[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] Draft Input to the Initial Report SubPro

[farzaneh badii]

I had a look at the document. I abstain from approving it and here are my
reasons:

While I believe in free market, innovation and everything else that Robin
and others claim should be in registries business model and they think
closed registries can bring that about and I believe that top level domain
names are property after allocation, I think having closed generics and
restricted brand registries by default can lead to the politicization of
the domain space even further. I don't even agree with having criteria set
by ICANN for community TLDs.  I believe it might have made sense to support
closed generics then, but the result is clear. We now have a much stronger
GAC to deal with in Geo names, we have public interest related to each and
every topic we discuss. And saying not to conflate trade mark with closed
generic without providing a reason how they are different (I have read
emails, transcripts etc) does not make sense to me.

I support not allowing closed generics but allowing any other business
model in registries in favor of not politicizing the domain space. It might
be too late. but that is my opinion.






Farzaneh


On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 11:44 AM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
wrote:

> hi all,
>
> this is a reminder about the subsequent procedures comment review
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 10:23, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> the draft was shared in NCSG list for review. asking PC members to go
>> through the comment.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
>> Date: mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 09:57
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Draft Input to the Initial Report SubPro
>> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Please find the initial draft of the NCSG Input to the Initial Report on
>> the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching
>> Issues & Work Tracks 1-4).
>>
>> Elsa and I are still working on this document
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SxCa4cn-NEiS_tea-jUP02DSG6IEzf_O4_MBPLUtxZs/edit>
>> so its not yet finalized but considered the importance of the subject and
>> the upcoming deadline for submission (sep 26th) we thought we should this
>> share this with the NCSG list soon.
>>
>> We will be finalizing this comment during the week and your input is very
>> much welcome.
>>
>> Best,
>> Bruna and Elsa
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180923/55a2ace1/attachment.htm>