: Rafik Dammak > Cc: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu > > > Dear all, > > Due to the approaching deadline, Rafik and I worked to propose a draft > response > to > this Public comment and would like to gather your inputs for the draft > report > published > by the contractor (Karen Scarfone, Scarfone Cybersecurity) for Study 1 for > the Name Collision Analysis Project. Please note that there are only 2 days > (even less) lefts for the PC to be closed. The report is very brief, one > page long. > > What is needed from you: > > > 1. Do you think that this study (Study 1 of 3) was broad enough to > include all prior works related to the Name Collisions related issues? > 2. According to you, is the approach used efficient? > > > For a quick background on the topic: > > 1) In October 2018 the BTC asked for OCTO?s assessment of the NCAP > proposal, which OCTO provided on 27 November 2018. Subsequently, OCTO and > SSAC had discussions that provided additional information and further > clarification to OCTO on the details of the proposal. OCTO provided its > assessment on all three studies that comprise the NCAP proposal. In that > assessment, OCTO expressed concerns about the scope of Study 1, that the > goals of Studies 2 and 3 might not be achievable, and that the overall > project might not ultimately provide the necessary information to the Board > to make decisions on whether or not a TLD is a ?collision string? and can > be safely delegated. OCTO also noted the high cost and long duration of the > overall project. (Source) > > 2) Study 1 (subjected to this call for Public Comment) is focused on > performing a survey of all the research that has been undertaken in the > area of name collision since 2014 and evaluating if this work could meet, > or assist in meeting, the objectives set out in the Board resolutions. The > study includes a decision on if the project should proceed based on the > results of the survey and the availability of data necessary to perform > Studies 2 and 3. Study 1 also calls for creating a data repository and > associated policies and processes to store data necessary for use in > subsequent studies. (Source) > > 3) In July 2019, ICANN publishes a call for applications to select a > contractor to conduct Study 1. Details can be found here > . > 4) The RFC for proposal that outline the requirements that the contractor > in 3) should meet is available here > > . > > 5) Our draft response is available through this link > > . > > > That is all?.by now ;) > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > GNSO Councillor > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > On 14 Feb 2020, at 02:52, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all > > ICANN just published a consultation on Name Collision Analysis Project > (NCAP) Study 1. You can find here all the details here > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ncap-study-1-2020-02-13-en . We > preciously commented on NCAP plan and so this is an opportunity to comment > on the study and follow-up. > > I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible to > all in order to kick off the discussion and comments: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_27iFmqrAnVJ7Aq1jedo9CmBlb6MbBFq-roaMpb-xGU/edit > > > Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting > the NCSG comment and join the drafting team. For those interested by the > policy and technology discussion, this is a good topic to review and work > on drafting a comment. > > You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki page > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and > listing those who drafted them. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik Dammak > > NCSG Policy Committee Chair > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Mar 31 14:26:09 2020 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:26:09 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: hi all, reminder to review the draft comment. Best, Rafik Le lun. 30 mars 2020 ? 08:44, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > thanks all, > just reminder that deadline for submission is 31st Marc, last change to > review the draft and express any concern. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le sam. 28 mars 2020 ? 02:07, Tatiana Tropina > a ?crit : > >> No objection from me either -- thanks Olga! >> Warm regards, >> Tanya >> >> >> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 18:00, Oreoluwa Somolu Lesi >> wrote: >> >>> This is a nicely put-together comment and I have no objection to it. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Ore >>> -- >>> Oreoluwa Lesi >>> Executive Director, Women's Technology Empowerment Centre (W.TEC) >>> +234.803.621.1307, +234.813.339.9999 | www.wtec.org.ng >>> | @wteconline >>> >>> >>> On 27/03/2020 5:18 pm, James Gannon wrote: >>> >>> No objection here too >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 27 Mar 2020, at 15:52, Liz Orembo >>> wrote: >>> >>> ? >>> Me too. No major objections. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:37 PM Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC < >>> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> I have read the comment and I have no objections to being sent. >>>> >>>> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. >>>> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia >>>> GNSO Councilor - ICANN >>>> Cluster Orinoco TIC member >>>> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes >>>> >>>> Cel. +57 3017435600 >>>> Twitter: @JmanuRojas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> El viernes, 27 de marzo de 2020 01:34:45 a. m. GMT-5, Farell FOLLY < >>>> farell at benin2point0.org> escribi?: >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> Thank you very much for pulling this together. I believe that the >>>> current content addresses all the very important point around the Next-Gen >>>> program. Others should review it ASAP, otherwise; it is good shape to be >>>> submitted part from typos or minors. >>>> >>>> @__f_f__ >>>> >>>> Best Regards >>>> ____________________________________ >>>> >>>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY >>>> GNSO Councillor >>>> linkedin.com/in/farellf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26 Mar 2020, at 00:28, Rafik Dammak wrote: >>>> >>>> hi all, >>>> >>>> we have a public comment draft for review and endorsement. >>>> the deadline for submission is the 31st March. >>>> >>>> Best. >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> De : *Olga Kyryliuk* >>>> Date: jeu. 26 mars 2020 ? 00:23 >>>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Action required_NCSG Draft Comment on Draft >>>> Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements >>>> To: >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> We have prepared a draft NCSG comment >>>> to >>>> the Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements. The >>>> deadline for submission is 31 March. We also need to leave some time for >>>> the PC to approve the comment. >>>> >>>> Please, take a moment to review the draft and leave your edits/comments >>>> in track changes for easier reference. We will be waiting for your >>>> contributions *till Friday, 27 March, end of the day*. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Olga >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Best regards. >>> Liz. >>> >>> PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: