[NCSG-PC] [NCSG EPDP] Fwd: [council] For Council review: updated response to ICANN org re: WHOIS Accuracy and ARS

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi Rafik,

Thanks for sharing this here. This is a pretty good draft response, IMO, and hope it isn’t amended by the IPC or BC. The only part that makes me slightly uncomfortable is this:

“Should ICANN org have any specific issues that you believe the EPDP Team should consider as it discusses data accuracy and impacts to the ARS, we invite you to bring these to the attention of the GNSO Council.“

In the draft letter, the GNSO Council already very clearly explains why the topics of data accuracy and ARS should not be addressed by the EPDP, and yet is inviting the Board to propose specific issues on these two topics that it believes the EPDP does need to address.

On the other hand, it might be telling to get an answer to that question, since the Board is now apparently anxious to have the GNSO conduct policy development on these two topics, having not addressed either of them itself when they came up with the Temporary Specification. Someone or something seems to have changed their thoughts on the topic (I wonder or what that could be); enough so that they would write to the GNSO Council with enquiries on how the topics will be handled.

Another thought I have is that I do really wish the Council had shared these sentiments on data accuracy and the ARS back with the EPDP Team when it was discussing them in Phase 1. Would have saved the Team a great deal of time, and would have also likely not needed to deal with them as Priority 2 issues in Phase 2. Also, had this been settled during Phase 1, the topics might have not ended up in the Final Report for Phase 1, the Board would not have sent a letter to the Council with its enquiries, and the Council would not have needed to draft this response at all. ;-)

Thanks again.

Amr

> On Oct 14, 2019, at 4:22 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> any comment on the draft response from GNSO council on ARS?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> De : Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> Date: ven. 11 oct. 2019 à 01:56
> Subject: [council] For Council review: updated response to ICANN org re: WHOIS Accuracy and ARS
> To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
> Attached, please find an updated draft of the response to [ICANN org’s letter to the GNSO Council re: WHOIS accuracy and WHOIS ARS](https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-drazek-21jun19-en.pdf). Keith has reviewed this text with Darcy and Marie, who proposed the original text of the letter.
>
> Please review the letter and provide feedback and proposed edits (if any) by COB Monday, 14 October.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Caitlin
>
> --
>
> Caitlin Tubergen
>
> Policy Senior Manager - GNSO
>
> ICANN
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.<GNSO Council Response to ICANN org Letter on Data Accuracy 09OCT2019 KCD CLEAN.docx><smime.p7s>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20191014/a7a39cb4/attachment.htm>