From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Oct 3 17:08:47 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:08:47 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Questions to Board Message-ID: 1. Does the Board keep track of finalized PDPs and public comments that it re-opens for the community? What is the Board approach in not overburdening the community with tasks that were finalized? 2. Does the Board believe that the whole community want a unified access model to registrants personal information in WHOIS? What is the Board approach in gauging consensus in the community? Here are two questions to Board. I will submit these today. Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Oct 3 17:09:09 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:09:09 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Questions to Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: For Barcelona Board meeting. Farzaneh On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:08 AM farzaneh badii wrote: > 1. Does the Board keep track of finalized PDPs and public comments that > it re-opens for the community? What is the Board approach in not > overburdening the community with tasks that were finalized? > > 2. Does the Board believe that the whole community want a unified access > model to registrants personal information in WHOIS? What is the Board > approach in gauging consensus in the community? > > > Here are two questions to Board. I will submit these today. > > > > > > Farzaneh > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Wed Oct 3 17:19:34 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 14:19:34 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Questions to Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2740FC58-C379-4E82-9AAD-184E3BF057D5@ferdeline.com> Thanks Farzi May I suggest we share these on the NCSG-Discuss list too? Just in case members have any thoughts. Best wishes, Ayden > On 3 Oct 2018, at 16:09, farzaneh badii wrote: > > For Barcelona Board meeting. > > Farzaneh > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:08 AM farzaneh badii wrote: > >> 1. Does the Board keep track of finalized PDPs and public comments that it re-opens for the community? What is the Board approach in not overburdening the community with tasks that were finalized? >> >> 2. Does the Board believe that the whole community want a unified access model to registrants personal information in WHOIS? What is the Board approach in gauging consensus in the community? >> >> Here are two questions to Board. I will submit these today. >> >> Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Oct 3 20:48:11 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:48:11 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews Message-ID: Hi all, I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the resubmission of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share it with the mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to submit on Friday. we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long term review. We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews due to limited comments (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) and Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Wed Oct 3 22:19:05 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 19:19:05 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we are re-submitting our comments dated 31 July 2018 pertainingon to the future of short-term[1] and long-term[2] specific and organizational reviews. We were aredisappointed surprisedthat the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational Effectiveness Committee meeting[3] formed the view [(in OEC meeting)](https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en) decided that there was insufficient not enoughconsensus to move forward.on short and long term reviews due to limited comments[ (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC)](https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-16aug18-en.pdf) and Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to gather further community input through an additional comment window is disappointing, because ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted comments, and reopening this topic puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time and resources. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs the community to work on. In future when reopening an issue for further input, wWe alsoask thatethe Board toclearly state its method of gauging consensus in when evaluating public comments submissions and outline why it believes additional input is required. Thank you. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. [1] https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html [2] https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html [3] https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en Best wishes, Ayden > On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Hi all, > I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the resubmission of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share it with the mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to submit on Friday. > > we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long term review. We are surprised that the board [(in OEC meeting)](https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en) decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews due to limited comments[ (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC)](https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-16aug18-en.pdf) and Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. > > Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 03:15:12 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:15:12 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> References: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Hi, Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I reviewed the paper again and what it is suggesting as options. one issue is that some are not related to what we got mainly in the first paper about timelines: 1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we can support. the ATRT will start its work on January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is confirming the selection (September Council meeting discussion). no issue here. 2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss "streamlining" specific reviews. that is of high concern as it is limit the de factiATRT scope and also impact other specific reviews. I think we should add a comment on that front to not prevent the ATRT from setting its own scope and what covers as areas such as review ATRT2 recommendations and linking to WS1&2 recommendations. 3- to "streamline" organizational review and starting a consultation process led by the board(OEC), no particular issue here in term of the process but we will see with what is proposed. the outcome will impact us directly as it concerns the GNSO review too that should start likely in 2020. one possible comment will be to avoid having the process as board and staff led only and ensure community full participation (they mention consultation but...) 4- operating standards for specific review, we missed commenting on the first draft, the concern would be about the ability to comment on the second draft and what is proposed here. for reminders the operating standards covered area like the scoping, formation and other operating procedures for review teams. one possible comment is to request that the second version of operating standards should go through a public comment and consultation e.g. public session. do you think we can include those items? let's share the current draft in NCSG list and I moved it to the google doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit . Best, Rafik Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 04:19, Ayden F?rdeline a ?crit : > Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: > > The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we are re-submitting our > comments dated 31 July 2018 pertaining on to the future of short-term[1] and > long-term[2] specific and organizational reviews. We were are disappointed > surprised that the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational > Effectiveness Committee meeting[3] formed the view (in OEC meeting) > > decided that there was insufficient not enough consensus to move forward. on > short and long term reviews due to limited comments (a total of 9 but > from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) > and > Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder > groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to gather further > community input through an additional comment window is disappointing, > because ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was > consensus among the submitted comments, and reopening this topic puts a > great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time and > resources. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development > Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and > instructs the community to work on. In future when reopening an issue for > further input, wWe also ask thate the Board to clearly state its method > of gauging consensus in when evaluating public comments submissions and > outline why it believes additional input is required. Thank you. Otherwise, > it can arbitrarily re-open issues. > > > > [1] > https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html > > [2] > https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html > > [3] > https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en > > > Best wishes, > > Ayden > > > > > On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Hi all, > I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the resubmission > of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share it with the > mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to submit on > Friday. > > > > > we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long term review. > We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) > > decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews > due to limited comments (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) > and > Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder > groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments > despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted > comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited > time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, > the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs > the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method > of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can > arbitrarily re-open issues. > > > > > Farzaneh > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 03:18:11 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:18:11 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: References: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Hi Rafik I have no problem with including them but I can't do it myself before the deadline. I am on leave and will be back on Tuesday hopefully. On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:15 PM Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I reviewed the paper again and what > it is suggesting as options. one issue is that some are not related to what > we got mainly in the first paper about timelines: > > 1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we can support. the ATRT will > start its work on January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is confirming the > selection (September Council meeting discussion). no issue here. > 2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss "streamlining" specific reviews. > that is of high concern as it is limit the de factiATRT scope and also > impact other specific reviews. I think we should add a comment on that > front to not prevent the ATRT from setting its own scope and what covers as > areas such as review ATRT2 recommendations and linking to WS1&2 > recommendations. > 3- to "streamline" organizational review and starting a consultation > process led by the board(OEC), no particular issue here in term of the > process but we will see with what is proposed. the outcome will impact us > directly as it concerns the GNSO review too that should start likely in > 2020. one possible comment will be to avoid having the process as board and > staff led only and ensure community full participation (they mention > consultation but...) > 4- operating standards for specific review, we missed commenting on the > first draft, the concern would be about the ability to comment on the > second draft and what is proposed here. for reminders the operating > standards covered area like the scoping, formation and other operating > procedures for review teams. one possible comment is to request that the > second version of operating standards should go through a public comment > and consultation e.g. public session. > > do you think we can include those items? > > let's share the current draft in NCSG list and I moved it to the google > doc > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit > . > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 04:19, Ayden F?rdeline a > ?crit : > >> Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: >> >> The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we are re-submitting our >> comments dated 31 July 2018 pertaining on to the future of short-term[1] and >> long-term[2] specific and organizational reviews. We were are disappointed >> surprised that the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational >> Effectiveness Committee meeting[3] formed the view (in OEC meeting) >> >> decided that there was insufficient not enough consensus to move >> forward. on short and long term reviews due to limited comments (a total >> of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >> and >> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to gather further >> community input through an additional comment window is disappointing, >> because ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was >> consensus among the submitted comments, and reopening this topic puts a >> great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time and >> resources. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development >> Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and >> instructs the community to work on. In future when reopening an issue >> for further input, wWe also ask thate the Board to clearly state its >> method of gauging consensus in when evaluating public comments >> submissions and outline why it believes additional input is required. Thank >> you. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html >> >> [2] >> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html >> >> [3] >> https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Ayden >> >> >> >> >> On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the resubmission >> of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share it with the >> mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to submit on >> Friday. >> >> >> >> >> we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long term review. >> We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) >> >> decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews >> due to limited comments (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >> and >> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments >> despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted >> comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited >> time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, >> the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs >> the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method >> of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can >> arbitrarily re-open issues. >> >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 03:25:41 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:25:41 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Questions to Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Farzaneh, thanks for the questions. no comment for me as I believe the issue remains the same on how to have a real dialogue with the board. it is not just NCSG but even the council had that issue lately and no question was proposed there. I think we should also discuss what board proposed as topics about priorities (tbh not so much to be said really as priorities are impacted heavily by what we have as PDP or imposed like UAM ) and more important about the ICANN PDP model : "*How should ICANN's multisatkeholder model of governance and Policy Development Process evolve to balance the increasing need for inclusivity, accountability and transparency, with the imperative of getting our work done and our policies developed in a more effective and timely manner, and with the efficient utilization of ICANN?s resources? *" I am finding it concerning due to the ongoing discourse (by Goran, some board members) and the current context, while I understand there is genuine concern from several board members: - focus on budget and presenting accountability and policy development as costly while the later is definitely the main business of ICANN. - rethinking the model because of some don't like the result. it may also undermine more community-led efforts like the PDP 3.0. Also based on reviews discussion, I don't support Goran and staff getting involved in this kind of discussion. happy to bring this discussion to NCSG list later on. Best, Rafik Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 ? 23:09, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > 1. Does the Board keep track of finalized PDPs and public comments that > it re-opens for the community? What is the Board approach in not > overburdening the community with tasks that were finalized? > > 2. Does the Board believe that the whole community want a unified access > model to registrants personal information in WHOIS? What is the Board > approach in gauging consensus in the community? > > > Here are two questions to Board. I will submit these today. > > > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 17:34:41 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 23:34:41 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: References: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: hi all, this a reminder about reviewing this draft comment https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit I added some bits I mentioned before. the deadline for submission is today. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 09:15, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi, > > Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I reviewed the paper again and what > it is suggesting as options. one issue is that some are not related to what > we got mainly in the first paper about timelines: > > 1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we can support. the ATRT will > start its work on January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is confirming the > selection (September Council meeting discussion). no issue here. > 2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss "streamlining" specific reviews. > that is of high concern as it is limit the de factiATRT scope and also > impact other specific reviews. I think we should add a comment on that > front to not prevent the ATRT from setting its own scope and what covers as > areas such as review ATRT2 recommendations and linking to WS1&2 > recommendations. > 3- to "streamline" organizational review and starting a consultation > process led by the board(OEC), no particular issue here in term of the > process but we will see with what is proposed. the outcome will impact us > directly as it concerns the GNSO review too that should start likely in > 2020. one possible comment will be to avoid having the process as board and > staff led only and ensure community full participation (they mention > consultation but...) > 4- operating standards for specific review, we missed commenting on the > first draft, the concern would be about the ability to comment on the > second draft and what is proposed here. for reminders the operating > standards covered area like the scoping, formation and other operating > procedures for review teams. one possible comment is to request that the > second version of operating standards should go through a public comment > and consultation e.g. public session. > > do you think we can include those items? > > let's share the current draft in NCSG list and I moved it to the google > doc > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit > . > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 04:19, Ayden F?rdeline a > ?crit : > >> Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: >> >> The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we are re-submitting our >> comments dated 31 July 2018 pertaining on to the future of short-term[1] and >> long-term[2] specific and organizational reviews. We were are disappointed >> surprised that the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational >> Effectiveness Committee meeting[3] formed the view (in OEC meeting) >> >> decided that there was insufficient not enough consensus to move >> forward. on short and long term reviews due to limited comments (a total >> of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >> and >> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to gather further >> community input through an additional comment window is disappointing, >> because ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was >> consensus among the submitted comments, and reopening this topic puts a >> great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time and >> resources. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development >> Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and >> instructs the community to work on. In future when reopening an issue >> for further input, wWe also ask thate the Board to clearly state its >> method of gauging consensus in when evaluating public comments >> submissions and outline why it believes additional input is required. Thank >> you. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html >> >> [2] >> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html >> >> [3] >> https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Ayden >> >> >> >> >> On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the resubmission >> of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share it with the >> mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to submit on >> Friday. >> >> >> >> >> we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long term review. >> We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) >> >> decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews >> due to limited comments (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >> and >> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments >> despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted >> comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited >> time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, >> the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs >> the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method >> of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can >> arbitrarily re-open issues. >> >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at kathykleiman.com Fri Oct 5 17:42:01 2018 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathryn Kleiman) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:42:01 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: References: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: <3aeab2ac-77c8-4952-776b-2553113b79e5@kathykleiman.com> I'm an observer, but I support. Important to submit! Kathy On 10/5/2018 10:34 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > hi all, > > this a reminder about reviewing this draft comment > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit > I added some bits I mentioned before. the deadline for submission is > today. > > Best, > > Rafik > Le?jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ??09:15, Rafik Dammak > a ?crit?: > > Hi, > > Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I reviewed the paper again > and what it is suggesting as options. one issue is that some are > not related to what we got mainly in the first paper about timelines: > > 1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we can support. the > ATRT will start its work on January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is > confirming the selection (September Council meeting discussion). > no issue here. > 2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss "streamlining" specific > reviews. that is of high concern as it is limit the de factiATRT > scope and also impact other specific reviews. I think we should > add a comment on that front to?not prevent the ATRT from setting > its own scope and what covers as areas such as review ATRT2 > recommendations and linking to WS1&2 recommendations. > 3- to "streamline" organizational review and starting a > consultation process led by the board(OEC), no particular issue > here in term of the process but we will see with what is proposed. > the outcome will impact us directly as it concerns the GNSO review > too that should start likely in 2020. one possible comment will be > to avoid having the process as board and staff led only and ensure > community full participation (they mention consultation but...) > 4- operating standards for specific review, we missed commenting > on the first draft, the concern would be about the ability to > comment on the second draft and what is proposed here.? for > reminders the operating standards covered area like the scoping, > formation and other operating procedures for review teams. one > possible comment is to request that the second version of > operating standards should go through a public comment and > consultation e.g. public session. > > do you think we can include those items? > > let's share the current draft in NCSG list and I?moved it to the > google doc > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le?jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ??04:19, Ayden F?rdeline > a ?crit?: > > Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: > > The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we arere-submitting > our comments dated 31 July 2018 pertainingontothe future > ofshort-term[1] and long-term[2] specific and > organizational?reviews. We were aredisappointed surprised that > the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational Effectiveness > Committee meeting[3] formed the view (in OEC meeting) > ?decidedthat > there was insufficient not enough consensus to move forward.on > short and long term?reviews due to limited comments?(a total > of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) > ?and > Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of? GNSO > stakeholder groups and constituencies).The Board's decision to > gather further community input through an additional comment > window is disappointing, because ask for more comments despite > the fact that clearlythere was consensus among the submitted > comments, and reopening this topicputs a great strain on a > community of volunteers with limited time and resources. In > parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development > Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it > re-opens and instructs the community to work on. In future > when reopening an issue for further input, wWe alsoask > thatetheBoard toclearly state its method of gauging consensus > in whenevaluating public commentssubmissions and outline why > it believes additional input is required. Thank you. > Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. > > [1] > https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html > > [2] > https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html > > [3] > https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en > > Best wishes, > > Ayden > > > > >> On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii >> > >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the >> resubmission of our comments. Please see below. Also I >> suggest Rafik share it with the mailing list after receiving >> your comments tomorrow. we have to submit on Friday. >> >> >> >> >> we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long >> term?review. We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) >> >> decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long >> term?reviews due to limited comments?(a total of 9 but from >> two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >> ?and >> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of? GNSO >> stakeholder groups and constituencies). The Board's decision >> to ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there >> was consensus among the submitted comments puts a great >> strain on a community of volunteers with limited time.? In >> parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development >> Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it >> re-opens and instructs the community to work on. We also ask >> the Board to clearly state its method of gauging consensus >> when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can >> arbitrarily re-open issues. >> >> >> >> >> Farzaneh > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 17:50:55 2018 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 11:50:55 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: <3aeab2ac-77c8-4952-776b-2553113b79e5@kathykleiman.com> References: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> <3aeab2ac-77c8-4952-776b-2553113b79e5@kathykleiman.com> Message-ID: All my support to this comment. Mart?n On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 11:42 Kathryn Kleiman wrote: > I'm an observer, but I support. Important to submit! > > Kathy > On 10/5/2018 10:34 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > this a reminder about reviewing this draft comment > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit > I added some bits I mentioned before. the deadline for submission is today. > > Best, > > Rafik > Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 09:15, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I reviewed the paper again and what >> it is suggesting as options. one issue is that some are not related to what >> we got mainly in the first paper about timelines: >> >> 1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we can support. the ATRT will >> start its work on January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is confirming the >> selection (September Council meeting discussion). no issue here. >> 2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss "streamlining" specific >> reviews. that is of high concern as it is limit the de factiATRT scope and >> also impact other specific reviews. I think we should add a comment on that >> front to not prevent the ATRT from setting its own scope and what covers as >> areas such as review ATRT2 recommendations and linking to WS1&2 >> recommendations. >> 3- to "streamline" organizational review and starting a consultation >> process led by the board(OEC), no particular issue here in term of the >> process but we will see with what is proposed. the outcome will impact us >> directly as it concerns the GNSO review too that should start likely in >> 2020. one possible comment will be to avoid having the process as board and >> staff led only and ensure community full participation (they mention >> consultation but...) >> 4- operating standards for specific review, we missed commenting on the >> first draft, the concern would be about the ability to comment on the >> second draft and what is proposed here. for reminders the operating >> standards covered area like the scoping, formation and other operating >> procedures for review teams. one possible comment is to request that the >> second version of operating standards should go through a public comment >> and consultation e.g. public session. >> >> do you think we can include those items? >> >> let's share the current draft in NCSG list and I moved it to the google >> doc >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit >> . >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 04:19, Ayden F?rdeline a >> ?crit : >> >>> Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: >>> >>> The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we are re-submitting our >>> comments dated 31 July 2018 pertaining on to the future of short-term[1] >>> and long-term[2] specific and organizational reviews. We were are disappointed >>> surprised that the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational >>> Effectiveness Committee meeting[3] formed the view (in OEC meeting) >>> >>> decided that there was insufficient not enough consensus to move >>> forward. on short and long term reviews due to limited comments (a >>> total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >>> and >>> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >>> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to gather further >>> community input through an additional comment window is disappointing, >>> because ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was >>> consensus among the submitted comments, and reopening this topic puts a >>> great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time and >>> resources. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development >>> Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and >>> instructs the community to work on. In future when reopening an issue >>> for further input, wWe also ask thate the Board to clearly state its >>> method of gauging consensus in when evaluating public comments >>> submissions and outline why it believes additional input is required. Thank >>> you. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html >>> >>> [2] >>> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html >>> >>> [3] >>> https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en >>> >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Ayden >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the >>> resubmission of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share >>> it with the mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to >>> submit on Friday. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long >>> term review. We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) >>> >>> decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews >>> due to limited comments (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >>> and >>> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >>> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments >>> despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted >>> comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited >>> time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, >>> the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs >>> the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method >>> of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can >>> arbitrarily re-open issues. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Fri Oct 5 23:44:29 2018 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:44:29 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] PP IRT Status Update, Plans for ICANN63 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2e6edecb-e9a2-42a6-5ac8-27a2d57ef41c@mail.utoronto.ca> Heads up gang.? We need to be ready to kill this one. Stephanie -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] PP IRT Status Update, Plans for ICANN63 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 19:38:24 +0000 From: Amy Bivins Reply-To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org Dear Colleagues, I hope you are well! I have an update on the PP IRT?s status. ICANN org is reviewing of all of the materials that ICANN and the IRT have been working on in preparation for public comment. As a reminder, we are planning to post the following items for public comment, once these are final (and following your final review of these documents): (a) the draft PPAA; (b) the draft PP Accreditation Policy document; (c) the draft PP De-Accreditation and Transition Procedure; (d) the PP Accreditation Program fees proposal; (e) the PP Service Provider Accreditation Applicant Guide; and (f) a list of any unresolved items and questions for community discussion. Our next meeting will be at ICANN63 (Weds, 24 Oct, 13:30 local time). We plan to distribute these materials to you prior to ICANN63 so that we can discuss any further feedback, comments, or questions you may have during our working meeting in Barcelona. I?ll send you an invite for the ICANN63 session separately. Best, Amy *Amy E. Bivins* Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax:? +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins at icann.org www.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Oct 6 11:33:54 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 17:33:54 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: References: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> <3aeab2ac-77c8-4952-776b-2553113b79e5@kathykleiman.com> Message-ID: Hi all, if there is no strong objection in coming hours, I will submit the attached comment. Best, Rafik Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 ? 23:51, Martin Pablo Silva Valent < mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> a ?crit : > All my support to this comment. > > Mart?n > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 11:42 Kathryn Kleiman wrote: > >> I'm an observer, but I support. Important to submit! >> >> Kathy >> On 10/5/2018 10:34 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> hi all, >> >> this a reminder about reviewing this draft comment >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit >> I added some bits I mentioned before. the deadline for submission is >> today. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 09:15, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I reviewed the paper again and >>> what it is suggesting as options. one issue is that some are not related to >>> what we got mainly in the first paper about timelines: >>> >>> 1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we can support. the ATRT will >>> start its work on January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is confirming the >>> selection (September Council meeting discussion). no issue here. >>> 2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss "streamlining" specific >>> reviews. that is of high concern as it is limit the de factiATRT scope and >>> also impact other specific reviews. I think we should add a comment on that >>> front to not prevent the ATRT from setting its own scope and what covers as >>> areas such as review ATRT2 recommendations and linking to WS1&2 >>> recommendations. >>> 3- to "streamline" organizational review and starting a consultation >>> process led by the board(OEC), no particular issue here in term of the >>> process but we will see with what is proposed. the outcome will impact us >>> directly as it concerns the GNSO review too that should start likely in >>> 2020. one possible comment will be to avoid having the process as board and >>> staff led only and ensure community full participation (they mention >>> consultation but...) >>> 4- operating standards for specific review, we missed commenting on the >>> first draft, the concern would be about the ability to comment on the >>> second draft and what is proposed here. for reminders the operating >>> standards covered area like the scoping, formation and other operating >>> procedures for review teams. one possible comment is to request that the >>> second version of operating standards should go through a public comment >>> and consultation e.g. public session. >>> >>> do you think we can include those items? >>> >>> let's share the current draft in NCSG list and I moved it to the google >>> doc >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit >>> . >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 04:19, Ayden F?rdeline a >>> ?crit : >>> >>>> Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: >>>> >>>> The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we are re-submitting our >>>> comments dated 31 July 2018 pertaining on to the future of short-term[1] >>>> and long-term[2] specific and organizational reviews. We were are disappointed >>>> surprised that the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational >>>> Effectiveness Committee meeting[3] formed the view (in OEC meeting) >>>> >>>> decided that there was insufficient not enough consensus to move >>>> forward. on short and long term reviews due to limited comments (a >>>> total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >>>> and >>>> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >>>> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to gather further >>>> community input through an additional comment window is disappointing, >>>> because ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was >>>> consensus among the submitted comments, and reopening this topic puts >>>> a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time and >>>> resources. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development >>>> Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and >>>> instructs the community to work on. In future when reopening an issue >>>> for further input, wWe also ask thate the Board to clearly state its >>>> method of gauging consensus in when evaluating public comments >>>> submissions and outline why it believes additional input is required. Thank >>>> you. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html >>>> >>>> [2] >>>> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html >>>> >>>> [3] >>>> https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en >>>> >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Ayden >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the >>>> resubmission of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share >>>> it with the mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to >>>> submit on Friday. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long >>>> term review. We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) >>>> >>>> decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews >>>> due to limited comments (a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) >>>> and >>>> Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder >>>> groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments >>>> despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted >>>> comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited >>>> time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, >>>> the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs >>>> the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method >>>> of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can >>>> arbitrarily re-open issues. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Farzaneh >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Next Steps On Reviews - NCSG Comment.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 57650 bytes Desc: not available URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Sun Oct 7 13:52:43 2018 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 12:52:43 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] pragraph when re-submitting short and long term reviews In-Reply-To: References: <2C0649BB-CB84-4AAF-998A-2C8FF3B22825@ferdeline.com> <3aeab2ac-77c8-4952-776b-2553113b79e5@kathykleiman.com> Message-ID: I have no comment. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 6 Oct 2018, at 10:33, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > if there is no strong objection in coming hours, I will submit the attached comment. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 ? 23:51, Martin Pablo Silva Valent > a ?crit : > All my support to this comment. > > Mart?n > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 11:42 Kathryn Kleiman > wrote: > I'm an observer, but I support. Important to submit! > > Kathy > On 10/5/2018 10:34 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> hi all, >> >> this a reminder about reviewing this draft comment https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit >> I added some bits I mentioned before. the deadline for submission is today. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 09:15, Rafik Dammak > a ?crit : >> Hi, >> >> Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I reviewed the paper again and what it is suggesting as options. one issue is that some are not related to what we got mainly in the first paper about timelines: >> >> 1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we can support. the ATRT will start its work on January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is confirming the selection (September Council meeting discussion). no issue here. >> 2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss "streamlining" specific reviews. that is of high concern as it is limit the de factiATRT scope and also impact other specific reviews. I think we should add a comment on that front to not prevent the ATRT from setting its own scope and what covers as areas such as review ATRT2 recommendations and linking to WS1&2 recommendations. >> 3- to "streamline" organizational review and starting a consultation process led by the board(OEC), no particular issue here in term of the process but we will see with what is proposed. the outcome will impact us directly as it concerns the GNSO review too that should start likely in 2020. one possible comment will be to avoid having the process as board and staff led only and ensure community full participation (they mention consultation but...) >> 4- operating standards for specific review, we missed commenting on the first draft, the concern would be about the ability to comment on the second draft and what is proposed here. for reminders the operating standards covered area like the scoping, formation and other operating procedures for review teams. one possible comment is to request that the second version of operating standards should go through a public comment and consultation e.g. public session. >> >> do you think we can include those items? >> >> let's share the current draft in NCSG list and I moved it to the google doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit . >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 ? 04:19, Ayden F?rdeline > a ?crit : >> Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red some suggested edits: >> >> The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is we are re-submitting our comments dated 31 July 2018 pertaining on to the future of short-term[1] and long-term[2] specific and organizational reviews. We were are disappointed surprised that the Bboard in its 10 August 2018 Organizational Effectiveness Committee meeting[3] formed the view (in OEC meeting) decided that there was insufficient not enough consensus to move forward. on short and long term reviews due to limited comments?(a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) and Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to gather further community input through an additional comment window is disappointing, because ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted comments, and reopening this topic puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time and resources. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs the community to work on. In future when reopening an issue for further input, wWe also ask thate the Board to clearly state its method of gauging consensus in when evaluating public comments submissions and outline why it believes additional input is required. Thank you. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. >> >> >> [1] https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html >> [2] https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html >> [3] https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Ayden >> >> >> >> >>> On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48, farzaneh badii > wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> I wrote this paragraph to be added as an introduction to the resubmission of our comments. Please see below. Also I suggest Rafik share it with the mailing list after receiving your comments tomorrow. we have to submit on Friday. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> we are re-submitting our comments on the short term and long term review. We are surprised that the board (in OEC meeting) decided that there was not enough consensus on short and long term reviews due to limited comments?(a total of 9 but from two ACs (ALAC and SSAC) and Supporting organizations (GNSO and CCNSO) and most of GNSO stakeholder groups and constituencies). The Board's decision to ask for more comments despite the fact that clearly there was consensus among the submitted comments puts a great strain on a community of volunteers with limited time. In parallel with the effectiveness of Policy Development Processes, the Board should also consider how many issues it re-opens and instructs the community to work on. We also ask the Board to clearly state its method of gauging consensus when evaluating public comments. Otherwise, it can arbitrarily re-open issues. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Farzaneh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 05:43:55 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 22:43:55 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG open session agenda Message-ID: Here are what we are going to do for NCSG open session in Barcelona. My question is do you want to cancel the meeting with the budget team and have a break? Also RDS review team wanted to meet but I can't accommodate them. Do you think we should have them even if it's for 15 minutes? NCSG Open Meeting 23 October; 15:15-18:30 15:15 - 15:20 Welcome & Introductions 15:20 - 16:00 NCSG goals and strategy 16.00 - 16:30 Brief reports about our meetings in the second half of NCSG Open session 16:30 - 17:00 NomCom IPT leadership presentation (4:30 ? 5:00) (During Coffee break) 17:00 - 17:30 meeting with Budget team (TBD) 17:30 - 18:00 SSR2 18:00 - 18:30 ALAC Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 18:29:33 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 11:29:33 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Farell as Arsene alternate to the council Message-ID: EC decided to appoint Farrell as Arsene alternate to the council for Barcelona. I will fill in the necessary form. -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 19:18:35 2018 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:18:35 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Farell as Arsene alternate to the council In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Welcome Farrel! We will give you all the support you need. Happy to have you near us in the council at barcelona. Best, Martin On Mon, Oct 8, 2018, 12:29 farzaneh badii wrote: > EC decided to appoint Farrell as Arsene alternate to the council for > Barcelona. I will fill in the necessary form. > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arsenebaguma at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 21:14:25 2018 From: arsenebaguma at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ars=C3=A8ne_Tungali?=) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:14:25 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Farell as Arsene alternate to the council In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Farzi and good to have Farell in the team! Sent from my iPhone > On 08 Oct 2018, at 18:18, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: > > Welcome Farrel! We will give you all the support you need. Happy to have you near us in the council at barcelona. > > Best, > Martin > >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018, 12:29 farzaneh badii wrote: >> EC decided to appoint Farrell as Arsene alternate to the council for Barcelona. I will fill in the necessary form. >> -- >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 22:12:15 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:12:15 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG open session agenda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all Please let me know if you want to meet with the finance team during NCSG open session, if not I will ask NomCom IPT to join us at 17.00 and we can have a break from 16.30 to 17.00. If I don't receive feedback I will ask NomCom IPT tomorrow to join us at 17.00 and not have a meeting with ICANN finance team. Best Farzaneh On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 10:43 PM farzaneh badii wrote: > Here are what we are going to do for NCSG open session in Barcelona. My > question is do you want to cancel the meeting with the budget team and have > a break? Also RDS review team wanted to meet but I can't accommodate them. > Do you think we should have them even if it's for 15 minutes? > > NCSG Open Meeting > > 23 October; 15:15-18:30 > > 15:15 - 15:20 > > Welcome & Introductions > > 15:20 - 16:00 > NCSG goals and strategy > > 16.00 - 16:30 > Brief reports about our meetings in the second half of NCSG Open session > > 16:30 - 17:00 > > NomCom IPT leadership presentation (4:30 ? 5:00) > > (During Coffee break) > > 17:00 - 17:30 > meeting with Budget team (TBD) > > 17:30 - 18:00 > > SSR2 > > 18:00 - 18:30 > > ALAC > Farzaneh > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at kathykleiman.com Mon Oct 8 22:44:11 2018 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathryn Kleiman) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:44:11 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG open session agenda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <780e5984-5e74-a042-334a-d4efd788bbd9@kathykleiman.com> Farzi,? Good question! We had a lot of complaints and concerns about the budget this year. Would it help forestall or prepare us for the budget battles ahead if we knew more about what the finance team is thinking?? So much of our work depends on travel grants, CROPP and other types of grants and funding. Should we try to be ahead of the curve this year -- and see if some of the requests for re-expansion of funding are falling on ears that are interested and sympathetic. Best, Kathy On 10/8/2018 3:12 PM, farzaneh badii wrote: > Dear all > > Please let me know if you want to meet with the finance team during > NCSG open session, if not I will ask NomCom IPT to join us at 17.00 > and we can have a break from 16.30 to 17.00. If I don't receive > feedback I will ask NomCom IPT tomorrow to join us at 17.00 and not > have a meeting with ICANN finance team. > > > Best > Farzaneh > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 10:43 PM farzaneh badii > > wrote: > > Here are what we are going to do for NCSG open session in > Barcelona. My question is do you want to cancel the meeting with > the budget team and have a break? Also RDS review team wanted to > meet but I can't accommodate them. Do you think we should have > them even if it's for 15 minutes? > > NCSG Open Meeting > > 23 October; 15:15-18:30 > > 15:15 - 15:20 > > > > Welcome & Introductions > > 15:20 - 16:00 > > NCSG goals and strategy > > 16.00 - 16:30 > > Brief reports about our meetings in the second half of NCSG Open > session > > 16:30 - 17:00 > > > > NomComIPT leadership presentation (4:30 ? 5:00) > > (During Coffee break) > > 17:00 - 17:30 > > meeting with Budget team (TBD) > > 17:30 - 18:00 > > > > SSR2 > > 18:00 - 18:30 > > > > ALAC > > Farzaneh > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 22:54:56 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:54:56 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG open session agenda In-Reply-To: <780e5984-5e74-a042-334a-d4efd788bbd9@kathykleiman.com> References: <780e5984-5e74-a042-334a-d4efd788bbd9@kathykleiman.com> Message-ID: Hi Kathy They are going to brief us on FY20. We really need to be prepared and have our questions ready. We have raised the finance issues multiple times. Do we have a new item? Is this going to be effective? Ayden is always very vocal about this issue and has authored many letters on behalf of NCSG to the finance team and the board. I think they were effective to a certain extent, we got back at least some of the CROP etc. So we gotta pick our battle. I leave it up to PC. Farzaneh On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:44 PM Kathryn Kleiman wrote: > Farzi, Good question! > > We had a lot of complaints and concerns about the budget this year. Would > it help forestall or prepare us for the budget battles ahead if we knew > more about what the finance team is thinking? So much of our work depends > on travel grants, CROPP and other types of grants and funding. Should we > try to be ahead of the curve this year -- and see if some of the requests > for re-expansion of funding are falling on ears that are interested and > sympathetic. > > Best, Kathy > On 10/8/2018 3:12 PM, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Dear all > > Please let me know if you want to meet with the finance team during NCSG > open session, if not I will ask NomCom IPT to join us at 17.00 and we can > have a break from 16.30 to 17.00. If I don't receive feedback I will ask > NomCom IPT tomorrow to join us at 17.00 and not have a meeting with ICANN > finance team. > > > Best > Farzaneh > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 10:43 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> Here are what we are going to do for NCSG open session in Barcelona. My >> question is do you want to cancel the meeting with the budget team and have >> a break? Also RDS review team wanted to meet but I can't accommodate them. >> Do you think we should have them even if it's for 15 minutes? >> >> NCSG Open Meeting >> >> 23 October; 15:15-18:30 >> >> 15:15 - 15:20 >> >> Welcome & Introductions >> >> 15:20 - 16:00 >> NCSG goals and strategy >> >> 16.00 - 16:30 >> Brief reports about our meetings in the second half of NCSG Open session >> >> 16:30 - 17:00 >> >> NomCom IPT leadership presentation (4:30 ? 5:00) >> >> (During Coffee break) >> >> 17:00 - 17:30 >> meeting with Budget team (TBD) >> >> 17:30 - 18:00 >> >> SSR2 >> >> 18:00 - 18:30 >> >> ALAC >> Farzaneh >> > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 23:03:01 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:03:01 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: NCSG at ICANN63 Webinar on Monday 15 October 2018 at 13UTC In-Reply-To: <2580b6c3a24444acb556b897aba96fe6@PMBX112-E1-VA-2.pexch112.icann.org> References: <2580b6c3a24444acb556b897aba96fe6@PMBX112-E1-VA-2.pexch112.icann.org> Message-ID: I arranged this to brief our members before ICANN 63 starts. I did one before Panama too and they found it useful. Generally I am going to talk about NCSG structure, meetings (EPDP) NCSG values etc and will ask the Constitutnecies chair to also update us on their activities. Farzaneh ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Maryam Bakoshi Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:54 PM Subject: NCSG at ICANN63 Webinar on Monday 15 October 2018 at 13UTC To: Dear All, Please find participation details for the *NCSG at ICANN63 Webinar, on Monday 15 October 2018 at 1300 UTC* *Adobe Connect*: https://participate.icann.org/ncsg *Time Zones*: https://tinyurl.com/yb3caadx *Dial out request*: please send an email to Maryam.bakoshi at icann.org offline. *Audio Dial in: * [image: https://cobranding-pgi.s3.amazonaws.com/1/Logo1.png] *You're invited.* You've been invited to a GlobalMeet? audio meeting. *Have the meeting call you.* Click the Connect Me link below. *No need to dial-in.* *Connect Me [go.conferencinghub.com] * *Not at your computer?* You can join by dialing one of the access numbers below. *Mobile:* tel://16054755604,*,,9922790467# *Phone Only Controls :* https://go.conferencinghub.com/2xdh7 *Access Number:* 1-605-475-5604 *Guest Passcode:* 992 279 0467 *Additional Access:* USA: 1-605-475-5604 USA: 1-719-457-6209 Canada, Calgary: +1 403 407 5793 Canada, Montreal: +1 514 669 5928 Canada, Toronto: +1 647 426 9172 Canada, Vancouver: +1 604 222 7836 Argentina, Buenos Aires: +54 (0) 11 5172 6003 Argentina (toll free): 0800 800 1223 Australia, Sydney: +61 (0) 2 8017 6064 Australia, Melbourne: +61 (0) 3 8687 0553 Australia, Brisbane: +61 (0) 7 3015 0535 Australia (toll free): 1 800 804 786 Austria (toll free): 0800 070 981 Bahrain, Manama: +973 1619 8739 Bahrain (toll free): 800 04212 Belarus (toll free): 8 820 0011 0341 Belgium, Brussels: +32 (0) 2 400 6928 Belgium (toll free): 0800 39279 Bosnia and Herzegovina: +387 7031 1442 Brazil, Sao Paulo: +55 11 4935 7169 Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: +55 21 4560 0072 Brazil (toll free): 0800 887 0233 Bulgaria, Sofia: +359 (0) 2 491 6045 Bulgaria (toll free): 00800 111 4950 Cambodia, Phnom Penh: +855 23 965 723 Canada (toll free): 1 855 950 3717 Chile, Santiago: +56 (0) 2 2666 0696 Chile (toll free): 171 800 835 783 China (national): +400 613 8103 China, Beijing: +86 10 5667 0003 China, Shanghai: +86 21 2039 7081 Colombia, Bogota: +57 1 508 8137 Colombia (toll free): 01 800 755 0102 Costa Rica (toll free): 800 542 5328 Croatia (toll free): 0800 805 940 Cyprus (toll free): 800 97424 Czech Republic, Prague: +420 225 986 554 Czech Republic (toll free): 800 701 532 Denmark, Copenhagen: +45 32 72 78 10 Denmark (toll free): 80 70 35 86 Egypt (toll free): 0800 000 0593 Estonia, Tallinn: +372 622 6551 Estonia (toll free): 800 011 1589 Fiji (toll free): 00800 3322 Finland, Helsinki: +358 (0) 9 2310 1677 Finland (toll free): 0800 772 236 France, Paris: +33 (0) 1 70 37 16 56 France (toll free): 0800 946 531 France (national): 0811 655 100 France (national): 0821 231 671 Georgia, Tbilisi: +995 32 2 050 778 Germany, Frankfurt: +49 (0) 69 2222 10612 Germany, Munich: +49 (0) 89 2030 31207 Germany (national): 01801 003 899 Germany (toll free): 0800 588 9170 Greece, Athens: +30 211 181 3824 Greece (toll free): 00800 128 913 Hong Kong: +852 3018 9111 Hong Kong (toll free): 800 901 787 Hungary, Budapest: +36 1408 8953 Hungary (toll free): 068 001 9673 Iceland (toll free): 800 9847 India, Delhi: +91 11 6310 0268 India, Mumbai: +91 22 6310 0298 India, Chennai: +91 44 6310 0234 India, Bangalore: +91 80 6760 8755 India (toll free): 1800 3010 1582 Indonesia, Jakarta: +62 21 2188 9084 Indonesia (toll free): 007 803 321 8927 Ireland, Dublin: +353 (0) 1 526 9421 Ireland (national): 0818 270 271 Ireland (toll free): 1800 937 649 Ireland (national): 1890 907 630 Israel, Tel Aviv: +972 (0)3 721 7943 Israel (toll free): 1809 213 168 Italy, Milan: +39 02 3600 8006 Italy, Rome: +39 06 8750 0676 Italy (toll free): 800 146 094 Japan, Tokyo: +81 3 4560 1270 Japan, Osaka: +81 6 4560 2410 Japan (toll free): 0120 305 211 Japan (mobile): 0120 632 611 Japan (national): 0570 085 744 Jordan (toll free): 0800 22172 Kazakhstan (toll free): 8800 333 7554 Kenya, Nairobi: +254 (0)207 643 581 South Korea, Seoul: +82 (0) 2 6007 0079 South Korea (toll free): 00798 6136 1454 Kuwait (national): +965 2206 3002 Latvia, Riga: +371 6601 3627 Latvia (toll free): 8000 4418 Lithuania, Vilnius: +370 5205 5468 Lithuania (toll free): 8800 31449 Luxembourg: +352 2088 1749 Luxembourg (toll free): 800 28433 Macau (national): +853 6262 1676 Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: +60 (0) 3 7724 8010 Malaysia (toll free): 1 800 816 152 Mexico, Guadalajara: +52 33 4162 4504 Mexico, Mexico City: +52 55 8421 0326 Mexico, Monterrey: +52 81 4162 5648 Mexico (toll free): 01 800 733 4102 Morocco, Casablanca: +212 (0) 520 48 0022 Morocco (toll free): 0800 091 296 Netherlands, Amsterdam: +31 (0) 20 716 8345 Netherlands (toll free): 0800 020 2597 New Zealand, Christchurch: +64 (0) 3 974 2596 New Zealand, Wellington: +64 (0) 4 909 4674 New Zealand, Auckland: +64 (0) 9 929 1825 New Zealand (toll free): 0800 452 947 Nigeria, Lagos: +234 1 277 3944 Norway, Oslo: +47 21 00 48 15 Norway (toll free): 800 56081 Oman (toll free): 800 77265 Pakistan, Islamabad: +92 5181 08863 Panama, Panama City: +507 8 335 913 Panama (toll free): 00800 223 1390 Peru, Lima: +51 (0) 1 700 9571 Philippines, Manila: +63 (0)2 395 3426 Philippines (toll free): 1 800 111 013 99 Poland, Warsaw: +48 22 295 3570 Poland (toll free): 00 800 121 4356 Portugal, Lisbon: +351 21 316 4093 Portugal (toll free): 800 784 442 Qatar (freephone): 00 800 100 491 Romania, Bucharest: +40 (0) 21 529 3992 Romania (toll free): 0800 801 035 Russia, Moscow: +7 495 646 9181 Russia (toll free): 8 800 500 9241 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 844 6641 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 850 0219 Serbia (toll free): 0800 190 712 Singapore: +65 6654 9112 Singapore (toll free): 800 616 3192 Slovakia, Bratislava: +421 (0)2 3321 5498 Slovakia (toll free): 0800 002 002 Slovenia, Ljubljana: +386 1600 8695 Slovenia (toll free): 0800 81193 South Africa, Johannesburg: +27 (0)11 589 8321 South Africa (toll free): 0800 999 434 Spain, Madrid: +34 91 114 6653 Spain, Barcelona: +34 93 800 1946 Spain (toll free): 900 828 035 Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka: +94 720 910 333 Sweden, Stockholm: +46 (0) 8 5065 3956 Sweden (toll free): 0200 125 588 Switzerland, Geneva: +41 (0) 22 595 4795 Switzerland, Zurich: +41 (0) 44 580 7207 Switzerland (toll free): 0800 740 360 Taiwan, Taipei: +886 (0) 2 2650 7329 Taiwan (toll free): 0800 666 596 Thailand, Bangkok: +66 (0) 2104 0761 Thailand (toll free): 001 800 6136 1473 Tunisia, Tunis: +216 31 378 101 Turkey, Istanbul: +90 212 375 50 49 Turkey (toll free): 00800 4488 26642 Ukraine (toll free): 0800 500 896 UAE (toll free): 8000 3570 2662 UK (03): +44 (0)330 336 6002 UK (toll free): 0800 358 6385 UK (national): 0844 473 5010 UK (national): 0845 545 0015 USA /Canada (toll free): 1-866-398-2885 Uruguay (toll free): 0004 019 0152 Venezuela, Caracas: +58 212 720 2164 Venezuela (toll free): 0 800 162 7451 Vietnam, Hanoi: +84 24 4458 3312 Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh: +84 28 4458 1322 Vietnam (toll free): 1800 9226 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: invite.ics Type: application/ics Size: 11222 bytes Desc: not available URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Oct 9 02:48:47 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 23:48:47 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the Board at ICANN63 -urgent call for objections In-Reply-To: <6a79351c64d74a948cd56f926a965eee@winston.com> References: <6a79351c64d74a948cd56f926a965eee@winston.com> Message-ID: <368D619C-9712-4AA1-B454-6119AF41F9B1@ferdeline.com> Sounds like someone is potentially proposing an end to bottom-up, multistakeholder policy development. Ayden > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "McGrady, Paul D." > Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the Board at ICANN63 -urgent call for objections > > Date: 9 October 2018 at 01:46:02 CEST > To: "Heather Forrest" , "GNSO Council List" > Reply-To: "McGrady, Paul D." > > Thanks Heather. > > I think this plan makes sense. Let?s bring them some of the concrete ideas that came out of the LA meeting, e.g. limits on the size of WG participants, strict timeframes to get the work done, etc. I?d really like to see what the Board thinks about the GNSO Council running a tighter ship. > > Best, > Paul > > From: council On Behalf Of Heather Forrest > Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 6:34 PM > To: GNSO Council List > Subject: [council] GNSO Council meeting with the Board at ICANN63 -urgent call for objections > > Dear Council colleagues, > > I put out a call for questions for the Board some time ago and got no response. Leadership has given this quite a bit of thought, and particularly referred back to the ideas Rafik raised in our Strategic Planning Session back in January about moving away from a they ask-we ask type setup. > > In the meantime, I received the agenda for the SO/AC Chairs' workshop which falls on the Friday before ICANN63 begins, and it contains the following discussion item: > > How should ICANN's multi stakeholder model of governance and Policy Development Process evolve to balance the increasing need for inclusivity, accountability and transparency, with the imperative of getting our work done and our policies developed in a more effective and timely manner, and with the efficient utilization of ICANN?s resources? > > Donna, Rafik and I propose to you all that we spend our time with the Board workshopping this question - it would be interesting to hear their perspective, and we have much to bring to the table in this discussion from Council's perspective. > > We're very late behind the deadline because this one got buried in my inbox (which looks like a natural disaster as ICANN63 bears down, so apologies if you've emailed me and haven't yet received a response) so I'll ask for a quick call for objections. Hearing none within 24 hours, we'll send this on to Board Ops. > > Many thanks, best wishes, stay sane in the run up to Barcelona, > > Heather > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 9 03:33:18 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:33:18 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG open session agenda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Farzaneh, Thanks for sharing this. I just have one question, what Nomcom IPT will present? as it is an implementation matter, I don't think we have much to say or influence at this stage. Best, Rafik Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 04:12, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > Dear all > > Please let me know if you want to meet with the finance team during NCSG > open session, if not I will ask NomCom IPT to join us at 17.00 and we can > have a break from 16.30 to 17.00. If I don't receive feedback I will ask > NomCom IPT tomorrow to join us at 17.00 and not have a meeting with ICANN > finance team. > > > Best > Farzaneh > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 10:43 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> Here are what we are going to do for NCSG open session in Barcelona. My >> question is do you want to cancel the meeting with the budget team and have >> a break? Also RDS review team wanted to meet but I can't accommodate them. >> Do you think we should have them even if it's for 15 minutes? >> >> NCSG Open Meeting >> >> 23 October; 15:15-18:30 >> >> 15:15 - 15:20 >> >> Welcome & Introductions >> >> 15:20 - 16:00 >> NCSG goals and strategy >> >> 16.00 - 16:30 >> Brief reports about our meetings in the second half of NCSG Open session >> >> 16:30 - 17:00 >> >> NomCom IPT leadership presentation (4:30 ? 5:00) >> >> (During Coffee break) >> >> 17:00 - 17:30 >> meeting with Budget team (TBD) >> >> 17:30 - 18:00 >> >> SSR2 >> >> 18:00 - 18:30 >> >> ALAC >> Farzaneh >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Oct 9 03:36:52 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:36:52 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG open session agenda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I wanted IPT to come over and talk to us to specifically understand when they are going to start looking at representation balance on NomCom and what exactly should be done there since we are underrepresented there. But I could cancel if we can get this information by other means. Farzaneh On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:33 PM Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi Farzaneh, > > Thanks for sharing this. > I just have one question, what Nomcom IPT will present? as it is an > implementation matter, I don't think we have much to say or influence at > this stage. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 04:12, farzaneh badii a > ?crit : > >> Dear all >> >> Please let me know if you want to meet with the finance team during NCSG >> open session, if not I will ask NomCom IPT to join us at 17.00 and we can >> have a break from 16.30 to 17.00. If I don't receive feedback I will ask >> NomCom IPT tomorrow to join us at 17.00 and not have a meeting with ICANN >> finance team. >> >> >> Best >> Farzaneh >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 10:43 PM farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >>> Here are what we are going to do for NCSG open session in Barcelona. My >>> question is do you want to cancel the meeting with the budget team and have >>> a break? Also RDS review team wanted to meet but I can't accommodate them. >>> Do you think we should have them even if it's for 15 minutes? >>> >>> NCSG Open Meeting >>> >>> 23 October; 15:15-18:30 >>> >>> 15:15 - 15:20 >>> >>> Welcome & Introductions >>> >>> 15:20 - 16:00 >>> NCSG goals and strategy >>> >>> 16.00 - 16:30 >>> Brief reports about our meetings in the second half of NCSG Open session >>> >>> 16:30 - 17:00 >>> >>> NomCom IPT leadership presentation (4:30 ? 5:00) >>> >>> (During Coffee break) >>> >>> 17:00 - 17:30 >>> meeting with Budget team (TBD) >>> >>> 17:30 - 18:00 >>> >>> SSR2 >>> >>> 18:00 - 18:30 >>> >>> ALAC >>> Farzaneh >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 9 14:20:00 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:20:00 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, putting this for NCSG PC review soon *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit * . I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from another person planning to add edits too. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile To: ncsg-discuss Cc: Rafik Dammak Dear all, As you know, the public comment period for the proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, edit and comment. *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit * Cheers, ---- Tomslin > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 9 14:23:48 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:23:48 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] welcome to new representatives to PC Message-ID: Hi all, with some delay, I would like to welcome the new representatives to NCSG PC from NPOC: David and Dina. For some reasons, I didn't get the notification but I understood they were appointed lately. I think they are already subscribed to the PC list I want to thank Poncelet and Juan for their service in PC and their active participation. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Tue Oct 9 14:44:09 2018 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:44:09 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7D006421-20B4-4095-8300-C3B338F73B9F@benin2point0.org> Dear Rafik, I have commented. Meanwhile, I will read more materials and perhaps add more inputs. But Tomslin did a good job already. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 9 Oct 2018, at 13:20, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi, > > putting this for NCSG PC review soon https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit . I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from another person planning to add edits too. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar > > Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 > Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile > To: ncsg-discuss > > Cc: Rafik Dammak > > > > Dear all, > > As you know, the public comment period for the proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, edit and comment. > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit > > Cheers, > ---- > Tomslin > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Oct 10 01:32:44 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:32:44 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC Message-ID: All I think Joan sent an email to NCSG mailing list about this but a while back Dina was appointed by NPOC to NCSG PC. Dina I saw you were subscribed on the mailing list. Are you here? I thought I let NCSG PC know about the appointment. Rafik is the PC chair and needs to be informed at all times about the appointments and changes. Thanks Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Wed Oct 10 01:55:19 2018 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <158035543.289464.1539125719791@mail.yahoo.com> Farzi,? Just to clarify. From NPOC PC were David and Dina appointed. Joan sent an email some days ago.? JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. Presidente?-?AGEIA DENSI?ColombiaMembership Committee Chair.?Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANNCluster Orinoco TIC memberMaster IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes Cel. +57 3017435600 Twitter:?@JmanuRojas ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? El martes, 9 de octubre de 2018 5:33:21 p. m. GMT-5, farzaneh badii escribi?: All I think Joan sent an email to NCSG mailing list about this but a while back Dina was appointed by NPOC to NCSG PC.? Dina I saw you were subscribed on the mailing list. Are you here?? I thought I?let NCSG PC know about the appointment. Rafik is the PC chair and needs to be informed at all times about the appointments and changes. Thanks?Farzaneh _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Oct 10 01:58:21 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:58:21 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: <158035543.289464.1539125719791@mail.yahoo.com> References: <158035543.289464.1539125719791@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thank you Juan. On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:55 PM Juan Manuel Rojas wrote: > Farzi, > Just to clarify. From NPOC PC were David and Dina appointed. Joan sent an > email some days ago. > > JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. > Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia > Membership Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns > Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN > Cluster Orinoco TIC member > Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes > > Cel. +57 3017435600 > Twitter: @JmanuRojas > > > > > > > > > El martes, 9 de octubre de 2018 5:33:21 p. m. GMT-5, farzaneh badii < > farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> escribi?: > > > All > > I think Joan sent an email to NCSG mailing list about this but a while > back Dina was appointed by NPOC to NCSG PC. > > Dina I saw you were subscribed on the mailing list. Are you here? I > thought I let NCSG PC know about the appointment. Rafik is the PC chair and > needs to be informed at all times about the appointments and changes. > > Thanks > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Oct 10 02:01:59 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:01:59 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: <158035543.289464.1539125719791@mail.yahoo.com> References: <158035543.289464.1539125719791@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Juan, I cannot find such notification. I didnt receive anything directly. Anyway, I sent welcome message yesterday. Best, Rafik On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 07:55 Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC < ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Farzi, > Just to clarify. From NPOC PC were David and Dina appointed. Joan sent an > email some days ago. > > JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. > Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia > Membership Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns > Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN > Cluster Orinoco TIC member > Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes > > Cel. +57 3017435600 > Twitter: @JmanuRojas > > > > > > > > > El martes, 9 de octubre de 2018 5:33:21 p. m. GMT-5, farzaneh badii < > farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> escribi?: > > > All > > I think Joan sent an email to NCSG mailing list about this but a while > back Dina was appointed by NPOC to NCSG PC. > > Dina I saw you were subscribed on the mailing list. Are you here? I > thought I let NCSG PC know about the appointment. Rafik is the PC chair and > needs to be informed at all times about the appointments and changes. > > Thanks > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Thu Oct 11 15:24:35 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:24:35 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Meeting with CPH Message-ID: Hi all We will have a meeting with CPH in Barcelona . Other than epdp, anwhat do you want to talk about? Any GNSO operational matters? -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Oct 13 12:24:20 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 18:24:20 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for submission is this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments and Farell did a review already. Best, Rafik Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi, > > putting this for NCSG PC review soon *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit > * . > I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from > another person planning to add edits too. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar > Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 > Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration > Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile > To: ncsg-discuss > Cc: Rafik Dammak > > > Dear all, > > As you know, the public comment period for the proposed gTLD-Registration > Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. It closes on 13 > October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, please find the link > to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, edit and comment. > *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit > * > > > Cheers, > ---- > Tomslin > >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sat Oct 13 13:33:08 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:33:08 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7AE941B1-E0DC-48FE-94F7-28BE9A1E4562@ferdeline.com> Hi, I have added some suggested edits to the document now. Thanks to all those who drafted it. I believe the submission deadline is in less than 12 hours time. Ayden > On 13 Oct 2018, at 11:24, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for submission is this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments and Farell did a review already. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > >> Hi, >> >> putting this for NCSG PC review soon https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit . I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from another person planning to add edits too. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar >> Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 >> Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile >> To: ncsg-discuss >> Cc: Rafik Dammak >> >> Dear all, >> >> As you know, the public comment period for the proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, edit and comment. >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >> >> Cheers, >> ---- >> Tomslin >> >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at thomascovenant.org Sat Oct 13 17:58:53 2018 From: icann at thomascovenant.org (Dina Solveig Jalkanen) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:58:53 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi NCSG PC, >> Are you here? yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you. BR, Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas -- *** Thomas, friendly geek in Amsterdam Chaos https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant On 10.10.2018 01:32, farzaneh badii wrote: > All > > I think Joan sent an email to NCSG mailing list about this but a while > back Dina was appointed by NPOC to NCSG PC.? > > Dina I saw you were subscribed on the mailing list. Are you here?? I > thought I?let NCSG PC know about the appointment. Rafik is the PC > chair and needs to be informed at all times about the appointments and > changes. > > Thanks? > Farzaneh > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Sat Oct 13 18:00:36 2018 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:00:36 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> Great to have you here Dina!? Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment?? I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I think. cheers Stephanie On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: > Hi NCSG PC, > >>> Are you here? > yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you. > > BR, > > Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sat Oct 13 18:02:44 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:02:44 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as appropriate. On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? I > am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I > think. > > cheers Stephanie > > > On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: > > Hi NCSG PC, > > > Are you here? > > yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you. > > BR, > > Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sat Oct 13 18:11:49 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:11:49 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve attempted to tidy it up this morning. Ayden On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii wrote: > I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as appropriate. > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin wrote: > >> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I think. >> >> cheers Stephanie >> >> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >> >>> Hi NCSG PC, >>> >>>>> Are you here? >>> >>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- > > Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sat Oct 13 18:14:00 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:14:00 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so soon. I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. Farzaneh On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve > attempted to tidy it up this morning. > > Ayden > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii > wrote: > > I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as > appropriate. > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin < > stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > >> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? >> I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I >> think. >> >> cheers Stephanie >> >> >> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >> >> Hi NCSG PC, >> >> Are you here? >> >> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -- > Farzaneh > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Oct 13 18:17:05 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 00:17:05 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Hi, Yes it is the case as the deadline fall during the weekend. For the RDAP comment, there is another mail thread. Best, Rafik On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, 00:14 farzaneh badii wrote: > There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so > soon. > > I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. > > Farzaneh > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline > wrote: > >> The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve >> attempted to tidy it up this morning. >> >> Ayden >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >> I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as >> appropriate. >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin < >> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: >> >>> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? >>> I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I >>> think. >>> >>> cheers Stephanie >>> >>> >>> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >>> >>> Hi NCSG PC, >>> >>> Are you here? >>> >>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >> -- >> Farzaneh >> >> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sat Oct 13 18:17:35 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:17:35 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1qxJfh7vD-8BLibEsndb707FU9uts4G0uln_GOHZHIpeAwAnaR9gkT8Zsdfe96r5F9kWcQOHMASXcUG53-yNGI4neCqLxl2PdnHR7zA0bJY=@ferdeline.com> While I don?t think it matters if it is submitted a few hours late, if substantial revisions are about to take place, we all need time to review the comment again. Thanks. Ayden Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:14, farzaneh badii wrote: > There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so soon. > > I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. > > Farzaneh > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > >> The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve attempted to tidy it up this morning. >> >> Ayden >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii wrote: >> >>> I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as appropriate. >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin wrote: >>> >>>> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I think. >>>> >>>> cheers Stephanie >>>> >>>> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi NCSG PC, >>>>> >>>>>>> Are you here? >>>>> >>>>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sat Oct 13 18:18:26 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:18:26 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: <1qxJfh7vD-8BLibEsndb707FU9uts4G0uln_GOHZHIpeAwAnaR9gkT8Zsdfe96r5F9kWcQOHMASXcUG53-yNGI4neCqLxl2PdnHR7zA0bJY=@ferdeline.com> References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> <1qxJfh7vD-8BLibEsndb707FU9uts4G0uln_GOHZHIpeAwAnaR9gkT8Zsdfe96r5F9kWcQOHMASXcUG53-yNGI4neCqLxl2PdnHR7zA0bJY=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: I have to make substantial comments I was in fact writing it. Wont be more than one paragraph or two. On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:17 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > While I don?t think it matters if it is submitted a few hours late, if > substantial revisions are about to take place, we all need time to review > the comment again. Thanks. > > Ayden > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:14, farzaneh badii > wrote: > > There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so > soon. > > I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. > > Farzaneh > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline > wrote: > >> The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve >> attempted to tidy it up this morning. >> >> Ayden >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >> I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as >> appropriate. >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin < >> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: >> >>> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? >>> I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I >>> think. >>> >>> cheers Stephanie >>> >>> >>> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >>> >>> Hi NCSG PC, >>> >>> Are you here? >>> >>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >> -- >> Farzaneh >> >> -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sat Oct 13 18:20:18 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:20:18 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> <1qxJfh7vD-8BLibEsndb707FU9uts4G0uln_GOHZHIpeAwAnaR9gkT8Zsdfe96r5F9kWcQOHMASXcUG53-yNGI4neCqLxl2PdnHR7zA0bJY=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Thanks, I appreciate that ? all I am saying is, once it is ?complete?, prior to submission the entire PC needs time to review the final version. If we submit it 24 hours late so be it, but we need to have time to review it again. Best wishes, Ayden Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:18, farzaneh badii wrote: > I have to make substantial comments I was in fact writing it. Wont be more than one paragraph or two. > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:17 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > >> While I don?t think it matters if it is submitted a few hours late, if substantial revisions are about to take place, we all need time to review the comment again. Thanks. >> >> Ayden >> >> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:14, farzaneh badii wrote: >> >>> There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so soon. >>> >>> I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >>> >>>> The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve attempted to tidy it up this morning. >>>> >>>> Ayden >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as appropriate. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I think. >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers Stephanie >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi NCSG PC, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are you here? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Farzaneh > > -- > > Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sat Oct 13 18:21:20 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:21:20 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> <1qxJfh7vD-8BLibEsndb707FU9uts4G0uln_GOHZHIpeAwAnaR9gkT8Zsdfe96r5F9kWcQOHMASXcUG53-yNGI4neCqLxl2PdnHR7zA0bJY=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Ok cool I am fine with that. I don't think staff would not consider our comment because it was not submitted on a saturday! Farzaneh On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:20 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Thanks, I appreciate that ? all I am saying is, once it is ?complete?, > prior to submission the entire PC needs time to review the final version. > If we submit it 24 hours late so be it, but we need to have time to review > it again. > > Best wishes, Ayden > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:18, farzaneh badii > wrote: > > I have to make substantial comments I was in fact writing it. Wont be more > than one paragraph or two. > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:17 AM Ayden F?rdeline > wrote: > >> While I don?t think it matters if it is submitted a few hours late, if >> substantial revisions are about to take place, we all need time to review >> the comment again. Thanks. >> >> Ayden >> >> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:14, farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >> There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so >> soon. >> >> I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline >> wrote: >> >>> The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve >>> attempted to tidy it up this morning. >>> >>> Ayden >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii >>> wrote: >>> >>> I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as >>> appropriate. >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin < >>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP >>>> comment? I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go >>>> tomorrow I think. >>>> >>>> cheers Stephanie >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi NCSG PC, >>>> >>>> Are you here? >>>> >>>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>> >>> -- >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> -- > Farzaneh > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sat Oct 13 18:24:25 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:24:25 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> <1qxJfh7vD-8BLibEsndb707FU9uts4G0uln_GOHZHIpeAwAnaR9gkT8Zsdfe96r5F9kWcQOHMASXcUG53-yNGI4neCqLxl2PdnHR7zA0bJY=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Yes, we probably have until 9am Monday (Los Angeles) to get something in :-) Ayden Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:21, farzaneh badii wrote: > Ok cool I am fine with that. I don't think staff would not consider our comment because it was not submitted on a saturday! > > Farzaneh > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:20 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > >> Thanks, I appreciate that ? all I am saying is, once it is ?complete?, prior to submission the entire PC needs time to review the final version. If we submit it 24 hours late so be it, but we need to have time to review it again. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden >> >> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:18, farzaneh badii wrote: >> >>> I have to make substantial comments I was in fact writing it. Wont be more than one paragraph or two. >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:17 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >>> >>>> While I don?t think it matters if it is submitted a few hours late, if substantial revisions are about to take place, we all need time to review the comment again. Thanks. >>>> >>>> Ayden >>>> >>>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:14, farzaneh badii wrote: >>>> >>>>> There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so soon. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. >>>>> >>>>> Farzaneh >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve attempted to tidy it up this morning. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ayden >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as appropriate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP comment? I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go tomorrow I think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers Stephanie >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi NCSG PC, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are you here? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Farzaneh >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Oct 13 18:29:00 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 00:29:00 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] RDAP Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, I understand that Farzaneh is doing some changes in the draft and hearing also that James wants to add (the link is here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit). having the deadline during the weekend help us to continue the finalization and review of the draft. when we have a new version, I will ask all PC members to review the comment. Thanks. Best, Rafik Le sam. 13 oct. 2018 ? 18:24, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi all, > > this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for submission is > this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments and Farell > did a review already. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi, >> >> putting this for NCSG PC review soon *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >> * . >> I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from >> another person planning to add edits too. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar >> Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 >> Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration >> Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile >> To: ncsg-discuss >> Cc: Rafik Dammak >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> As you know, the public comment period for the proposed gTLD-Registration >> Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. It closes on 13 >> October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, please find the link >> to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, edit and comment. >> *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >> * >> >> >> Cheers, >> ---- >> Tomslin >> >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sun Oct 14 08:23:55 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:23:55 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Dina as NPOC rep on NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: <3ddee151-c8f8-2eee-357c-39caba38c984@mail.utoronto.ca> <1qxJfh7vD-8BLibEsndb707FU9uts4G0uln_GOHZHIpeAwAnaR9gkT8Zsdfe96r5F9kWcQOHMASXcUG53-yNGI4neCqLxl2PdnHR7zA0bJY=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: I am done with this RDAP comment PC. you can have a look and edit as you see fit and approve. Thanks Farzaneh On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:24 AM Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Yes, we probably have until 9am Monday (Los Angeles) to get something in > :-) > > Ayden > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:21, farzaneh badii > wrote: > > Ok cool I am fine with that. I don't think staff would not consider our > comment because it was not submitted on a saturday! > > Farzaneh > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:20 AM Ayden F?rdeline > wrote: > >> Thanks, I appreciate that ? all I am saying is, once it is ?complete?, >> prior to submission the entire PC needs time to review the final version. >> If we submit it 24 hours late so be it, but we need to have time to review >> it again. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden >> >> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:18, farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >> I have to make substantial comments I was in fact writing it. Wont be >> more than one paragraph or two. >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:17 AM Ayden F?rdeline >> wrote: >> >>> While I don?t think it matters if it is submitted a few hours late, if >>> substantial revisions are about to take place, we all need time to review >>> the comment again. Thanks. >>> >>> Ayden >>> >>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:14, farzaneh badii >>> wrote: >>> >>> There are important things I have to put in that document. will do so >>> soon. >>> >>> I don't think submitting it a few hours late is a big deal either. >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:11 AM Ayden F?rdeline >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The submission deadline is today, around five hours from now. I?ve >>>> attempted to tidy it up this morning. >>>> >>>> Ayden >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 17:02, farzaneh badii >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am working on it but yes please keep an eye on it and add as >>>> appropriate. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM Stephanie Perrin < >>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great to have you here Dina! Have you guys looked at the RDAP >>>>> comment? I am stretched to the limit this weekend, and it is due to go >>>>> tomorrow I think. >>>>> >>>>> cheers Stephanie >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2018-10-13 10:58, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi NCSG PC, >>>>> >>>>> Are you here? >>>>> >>>>> yes, I am here and looking forward to working with you.BR,Jalkanen Dina Solveig / Thomas >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Farzaneh >>>> >>>> -- >> Farzaneh >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sun Oct 14 13:00:44 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:00:44 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder RDAP Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, please review RDAP draft comment. we have to submit asap. Best Regards, Rafik Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 ? 00:29, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi all, > > I understand that Farzaneh is doing some changes in the draft and hearing > also that James wants to add (the link is here > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit). > having the deadline during the weekend help us to continue the finalization > and review of the draft. > when we have a new version, I will ask all PC members to review the > comment. > Thanks. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le sam. 13 oct. 2018 ? 18:24, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi all, >> >> this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for submission >> is this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments and Farell >> did a review already. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> putting this for NCSG PC review soon *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>> * . >>> I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from >>> another person planning to add edits too. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>> Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 >>> Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration >>> Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile >>> To: ncsg-discuss >>> Cc: Rafik Dammak >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> As you know, the public comment period for the proposed >>> gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. >>> It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, >>> please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, >>> edit and comment. >>> *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>> * >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ---- >>> Tomslin >>> >>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tatiana.tropina at gmail.com Sun Oct 14 13:17:06 2018 From: tatiana.tropina at gmail.com (Tatiana Tropina) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 12:17:06 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder RDAP Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All, I added some corrections. A couple of sentences need to be rephrased as they are not clear, but I see that Ayden is giving it a go so am sure he will fix the things language-wise. I am fine for now, if I don't have time to go after Ayden, I support the submission anyway. Cheers, Tanya On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 12:01, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > please review RDAP draft comment. we have to submit asap. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > > Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 ? 00:29, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi all, >> >> I understand that Farzaneh is doing some changes in the draft and hearing >> also that James wants to add (the link is here >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit). >> having the deadline during the weekend help us to continue the finalization >> and review of the draft. >> when we have a new version, I will ask all PC members to review the >> comment. >> Thanks. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> Le sam. 13 oct. 2018 ? 18:24, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for submission >>> is this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments and Farell >>> did a review already. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a >>> ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> putting this for NCSG PC review soon *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>>> * . >>>> I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from >>>> another person planning to add edits too. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>> Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 >>>> Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration >>>> Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile >>>> To: ncsg-discuss >>>> Cc: Rafik Dammak >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> As you know, the public comment period for the proposed >>>> gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. >>>> It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, >>>> please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, >>>> edit and comment. >>>> *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>>> * >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> ---- >>>> Tomslin >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sun Oct 14 13:30:00 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:30:00 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder RDAP Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Tanya, Rafik- I also support the submission now of this comment. Best wishes, Ayden > On 14 Oct 2018, at 12:17, Tatiana Tropina wrote: > > All, > I added some corrections. A couple of sentences need to be rephrased as they are not clear, but I see that Ayden is giving it a go so am sure he will fix the things language-wise. I am fine for now, if I don't have time to go after Ayden, I support the submission anyway. > Cheers, > Tanya > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 12:01, Rafik Dammak wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> please review RDAP draft comment. we have to submit asap. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 ? 00:29, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I understand that Farzaneh is doing some changes in the draft and hearing also that James wants to add (the link is here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit). having the deadline during the weekend help us to continue the finalization and review of the draft. >>> when we have a new version, I will ask all PC members to review the comment. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> Le sam. 13 oct. 2018 ? 18:24, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for submission is this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments and Farell did a review already. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> putting this for NCSG PC review soon https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit . I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from another person planning to add edits too. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>> Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 >>>>> Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile >>>>> To: ncsg-discuss >>>>> Cc: Rafik Dammak >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> As you know, the public comment period for the proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, edit and comment. >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> ---- >>>>> Tomslin >>>>> >>>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tatiana.tropina at gmail.com Sun Oct 14 13:31:43 2018 From: tatiana.tropina at gmail.com (Tatiana Tropina) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 12:31:43 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder RDAP Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Ayden for going through it and corrections. :-) Have a great Sunday, all! On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 12:30, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Thanks Tanya, Rafik- > > I also support the submission now of this comment. > > Best wishes, Ayden > > On 14 Oct 2018, at 12:17, Tatiana Tropina > wrote: > > All, > I added some corrections. A couple of sentences need to be rephrased as > they are not clear, but I see that Ayden is giving it a go so am sure he > will fix the things language-wise. I am fine for now, if I don't have time > to go after Ayden, I support the submission anyway. > Cheers, > Tanya > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 12:01, Rafik Dammak wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> please review RDAP draft comment. we have to submit asap. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 ? 00:29, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I understand that Farzaneh is doing some changes in the draft and >>> hearing also that James wants to add (the link is here >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit). >>> having the deadline during the weekend help us to continue the finalization >>> and review of the draft. >>> when we have a new version, I will ask all PC members to review the >>> comment. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> Le sam. 13 oct. 2018 ? 18:24, Rafik Dammak a >>> ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for submission >>>> is this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments and Farell >>>> did a review already. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a >>>> ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> putting this for NCSG PC review soon *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>>>> * . >>>>> I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from >>>>> another person planning to add edits too. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>> Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 >>>>> Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed gTLD-Registration >>>>> Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile >>>>> To: ncsg-discuss >>>>> Cc: Rafik Dammak >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> As you know, the public comment period for the proposed >>>>> gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. >>>>> It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, >>>>> please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, >>>>> edit and comment. >>>>> *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> ---- >>>>> Tomslin >>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Oct 15 03:15:47 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:15:47 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder RDAP Comment review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: hi all, attached the latest version to be submitted if there is no strong objection in coming hours. Thank you. Best Regards, Rafik Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 ? 19:31, Tatiana Tropina a ?crit : > Thanks Ayden for going through it and corrections. :-) > Have a great Sunday, all! > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 12:30, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > >> Thanks Tanya, Rafik- >> >> I also support the submission now of this comment. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden >> >> On 14 Oct 2018, at 12:17, Tatiana Tropina >> wrote: >> >> All, >> I added some corrections. A couple of sentences need to be rephrased as >> they are not clear, but I see that Ayden is giving it a go so am sure he >> will fix the things language-wise. I am fine for now, if I don't have time >> to go after Ayden, I support the submission anyway. >> Cheers, >> Tanya >> >> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 12:01, Rafik Dammak >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> please review RDAP draft comment. we have to submit asap. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 ? 00:29, Rafik Dammak a >>> ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I understand that Farzaneh is doing some changes in the draft and >>>> hearing also that James wants to add (the link is here >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit). >>>> having the deadline during the weekend help us to continue the finalization >>>> and review of the draft. >>>> when we have a new version, I will ask all PC members to review the >>>> comment. >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> >>>> Le sam. 13 oct. 2018 ? 18:24, Rafik Dammak a >>>> ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> this a reminder regarding the RDAP comment. the deadline for >>>>> submission is this weekend. Farzaneh already added her substantive comments >>>>> and Farell did a review already. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 ? 20:20, Rafik Dammak a >>>>> ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> putting this for NCSG PC review soon *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>>>>> * . >>>>>> I know that Farzaneh will add more to the comment. I also heard from >>>>>> another person planning to add edits too. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>> From: Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>> Date: lun. 24 sept. 2018 ? 12:38 >>>>>> Subject: [Public Comments] Draft Comment on Proposed >>>>>> gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile >>>>>> To: ncsg-discuss >>>>>> Cc: Rafik Dammak >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> As you know, the public comment period for the proposed >>>>>> gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile is currently open. >>>>>> It closes on 13 October 2018. On behalf of the comment drafting team, >>>>>> please find the link to the NCSG draft we have prepared for your review, >>>>>> edit and comment. >>>>>> *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4VtzmTe9qTSC8h8RPuT4HMb0c83odIN75wBdDA2VVg/edit >>>>>> * >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> ---- >>>>>> Tomslin >>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile - NCSG comment.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 167866 bytes Desc: not available URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Mon Oct 15 11:13:40 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:13:40 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Draft agenda: GNSO Working session Sunday 21 October 2018 In-Reply-To: <5BC4464A.4040006@firsthand.net> References: <37471b5c-3dc9-b0b0-5110-47e87a3903c4@gih.com> <5BBD1FB6.3030501@firsthand.net> <5BBDF80F.9040200@firsthand.net> <5BC4464A.4040006@firsthand.net> Message-ID: <3F28D04F-AA47-4DDF-B212-8AADA898C37B@ferdeline.com> I will join this session until 1:15pm, when I will need to leave to attend the Standards workshop being organised by Stephanie and the NCSG. But I note that one of the agenda items I will be missing is the Council Chair candidate interviews. Would it be useful to have an alternate in the room when I am gone? Ayden > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Nathalie Peregrine" > Subject: [council] Draft agenda: GNSO Working session Sunday 21 October 2018 > > Date: 15 October 2018 at 09:18:48 CEST > To: "council at gnso.icann.org" > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" > Reply-To: "Nathalie Peregrine" > > Dear councilors, > > Please find the draft agenda for the GNSO Working session on Sunday 21 October 2018 in room 115 (GNSO room) posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/lhVpBQ > > Please note the new start time of 08:30 CET (06:30 UTC). > > Thank you, > > Kind regards, > > Nathalie > > Nathalie Peregrine > > Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Email: [nathalie.peregrine at icann.org ](x-msg://1/nathalie.peregrine at icann.org%20) > > Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann > > Find out more about the GNSO by taking our i[nteractive courses](applewebdata://EB3A6F47-9760-400D-A39B-A7EFFC56B467/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso) and visiting the [GNSO Newcomer pages](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DgMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=-d9m4sr16OXloyLjz4TF6npbe51hgE0EHtoX1U6WUOA&s=Bw2Uzbh2Pu1X0lObLtbwtN5ZNEP3ECdPAfcqzVvIOYE&e=) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Oct 15 22:11:03 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:11:03 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Letter to ICANN Board about Privacy of Domain Name Registrants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Farzaneh ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: farzaneh badii Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:10 PM Subject: Letter to ICANN Board about Privacy of Domain Name Registrants To: NCSG List Dear all Please find below a link to a google doc of our letter to ICANN board about the privacy of domain name registrants. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit?usp=sharing This has to be sent urgently before ICANN starts so it's better to send it by the end of the day tomorrow. Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG-Letter to ICANN Board.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 22198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 00:51:16 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:51:16 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model References: Message-ID: Farzaneh ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: farzaneh badii Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model To: NCSG List Dear all, Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing Best Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 01:30:47 2018 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:30:47 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [council] Draft agenda: GNSO Working session Sunday 21 October 2018 In-Reply-To: <3F28D04F-AA47-4DDF-B212-8AADA898C37B@ferdeline.com> References: <37471b5c-3dc9-b0b0-5110-47e87a3903c4@gih.com> <5BBD1FB6.3030501@firsthand.net> <5BBDF80F.9040200@firsthand.net> <5BC4464A.4040006@firsthand.net> <3F28D04F-AA47-4DDF-B212-8AADA898C37B@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: <469F4CBC-C771-44A8-A20C-1E58B2A79C28@gmail.com> Want me to cover for you? Martin Silva Valent Partner @ Silva.legal > On 15 Oct 2018, at 05:13, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > > I will join this session until 1:15pm, when I will need to leave to attend the Standards workshop being organised by Stephanie and the NCSG. But I note that one of the agenda items I will be missing is the Council Chair candidate interviews. Would it be useful to have an alternate in the room when I am gone? > > Ayden > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: "Nathalie Peregrine" > >> Subject: [council] Draft agenda: GNSO Working session Sunday 21 October 2018 >> Date: 15 October 2018 at 09:18:48 CEST >> To: "council at gnso.icann.org " > >> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org " > >> Reply-To: "Nathalie Peregrine" > >> >> Dear councilors, >> >> Please find the draft agenda for the GNSO Working session on Sunday 21 October 2018 in room 115 (GNSO room) posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/lhVpBQ >> >> Please note the new start time of 08:30 CET (06:30 UTC). >> >> Thank you, >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Nathalie >> >> >> Nathalie Peregrine >> Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org? >> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann >> >> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 01:44:50 2018 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:44:50 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [council] Draft agenda: GNSO Working session Sunday 21 October 2018 In-Reply-To: <469F4CBC-C771-44A8-A20C-1E58B2A79C28@gmail.com> References: <37471b5c-3dc9-b0b0-5110-47e87a3903c4@gih.com> <5BBD1FB6.3030501@firsthand.net> <5BBDF80F.9040200@firsthand.net> <5BC4464A.4040006@firsthand.net> <3F28D04F-AA47-4DDF-B212-8AADA898C37B@ferdeline.com> <469F4CBC-C771-44A8-A20C-1E58B2A79C28@gmail.com> Message-ID: I will step out of the same GNSO working session for 10 min but at a different time the you. They asked me to introduce the GNSO at all ICANN Newcomers Session. Martin to Speak to Newcomers Scheduled: 21 Oct 2018, 05:35 to 05:45 Location: Room 111/112 Invitees: Martin Pablo Silva Valent Topic: GNSO Martin Silva Valent Partner @ Silva.legal > On 15 Oct 2018, at 19:30, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: > > Want me to cover for you? > > Martin Silva Valent > > Partner @ Silva.legal > >> On 15 Oct 2018, at 05:13, Ayden F?rdeline > wrote: >> >> I will join this session until 1:15pm, when I will need to leave to attend the Standards workshop being organised by Stephanie and the NCSG. But I note that one of the agenda items I will be missing is the Council Chair candidate interviews. Would it be useful to have an alternate in the room when I am gone? >> >> Ayden >> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> From: "Nathalie Peregrine" > >>> Subject: [council] Draft agenda: GNSO Working session Sunday 21 October 2018 >>> Date: 15 October 2018 at 09:18:48 CEST >>> To: "council at gnso.icann.org " > >>> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org " > >>> Reply-To: "Nathalie Peregrine" > >>> >>> Dear councilors, >>> >>> Please find the draft agenda for the GNSO Working session on Sunday 21 October 2018 in room 115 (GNSO room) posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/lhVpBQ >>> >>> Please note the new start time of 08:30 CET (06:30 UTC). >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Nathalie >>> >>> >>> Nathalie Peregrine >>> Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) >>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>> Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org? >>> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann >>> >>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 04:15:00 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:15:00 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Council Members/Who is going to Japan Message-ID: Council members (Elsa as well) Going to Japan? Tell me now so that I submit your name to ICANN travel. We have to submit the names before 9th of November. I submit Steph's name already as the incoming chair of NCSG (she will be the chair after the end of AGM). Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 04:20:33 2018 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:20:33 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Council Members/Who is going to Japan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am going. Best, Martin On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 22:15 farzaneh badii wrote: > Council members (Elsa as well) > > Going to Japan? Tell me now so that I submit your name to ICANN travel. > > We have to submit the names before 9th of November. I submit Steph's name > already as the incoming chair of NCSG (she will be the chair after the end > of AGM). > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 04:34:40 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:34:40 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Council Members/Who is going to Japan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Farzaneh, I think I am going for that one for sure :) Rafik Le mar. 16 oct. 2018 ? 10:15, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > Council members (Elsa as well) > > Going to Japan? Tell me now so that I submit your name to ICANN travel. > > We have to submit the names before 9th of November. I submit Steph's name > already as the incoming chair of NCSG (she will be the chair after the end > of AGM). > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tatiana.tropina at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 08:07:20 2018 From: tatiana.tropina at gmail.com (Tatiana Tropina) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:07:20 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Council Members/Who is going to Japan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you Farzaneh, I am going, too. Cheers, Tanya On Tue 16. Oct 2018 at 03:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi Farzaneh, > > I think I am going for that one for sure :) > > > Rafik > > Le mar. 16 oct. 2018 ? 10:15, farzaneh badii a > ?crit : > >> Council members (Elsa as well) >> >> Going to Japan? Tell me now so that I submit your name to ICANN travel. >> >> We have to submit the names before 9th of November. I submit Steph's name >> already as the incoming chair of NCSG (she will be the chair after the end >> of AGM). >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arsenebaguma at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 11:00:37 2018 From: arsenebaguma at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ars=C3=A8ne_Tungali?=) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:00:37 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Council Members/Who is going to Japan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6BB3C4F0-E609-4E1B-ABB7-68347CEBA7BD@gmail.com> Me too, i want to go! Sent from my iPhone > On 16 Oct 2018, at 07:07, Tatiana Tropina wrote: > > Thank you Farzaneh, I am going, too. > Cheers, > Tanya > >> On Tue 16. Oct 2018 at 03:35, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> Hi Farzaneh, >> >> I think I am going for that one for sure :) >> >> >> Rafik >> >>> Le mar. 16 oct. 2018 ? 10:15, farzaneh badii a ?crit : >>> Council members (Elsa as well) >>> >>> Going to Japan? Tell me now so that I submit your name to ICANN travel. >>> >>> We have to submit the names before 9th of November. I submit Steph's name already as the incoming chair of NCSG (she will be the chair after the end of AGM). >>> >>> >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Oct 16 11:16:42 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:16:42 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Council Members/Who is going to Japan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Farzaneh, I will be attending the meeting in Kobe. Thanks. Best wishes, Ayden > On 16 Oct 2018, at 03:15, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Council members (Elsa as well) > > Going to Japan? Tell me now so that I submit your name to ICANN travel. > > We have to submit the names before 9th of November. I submit Steph's name already as the incoming chair of NCSG (she will be the chair after the end of AGM). > > Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From elsa.saade at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 17:54:41 2018 From: elsa.saade at gmail.com (Elsa S) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:54:41 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] NCSG Council Members/Who is going to Japan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Farzi ! Yes, hopefully I will be able to make it. E. ? On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:15 PM farzaneh badii wrote: > Council members (Elsa as well) > > Going to Japan? Tell me now so that I submit your name to ICANN travel. > > We have to submit the names before 9th of November. I submit Steph's name > already as the incoming chair of NCSG (she will be the chair after the end > of AGM). > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- -- Elsa Saade Consultant Gulf Centre for Human Rights Twitter: @Elsa_Saade -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 00:06:54 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:06:54 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] The letter to ICANN Board Message-ID: Dear PC We were planning to send this letter yesterday but there were a lot of edits and issues to be resolved so we are planning to send it today and I am sorry for the short notice, document was shared with you a couple of days ago please have a look at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit if no objections I will send it in a couple of hours Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Thu Oct 18 00:12:50 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 21:12:50 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] The letter to ICANN Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I support its submission, Many thanks, Ayden > On 17 Oct 2018, at 23:06, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Dear PC > > We were planning to send this letter yesterday but there were a lot of edits and issues to be resolved so we are planning to send it today and I am sorry for the short notice, document was shared with you a couple of days ago please have a look at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit > > if no objections I will send it in a couple of hours > > Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Thu Oct 18 00:13:57 2018 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 21:13:57 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] The letter to ICANN Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <155d8c31-41c1-c57f-00c1-c1ebe115d3fa@mail.utoronto.ca> me too. Where is the link for the uam? Steph On 2018-10-17 17:12, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: I support its submission, Many thanks, Ayden On 17 Oct 2018, at 23:06, farzaneh badii > wrote: Dear PC We were planning to send this letter yesterday but there were a lot of edits and issues to be resolved so we are planning to send it today and I am sorry for the short notice, document was shared with you a couple of days ago please have a look at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit if no objections I will send it in a couple of hours Farzaneh _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tatiana.tropina at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 00:17:28 2018 From: tatiana.tropina at gmail.com (Tatiana Tropina) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 23:17:28 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] The letter to ICANN Board In-Reply-To: <155d8c31-41c1-c57f-00c1-c1ebe115d3fa@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <155d8c31-41c1-c57f-00c1-c1ebe115d3fa@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: I support the submission, too. Thank you! On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 23:14, Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > me too. Where is the link for the uam? > > Steph > On 2018-10-17 17:12, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > > I support its submission, > > Many thanks, > > Ayden > > On 17 Oct 2018, at 23:06, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Dear PC > > We were planning to send this letter yesterday but there were a lot of > edits and issues to be resolved so we are planning to send it today and I > am sorry for the short notice, document was shared with you a couple of > days ago please have a look at this link: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit > > if no objections I will send it in a couple of hours > > > > > Farzaneh > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 01:14:40 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:14:40 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] The letter to ICANN Board In-Reply-To: References: <155d8c31-41c1-c57f-00c1-c1ebe115d3fa@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Thank you I am now sending the attached to ICANN Board, cc the CEO and ICANN GDPR email and Stephanie. Farzaneh On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:17 PM Tatiana Tropina wrote: > I support the submission, too. Thank you! > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 23:14, Stephanie Perrin < > stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > >> me too. Where is the link for the uam? >> >> Steph >> On 2018-10-17 17:12, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >> >> I support its submission, >> >> Many thanks, >> >> Ayden >> >> On 17 Oct 2018, at 23:06, farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >> Dear PC >> >> We were planning to send this letter yesterday but there were a lot of >> edits and issues to be resolved so we are planning to send it today and I >> am sorry for the short notice, document was shared with you a couple of >> days ago please have a look at this link: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit >> >> if no objections I will send it in a couple of hours >> >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG Letter to ICANN Board about Privacy of Domain Name Registrants.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 223230 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 02:03:54 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 08:03:54 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] The letter to ICANN Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Farzaneh, thanks for the letter. due to the urgency, the letter was already shared in NCSG list for consultation and it went through many revisions by several members including from PC, I think it is ok to be submitted. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 18 oct. 2018 ? 06:07, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > Dear PC > > We were planning to send this letter yesterday but there were a lot of > edits and issues to be resolved so we are planning to send it today and I > am sorry for the short notice, document was shared with you a couple of > days ago please have a look at this link: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit > > if no objections I will send it in a couple of hours > > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Thu Oct 18 12:28:37 2018 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:28:37 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] The letter to ICANN Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <499BFE05-1E0F-4EF9-B2AC-9FE8BA89C2DC@benin2point0.org> I endorse the document. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 17 Oct 2018, at 23:06, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Dear PC > > We were planning to send this letter yesterday but there were a lot of edits and issues to be resolved so we are planning to send it today and I am sorry for the short notice, document was shared with you a couple of days ago please have a look at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ucpgxgOZKssHV5ZPGx9SnX2b1SS8vo9AN3In4merOyk/edit > > if no objections I will send it in a couple of hours > > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 19:02:04 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:02:04 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear PC Please go through this document, edit and see if you can approve it today or tomorrow. Farzaneh On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM farzaneh badii wrote: > > Farzaneh > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: farzaneh badii > Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM > Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model > To: NCSG List > > > Dear all, > > Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that > ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines > and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. > Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > Best > Farzaneh > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Fri Oct 19 00:19:10 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 21:19:10 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model In-Reply-To: <0.0.0.34.1D46725DA3F5B46.1C5A86@mail.haronacieu.icu> References: <0.0.0.34.1D46725DA3F5B46.1C5A86@mail.haronacieu.icu> Message-ID: <6B4E62AD-7FB8-4CA5-AF74-DD178E891D3C@ferdeline.com> Dear all, I support the submission of this comment. Thanks. Best wishes, Ayden > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "farzaneh badii" > Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model > > Date: 15 October 2018 at 23:51:03 CEST > To: > Reply-To: "farzaneh badii" > > Dear all, > > Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing > > Best > Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Fri Oct 19 00:25:54 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:25:54 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello PC Comments we received so far are editorial so they can be accepted easily. If no objection by PC we should send it preferably today. I know Rafik is flying so as soon as he sees it and approves and there are no objections he can send it. It is difficult to do it in an airport so I understand if he can?t and not really the end of the world if he submits tomorrow. So Rafik, over to you. I thought would be good to send it to the Board as well. Up to you. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:02 PM farzaneh badii wrote: > Dear PC > > Please go through this document, edit and see if you can approve it today > or tomorrow. > > Farzaneh > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: farzaneh badii >> Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM >> Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model >> To: NCSG List >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that >> ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines >> and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. >> Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> >> >> Best >> Farzaneh >> > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 20:08:11 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 02:08:11 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Farzaneh for work done. I support the submission if no strong objection. Rafik On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 01:02 farzaneh badii wrote: > Dear PC > > Please go through this document, edit and see if you can approve it today > or tomorrow. > > Farzaneh > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: farzaneh badii >> Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM >> Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model >> To: NCSG List >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that >> ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines >> and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. >> Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> >> >> Best >> Farzaneh >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Oct 19 07:08:25 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:08:25 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, I submitted the statement (attached) as there was no objection and to be in time in order to be effective. Best, Rafik Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 ? 06:26, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > Hello PC > > Comments we received so far are editorial so they can be accepted easily. > If no objection by PC we should send it preferably today. I know Rafik is > flying so as soon as he sees it and approves and there are no objections he > can send it. It is difficult to do it in an airport so I understand if he > can?t and not really the end of the world if he submits tomorrow. So Rafik, > over to you. I thought would be good to send it to the Board as well. Up > to you. > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:02 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> Dear PC >> >> Please go through this document, edit and see if you can approve it today >> or tomorrow. >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: farzaneh badii >>> Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM >>> Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model >>> To: NCSG List >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that >>> ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines >>> and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. >>> Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. >>> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best >>> Farzaneh >>> >> -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG comment on UAM.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 166296 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pileleji at ymca.gm Fri Oct 19 12:57:28 2018 From: pileleji at ymca.gm (Poncelet Ileleji) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:57:28 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Concur Rafik, Thank you great work put in. Kind Regards Poncelet On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 04:09, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > I submitted the statement (attached) as there was no objection and to be > in time in order to be effective. > > Best, > > Rafik > Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 ? 06:26, farzaneh badii a > ?crit : > >> Hello PC >> >> Comments we received so far are editorial so they can be accepted easily. >> If no objection by PC we should send it preferably today. I know Rafik is >> flying so as soon as he sees it and approves and there are no objections he >> can send it. It is difficult to do it in an airport so I understand if he >> can?t and not really the end of the world if he submits tomorrow. So Rafik, >> over to you. I thought would be good to send it to the Board as well. Up >> to you. >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:02 PM farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >>> Dear PC >>> >>> Please go through this document, edit and see if you can approve it >>> today or tomorrow. >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM farzaneh badii >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Farzaneh >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> From: farzaneh badii >>>> Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM >>>> Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model >>>> To: NCSG List >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that >>>> ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines >>>> and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. >>>> Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Farzaneh >>>> >>> -- >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm http://signaraglobalsolutions.com/ http://jokkolabs.net/en/ www.waigf.org www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 *www.diplointernetgovernance.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dave at davecake.net Fri Oct 19 13:37:55 2018 From: dave at davecake.net (David Cake) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:37:55 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2F685A12-03C6-46BE-97B8-E48925CF5138@davecake.net> Thank you for the submission. This was an excellent response. David > On 19 Oct 2018, at 6:08 am, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > I submitted the statement (attached) as there was no objection and to be in time in order to be effective. > > Best, > > Rafik > Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 ? 06:26, farzaneh badii > a ?crit : > Hello PC > > Comments we received so far are editorial so they can be accepted easily. If no objection by PC we should send it preferably today. I know Rafik is flying so as soon as he sees it and approves and there are no objections he can send it. It is difficult to do it in an airport so I understand if he can?t and not really the end of the world if he submits tomorrow. So Rafik, over to you. I thought would be good to send it to the Board as well. Up to you. > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:02 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > Dear PC > > Please go through this document, edit and see if you can approve it today or tomorrow. > > Farzaneh > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > > Farzaneh > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: farzaneh badii > > Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM > Subject: [Request for review] NCSG comment on Unified Access Model > To: NCSG List > > > > Dear all, > > Please find below the NCSG draft comment on Unified Access Model that ICANN has drafted which it has repeatedly said it's just some guidelines and "possible" framework for the community to use in its deliberations. Please comment by Wednesday the latest. Sorry for the short notice. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvYR-60lWxzf3zPmtCJ-61xHvtAhH7yFIYbywU6FfwI/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > Best > Farzaneh > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Oct 22 21:47:12 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:47:12 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure In-Reply-To: References: <24e36f1a-6e13-2b27-f438-7e48aa7be9a5@linx.net> Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: farzaneh badii Date: Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:46 PM Subject: Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure To: NCSG List We received this from Malcolm. An issue that we were concerned and said in our public comment. Perhaps we can add our name quickly? As you may know, the IRP Implementation Oversight Team last week adopted "Interim Rules of Procedure" that include a deadline for filing of no later than 12 months after ICANN's action (rather than after anyone is affected by the action complained about). I have just been told that these rules have been sent to the Board for approval on Thursday. You will recall that this will deprive many potential claimants of the right to bring IRP cases, simply because ICANN's action is not implemented for 12 months and so nobody ever acquired the right to challenge it before the deadline expired. Each of your constituencies (SG, for NCSG) wrote to oppose the adoption of this "right of repose" for ICANN in the first public consultation, and each of you (except IPC) wrote to welcome the team's decision to reverse itself in the public consultation August just passed. I therefore assume you are as concerned as I am that the IOT has now put up these "Interim Rules" for approval, at ICANN Legal's request: the opposite of what was promised in the recent consultation! While the IOT currently plans to "continue these discussions" once the interim rules are adopted, there must be a real risk that these "interim rules" become permanent, if only because ICANN and the Chair refuse to join a consensus to change them. Most Board members have no clue this is controversial (or even that it's scheduled), and unless we intervene strongly it is likely to be nodded through on the consent agenda on Thursday. However, I have spoken to Matthew and Avri, so they are ready (and I believe supportive) should Cherine ask them if this should be deferred. I have drafted a letter to Cherine warning him that these rules are incompatible with the Bylaws (see attached). Will you CO-SIGN this letter on behalf of your constituency? P.S. This needs to go out urgently if it is to persuade the Board to drop this from the consent agenda. As tomorrow (Tues) is constituency day, I need your answer by the 5pm tomorrow. -- -- Farzaneh -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Letter to ICANN Board on IRP Interim Rules of Procedure 2018-10-22 draft 1.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 16145 bytes Desc: not available URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Oct 23 09:46:07 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:46:07 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure In-Reply-To: References: <24e36f1a-6e13-2b27-f438-7e48aa7be9a5@linx.net> Message-ID: Hi PC If no objection I will ask to add our name as Co signer to the letter in a couple of hours. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:47 PM farzaneh badii wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: farzaneh badii > Date: Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:46 PM > Subject: Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules > of Procedure > To: NCSG List > > > We received this from Malcolm. An issue that we were concerned and said in > our public comment. Perhaps we can add our name quickly? > > > > > > As you may know, the IRP Implementation Oversight Team last week adopted > "Interim Rules of Procedure" that include a deadline for filing of no > later than 12 months after ICANN's action (rather than after anyone is > affected by the action complained about). > > I have just been told that these rules have been sent to the Board for > approval on Thursday. > > You will recall that this will deprive many potential claimants of the > right to bring IRP cases, simply because ICANN's action is not > implemented for 12 months and so nobody ever acquired the right to > challenge it before the deadline expired. > > Each of your constituencies (SG, for NCSG) wrote to oppose the adoption > of this "right of repose" for ICANN in the first public consultation, > and each of you (except IPC) wrote to welcome the team's decision to > reverse itself in the public consultation August just passed. > > I therefore assume you are as concerned as I am that the IOT has now put > up these "Interim Rules" for approval, at ICANN Legal's request: the > opposite of what was promised in the recent consultation! > > While the IOT currently plans to "continue these discussions" once the > interim rules are adopted, there must be a real risk that these "interim > rules" become permanent, if only because ICANN and the Chair refuse to > join a consensus to change them. > > Most Board members have no clue this is controversial (or even that it's > scheduled), and unless we intervene strongly it is likely to be nodded > through on the consent agenda on Thursday. However, I have spoken to > Matthew and Avri, so they are ready (and I believe supportive) should > Cherine ask them if this should be deferred. > > I have drafted a letter to Cherine warning him that these rules are > incompatible with the Bylaws (see attached). > > Will you CO-SIGN this letter on behalf of your constituency? > > > P.S. This needs to go out urgently if it is to persuade the Board to > drop this from the consent agenda. As tomorrow (Tues) is constituency > day, I need your answer by the 5pm tomorrow. > > -- > > -- > Farzaneh > -- > Farzaneh > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 23 09:58:33 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 15:58:33 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure In-Reply-To: References: <24e36f1a-6e13-2b27-f438-7e48aa7be9a5@linx.net> Message-ID: Hi, thanks, Farzaneh for the letter. I have no problem with the content and I do believe it is important. as we have NCSG meeting today, I think the first suggested deadline, 17:00, is appropriate to confirm the endorsement. Best Regards, Rafik Le mar. 23 oct. 2018 ? 15:46, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > Hi PC > > If no objection I will ask to add our name as Co signer to the letter in a > couple of hours. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:47 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: farzaneh badii >> Date: Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:46 PM >> Subject: Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules >> of Procedure >> To: NCSG List >> >> >> We received this from Malcolm. An issue that we were concerned and said >> in our public comment. Perhaps we can add our name quickly? >> >> >> >> >> >> As you may know, the IRP Implementation Oversight Team last week adopted >> "Interim Rules of Procedure" that include a deadline for filing of no >> later than 12 months after ICANN's action (rather than after anyone is >> affected by the action complained about). >> >> I have just been told that these rules have been sent to the Board for >> approval on Thursday. >> >> You will recall that this will deprive many potential claimants of the >> right to bring IRP cases, simply because ICANN's action is not >> implemented for 12 months and so nobody ever acquired the right to >> challenge it before the deadline expired. >> >> Each of your constituencies (SG, for NCSG) wrote to oppose the adoption >> of this "right of repose" for ICANN in the first public consultation, >> and each of you (except IPC) wrote to welcome the team's decision to >> reverse itself in the public consultation August just passed. >> >> I therefore assume you are as concerned as I am that the IOT has now put >> up these "Interim Rules" for approval, at ICANN Legal's request: the >> opposite of what was promised in the recent consultation! >> >> While the IOT currently plans to "continue these discussions" once the >> interim rules are adopted, there must be a real risk that these "interim >> rules" become permanent, if only because ICANN and the Chair refuse to >> join a consensus to change them. >> >> Most Board members have no clue this is controversial (or even that it's >> scheduled), and unless we intervene strongly it is likely to be nodded >> through on the consent agenda on Thursday. However, I have spoken to >> Matthew and Avri, so they are ready (and I believe supportive) should >> Cherine ask them if this should be deferred. >> >> I have drafted a letter to Cherine warning him that these rules are >> incompatible with the Bylaws (see attached). >> >> Will you CO-SIGN this letter on behalf of your constituency? >> >> >> P.S. This needs to go out urgently if it is to persuade the Board to >> drop this from the consent agenda. As tomorrow (Tues) is constituency >> day, I need your answer by the 5pm tomorrow. >> >> -- >> >> -- >> Farzaneh >> -- >> Farzaneh >> > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Tue Oct 23 10:20:12 2018 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:20:12 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure In-Reply-To: References: <24e36f1a-6e13-2b27-f438-7e48aa7be9a5@linx.net> Message-ID: No objection. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 23 Oct 2018, at 08:46, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Hi PC > > If no objection I will ask to add our name as Co signer to the letter in a couple of hours. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:47 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: farzaneh badii > > Date: Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:46 PM > Subject: Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure > To: NCSG List > > > > We received this from Malcolm. An issue that we were concerned and said in our public comment. Perhaps we can add our name quickly? > > > > > > As you may know, the IRP Implementation Oversight Team last week adopted > "Interim Rules of Procedure" that include a deadline for filing of no > later than 12 months after ICANN's action (rather than after anyone is > affected by the action complained about). > > I have just been told that these rules have been sent to the Board for > approval on Thursday. > > You will recall that this will deprive many potential claimants of the > right to bring IRP cases, simply because ICANN's action is not > implemented for 12 months and so nobody ever acquired the right to > challenge it before the deadline expired. > > Each of your constituencies (SG, for NCSG) wrote to oppose the adoption > of this "right of repose" for ICANN in the first public consultation, > and each of you (except IPC) wrote to welcome the team's decision to > reverse itself in the public consultation August just passed. > > I therefore assume you are as concerned as I am that the IOT has now put > up these "Interim Rules" for approval, at ICANN Legal's request: the > opposite of what was promised in the recent consultation! > > While the IOT currently plans to "continue these discussions" once the > interim rules are adopted, there must be a real risk that these "interim > rules" become permanent, if only because ICANN and the Chair refuse to > join a consensus to change them. > > Most Board members have no clue this is controversial (or even that it's > scheduled), and unless we intervene strongly it is likely to be nodded > through on the consent agenda on Thursday. However, I have spoken to > Matthew and Avri, so they are ready (and I believe supportive) should > Cherine ask them if this should be deferred. > > I have drafted a letter to Cherine warning him that these rules are > incompatible with the Bylaws (see attached). > > Will you CO-SIGN this letter on behalf of your constituency? > > > P.S. This needs to go out urgently if it is to persuade the Board to > drop this from the consent agenda. As tomorrow (Tues) is constituency > day, I need your answer by the 5pm tomorrow. > > -- > > -- > Farzaneh > -- > Farzaneh > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 23 15:27:57 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:27:57 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure In-Reply-To: References: <24e36f1a-6e13-2b27-f438-7e48aa7be9a5@linx.net> Message-ID: hi all, I am seeing a large support in NCSG list to co-sign the letter and that makes PC decision straightforward here. We can record the endorsement during the NCSG session (in 45 minutes) and ask Farzaneh to relay that to related parties. Best, Rafik Le mar. 23 oct. 2018 ? 15:58, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi, > > thanks, Farzaneh for the letter. I have no problem with the content and > I do believe it is important. > as we have NCSG meeting today, I think the first suggested deadline, > 17:00, is appropriate to confirm the endorsement. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 23 oct. 2018 ? 15:46, farzaneh badii a > ?crit : > >> Hi PC >> >> If no objection I will ask to add our name as Co signer to the letter in >> a couple of hours. >> >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:47 PM farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: farzaneh badii >>> Date: Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:46 PM >>> Subject: Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules >>> of Procedure >>> To: NCSG List >>> >>> >>> We received this from Malcolm. An issue that we were concerned and said >>> in our public comment. Perhaps we can add our name quickly? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> As you may know, the IRP Implementation Oversight Team last week adopted >>> "Interim Rules of Procedure" that include a deadline for filing of no >>> later than 12 months after ICANN's action (rather than after anyone is >>> affected by the action complained about). >>> >>> I have just been told that these rules have been sent to the Board for >>> approval on Thursday. >>> >>> You will recall that this will deprive many potential claimants of the >>> right to bring IRP cases, simply because ICANN's action is not >>> implemented for 12 months and so nobody ever acquired the right to >>> challenge it before the deadline expired. >>> >>> Each of your constituencies (SG, for NCSG) wrote to oppose the adoption >>> of this "right of repose" for ICANN in the first public consultation, >>> and each of you (except IPC) wrote to welcome the team's decision to >>> reverse itself in the public consultation August just passed. >>> >>> I therefore assume you are as concerned as I am that the IOT has now put >>> up these "Interim Rules" for approval, at ICANN Legal's request: the >>> opposite of what was promised in the recent consultation! >>> >>> While the IOT currently plans to "continue these discussions" once the >>> interim rules are adopted, there must be a real risk that these "interim >>> rules" become permanent, if only because ICANN and the Chair refuse to >>> join a consensus to change them. >>> >>> Most Board members have no clue this is controversial (or even that it's >>> scheduled), and unless we intervene strongly it is likely to be nodded >>> through on the consent agenda on Thursday. However, I have spoken to >>> Matthew and Avri, so they are ready (and I believe supportive) should >>> Cherine ask them if this should be deferred. >>> >>> I have drafted a letter to Cherine warning him that these rules are >>> incompatible with the Bylaws (see attached). >>> >>> Will you CO-SIGN this letter on behalf of your constituency? >>> >>> >>> P.S. This needs to go out urgently if it is to persuade the Board to >>> drop this from the consent agenda. As tomorrow (Tues) is constituency >>> day, I need your answer by the 5pm tomorrow. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- >>> Farzaneh >>> -- >>> Farzaneh >>> >> -- >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robin at ipjustice.org Tue Oct 23 16:37:49 2018 From: robin at ipjustice.org (Robin Gross) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:37:49 -0700 Subject: [NCSG-PC] URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure In-Reply-To: References: <24e36f1a-6e13-2b27-f438-7e48aa7be9a5@linx.net> Message-ID: <79E673E4-C405-4EA1-BEE6-9A350823D39D@ipjustice.org> I agree to signing on to this letter. Thanks, Robin > On Oct 23, 2018, at 5:27 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > I am seeing a large support in NCSG list to co-sign the letter and that makes PC decision straightforward here. We can record the endorsement during the NCSG session (in 45 minutes) and ask Farzaneh to relay that to related parties. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 23 oct. 2018 ? 15:58, Rafik Dammak > a ?crit : > Hi, > > thanks, Farzaneh for the letter. I have no problem with the content and I do believe it is important. > as we have NCSG meeting today, I think the first suggested deadline, 17:00, is appropriate to confirm the endorsement. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 23 oct. 2018 ? 15:46, farzaneh badii > a ?crit : > Hi PC > > If no objection I will ask to add our name as Co signer to the letter in a couple of hours. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:47 PM farzaneh badii > wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: farzaneh badii > > Date: Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:46 PM > Subject: Fwd: URGENT CO-SIGN request: Joint letter to Board on IRP Rules of Procedure > To: NCSG List > > > > We received this from Malcolm. An issue that we were concerned and said in our public comment. Perhaps we can add our name quickly? > > > > > > As you may know, the IRP Implementation Oversight Team last week adopted > "Interim Rules of Procedure" that include a deadline for filing of no > later than 12 months after ICANN's action (rather than after anyone is > affected by the action complained about). > > I have just been told that these rules have been sent to the Board for > approval on Thursday. > > You will recall that this will deprive many potential claimants of the > right to bring IRP cases, simply because ICANN's action is not > implemented for 12 months and so nobody ever acquired the right to > challenge it before the deadline expired. > > Each of your constituencies (SG, for NCSG) wrote to oppose the adoption > of this "right of repose" for ICANN in the first public consultation, > and each of you (except IPC) wrote to welcome the team's decision to > reverse itself in the public consultation August just passed. > > I therefore assume you are as concerned as I am that the IOT has now put > up these "Interim Rules" for approval, at ICANN Legal's request: the > opposite of what was promised in the recent consultation! > > While the IOT currently plans to "continue these discussions" once the > interim rules are adopted, there must be a real risk that these "interim > rules" become permanent, if only because ICANN and the Chair refuse to > join a consensus to change them. > > Most Board members have no clue this is controversial (or even that it's > scheduled), and unless we intervene strongly it is likely to be nodded > through on the consent agenda on Thursday. However, I have spoken to > Matthew and Avri, so they are ready (and I believe supportive) should > Cherine ask them if this should be deferred. > > I have drafted a letter to Cherine warning him that these rules are > incompatible with the Bylaws (see attached). > > Will you CO-SIGN this letter on behalf of your constituency? > > > P.S. This needs to go out urgently if it is to persuade the Board to > drop this from the consent agenda. As tomorrow (Tues) is constituency > day, I need your answer by the 5pm tomorrow. > > -- > > -- > Farzaneh > -- > Farzaneh > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 19:52:52 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:52:52 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Rafik reappointment as vice chair of gnso council Message-ID: Hi everybody CSG agreed to re appoint Rafik as the vice chair to the gnso council for this year as well. Congratulations Rafik. -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pileleji at ymca.gm Thu Oct 25 20:26:16 2018 From: pileleji at ymca.gm (Poncelet Ileleji) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 17:26:16 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Rafik reappointment as vice chair of gnso council In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Great Thanks for the notification Farzi Kind Regards Poncelet On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 16:53, farzaneh badii wrote: > Hi everybody > > CSG agreed to re appoint Rafik as the vice chair to the gnso council for > this year as well. > > Congratulations Rafik. > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm http://signaraglobalsolutions.com/ http://jokkolabs.net/en/ www.waigf.org www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 *www.diplointernetgovernance.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farell at benin2point0.org Fri Oct 26 15:08:38 2018 From: farell at benin2point0.org (Farell FOLLY) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:08:38 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Rafik reappointment as vice chair of gnso council In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1F9CFF6B-B037-42DC-97F0-1A17C7046F1F@benin2point0.org> Congratulations to Rafik. I wish all those who attended ICANN63 to have a safe trip back home. Mine went smoothly. @__f_f__ Best Regards ____________________________________ (Ekue) Farell FOLLY NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee linkedin.com/in/farellf > On 25 Oct 2018, at 18:52, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Hi everybody > > CSG agreed to re appoint Rafik as the vice chair to the gnso council for this year as well. > > Congratulations Rafik. > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avri at doria.org Fri Oct 26 16:22:21 2018 From: avri at doria.org (avri@acm.org) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:22:21 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Rafik reappointment as vice chair of gnso council In-Reply-To: <1F9CFF6B-B037-42DC-97F0-1A17C7046F1F@benin2point0.org> Message-ID: Yay!Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message --------From: Farell FOLLY Date: 10/26/18 14:08 (GMT+01:00) To: farzaneh badii Cc: ncsg-pc Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Rafik reappointment as vice chair of gnso council Congratulations to Rafik.?I wish all those who attended ICANN63 to have a safe trip back home. Mine went smoothly. @__f_f__Best Regards____________________________________(Ekue) Farell FOLLYNCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committeelinkedin.com/in/farellf? On 25 Oct 2018, at 18:52, farzaneh badii wrote:Hi everybodyCSG agreed to re appoint Rafik as the vice chair to the gnso council for this year as well.?Congratulations Rafik.?-- Farzaneh _______________________________________________NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Oct 27 02:05:18 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 08:05:18 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Rafik reappointment as vice chair of gnso council In-Reply-To: <20181026132237.18D1028@posti.effi.org> References: <1F9CFF6B-B037-42DC-97F0-1A17C7046F1F@benin2point0.org> <20181026132237.18D1028@posti.effi.org> Message-ID: Thanks all! Rafik Le ven. 26 oct. 2018 ? 22:22, avri at acm.org a ?crit : > Yay! > > > > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Farell FOLLY > Date: 10/26/18 14:08 (GMT+01:00) > To: farzaneh badii > Cc: ncsg-pc > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Rafik reappointment as vice chair of gnso council > > Congratulations to Rafik. > > I wish all those who attended ICANN63 to have a safe trip back home. Mine > went smoothly. > > @__f_f__ > > Best Regards > ____________________________________ > > (Ekue) Farell FOLLY > NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee > linkedin.com/in/farellf > > > > > > > On 25 Oct 2018, at 18:52, farzaneh badii wrote: > > Hi everybody > > CSG agreed to re appoint Rafik as the vice chair to the gnso council for > this year as well. > > Congratulations Rafik. > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 02:10:05 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:10:05 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Call for Volunteers - SCBO In-Reply-To: <013601d46eb7$4549ec10$cfddc430$@berrycobb.com> References: <013601d46eb7$4549ec10$cfddc430$@berrycobb.com> Message-ID: hi all, with the new term starting, we will receive several calls to appoint and/or to confirm representatives e.g. SSC. we should appoint subject matter expert(s) to SCBO from NCSG in addition to the councilors who can volunteer directly (they don't need to be appointed). I understand that Stephanie is interested to be appointed as SME as she was there as councilor previously. I will prepare a call for candidates. Best Regards, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- Hi All, As discussed at the GNSO Council wrap-up session in Barcelona, please find attached a call for volunteers to join the Standing Committee on ICANN?s Budget and Operations. It will be helpful to have adequate representation from both houses. You can view the current membership here . The SCBO is formulating comments for the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget, which is due *12 November 2018*. The draft FY20 ICANN Org budget is expected to be posted on *17 December 2018*. Thank you. B Berry Cobb GNSO Policy Consultant @berrycobb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gnso-council-sc-budget-council-cfv_20181028.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 56352 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 02:18:11 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:18:11 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC Message-ID: hi all, as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its composition is being renewed with new councilors and appointments of constituencies representatives. While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC in the last weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by appointing or confirming its representatives following NCUC internal procedures in coming weeks. When the composition is set, a first action will be to have an NCSG PC chair election and possibly appointing vice-chair(s). We don't have a set process and it is a good opportunity to work on that, in addition, to resume the work on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while now). as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to (re)appoint NCSG representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, SSC, PIR. we may add other tasks to those later on. Best Regards, Rafik Dammak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 02:29:19 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:29:19 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ATRT 3 will start soon/ do we have a candidate to recommend to SCC? Message-ID: GNSO is seeking additional volunteers to serve on the ATRT3 and has opened an Expression of Interest period for this purpose. As it may be of your concern, the third review of ICANN?s Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) is scheduled to begin in January 2019 following a delay to allow for public consultation on the schedule of ICANN reviews. The application deadline is Tuesday 30 October 2018 at 23:59 UTC and you can find additional information about the Review Team and the skills required on the following link: https://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11oct18-en.htm I don't know how the process of appointment is but I think it is at the GNSO SCC level if I am not mistaken. I suggest someone sends the call ASAP to NCSG Discuss list and see who will apply. Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 02:37:00 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:37:00 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Leadership program/ ICANN 64 Message-ID: Here is what I sent to NCSG EC. i don't know if EC will have a different process but I believe those who are interested should have their brief statement of interest ready. Hi everyone, Among the EC someone has to pick this task up. Note that what we did before was to make a call to NCSG EC and NCSG PC and see who would be interested,. Note that preferably current or incoming leaders should be recommended for the program. we don't have a selection process for this normally when non of the leaders in PC nor EC applied for it then the call went to the general membership list with a deadline. If more than one leader is interested, normally they discuss and one goes away in favor of the other or becomes an alternate. I will send this call to PC as well t since I am not chair I will not get involved with setting deadlines and a lightweight process like before. Please volunteer and take up this task. The ICANN Academy Leadership Program (LP) during the ICANN61 Meeting in Puerto Rico was another success and we are now preparing the 6th edition that is scheduled to take place 7-8 March 2019, two days prior to the official start of ICANN64 in Kobe, Japan. For this program, one (1) seat is reserved for a representative from the NCSG. The program is designed for current *and *incoming leaders, helping to increase understanding of the complexity of ICANN and to develop facilitation skills, as well as building a network with other leaders. We are aware that understanding ICANN as an organization, the topics discussed within ICANN, and interaction within other stakeholder groups can be challenging for incoming leaders, but sometimes also for experienced leaders. ICANN and the community are making considerable efforts in order to help incoming leaders have a good start to their terms and to provide current leaders the opportunity to strengthen their leadership and facilitation skills. Opportunities for Leadership Program participants include the following: - Meet leaders from the other SOs/ACs and get an insight of the functionality and issues in other groups - Discuss current ICANN topics in an in-depth manner - Deepen the understanding of key ICANN processes - Develop facilitation and leadership skills, focused personal effectiveness to run meetings and foster processes A preliminary program is attached to this email. Kindly note that this is subject to change. Accommodation for participants will be covered between Wednesday and Thursday, 6-7 March 2019, and participants will receive a stipend. Please note that flights will *NOT* be covered under this program, as incoming and current leaders are normally covered by the regular ICANN travel support. Please ensure that the leaders you select are being covered by ICANN Travel Support for their flights to Kobe for ICANN64. We would like to ask you to identify one incoming or current leader from your stakeholder group who is interested and available to participate in this program. We recommend that you also identify an alternate candidate. Kindly forward us the names and email addresses of the endorsed individuals no later than *Thursday, 8 November 2018*, and ask them to register here by 23:59 UTC on 8 November as well. We hope this program will meet the needs of your community. All participants will be encouraged to partake in an open exchange of their views, as this will help facilitate cross-constituency collaboration during their terms. We are very happy to answer any questions you may have on this exciting LP and look forward to having your group?s participants confirmed. Kind regards, Sandra Hoferichter, Chair of the ICANN Academy Working Group Ergys Ramaj, VP, Public Responsibility Support Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 14:50:05 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:50:05 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ATRT 3 will start soon/ do we have a candidate to recommend to SCC? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: hi Farzaneh, Thanks, yes the final selection/appointment will be made by SSC between existing slate and new candidates to fill the GNSO slate. Best, Rafik Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 09:29, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > GNSO is seeking additional volunteers to serve on the ATRT3 and has opened > an Expression of Interest period for this purpose. As it may be of your > concern, the third review of ICANN?s Accountability and Transparency > (ATRT3) is scheduled to begin in January 2019 following a delay to allow > for public consultation on the schedule of ICANN reviews. > > The application deadline is Tuesday 30 October 2018 at 23:59 UTC and you > can find additional information about the Review Team and the skills > required on the following link: > https://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11oct18-en.htm > > I don't know how the process of appointment is but I think it is at the > GNSO SCC level if I am not mistaken. I suggest someone sends the call ASAP > to NCSG Discuss list and see who will apply. > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 15:15:34 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 22:15:34 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Leadership program/ ICANN 64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Farzaneh. I missed this opportunity several times because the dates but I am thinking if I should apply this time. anyway, others may be interested too. Best, Rafik Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 09:37, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > Here is what I sent to NCSG EC. i don't know if EC will have a different > process but I believe those who are interested should have their brief > statement of interest ready. > > Hi everyone, > > Among the EC someone has to pick this task up. Note that what we did > before was to make a call to NCSG EC and NCSG PC and see who would be > interested,. Note that preferably current or incoming leaders should be > recommended for the program. we don't have a selection process for this > normally when non of the leaders in PC nor EC applied for it then the call > went to the general membership list with a deadline. If more than one > leader is interested, normally they discuss and one goes away in favor of > the other or becomes an alternate. I will send this call to PC as well t > since I am not chair I will not get involved with setting deadlines and a > lightweight process like before. Please volunteer and take up this task. > > > > The ICANN Academy Leadership Program (LP) during the ICANN61 Meeting in > Puerto Rico > was > another success and we are now preparing the 6th edition that is > scheduled to take place 7-8 March 2019, two days prior to the official > start of ICANN64 in Kobe, Japan. > > > > For this program, one (1) seat is reserved for a representative from the > NCSG. The program is designed for current *and *incoming leaders, helping > to increase understanding of the complexity of ICANN and to develop > facilitation skills, as well as building a network with other leaders. We > are aware that understanding ICANN as an organization, the topics discussed > within ICANN, and interaction within other stakeholder groups can > be challenging for incoming leaders, but sometimes also for experienced > leaders. ICANN and the community are making considerable efforts in order > to help incoming leaders have a good start to their terms and to provide > current leaders the opportunity to strengthen their leadership and > facilitation skills. Opportunities for Leadership Program participants > include the following: > > > > - Meet leaders from the other SOs/ACs and get an insight of the > functionality and issues in other groups > - Discuss current ICANN topics in an in-depth manner > - Deepen the understanding of key ICANN processes > - Develop facilitation and leadership skills, focused personal > effectiveness to run meetings and foster processes > > > > A preliminary program is attached to this email. Kindly note that this is > subject to change. > > Accommodation for participants will be covered between Wednesday and > Thursday, 6-7 March 2019, and participants will receive a stipend. Please > note that flights will *NOT* be covered under this program, as incoming > and current leaders are normally covered by the regular ICANN travel > support. Please ensure that the leaders you select are being covered by > ICANN Travel Support for their flights to Kobe for ICANN64. > > > > We would like to ask you to identify one incoming or current leader from > your stakeholder group who is interested and available to participate in > this program. We recommend that you also identify an alternate candidate. > Kindly forward us the names and email addresses of the endorsed individuals > no later than *Thursday, 8 November 2018*, and ask them to register here > by 23:59 UTC on 8 November as > well. > > > > We hope this program will meet the needs of your community. All > participants will be encouraged to partake in an open exchange of their > views, as this will help facilitate cross-constituency collaboration during > their terms. > > > > We are very happy to answer any questions you may have on this exciting LP > and look forward to having your group?s participants confirmed. > > > > Kind regards, > > Sandra Hoferichter, Chair of the ICANN Academy Working Group > > Ergys Ramaj, VP, Public Responsibility Support > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Oct 30 15:17:36 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:17:36 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ATRT 3 will start soon/ do we have a candidate to recommend to SCC? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <66C466ED-FDDC-4D19-B250-092FB66A3820@ferdeline.com> Sounds like a good approach. Best wishes, Ayden > On 30 Oct 2018, at 13:50, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi Farzaneh, > > Thanks, yes the final selection/appointment will be made by SSC between existing slate and new candidates to fill the GNSO slate. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 09:29, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > >> GNSO is seeking additional volunteers to serve on the ATRT3 and has opened an Expression of Interest period for this purpose. As it may be of your concern, the third review of ICANN?s Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) is scheduled to begin in January 2019 following a delay to allow for public consultation on the schedule of ICANN reviews. >> >> The application deadline is Tuesday 30 October 2018 at 23:59 UTC and you can find additional information about the Review Team and the skills required on the following link: https://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11oct18-en.htm >> >> I don't know how the process of appointment is but I think it is at the GNSO SCC level if I am not mistaken. I suggest someone sends the call ASAP to NCSG Discuss list and see who will apply. >> >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 15:18:39 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 22:18:39 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ATRT 3 will start soon/ do we have a candidate to recommend to SCC? In-Reply-To: <66C466ED-FDDC-4D19-B250-092FB66A3820@ferdeline.com> References: <66C466ED-FDDC-4D19-B250-092FB66A3820@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: thanks Ayden, for clarification new candidates have to be still endorsed by SG/C . Best, Rafik Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 22:17, Ayden F?rdeline a ?crit : > Sounds like a good approach. > > Best wishes, Ayden > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 13:50, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi Farzaneh, > > Thanks, yes the final selection/appointment will be made by SSC between > existing slate and new candidates to fill the GNSO slate. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 09:29, farzaneh badii a > ?crit : > >> GNSO is seeking additional volunteers to serve on the ATRT3 and has >> opened an Expression of Interest period for this purpose. As it may be of >> your concern, the third review of ICANN?s Accountability and Transparency >> (ATRT3) is scheduled to begin in January 2019 following a delay to allow >> for public consultation on the schedule of ICANN reviews. >> >> The application deadline is Tuesday 30 October 2018 at 23:59 UTC and you >> can find additional information about the Review Team and the skills >> required on the following link: >> https://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11oct18-en.htm >> >> I don't know how the process of appointment is but I think it is at the >> GNSO SCC level if I am not mistaken. I suggest someone sends the call ASAP >> to NCSG Discuss list and see who will apply. >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Oct 30 15:19:34 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:19:34 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Leadership program/ ICANN 64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I was under the impression that we (NCSG) were getting two seats, not one, for the leadership program. Am I mistaken? Best wishes, Ayden > On 30 Oct 2018, at 14:15, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Thanks Farzaneh. > I missed this opportunity several times because the dates but I am thinking if I should apply this time. > anyway, others may be interested too. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 09:37, farzaneh badii a ?crit : > >> Here is what I sent to NCSG EC. i don't know if EC will have a different process but I believe those who are interested should have their brief statement of interest ready. >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Among the EC someone has to pick this task up. Note that what we did before was to make a call to NCSG EC and NCSG PC and see who would be interested,. Note that preferably current or incoming leaders should be recommended for the program. we don't have a selection process for this normally when non of the leaders in PC nor EC applied for it then the call went to the general membership list with a deadline. If more than one leader is interested, normally they discuss and one goes away in favor of the other or becomes an alternate. I will send this call to PC as well t since I am not chair I will not get involved with setting deadlines and a lightweight process like before. Please volunteer and take up this task. >> >> The ICANN Academy Leadership Program (LP) during the [ICANN61 Meeting in Puerto Rico](https://community.icann.org/display/LTP/2018+Leadership+Program) was another success and we are now preparing the 6th edition that is scheduled to take place 7-8 March 2019, two days prior to the official start of ICANN64 in Kobe, Japan. >> >> For this program, one (1) seat is reserved for a representative from the NCSG. The program is designed for current and incoming leaders, helping to increase understanding of the complexity of ICANN and to develop facilitation skills, as well as building a network with other leaders. We are aware that understanding ICANN as an organization, the topics discussed within ICANN, and interaction within other stakeholder groups can be challenging for incoming leaders, but sometimes also for experienced leaders. ICANN and the community are making considerable efforts in order to help incoming leaders have a good start to their terms and to provide current leaders the opportunity to strengthen their leadership and facilitation skills. Opportunities for Leadership Program participants include the following: >> >> - Meet leaders from the other SOs/ACs and get an insight of the functionality and issues in other groups >> - Discuss current ICANN topics in an in-depth manner >> - Deepen the understanding of key ICANN processes >> - Develop facilitation and leadership skills, focused personal effectiveness to run meetings and foster processes >> >> A preliminary program is attached to this email. Kindly note that this is subject to change. >> >> Accommodation for participants will be covered between Wednesday and Thursday, 6-7 March 2019, and participants will receive a stipend. Please note that flights will NOT be covered under this program, as incoming and current leaders are normally covered by the regular ICANN travel support. Please ensure that the leaders you select are being covered by ICANN Travel Support for their flights to Kobe for ICANN64. >> >> We would like to ask you to identify one incoming or current leader from your stakeholder group who is interested and available to participate in this program. We recommend that you also identify an alternate candidate. Kindly forward us the names and email addresses of the endorsed individuals no later than Thursday, 8 November 2018, and ask them to register [here](https://goo.gl/forms/HAInCnPEwsYRxKFs2) by 23:59 UTC on 8 November as well. >> >> We hope this program will meet the needs of your community. All participants will be encouraged to partake in an open exchange of their views, as this will help facilitate cross-constituency collaboration during their terms. >> >> We are very happy to answer any questions you may have on this exciting LP and look forward to having your group?s participants confirmed. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Sandra Hoferichter, Chair of the ICANN Academy Working Group >> >> Ergys Ramaj, VP, Public Responsibility Support >> >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Oct 30 15:27:35 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:27:35 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ATRT 3 will start soon/ do we have a candidate to recommend to SCC? In-Reply-To: References: <66C466ED-FDDC-4D19-B250-092FB66A3820@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Thanks Rafik; yes, that will be a challenge. I am aware of some strong candidates from our colleagues with the CSG who would like to be on the ATRT 3, so if the GNSO only has three guaranteed seats, we might have a battle ahead? Ayden > On 30 Oct 2018, at 14:18, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > thanks Ayden, for clarification new candidates have to be still endorsed by SG/C . > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 22:17, Ayden F?rdeline a ?crit : > >> Sounds like a good approach. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden >> >>> On 30 Oct 2018, at 13:50, Rafik Dammak wrote: >>> >>> hi Farzaneh, >>> >>> Thanks, yes the final selection/appointment will be made by SSC between existing slate and new candidates to fill the GNSO slate. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 09:29, farzaneh badii a ?crit : >>> >>>> GNSO is seeking additional volunteers to serve on the ATRT3 and has opened an Expression of Interest period for this purpose. As it may be of your concern, the third review of ICANN?s Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) is scheduled to begin in January 2019 following a delay to allow for public consultation on the schedule of ICANN reviews. >>>> >>>> The application deadline is Tuesday 30 October 2018 at 23:59 UTC and you can find additional information about the Review Team and the skills required on the following link: https://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11oct18-en.htm >>>> >>>> I don't know how the process of appointment is but I think it is at the GNSO SCC level if I am not mistaken. I suggest someone sends the call ASAP to NCSG Discuss list and see who will apply. >>>> >>>> Farzaneh >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Oct 30 16:52:39 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:52:39 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik, Would you be willing to continue on as Chair of the Policy Committee? Best wishes, Ayden > On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:18, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its composition is being renewed with new councilors and appointments of constituencies representatives. > While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC in the last weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by appointing or confirming its representatives following NCUC internal procedures in coming weeks. > > When the composition is set, a first action will be to have an NCSG PC chair election and possibly appointing vice-chair(s). We don't have a set process and it is a good opportunity to work on that, in addition, to resume the work on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while now). > > as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to (re)appoint NCSG representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, SSC, PIR. > > we may add other tasks to those later on. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik Dammak > > From arsenebaguma at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 16:56:35 2018 From: arsenebaguma at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ars=C3=A8ne_Tungali?=) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:56:35 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I would support this, if Rafik is willing to continue. But we might need to have vice chair (s) to ensure continuity when Rafik is no longer available. And I would suggest, If I may, Ayden you consider this vice chair position. Thanks, Arsene 2018-10-30 16:52 UTC+02:00, Ayden F?rdeline : > Hi Rafik, > > Would you be willing to continue on as Chair of the Policy Committee? > > Best wishes, > > Ayden > >> On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:18, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> hi all, >> >> as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its composition is >> being renewed with new councilors and appointments of constituencies >> representatives. >> While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC in the last >> weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by appointing or confirming its >> representatives following NCUC internal procedures in coming weeks. >> >> When the composition is set, a first action will be to have an NCSG PC >> chair election and possibly appointing vice-chair(s). We don't have a set >> process and it is a good opportunity to work on that, in addition, to >> resume the work on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while >> now). >> >> as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to (re)appoint NCSG >> representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, SSC, PIR. >> >> we may add other tasks to those later on. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Rafik Dammak >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -- ------------------------ **Ars?ne Tungali* * Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international *, CEO,* Smart Services Sarl *, Tel: +243 993810967 GPG: 523644A0 *Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo* 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil & Mexico ) - AFRISIG 2016 - Blogger - ICANN's GNSO Council Member. AFRINIC Fellow ( Mauritius )* From icann at ferdeline.com Tue Oct 30 16:56:41 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:56:41 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Call for Volunteers - SCBO In-Reply-To: References: <013601d46eb7$4549ec10$cfddc430$@berrycobb.com> Message-ID: <378A0F97-CFF0-4F72-9228-64B0F7C14D9C@ferdeline.com> Thanks, Rafik. I would suggest we appoint three subject matter experts, to be at parity with representation from the other GNSO constituencies. In my opinion it is very important that we always have at least one NCSG subject matter expert on each call. The NCSG did not have a great attendance rate on the SCBO this year, and as Chair, that did put me in a difficult position where I had to put myself in the queue to advance our perspectives. I hope we might be able to have a healthier attendance record this year. Ayden > On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:10, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > hi all, > > with the new term starting, we will receive several calls to appoint and/or to confirm representatives e.g. SSC. > we should appoint subject matter expert(s) to SCBO from NCSG in addition to the councilors who can volunteer directly (they don't need to be appointed). > I understand that Stephanie is interested to be appointed as SME as she was there as councilor previously. I will prepare a call for candidates. > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > Hi All, > > As discussed at the GNSO Council wrap-up session in Barcelona, please find attached a call for volunteers to join the Standing Committee on ICANN?s Budget and Operations. It will be helpful to have adequate representation from both houses. You can view the current membership [here](https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74580769). > > The SCBO is formulating comments for the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget, which is due 12 November 2018. The draft FY20 ICANN Org budget is expected to be posted on 17 December 2018. > > Thank you. > > B > > Berry Cobb > > GNSO Policy Consultant > > @berrycobb > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 09:59:10 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:59:10 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Application ATRT3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, following Farzaneh sharing the call for volunteers in the NCSG list, there is one candidate asking for NCSG endorsement. You can find attached the application. we should make a decision to endorse or not the candidate. I think we can reach conclusion by Thursday. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Roli Mahajan Date: mer. 31 oct. 2018 ? 07:55 Subject: Application ATRT3 To: Cc: Rafik Dammak , , < gnso-secs at icann.org> Dear Stephanie, Rafik, Maryam et. all, I am interested in working as a volunteer for ATRT3. Please find attached my complete application and do let me know if anything is amiss. Thanking you, Kind regards, Roli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: atrt3-eoi-gnso-representatives-Mahajan.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 356988 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 10:01:11 2018 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:01:11 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ayden, Thanks for the response. I will be glad to continue for another term as chair if there is support. Best, Rafik Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 23:52, Ayden F?rdeline a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > Would you be willing to continue on as Chair of the Policy Committee? > > Best wishes, > > Ayden > > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:18, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > > > hi all, > > > > as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its composition is > being renewed with new councilors and appointments of constituencies > representatives. > > While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC in the last > weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by appointing or confirming its > representatives following NCUC internal procedures in coming weeks. > > > > When the composition is set, a first action will be to have an NCSG PC > chair election and possibly appointing vice-chair(s). We don't have a set > process and it is a good opportunity to work on that, in addition, to > resume the work on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while > now). > > > > as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to (re)appoint NCSG > representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, SSC, PIR. > > > > we may add other tasks to those later on. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Rafik Dammak > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tatiana.tropina at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 10:36:30 2018 From: tatiana.tropina at gmail.com (Tatiana Tropina) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 09:36:30 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This is awesome new, Rafik. We are so lucky to have you with us! I support fully. Cheers, Tanya On Wed 31. Oct 2018 at 09:01, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi Ayden, > > Thanks for the response. > I will be glad to continue for another term as chair if there is support. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 23:52, Ayden F?rdeline a > ?crit : > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> Would you be willing to continue on as Chair of the Policy Committee? >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Ayden >> >> > On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:18, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> > >> > hi all, >> > >> > as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its composition is >> being renewed with new councilors and appointments of constituencies >> representatives. >> > While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC in the last >> weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by appointing or confirming its >> representatives following NCUC internal procedures in coming weeks. >> > >> > When the composition is set, a first action will be to have an NCSG PC >> chair election and possibly appointing vice-chair(s). We don't have a set >> process and it is a good opportunity to work on that, in addition, to >> resume the work on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while >> now). >> > >> > as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to (re)appoint NCSG >> representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, SSC, PIR. >> > >> > we may add other tasks to those later on. >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Rafik Dammak >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at thomascovenant.org Wed Oct 31 11:03:24 2018 From: icann at thomascovenant.org (Dina Solveig Jalkanen) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:03:24 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I second Tatiana, Rafik is an excellent chair. Apologies for being inactive - I am too busy with work and ITU for the next couple weeks. Thomas On 31.10.2018 10.36, Tatiana Tropina wrote: > This is awesome new, Rafik.? > We are so lucky to have you with us!? > I support fully.? > Cheers,? > Tanya? > > On Wed 31. Oct 2018 at 09:01, Rafik Dammak > wrote: > > Hi Ayden, > ? > Thanks for the response. > I will be glad to continue for another term as chair if there is > support. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > Le?mar. 30 oct. 2018 ??23:52, Ayden F?rdeline > a ?crit?: > > Hi Rafik, > > Would you be willing to continue on as Chair of the Policy > Committee? > > Best wishes, > > Ayden > > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:18, Rafik Dammak > > wrote: > > > > hi all, > > > > as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its > composition is being renewed with new councilors and > appointments of constituencies representatives. > > While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC > in the last weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by > appointing or confirming its representatives following NCUC > internal procedures in coming weeks. > > > > When the composition is set, a first action will be to have > an NCSG PC chair election and possibly appointing > vice-chair(s). We don't have a set process and it is a good > opportunity to work on that, in addition, to resume the work > on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while now). > > > > as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to > (re)appoint NCSG representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, > SSC, PIR. > > > > we may add other tasks to those later on. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Rafik Dammak > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- *** Thomas, friendly geek in Amsterdam Chaos https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant From icann at ferdeline.com Wed Oct 31 13:52:31 2018 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:52:31 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Looks like there is support then for you to continue on, Rafik. This is not a very rewarding role, chasing people to draft comments and for the rest of us to review them, so we're very lucky to have you stepping forward for another term! Best wishes, Ayden ??????? Original Message ??????? On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 09:03, Dina Solveig Jalkanen wrote: > I second Tatiana, Rafik is an excellent chair. > > Apologies for being inactive - I am too busy with work and ITU for the > next couple weeks. > > Thomas > > On 31.10.2018 10.36, Tatiana Tropina wrote: > > > This is awesome new, Rafik.? > > We are so lucky to have you with us!? > > I support fully.? > > Cheers,? > > Tanya > > On Wed 31. Oct 2018 at 09:01, Rafik Dammak > mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Ayden, > > ? > > Thanks for the response. > > I will be glad to continue for another term as chair if there is > > support. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > > > > > Le?mar. 30 oct. 2018 ??23:52, Ayden F?rdeline > > a ?crit?: > > > > Hi Rafik, > > > > Would you be willing to continue on as Chair of the Policy > > Committee? > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Ayden > > > > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:18, Rafik Dammak > > > wrote: > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its > > composition is being renewed with new councilors and > > appointments of constituencies representatives. > > > While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC > > in the last weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by > > appointing or confirming its representatives following NCUC > > internal procedures in coming weeks. > > > > > > When the composition is set, a first action will be to have > > an NCSG PC chair election and possibly appointing > > vice-chair(s). We don't have a set process and it is a good > > opportunity to work on that, in addition, to resume the work > > on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while now). > > > > > > as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to > > (re)appoint NCSG representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, > > SSC, PIR. > > > > > > we may add other tasks to those later on. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Rafik Dammak > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-PC mailing list > > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > > > NCSG-PC mailing list > > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- > > Thomas, friendly geek in Amsterdam Chaos > https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant > > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 15:39:21 2018 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:39:21 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] next steps for NCSG PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All my support and thankfulness for Rafik as chair. Best, Mart?n On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 08:52 Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Looks like there is support then for you to continue on, Rafik. This is > not a very rewarding role, chasing people to draft comments and for the > rest of us to review them, so we're very lucky to have you stepping forward > for another term! > > Best wishes, Ayden > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 09:03, Dina Solveig Jalkanen < > icann at thomascovenant.org> wrote: > > > I second Tatiana, Rafik is an excellent chair. > > > > Apologies for being inactive - I am too busy with work and ITU for the > > next couple weeks. > > > > Thomas > > > > On 31.10.2018 10.36, Tatiana Tropina wrote: > > > > > This is awesome new, Rafik. > > > We are so lucky to have you with us! > > > I support fully. > > > Cheers, > > > Tanya > > > On Wed 31. Oct 2018 at 09:01, Rafik Dammak > > mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ayden, > > > > > > Thanks for the response. > > > I will be glad to continue for another term as chair if there is > > > support. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Rafik > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 30 oct. 2018 ? 23:52, Ayden F?rdeline > > > a ?crit : > > > > > > Hi Rafik, > > > > > > Would you be willing to continue on as Chair of the Policy > > > Committee? > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Ayden > > > > > > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 01:18, Rafik Dammak > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > > > as PC we have some actions to take after the AGM as its > > > composition is being renewed with new councilors and > > > appointments of constituencies representatives. > > > > While NPOC already appointed its new representatives to PC > > > in the last weeks, I expect NCUC EC to do the same by > > > appointing or confirming its representatives following NCUC > > > internal procedures in coming weeks. > > > > > > > > When the composition is set, a first action will be to have > > > an NCSG PC chair election and possibly appointing > > > vice-chair(s). We don't have a set process and it is a good > > > opportunity to work on that, in addition, to resume the work > > > on the draft procedures effort (being on hold for a while now). > > > > > > > > as I sent in the previous email, we will also have to > > > (re)appoint NCSG representatives to some committees e.g SCBO, > > > SSC, PIR. > > > > > > > > we may add other tasks to those later on. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafik Dammak > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > NCSG-PC mailing list > > > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > > > > > > NCSG-PC mailing list > > > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > -- > > > > Thomas, friendly geek in Amsterdam Chaos > > https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant > > > > NCSG-PC mailing list > > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: