From robin Thu Jan 3 00:50:19 2019 From: robin (Robin Gross) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:50:19 -0800 Subject: [PC-NCSG] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_=5BGnso-newgtld-wg--wt5=5D_REMINDER=3A?= =?utf-8?q?_Announcement=3A_New_gTLD_Subsequent_Procedures_Policy_Developm?= =?utf-8?q?ent_Process_Working_Group=E2=80=99s_Work_Track_5_on_geographic_?= =?utf-8?q?names_at_the_top_level_webinar?= References: Message-ID: <41B1614E-FD68-4D0A-B9CC-4FB0513D1D06@ipjustice.org> FYI: > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Terri Agnew > Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] REMINDER: Announcement: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group?s Work Track 5 on geographic names at the top level webinar > Date: January 2, 2019 at 12:57:02 PM PST > To: "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" > > Dear all, > > The Co-Leaders of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group?s Work Track 5 on geographic names at the top level will be holding a community information webinar on Wednesday 9 January 2019 at 20:00 UTC for 60 minutes. The purpose of the webinar is to provide an overview of Work Track 5?s Supplemental Initial Report [gnso.icann.org] , for which a public comment period [icann.org] is currently open. The public comment period is scheduled to close on 22 January 2019. > > The goal of this webinar is not to debate substantive issues contained in the report but rather to ensure that there is an understanding of the structure and content of the document and answer questions. > > All are welcome to attend the webinar. If you would like to participate, please fill out this form: https://goo.gl/forms/cGZVV86qjaqJt56v2 > > You will receive call details by email. The webinar will be recorded for those who are unable to attend. > > We look forward to your participation. > > > Emily Barabas | Policy Manager > ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > Email: emily.barabas at icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list > Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin Wed Jan 23 04:47:21 2019 From: stephanie.perrin (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 02:47:21 +0000 Subject: [PC-NCSG] Fwd: [TSG-Access-RD] Notes from TSG-Access-RD Meeting #4 - 22 Jan 2019 In-Reply-To: <2D87D2BD-30F5-4909-BFB6-E48AD3E4ED87@icann.org> References: <2D87D2BD-30F5-4909-BFB6-E48AD3E4ED87@icann.org> Message-ID: <6fa12b2f-0963-fb23-0437-724fadd4cea7@mail.utoronto.ca> I have signed up for this mailing list....I strongly suggest that someone a lot geekier than I am also sign up and take a look. Stephanie -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [TSG-Access-RD] Notes from TSG-Access-RD Meeting #4 - 22 Jan 2019 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:58:24 +0000 From: Diana Middleton To: Technical Study Group RD

> > Dear all, > > > > See below for notes from meeting #4. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > > > > Best, > > Diana > > > > ************************** > > > > Technical Study Group on Access to Non-Public Registration Data > > Meeting #4 > > 22 January 2019 > > 0900 PST / 1200 EST / 1700 UTC > > > > Attendees: Jorge Cano, Tomofumi Okubo, Steve Crocker, Andy Newton, Gavin Brown, Scott Hollenbeck, Jody Kolker, Murray Kucherawy, Diana Middleton, Eleeza Agopian, John Crain, Francisco Arias, Yvette Guigneaux, Gustavo Lozano > > > > Apologies: Benedict Addis, Ram Mohan > > > > During this call we discussed the following items (see attached summary from Gustavo): > > ? Review of requirements from homework assignments > ? Brief discussion of memo sent to EPDP re: independent controllership > > > Below is a list of action items from the meeting: > > ? Merge items from homework assignments ? Andy/Scott > ? Obtain clarification of memo - Eleeza > ? Review notes from January?s F2F for accuracy ? Entire group (see attached) > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > EPDP mailing list > EPDP at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/epdp > _______________________________________________ > EPDP mailing list > EPDP at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/epdp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin Thu Jan 24 01:23:47 2019 From: stephanie.perrin (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:23:47 +0000 Subject: [PC-NCSG] [NCSG EPDP] Fwd: [TSG-Access-RD] Notes from TSG-Access-RD Meeting #4 - 22 Jan 2019 In-Reply-To: References: <2D87D2BD-30F5-4909-BFB6-E48AD3E4ED87@icann.org> <6fa12b2f-0963-fb23-0437-724fadd4cea7@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: That is a good question Tomslin....I will ask the geekier ones when I see a policy issue creeping in that raises questions about the tech solution being pursued. Hopefully, we can mutually inform on issues as they arise. cheers Stephanie On 2019-01-23 02:19, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote: Hi Stephanie, all, I was thinking, to make volunteering to sign up to that mailing list more effective, and to get others not actively participating in the EPDP to help, perhaps the policy committee/epdp team should define what the geeky person should look out for/expectations from the technical discussions. Just a thought. Cheers, Tomslin On Wed., 23 Jan. 2019, 13:47 Stephanie Perrin wrote: I have signed up for this mailing list....I strongly suggest that someone a lot geekier than I am also sign up and take a look. Stephanie -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [TSG-Access-RD] Notes from TSG-Access-RD Meeting #4 - 22 Jan 2019 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:58:24 +0000 From: Diana Middleton To: Technical Study Group RD

Dear all, See below for notes from meeting #4. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best, Diana ************************** Technical Study Group on Access to Non-Public Registration Data Meeting #4 22 January 2019 0900 PST / 1200 EST / 1700 UTC Attendees: Jorge Cano, Tomofumi Okubo, Steve Crocker, Andy Newton, Gavin Brown, Scott Hollenbeck, Jody Kolker, Murray Kucherawy, Diana Middleton, Eleeza Agopian, John Crain, Francisco Arias, Yvette Guigneaux, Gustavo Lozano Apologies: Benedict Addis, Ram Mohan During this call we discussed the following items (see attached summary from Gustavo): ? Review of requirements from homework assignments ? Brief discussion of memo sent to EPDP re: independent controllership Below is a list of action items from the meeting: ? Merge items from homework assignments ? Andy/Scott ? Obtain clarification of memo - Eleeza ? Review notes from January?s F2F for accuracy ? Entire group (see attached) _______________________________________________ EPDP mailing list EPDP at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/epdp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Jan 3 02:18:05 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:18:05 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Reminder] Call For Volunteers for Public Comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, we have several ongoing public comments but at least 2 have no volunteers even after sending reminder (maybe because the holidays but still): 1. ICANN Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2021 ? 2025 : NCSG mailing list thread here 2. First Consultation on a 2-Year Planning Process : NCSG mailing list thread here they are related to budget for the former is quite critical. so I am sending this to see if PC members want to volunteer to start the drafting. The strategic plan needs consultation within membership and it is possibly to organize a confcall/webinar as part of that consultation. we need to move quickly. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Rafik Dammak Date: sam. 29 d?c. 2018 ? 07:02 Subject: [Reminder] Call For Volunteers for Public Comments To: NCSG hi all, there are several newly opened public consultations and we need volunteers to join the drafting teams to participate on shaping NCSG comments. Please let me know offlist if you want to volunteer for one of them or more. We have those 4 public consultations: 1. ICANN Draft FY20 Operating Plan and Budget and Five-Year Operating Plan Update : NCSG mailing list thread here 2. ICANN Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2021 ? 2025 : NCSG mailing list thread here 3. First Consultation on a 2-Year Planning Process : NCSG mailing list thread here 4. Updated Operating Standards for Specific Reviews : NCSG mailing list thread here 1, 2 and 3 are related to some extent as they are about the ICANN budget, operating planning but also strategical plan and the process on itself to make them. They are quite critical and impacting the work and activities for coming years. Happy holidays, Best Regards, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Fri Jan 11 12:26:59 2019 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:26:59 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] EPDP Plan B Message-ID: Dear all, As you may have seen on the Council mailing list, the Council will have a discussion in Los Angeles later this month on a "Plan B" for the EPDP WG if it becomes clear it will not meet its projected timeline. The Council Chair wrote, "In the interest of time, those conversations should be happening now, and over the next two weeks, so our Council-level discussion is appropriately informed by SG/C views. We will need to act expeditiously and won?t be able to wait until the late-February Council meeting if a course-correction or temporary alternative path is necessary." I just wanted to flag this so that we can develop an NCSG position. Thanks. Best wishes, Ayden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 15 07:26:53 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 05:26:53 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider Message-ID: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to Toronto for the EPDP. Thanks! Stephanie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Jan 15 13:24:08 2019 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:24:08 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Perhaps Maryam can clarify, but I thought the deadline for the submission of ABRs was on the 25th of this month? Or is it tomorrow? Best wishes, Ayden ??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to Toronto for the EPDP. > > Thanks! > > Stephanie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arsenebaguma at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 13:40:04 2019 From: arsenebaguma at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ars=C3=A8ne_Tungali?=) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:40:04 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Stephanie, I am afraid you maybe forgot to make attachments? I cannot see the ABRs you are reffering to. Thanks, Arsene 2019-01-15 7:26 UTC+02:00, Stephanie Perrin : > Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and > to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you > would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them > to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to > Toronto for the EPDP. > > Thanks! > > Stephanie > -- ------------------------ **Ars?ne Tungali* * Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international *, CEO,* Smart Services Sarl *, Tel: +243 993810967 GPG: 523644A0 *Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo* 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil & Mexico ) - AFRISIG 2016 - Blogger - ICANN's GNSO Council Member. AFRINIC Fellow ( Mauritius )* From stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca Tue Jan 15 13:44:57 2019 From: stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 06:44:57 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1fa44112-24f3-a3af-3377-b1e1b953b0e8@digitaldiscretion.ca> So sorry, I forgot the google link! So much for working late....https://docs.google.com/document/d/102YzYI5uS2fGWS1FbhyaTACfRlPgxRam_h3cUasWzDQ/edit On 2019-01-15 06:40, Ars?ne Tungali wrote: > Stephanie, > > I am afraid you maybe forgot to make attachments? I cannot see the > ABRs you are reffering to. > > Thanks, > Arsene > > 2019-01-15 7:26 UTC+02:00, Stephanie Perrin : >> Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and >> to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you >> would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them >> to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to >> Toronto for the EPDP. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Stephanie >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca Tue Jan 15 13:46:05 2019 From: stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 06:46:05 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: I asked Maryam to check.? Thanks On 2019-01-15 06:24, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Perhaps Maryam can clarify, but I thought the deadline for the > submission of ABRs was on the 25th of this month? Or is it tomorrow? > > Best wishes, > Ayden > > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin > wrote: > >> Hi Folks.? Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their >> help, and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence.? Please let >> me know if you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I >> would try to get them to her early so that she can get them in on >> time....I will be on a train to Toronto for the EPDP. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Stephanie >> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 15 13:53:37 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:53:37 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: <1fa44112-24f3-a3af-3377-b1e1b953b0e8@digitaldiscretion.ca> References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> <1fa44112-24f3-a3af-3377-b1e1b953b0e8@digitaldiscretion.ca> Message-ID: <577ab133-48c6-4acc-ac3e-5a2b035b97b9@mail.utoronto.ca> On 2019-01-15 06:44, Stephanie Perrin wrote: So sorry, I forgot the google link! So much for working late....https://docs.google.com/document/d/102YzYI5uS2fGWS1FbhyaTACfRlPgxRam_h3cUasWzDQ/edit On 2019-01-15 06:40, Ars?ne Tungali wrote: Stephanie, I am afraid you maybe forgot to make attachments? I cannot see the ABRs you are reffering to. Thanks, Arsene 2019-01-15 7:26 UTC+02:00, Stephanie Perrin : Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to Toronto for the EPDP. Thanks! Stephanie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 15 13:54:07 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:54:07 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca>

Message-ID: On 2019-01-15 06:46, Stephanie Perrin wrote: I asked Maryam to check. Thanks On 2019-01-15 06:24, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: Perhaps Maryam can clarify, but I thought the deadline for the submission of ABRs was on the 25th of this month? Or is it tomorrow? Best wishes, Ayden ??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to Toronto for the EPDP. Thanks! Stephanie _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arsenebaguma at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 14:24:13 2019 From: arsenebaguma at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ars=C3=A8ne_Tungali?=) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:24:13 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca>

Message-ID: Thank you Stephanie, I have reviewed both ABRs and I think they look great, i have made minor edits though. I understand the time constraints that led this to be done in hurry, we would have done better. I have a comment on the second one about the training on security issues. This comment was also made by Farell on the Google doc but wanted to bring it here and weigh in for archiving purposes. Given that we are asking for funding to bring in some participants and have the workshop be held a day prior or after an ICANN meeting, I think to make our submission stronger, we might need to to be clear and focus such as by requesting for specific trainers who will help design a specific curriculum on a specific subjet. Rather than relying on groups such as the SSAC not mentionning a specific name or so. I too think we are too vague and this may affect our submission. Just wanted to throw this here. Regards, Arsene 2019-01-15 13:54 UTC+02:00, Stephanie Perrin : > > On 2019-01-15 06:46, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > > I asked Maryam to check. Thanks > > On 2019-01-15 06:24, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Perhaps Maryam can clarify, but I thought the deadline for the submission of > ABRs was on the 25th of this month? Or is it tomorrow? > > Best wishes, > Ayden > > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin > > wrote: > > > Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and > to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you > would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them > to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to > Toronto for the EPDP. > > Thanks! > > Stephanie > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- ------------------------ **Ars?ne Tungali* * Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international *, CEO,* Smart Services Sarl *, Tel: +243 993810967 GPG: 523644A0 *Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo* 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil & Mexico ) - AFRISIG 2016 - Blogger - ICANN's GNSO Council Member. AFRINIC Fellow ( Mauritius )* From maryam.bakoshi at icann.org Tue Jan 15 14:47:31 2019 From: maryam.bakoshi at icann.org (Maryam Bakoshi) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:47:31 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re: Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <8624BF1F-5006-4E55-ADB0-EFD64F111783@icann.org> Dear Ayden, Stephanie, All, I see this information from the Finance committee wiki: ? FY20 Budget Requests Submitted - Pending Due Date 25 Jan 2019 Based on this, I am assuming the deadline has been extended. -- Many thanks, Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 From: NCSG-PC on behalf of Ayden F?rdeline Reply-To: Ayden F?rdeline Date: Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 11:24 To: Stephanie Perrin Cc: NCSG PC , NCSG Finance Committee , NCSG EC , Bruna Santos Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider Perhaps Maryam can clarify, but I thought the deadline for the submission of ABRs was on the 25th of this month? Or is it tomorrow? Best wishes, Ayden ??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to Toronto for the EPDP. Thanks! Stephanie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 15 19:16:38 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:16:38 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re: Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: <8624BF1F-5006-4E55-ADB0-EFD64F111783@icann.org> References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> <8624BF1F-5006-4E55-ADB0-EFD64F111783@icann.org> Message-ID: wonderful, that gives us time to resolve some of the excellent comments we got. On 2019-01-15 07:47, Maryam Bakoshi wrote: Dear Ayden, Stephanie, All, I see this information from the Finance committee wiki: ? FY20 Budget Requests Submitted - Pending Due Date 25 Jan 2019 Based on this, I am assuming the deadline has been extended. -- Many thanks, Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 From: NCSG-PC

on behalf of Ayden F?rdeline Reply-To: Ayden F?rdeline Date: Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 11:24 To: Stephanie Perrin Cc: NCSG PC

, NCSG Finance Committee

, NCSG EC

, Bruna Santos Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider Perhaps Maryam can clarify, but I thought the deadline for the submission of ABRs was on the 25th of this month? Or is it tomorrow? Best wishes, Ayden ??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to Toronto for the EPDP. Thanks! Stephanie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca Tue Jan 15 20:17:31 2019 From: stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:17:31 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca>

Message-ID: thanks Arsene, I did add trainers at the end, but I will add something up front, I agree that this is important. If we are just meeting with SSAC, they could come to an NCSG meeting.? It is good that we have more time now to fix a few things. cheers Stephanie On 2019-01-15 07:24, Ars?ne Tungali wrote: > Thank you Stephanie, > > I have reviewed both ABRs and I think they look great, i have made > minor edits though. I understand the time constraints that led this to > be done in hurry, we would have done better. > > I have a comment on the second one about the training on security > issues. This comment was also made by Farell on the Google doc but > wanted to bring it here and weigh in for archiving purposes. > > Given that we are asking for funding to bring in some participants and > have the workshop be held a day prior or after an ICANN meeting, I > think to make our submission stronger, we might need to to be clear > and focus such as by requesting for specific trainers who will help > design a specific curriculum on a specific subjet. Rather than relying > on groups such as the SSAC not mentionning a specific name or so. > > I too think we are too vague and this may affect our submission. > > Just wanted to throw this here. > > Regards, > Arsene > > 2019-01-15 13:54 UTC+02:00, Stephanie Perrin > : >> On 2019-01-15 06:46, Stephanie Perrin wrote: >> >> I asked Maryam to check. Thanks >> >> On 2019-01-15 06:24, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >> Perhaps Maryam can clarify, but I thought the deadline for the submission of >> ABRs was on the 25th of this month? Or is it tomorrow? >> >> Best wishes, >> Ayden >> >> >> ??????? Original Message ??????? >> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin >> >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, and >> to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if you >> would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get them >> to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a train to >> Toronto for the EPDP. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Stephanie >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 20:35:16 2019 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:35:16 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: That budget is for maintaining CIVI where we are keeping personal information of our members which is very important to be maintained and secured by a managed service. Hence I do not recommend using that budget for any other purpose unless it is not used. Farzaneh On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:45 AM Raoul Plommer via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > I think the slack license should be bought from the communication/website > budget, that we get $9000/yr from ICANN. > > -Raoul > > Stephanie Perrin via NCSG-EC kirjoitti ti 15. > tammik. 2019 klo 7.27: > >> Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, >> and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if >> you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get >> them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a >> train to Toronto for the EPDP. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Stephanie >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 10:45:33 2019 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:45:33 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: I think the slack license should be bought from the communication/website budget, that we get $9000/yr from ICANN. -Raoul Stephanie Perrin via NCSG-EC kirjoitti ti 15. tammik. 2019 klo 7.27: > Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, > and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if > you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get > them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a > train to Toronto for the EPDP. > > Thanks! > > Stephanie > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thatomfikwe at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 11:25:49 2019 From: thatomfikwe at gmail.com (Thato Mfikwe) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:25:49 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [NCSG-FC] Here are two ABRs to consider In-Reply-To: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3c4a8f98-d0bc-861f-5226-6e73e872f608@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Ho Stephanie, There are no attachments on this email. Please resend, thanks. Thato Mfikwe. On Tuesday, January 15, 2019, Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > Hi Folks. Here are two ABRs, thanks to Bruna and Farzi for their help, > and to Ayden for the idea about the Slack licence. Please let me know if > you would like further changes, I promised Maryam that I would try to get > them to her early so that she can get them in on time....I will be on a > train to Toronto for the EPDP. > > Thanks! > > Stephanie > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Thu Jan 17 22:21:18 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:21:18 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Fwd=3A_NCSG_participation_in_GNSO?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=99s_Roles_and_Obligations_as_a_Decisional_Participant_in?= =?utf-8?q?_the_Empowered_Committee_DT?= In-Reply-To: <748A1822-C038-4E69-B253-0BB74F9D68BE@icann.org> References: <748A1822-C038-4E69-B253-0BB74F9D68BE@icann.org> Message-ID: <3fb08f19-0802-caae-4003-50e244149ff2@mail.utoronto.ca> Hi folks. As you can see below, we need two more volunteers for this committee....and I only filled in because we had to have a rep. Cheers SP -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Fwd: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:09:34 +0000 From: Maryam Bakoshi To: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Hi Stephanie, Please see below. ? Many thanks, Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: ?+44 7846 471777? Begin forwarded message: From: Nathalie Peregrine > Date: 17 January 2019 at 19:57:18 GMT To: Maryam Bakoshi > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" > Subject: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT Hi Maryam, Stephanie Perrin has volunteered for this DT, but it was pointed out to us that in the previous iteration of the DT, the NCSG had 3 members as SG AND Cs can send reps (Matthew Shears, Stefania Milan, Farzaneh Badii). In the interest of fair representation on the DT, would the NCSG want to put forward two extra members? Please let me know, Thank you! Nathalie Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Thu Jan 17 22:24:06 2019 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:24:06 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Fwd=3A_NCSG_participation_in_GNSO?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=99s_Roles_and_Obligations_as_a_Decisional_Partici?= =?utf-8?q?pant_in_the_Empowered_Committee_DT?= In-Reply-To: <3fb08f19-0802-caae-4003-50e244149ff2@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <748A1822-C038-4E69-B253-0BB74F9D68BE@icann.org> <3fb08f19-0802-caae-4003-50e244149ff2@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: You can put my name forward as well Steph. Farzaneh On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:21 PM Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > Hi folks. As you can see below, we need two more volunteers for this > committee....and I only filled in because we had to have a rep. > > Cheers SP > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a > Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:09:34 +0000 > From: Maryam Bakoshi > To: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca > > > Hi Stephanie, > > Please see below. > > ? > Many thanks, > > > *Maryam Bakoshi* | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator > *ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > *S*: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | *T*: ?+44 7846 471777? > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From:* Nathalie Peregrine > *Date:* 17 January 2019 at 19:57:18 GMT > *To:* Maryam Bakoshi > *Cc:* "gnso-secs at icann.org" > *Subject:* *NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a > Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT* > > Hi Maryam, > > > > Stephanie Perrin has volunteered for this DT, but it was pointed out to us > that in the previous iteration of the DT, the NCSG had 3 members as SG AND > Cs can send reps (Matthew Shears, Stefania Milan, Farzaneh Badii). In the > interest of fair representation on the DT, would the NCSG want to put > forward two extra members? > > > > Please let me know, > > > > Thank you! > > > > Nathalie > > > > > > Nathalie Peregrine > > Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org > > > Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann > > > > Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and > visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Thu Jan 17 22:49:45 2019 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:49:45 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Fwd=3A_NCSG_participation_in_GNSO?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=99s_Roles_and_Obligations_as_a_Decisional_Participant_in?= =?utf-8?q?_the_Empowered_Committee_DT?= In-Reply-To: References: <748A1822-C038-4E69-B253-0BB74F9D68BE@icann.org> <3fb08f19-0802-caae-4003-50e244149ff2@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: I am sort of overworked, and I am not up the date with their work, but I do find the topic very interesting. In case NO ONE else can step up and we end up with an empty seat, I can try to help, given the disclosure I am stretching my agenda. Best, Mart?n > On 17 Jan 2019, at 17:24, farzaneh badii wrote: > > You can put my name forward as well Steph. > > Farzaneh > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:21 PM Stephanie Perrin > wrote: > Hi folks. As you can see below, we need two more volunteers for this committee....and I only filled in because we had to have a rep. > > Cheers SP > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:09:34 +0000 > From: Maryam Bakoshi > To: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca > > Hi Stephanie, > > Please see below. > > ? > Many thanks, > > > Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator > ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: ?+44 7846 471777? > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Nathalie Peregrine > >> Date: 17 January 2019 at 19:57:18 GMT >> To: Maryam Bakoshi > >> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org " > >> Subject: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT >> >> Hi Maryam, >> >> >> >> Stephanie Perrin has volunteered for this DT, but it was pointed out to us that in the previous iteration of the DT, the NCSG had 3 members as SG AND Cs can send reps (Matthew Shears, Stefania Milan, Farzaneh Badii). In the interest of fair representation on the DT, would the NCSG want to put forward two extra members? >> >> >> >> Please let me know, >> >> >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> Nathalie >> >> >> >> >> >> Nathalie Peregrine >> >> Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org? >> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann >> >> >> >> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages >> >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Thu Jan 17 23:26:53 2019 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-PC] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Fwd=3A_NCSG_participation_in_GNSO?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=99s_Roles_and_Obligations_as_a_Decisional_Participant_in?= =?utf-8?q?_the_Empowered_Committee_DT?= In-Reply-To: References: <748A1822-C038-4E69-B253-0BB74F9D68BE@icann.org> <3fb08f19-0802-caae-4003-50e244149ff2@mail.utoronto.ca>

Message-ID: <1617536810.1467533.1547760413423@mail.yahoo.com> Hi Stephanie,?I would like to serve on this committee JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. Presidente?-?AGEIA DENSI?ColombiaMembership Committee Chair.?Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANNCluster Orinoco TIC memberMaster IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes Cel. +57 3017435600 Twitter:?@JmanuRojas ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? El jueves, 17 de enero de 2019 3:50:00 p. m. GMT-5, Martin Pablo Silva Valent escribi?: I am sort of overworked, and I am not up the date with their work, but I do find the topic very interesting. In case NO ONE else can step up and we end up with an empty seat, I can try to help, given the disclosure I am stretching my agenda. Best,Mart?n On 17 Jan 2019, at 17:24, farzaneh badii wrote: You can put my name forward as well Steph.? Farzaneh On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:21 PM Stephanie Perrin wrote: Hi folks.? As you can see below, we need two more volunteers for this committee....and I only filled in because we had to have a rep. Cheers SP -------- Forwarded Message -------- | Subject: | Fwd: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT | | Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:09:34 +0000 | | From: | Maryam Bakoshi | | To: | stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca | Hi Stephanie, Please see below.? ?Many thanks, Maryam Bakoshi?| SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator?ICANN?| Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers?S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann |?T:??+44 7846 471777? Begin forwarded message: From: Nathalie Peregrine Date: 17 January 2019 at 19:57:18 GMT To: Maryam Bakoshi Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" Subject: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT Hi Maryam, ? Stephanie Perrin has volunteered for this DT, but it was pointed out to us that in the previous iteration of the DT, the NCSG had 3 members as SG AND Cs can send reps (Matthew Shears, Stefania Milan, Farzaneh Badii). In the interest of fair representation on the DT, would the NCSG want to put forward two extra members? ? Please let me know, ? Thank you! ? Nathalie ? ? Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)? Email:?nathalie.peregrine at icann.org? Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann ? Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses?and visiting the?GNSO Newcomer pages ? _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Thu Jan 17 23:28:11 2019 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:28:11 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Fwd=3A_NCSG_participation_in_GNSO?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=99s_Roles_and_Obligations_as_a_Decisional_Participant_in?= =?utf-8?q?_the_Empowered_Committee_DT?= In-Reply-To: <1617536810.1467533.1547760413423@mail.yahoo.com> References: <748A1822-C038-4E69-B253-0BB74F9D68BE@icann.org> <3fb08f19-0802-caae-4003-50e244149ff2@mail.utoronto.ca>

<1617536810.1467533.1547760413423@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <795C0296-243E-42A9-A911-93A323413644@gmail.com> In that case, I support Juan and Farzi and withdraw my hand! > On 17 Jan 2019, at 18:26, Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC wrote: > > Hi Stephanie, > I would like to serve on this committee > > JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. > Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia > Membership Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN > Cluster Orinoco TIC member > Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes > > Cel. +57 3017435600 > Twitter: @JmanuRojas > > > > > > > > > El jueves, 17 de enero de 2019 3:50:00 p. m. GMT-5, Martin Pablo Silva Valent escribi?: > > > I am sort of overworked, and I am not up the date with their work, but I do find the topic very interesting. In case NO ONE else can step up and we end up with an empty seat, I can try to help, given the disclosure I am stretching my agenda. > > > Best, > Mart?n >> On 17 Jan 2019, at 17:24, farzaneh badii > wrote: >> >> You can put my name forward as well Steph. >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:21 PM Stephanie Perrin > wrote: >> Hi folks. As you can see below, we need two more volunteers for this committee....and I only filled in because we had to have a rep. >> >> Cheers SP >> >> >> >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: Fwd: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT >> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:09:34 +0000 >> From: Maryam Bakoshi >> To: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca >> >> Hi Stephanie, >> >> Please see below. >> >> ? >> Many thanks, >> >> >> Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator >> ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers >> S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: ?+44 7846 471777? >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Nathalie Peregrine > >>> Date: 17 January 2019 at 19:57:18 GMT >>> To: Maryam Bakoshi > >>> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org " > >>> Subject: NCSG participation in GNSO?s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee DT >>> >>> Hi Maryam, >>> >>> >>> >>> Stephanie Perrin has volunteered for this DT, but it was pointed out to us that in the previous iteration of the DT, the NCSG had 3 members as SG AND Cs can send reps (Matthew Shears, Stefania Milan, Farzaneh Badii). In the interest of fair representation on the DT, would the NCSG want to put forward two extra members? >>> >>> >>> >>> Please let me know, >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> >>> >>> Nathalie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Nathalie Peregrine >>> >>> Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) >>> >>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>> >>> Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org? >>> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann >>> >>> >>> >>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Fri Jan 18 19:43:04 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 17:43:04 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] EPDP Team meeting during ICANN 64 Kobe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am quite unhappy about this. Comments?? Steph -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] EPDP Team meeting during ICANN 64 Kobe Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:59:20 +0000 From: Marika Konings To: Kavouss Arasteh , Kurt Pritz CC: GNSO EPDP

Dear All, For your information, the following meetings have been requested for the EPDP Team for ICANN64: * Saturday, 09 March - 08:30-18:30 * Sunday, 10 March - 17:00-18:30 * Wed, 13 March - 10:30 -12:00 * Thursday, 14 March - 08:30-10:15 It will be decided closer to the date whether all these sessions are needed, but at a minimum, the EPDP Team is expected to meet all day on Saturday 9 March. Note that no travel support is available for this meeting, but remote participation will be available. Similarly, alternates can be requested to step in for members not attending ICANN64. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika From: Kavouss Arasteh Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 14:01 To: Kurt Pritz Cc: Marika Konings , Caitlin Tubergen , Terri Agnew , GNSO EPDP

Subject: [Ext] EPDP Team meeting during ICANN 64 Kobe Derar Kurt, Pls by the end of this meeting kindly clarify whether there would be travel support for the above-mentioned meeting The sooner the better to enable finding cheaper ticket " Marche grise" Regards Kavouss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Attached Message Part URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Mon Jan 21 19:34:32 2019 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:34:32 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fw: [Slack] NCSG updates for the week of January 13th, 2019 In-Reply-To: <0100016871776779-9d88e94e-d677-4a07-bc0f-ef19054ab60d-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <0100016871776779-9d88e94e-d677-4a07-bc0f-ef19054ab60d-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Sharing for statistical purposes, given our ABR for a Slack license - last week we sent 1,253 messages on Slack. As of today, we have sent 41,817 messages over the past 12 months. Ayden ??????? Original Message ??????? On Monday, January 21, 2019 12:31 PM, Slack wrote: > Want more useful (and beautiful) data about the way your team uses Slack? > [Check out Slack Analytics.](https://my.slack.com/stats?utm_source=weeklyemail) > > https://www.slack.com > > NCSG?s Weekly Summary > > Sunday, January 13th ? Saturday, January 19th > > Hope you had a good weekend! Here's a summary of what happened in your workspace last week: > > Your members sent a total of 1,253 messages last week (that's 581 more than the week before). Of those, 8% were in public channels, 85% were in private channels, and 7% were direct messages. Your members also uploaded 7 files (that's 6 more than the week before). > > https://icann-ncsg.slack.com/x-t320153683220-528396537424/ > > Looking for more stats? Check out [your workspace's stats page](https://icann-ncsg.slack.com/x-t320153683220-528396537424/admin/stats). > > An average email is 500 characters. At that rate, your workspace?s Slack messages last week prevented 125 emails. At least. > > Your workspace has 1 owner: Ayden F?rdeline. There are 2 admins: Farzaneh and Rafik. In total there are 31 people in your workspace. > > Remember: it's important to [keep the list of owners and admins up to date](https://icann-ncsg.slack.com/x-t320153683220-528396537424/admin) since they control your workspace's settings. > > Your workspace is on Slack's Free plan, which is free to use for as long as you want for teams of all sizes. Interested in unlimited archive access and integrations, single sign-on, custom data retention, and more? [Check out our paid plans](https://icann-ncsg.slack.com/x-t320153683220-528396537424/pricing) to learn all about it. > > This email is sent to Workspace Owners and Admins of active workspaces. If you'd prefer not to receive these emails, you can [unsubscribe here](https://icann-ncsg.slack.com/unsub/U9E54P6HG-5f322b6c65-weekly). > > Made by [Slack Technologies, Inc](https://slack.com) ? [Our Blog](https://slackhq.com) > [500 Howard Street ? San Francisco, CA ? 94105 ? United States](#) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Jan 22 05:25:42 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:25:42 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Agenda for NCSG Monthly Policy Call 23rd January In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Hi all, I am sending the NCSG Policy call draft agenda . The call will be exceptionally in Wednesday and for 1hour only since all councillors will be in LA for the SPS meeting and arriving in that day. So in term of agenda we will only focus on council agenda items . if time permits we can talk about other topics, while I am thinking it is better to discuss them in a separate call like for the strategic planning. We don't have any motion to vote this week but several topics for discussion. I. Introduction II. GNSO Council Call Preparation - Council agenda: https://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-24jan19-en.pdf III. Misc Best Regards, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Mon Jan 28 19:13:31 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:13:31 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe Message-ID: Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a call with Goran on the 31st, if there is anything you want me to bring up let me know. cheers Steph -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at kathykleiman.com Mon Jan 28 19:26:34 2019 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:26:34 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Stephanie, What is the Board doing in terms of defining the public interest?? Personally, I am not sure we need to define this term (or can), but it is my understanding that Board work is being done in this area, and NCSG should certainly be involved! Questions on public interest include: what is the Board doing, who is leading the effort (e.g., is there a committee), and how can we participate in the structuring and discussion of this important issue? Best, Kathy On 1/28/2019 12:13 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > > Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board?? what is our agenda? > > I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down > participation.? Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a call > with Goran on the 31st, if there is anything you want me to bring up > let me know. > > cheers Steph > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Jan 28 19:43:22 2019 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:43:22 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'd like to discuss our NOMCOM under representation which won't be fixed despite our every effort. Everytime we raised it they told us tell the reviewer or community has to fix it. How can we fix it when we are the minority in the community. I also think (if others agree) we should give a bit of a warning to the Board. While on some matters they always excuse themselves and push it back to the community for a decision, on some issues they are quite vocal and active some instances they actively support a certain positio. Now this might be inflammatory but it is true. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:13 PM Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? > > I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. > Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a call with Goran on the > 31st, if there is anything you want me to bring up let me know. > > cheers Steph > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Mon Jan 28 19:44:21 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:44:21 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Fabulous Kathy, thanks for this....i will sneak that into the call with goran. Perhaps we could ask for a visit/briefing in our NCSG meeting, which we need to develop an agenda for very soon. 3 hours, I think a half hour chat with whoever is working on this is in order....I would note that it appears twice in the 5 year plan, rather worrisome. cheers Steph On 2019-01-28 12:26, Kathy Kleiman wrote: Hi Stephanie, What is the Board doing in terms of defining the public interest? Personally, I am not sure we need to define this term (or can), but it is my understanding that Board work is being done in this area, and NCSG should certainly be involved! Questions on public interest include: what is the Board doing, who is leading the effort (e.g., is there a committee), and how can we participate in the structuring and discussion of this important issue? Best, Kathy On 1/28/2019 12:13 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a call with Goran on the 31st, if there is anything you want me to bring up let me know. cheers Steph _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Mon Jan 28 19:56:45 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:56:45 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: No harm in bringing it up again, in my view. and yes we need to delicately convey the message that they cannot have it both ways.... On 2019-01-28 12:43, farzaneh badii wrote: I'd like to discuss our NOMCOM under representation which won't be fixed despite our every effort. Everytime we raised it they told us tell the reviewer or community has to fix it. How can we fix it when we are the minority in the community. I also think (if others agree) we should give a bit of a warning to the Board. While on some matters they always excuse themselves and push it back to the community for a decision, on some issues they are quite vocal and active some instances they actively support a certain positio. Now this might be inflammatory but it is true. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:13 PM Stephanie Perrin > wrote: Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a call with Goran on the 31st, if there is anything you want me to bring up let me know. cheers Steph _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From elsa.saade at gmail.com Mon Jan 28 20:39:42 2019 From: elsa.saade at gmail.com (Elsa S) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:39:42 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Hi Steph, During the council meeting, we also met with the Board and Cherine mentioned board priorities which included evolving the mutlistakeholder model based on the exercise they had done with the community in previous meetings (if you remember our NCSG session, it was very poorly attended and did not really touch upon the points we should have touched upon if i remember correctly). When I asked for elaboration he mentioned (as far as I remember and as far as my notes go - please other councilors correct me if I'm wrong) (1) the need to revisit the process by which a PDP develops, (2) Minorities and how much weight they should have, (3) the culture of accountability and (4) overlaps in Cs. I'm extremely curious as to how those discussions developed because the four of them could very much affect our work and structure going forward. I?d also like NCSG, NCUC and NPOC to pioneer the anti-harassment efforts which the board have been discussing. Apparently there?s a new board working group for anti-harassment which they annouced today https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2019-01-28-en. So if we could ask them where they are at then (in Kobe), and what NCSG could do to help, it would be great. Bruna and I (Kathy also helped!) are already in close touch with Sarah Deutsch and have been trying to push for more community engagement, which the board has been receptive to. They recently asked us if any other individuals would be willing to join. Any ideas from the team would be welcome! Maybe we could also ask about some financial issues? Ayden sent an excellent detailed email concerning the public comment review of FY20 with some points that could be detrimental to NCSG. Including crop, intersessional, fellowship related issues. Finally, +1 to Farzi?s comments and we could give a very concrete example on IGO-INGO if it's not too confrontational to do so. Best, Elsa -- On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:44 PM Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > Fabulous Kathy, thanks for this....i will sneak that into the call with > goran. Perhaps we could ask for a visit/briefing in our NCSG meeting, > which we need to develop an agenda for very soon. 3 hours, I think a half > hour chat with whoever is working on this is in order....I would note that > it appears twice in the 5 year plan, rather worrisome. > > cheers Steph > On 2019-01-28 12:26, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > > Hi Stephanie, > > What is the Board doing in terms of defining the public interest? > Personally, I am not sure we need to define this term (or can), but it is > my understanding that Board work is being done in this area, and NCSG > should certainly be involved! > > Questions on public interest include: what is the Board doing, who is > leading the effort (e.g., is there a committee), and how can we participate > in the structuring and discussion of this important issue? > > Best, Kathy > > > On 1/28/2019 12:13 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > > Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? > > I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. > Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a call with Goran on the > 31st, if there is anything you want me to bring up let me know. > > cheers Steph > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Jan 28 22:42:17 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 05:42:17 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Stephanie, Before going into substance On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 02:13 Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca wrote: > Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? > I am confused here, isn't it the usual board-ncsg meeting in constituenvy day? Or you are talking about another meeting like the one with gnso elected board members? > I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. > It is an open meeting no? Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Mon Jan 28 23:17:33 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:17:33 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <6c6e97ae-c62a-88a3-0d70-ef37c4c0e53d@mail.utoronto.ca> the regular meeting with the entire Board is open. I am referring to the meeting, usually with EC members and councillors, with the GNSO appointed Board members. Usually this takes place over breakfast at an ungodly hour in the morning. Steph On 2019-01-28 15:42, Rafik Dammak wrote: Hi Stephanie, Before going into substance On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 02:13 Stephanie Perrin wrote: Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? I am confused here, isn't it the usual board-ncsg meeting in constituenvy day? Or you are talking about another meeting like the one with gnso elected board members? I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. It is an open meeting no? Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Jan 29 01:06:10 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:06:10 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] public comments review Message-ID: Hi all, we have 2 drafts for public comments, being reviewed by NCSG members but we should review them as PC too due to time constraint: - ICANN Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2021 ? 2025 , deadline 8th Feb, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WTfrDKosnig9hVghrlWr--znKSK5acVALJgaeeip5nU/edit - ICANN FY20 budget and operating plan, 11th Feb, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AniE-6_-i4-CAUGtJwgFA1gLaWzWHkBfWAHQ3Y-PvZs/edit?usp=sharing please start the review. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca Tue Jan 29 01:29:42 2019 From: stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:29:42 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <7125c5f7-6148-0621-d613-770b55c388f1@digitaldiscretion.ca> That is a great list of things Elsa, and I agree that is a very worrisome thought about the PDPs....sure they are not working, but ignoring dissidents is not the answer. Overlaps in constituencies in particular, given the love of ALAC, is a problem. cheers SP On 2019-01-28 13:39, Elsa S wrote: > Hi Steph, > > During the council meeting, we also met with the Board and Cherine > mentioned board priorities which included evolving the > mutlistakeholder model based on the exercise they had done with the > community in previous meetings (if you remember our NCSG session, it > was very poorly attended and did not really touch upon the points we > should have touched upon if i remember correctly). When I asked for > elaboration he mentioned(as far as I remember and as far as my notes > go - please other councilors correct me if I'm wrong) (1) the need to > revisit the process by which a PDP develops, (2) Minorities and how > much weight they should have, (3) the culture of accountability and > (4) overlaps in Cs. I'm extremely curious as to how those discussions > developed because the four of them could very much affect our work and > structure going forward. > > I?d also like NCSG, NCUC and NPOC to pioneer the anti-harassment > efforts which the board have been discussing. Apparently there?s a new > board working group for anti-harassment which they annouced today > https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2019-01-28-en. So if we could > ask them where they are atthen (in Kobe), and what NCSG could do to > help, it would be great. Bruna and I (Kathy also helped!) are already > in close touch with Sarah Deutsch and have been trying to push for > more community engagement, which the board has been receptive to. They > recently asked us if any other individuals would be willing to join. > Any ideas from the team would be welcome! > > Maybe we could also ask about some financial issues? Ayden sent an > excellent detailed email concerning the public comment review of FY20 > with some points that could be detrimental to NCSG. Including crop, > intersessional, fellowship related issues. > > Finally, +1 to Farzi?s comments and we could give a very concrete > example on IGO-INGO if it's not too confrontational to do so. > > Best, > > Elsa > -- > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:44 PM Stephanie Perrin > > wrote: > > Fabulous Kathy, thanks for this....i will sneak that into the call > with goran.? Perhaps we could ask for a visit/briefing in our NCSG > meeting, which we need to develop an agenda for very soon.? 3 > hours, I think a half hour chat with whoever is working on this is > in order....I would note that it appears twice in the 5 year plan, > rather worrisome. > > cheers Steph > > On 2019-01-28 12:26, Kathy Kleiman wrote: >> >> Hi Stephanie, >> >> What is the Board doing in terms of defining the public >> interest?? Personally, I am not sure we need to define this term >> (or can), but it is my understanding that Board work is being >> done in this area, and NCSG should certainly be involved! >> >> Questions on public interest include: what is the Board doing, >> who is leading the effort (e.g., is there a committee), and how >> can we participate in the structuring and discussion of this >> important issue? >> >> Best, Kathy >> >> >> On 1/28/2019 12:13 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: >>> >>> Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our >>> agenda? >>> >>> I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down >>> participation.? Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a >>> call with Goran on the 31st, if there is anything you want me to >>> bring up let me know. >>> >>> cheers Steph >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Jan 29 13:48:41 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:48:41 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [urgent for review] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, we have this draft comment to review quickly , regarding WT5 initial report. it is a critical track in subpro WG. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bruna Martins dos Santos Date: mar. 29 janv. 2019 ? 20:35 Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report To: Dear all, I would like to share with you the proposed comment to the *Work Track 5 on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process. *Submissions are due in just over three days time (feb 1st as a deadline), so I?m sharing this on our mailing list today for your speedy review and suggested edits. The proposed comment can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EyQ_D37jbIpKByOyknOVwrBO0-GLKVdyFI_64_s2l9U/edit Ps. Thanks to Farzaneh and all the others who volunteered to work on this comment. Best, -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Thu Jan 31 01:16:48 2019 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:16:48 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [urgent for review] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: I support the submission of this comment; thanks to Bruna et al for drafting it! Ayden ??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:48 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > we have this draft comment to review quickly , regarding WT5 initial report. > it is a critical track in subpro WG. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Bruna Martins dos Santos > Date: mar. 29 janv. 2019 ? 20:35 > Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report > To: > > Dear all, > > I would like to share with you the proposed comment to the Work Track 5 on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process. Submissions are due in just over three days time (feb 1st as a deadline), so I?m sharing this on our mailing list today for your speedy review and suggested edits. > > The proposed comment can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EyQ_D37jbIpKByOyknOVwrBO0-GLKVdyFI_64_s2l9U/edit > > Ps. Thanks to Farzaneh and all the others who volunteered to work on this comment. > > Best, > -- > Bruna Martins dos Santos > > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos > @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tatiana.tropina at gmail.com Thu Jan 31 01:25:47 2019 From: tatiana.tropina at gmail.com (Tatiana Tropina) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:25:47 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [urgent for review] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: My support for submission and my thanks to Bruna and everyone who drafted it, too. Cheers, Tanya On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 00:17, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > I support the submission of this comment; thanks to Bruna et al for > drafting it! > > Ayden > > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:48 AM, Rafik Dammak > wrote: > > Hi all, > > we have this draft comment to review quickly , regarding WT5 initial > report. > it is a critical track in subpro WG. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *Bruna Martins dos Santos* > Date: mar. 29 janv. 2019 ? 20:35 > Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the > Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report > To: > > > Dear all, > > I would like to share with you the proposed comment to the *Work Track 5 > on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the > New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process. *Submissions > are due in just over three days time (feb 1st as a deadline), so I?m > sharing this on our mailing list today for your speedy review and suggested > edits. > > The proposed comment can be found here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EyQ_D37jbIpKByOyknOVwrBO0-GLKVdyFI_64_s2l9U/edit > > Ps. Thanks to Farzaneh and all the others who volunteered to work on this > comment. > > Best, > -- > *Bruna Martins dos Santos * > > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos > @boomartins > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Jan 31 01:35:42 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:35:42 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe In-Reply-To: <6c6e97ae-c62a-88a3-0d70-ef37c4c0e53d@mail.utoronto.ca> References:

<6c6e97ae-c62a-88a3-0d70-ef37c4c0e53d@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Hi Stephanie, thanks for the clarification, I guess some assumed that was the usual meeting with full board. as that is a meeting with the GNSO appointed board members and some other , the agenda can be flexible and we can bring several topics as we can expect have a proper dialogue and less formal (and scripted) setting. Best, Rafik Le mar. 29 janv. 2019 ? 06:17, Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a ?crit : > the regular meeting with the entire Board is open. I am referring to the > meeting, usually with EC members and councillors, with the GNSO appointed > Board members. Usually this takes place over breakfast at an ungodly hour > in the morning. > > Steph > On 2019-01-28 15:42, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi Stephanie, > > > Before going into substance > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 02:13 Stephanie Perrin < > stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca wrote: > >> Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our agenda? >> > > I am confused here, isn't it the usual board-ncsg meeting in constituenvy > day? Or you are talking about another meeting like the one with gnso > elected board members? > >> I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down participation. >> > It is an open meeting no? > > > Best, > > Rafik > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Jan 31 07:52:54 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:52:54 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [urgent for review] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Thanks Tatiana and Ayden, looking for other PC members to review. Rafik Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 ? 08:26, Tatiana Tropina a ?crit : > My support for submission and my thanks to Bruna and everyone who drafted > it, too. > Cheers, > Tanya > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 00:17, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > >> I support the submission of this comment; thanks to Bruna et al for >> drafting it! >> >> Ayden >> >> >> ??????? Original Message ??????? >> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:48 AM, Rafik Dammak < >> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> we have this draft comment to review quickly , regarding WT5 initial >> report. >> it is a critical track in subpro WG. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: *Bruna Martins dos Santos* >> Date: mar. 29 janv. 2019 ? 20:35 >> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the >> Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report >> To: >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to share with you the proposed comment to the *Work Track 5 >> on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the >> New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process. *Submissions >> are due in just over three days time (feb 1st as a deadline), so I?m >> sharing this on our mailing list today for your speedy review and suggested >> edits. >> >> The proposed comment can be found here: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EyQ_D37jbIpKByOyknOVwrBO0-GLKVdyFI_64_s2l9U/edit >> >> Ps. Thanks to Farzaneh and all the others who volunteered to work on this >> comment. >> >> Best, >> -- >> *Bruna Martins dos Santos * >> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos >> @boomartins >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Thu Jan 31 10:20:26 2019 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:20:26 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [urgent for review] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <3AC4B2DE-6EC1-4440-80BF-878121ADA8A3@benin2point0.org> That is a very good comment. Apart from some minor typos, I have no additional input. I thank the drafters, they did a very good job. However; the format is rather different from recent comments we wrote, and for coherence I suggest that in the future we always try to stick to a similar template (paragraphs, numbering style, etc.), otherwise our targets/intended recipients could get confused about our style (i.e to easily identify where we analyse, where we conclude and where we opine, etc.) when they receive two or more consecutive feedbacks from us. Nevertheless, the document is good and well written. @Rafik, I recall that a DIFFERENT feedback submission format has been recently used for EPDP, and here; we had also agreed on a kind of template (style, paragraphs, information, fields) to include in our NCSG comments, consequently; do you think that we can merge both and suggest that to ICANN as PC submission template? Or simply adapt it for our own use (and of course, formalize it through our operations procedures) @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 31 Jan 2019, at 06:52, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Thanks Tatiana and Ayden, looking for other PC members to review. > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 ? 08:26, Tatiana Tropina > a ?crit : > My support for submission and my thanks to Bruna and everyone who drafted it, too. > Cheers, > Tanya > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 00:17, Ayden F?rdeline > wrote: > I support the submission of this comment; thanks to Bruna et al for drafting it! > > Ayden > > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:48 AM, Rafik Dammak > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> we have this draft comment to review quickly , regarding WT5 initial report. >> it is a critical track in subpro WG. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Bruna Martins dos Santos > >> Date: mar. 29 janv. 2019 ? 20:35 >> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report >> To: > >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to share with you the proposed comment to the Work Track 5 on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process. Submissions are due in just over three days time (feb 1st as a deadline), so I?m sharing this on our mailing list today for your speedy review and suggested edits. >> >> The proposed comment can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EyQ_D37jbIpKByOyknOVwrBO0-GLKVdyFI_64_s2l9U/edit >> >> Ps. Thanks to Farzaneh and all the others who volunteered to work on this comment. >> >> Best, >> -- >> Bruna Martins dos Santos >> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos >> @boomartins > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Jan 31 15:30:05 2019 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 22:30:05 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [urgent for review] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report In-Reply-To: <3AC4B2DE-6EC1-4440-80BF-878121ADA8A3@benin2point0.org> References:

<3AC4B2DE-6EC1-4440-80BF-878121ADA8A3@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: Hi Farell, thanks for the feedback. I don't think the format can be an issue, the policy staff has still to go through the submitted document and link each comment to recommendation, question or part of the report. I believe that the document explicitly indicates which recommendation or question we are commenting which make things easier for staff for compilation and WG members for review. EPDP is a particular case as the public comment was through a google form. Some WGs can ask to follow a different format for submission e.g. questionnaire. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 ? 17:20, Farell FOLLY a ?crit : > That is a very good comment. Apart from some minor typos, I have no > additional input. I thank the drafters, they did a very good job. > > However; the format is rather different from recent comments we wrote, and > for coherence I suggest that in the future we always try to stick to a > similar template (paragraphs, numbering style, etc.), otherwise our > targets/intended recipients could get confused about our style (i.e to > easily identify where we analyse, where we conclude and where we opine, > etc.) when they receive two or more consecutive feedbacks from us. > Nevertheless, the document is good and well written. > > @Rafik, I recall that a DIFFERENT feedback submission format has been > recently used for EPDP, and here; we had also agreed on a kind of template > (style, paragraphs, information, fields) to include in our NCSG comments, > consequently; do you think that we can merge both and suggest that to ICANN > as PC submission template? Or simply adapt it for our own use (and of > course, formalize it through our operations procedures) > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > On 31 Jan 2019, at 06:52, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Thanks Tatiana and Ayden, looking for other PC members to review. > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 ? 08:26, Tatiana Tropina