[NCSG-PC] [Urgent] IRP Standing Panel -- Please Review

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Wed Jul 10 02:24:27 EEST 2019


Hi ,

this comment was shared for a while and we need to respond. as I didn't see
any objection or comment, I think we can consider as approved.
@Farzaneh please resolve the suggestions and lets have the clean version to
be submitted.

Best,

Rafik

Le mar. 9 juil. 2019 à 09:09, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi all,
> this is reminder about this response to IRP questionnaire
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EhgKD9GhzheUVBC740WrEszd7dc1JtHwg7Q1wTNYPX8/edit?usp=sharing
>
> we need to submit asap.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le ven. 28 juin 2019 à 00:13, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> it is reminder to all NCSG PC members to review the draft asap.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le mer. 19 juin 2019 à 05:34, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hello Rafik
>>>
>>> I drafted a brief response to the 4 questions. I didn't know if you had
>>> prepared a google doc, sorry if I missed it. But the doc I prepared is
>>> here:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EhgKD9GhzheUVBC740WrEszd7dc1JtHwg7Q1wTNYPX8/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:36 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I got this response from Sam in relation to my question about possible
>>>> extension:
>>>>
>>>> "The deadline had previously been moved from the beginning of May to
>>>> May 15, but we would be happy to receive any inputs from the NCSG when they
>>>> are available.  Please submit to the publicly-archived email indicated and
>>>> we will include the NCSG’s inputs as we are continuing our analysis
>>>> document."
>>>>
>>>> so we have last change to weigh in the process and submit a comment to
>>>> respond to the questions.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Le lun. 17 juin 2019 à 11:26, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Stephanie,
>>>>>
>>>>> that is why I resent the reminder and communication from the council .
>>>>> it will be also discussed in Marrakech meeting.
>>>>> of course as it is not standard public comment, there is no indication
>>>>> of who is the right ICANN staff managing this (I assume it is legal
>>>>> counsel). I will reach Sam Eisner to check.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le sam. 15 juin 2019 à 23:46, Stephanie Perrin <
>>>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> GOran brought this up in our chat.  They want us to respond.  Beg for
>>>>>> more time if we must....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers Steph
>>>>>> On 2019-06-12 19:12, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Farzaneh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>>> I think we still have time respond. This is page where the
>>>>>> consultation was announced for the first time
>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/independent-review-process-standing-panel-call-to-action
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 00:10 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as far as I remember we had another member there but he was never
>>>>>>> active.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which questionnaire do you mean? Do you mean the one I attached
>>>>>>> here? Do we still have time for that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 6:54 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have 2 action items regarding IRP standing panel , starting with
>>>>>>>> adding more volunteers to the implementation oversight team (I think only
>>>>>>>> Robin is participating there) .
>>>>>>>> We still also have to give our  input and respond to the
>>>>>>>> questionnaire.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>>>> From: Drazek, Keith via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019, 23:49
>>>>>>>> Subject: [council] IRP IoT and IRP Standing Panel -- Please Review
>>>>>>>> To: Donna.Austin at team.neustar <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
>>>>>>>> <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>, gbunton at tucows.com <gbunton at tucows.com>,
>>>>>>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca <
>>>>>>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, claudia.selli at intl.att.com <
>>>>>>>> claudia.selli at intl.att.com>, Brian at Winterfeldt.law
>>>>>>>> <Brian at winterfeldt.law> <Brian at winterfeldt.law>,
>>>>>>>> wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>,
>>>>>>>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, joankerr at fbsc.org <
>>>>>>>> joankerr at fbsc.org>
>>>>>>>> Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>,
>>>>>>>> council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Chairs,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hope this note finds you well as we rapidly approach ICANN 65.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Marrakech, one of the topics we are likely to discuss and hear
>>>>>>>> about from the ICANN Board is the work of the Independent Review Process
>>>>>>>> (IRP) Implementation Oversight Team (IoT) and the need for the community to
>>>>>>>> focus on the appointment of an IRP Standing Panel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Two distinct items will require GNSO and SG/C consideration: The
>>>>>>>> first is a need to repopulate the current IoT, which began with about 25
>>>>>>>> members several years ago, but has dwindled in active participation.
>>>>>>>> Second, the ICANN community will be required to contribute to the
>>>>>>>> discussions around the appointment of members to a Standing Panel.  This is
>>>>>>>> a critical bylaw obligation and must be made a GNSO priority during the
>>>>>>>> second half of 2019.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please include this topic in your agenda planning for Marrakech and
>>>>>>>> for future SG/C meetings, so the GNSO Council can be well-informed of your
>>>>>>>> respective views.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> council mailing list
>>>>>>>> council at gnso.icann.org
>>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>>>>>>>> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
>>>>>>>> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (
>>>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>>>>>>>> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>>>>>>>> Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration,
>>>>>>>> including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling
>>>>>>>> delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190710/db9b9f7c/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list