[NCSG-PC] New letter to Board re: Budget?

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi all,

we have till today 23:59UTC. If you have any objection or comment, if there
is none, the letter will be sent.

Best,

Rafik



Le lun. 28 mai 2018 à 18:18, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Thanks, Ayden, asking everyone to do the review quickly.
> I also think the letter should be shared in NCSG list for info.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le dim. 27 mai 2018 à 23:43, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Thanks Rafik, good point. I pretty much copied and pasted your text into
>> the letter:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fZfD2qc_ksPpSDOZ_oVnf54lWl8pi8TPb6SGPDw27YM/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Sorry not to get this prepared sooner, but can everyone please review it
>> and suggest edits? The Board is set to review the Budget on 30 May so would
>> be great to get this out tomorrow - or Tuesday at the very latest - if
>> there is PC support. Thanks very much!
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 25 May 2018 1:10 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ayden,
>>
>> I think we point that without fixing that issue we will face the same
>> problems in next years and there is no so much left to cut from whatever
>> support directed to the community. the issue is not just the new fiscal
>> year budget but a whole structural change in ICANN for the coming years
>> with regard to human resources e.g. resizing gradually. redeployment is one
>> suggestion as we can reallocate staff to the areas of high priority like
>> policy.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le ven. 25 mai 2018 à 01:25, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Thanks all for the comments. I'll work on a new letter on this topic
>>> tonight, and we'll need to review this quickly, as it is on the Board
>>> agenda for 30 May.
>>>
>>> The HR point is difficult because I do take Xavier's response that the
>>> growth there is because the community directed the organisation to
>>> undertake certain activities. Sure, we never said hire staff to undertake
>>> these activities, but I guess it was implied. And salaries rising 2%
>>> (broadly in line with inflation) is not unreasonable. Will need to think
>>> about how we address this, i.e. re-deploy staff vertically?
>>>
>>> Ayden
>>>
>>>
>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>> On 24 May 2018 8:26 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks, Ayden for the summary.
>>> I think with regard to the letter to board we should focus on important
>>> and big issues on the budget as the cuts are not addressing the structural
>>> and systemic issues i.e. big part of the budget is for human resources. I
>>> think we can make a better argument by highlighting that instead.
>>> the budget approval is scheduled for next week.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> Le mer. 23 mai 2018 à 05:14, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> Is there any point in writing a new letter, this time to the Board
>>>> before it adopts the new Budget, asking that they kindly consider
>>>> reinstating CROP to 100% of its original size (cost implications - extra
>>>> $50,000), increase ABR envelope modestly to include support for the IGF as
>>>> has been the case in the past (conditional on workshop acceptance; we do
>>>> use this resource very well, and it can't cost more than $10,000 for the
>>>> entire GNSO), and expand the Council Strategic Planning Session from 2 days
>>>> to 3 days (cost implication, I'd guess max $5,000 for 1 extra night hotel +
>>>> per diem for 21 people) in recognition of the fact that the Intersessional
>>>> has been discontinued so the agenda will be more packed than usual?
>>>>
>>>> Ayden
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180529/128d29ec/attachment.htm>