[NCSG-PC] New letter to Board re: Budget?

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Ayden,

I think we point that without fixing that issue we will face the same
problems in next years and there is no so much left to cut from whatever
support directed to the community. the issue is not just the new fiscal
year budget but a whole structural change in ICANN for the coming years
with regard to human resources e.g. resizing gradually. redeployment is one
suggestion as we can reallocate staff to the areas of high priority like
policy.

Best,

Rafik

Le ven. 25 mai 2018 à 01:25, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a écrit :

> Thanks all for the comments. I'll work on a new letter on this topic
> tonight, and we'll need to review this quickly, as it is on the Board
> agenda for 30 May.
>
> The HR point is difficult because I do take Xavier's response that the
> growth there is because the community directed the organisation to
> undertake certain activities. Sure, we never said hire staff to undertake
> these activities, but I guess it was implied. And salaries rising 2%
> (broadly in line with inflation) is not unreasonable. Will need to think
> about how we address this, i.e. re-deploy staff vertically?
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 24 May 2018 8:26 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks, Ayden for the summary.
> I think with regard to the letter to board we should focus on important
> and big issues on the budget as the cuts are not addressing the structural
> and systemic issues i.e. big part of the budget is for human resources. I
> think we can make a better argument by highlighting that instead.
> the budget approval is scheduled for next week.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le mer. 23 mai 2018 à 05:14, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Is there any point in writing a new letter, this time to the Board before
>> it adopts the new Budget, asking that they kindly consider reinstating CROP
>> to 100% of its original size (cost implications - extra $50,000), increase
>> ABR envelope modestly to include support for the IGF as has been the case
>> in the past (conditional on workshop acceptance; we do use this resource
>> very well, and it can't cost more than $10,000 for the entire GNSO), and
>> expand the Council Strategic Planning Session from 2 days to 3 days (cost
>> implication, I'd guess max $5,000 for 1 extra night hotel + per diem for 21
>> people) in recognition of the fact that the Intersessional has been
>> discontinued so the agenda will be more packed than usual?
>>
>> Ayden
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180525/10971aca/attachment.htm>