[NCSG-PC] NCSG Statement on ALAC Review

[Ayden Férdeline]

I think it would be better to send sooner rather than later, we might even get the matter on the agenda... or at least give the OEC, if not the entire Board, the time to read our letter!

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 18 May 2018 1:38 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Farzaneh,
>
> I think the matter will be discussed first at OEC level before making any decision and sending that to board, we can check when the committee will have its next meeting
> Best,
>
> Rafik
> Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 à 04:41, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> I need to send this to the Discuss list to see if there are any objections. will send it off if no objection received wwithin 24 hours.
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:35 AM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ayden
>>>
>>> Thanks for drafting this. I made some changes to it and I think it looks good to be sent. If you could give me the editing rights or go through the changes yourself I can send it.
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> it doesn't seem that board covered this during its meeting and so we got some time.
>>>> happy with Farzaneh doing the editing during this week, it also gives us time to consult membership regarding the letter.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Le sam. 12 mai 2018 à 17:58, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Farzi, can I leave this letter with you to take forward? If so I will transfer ownership of the Google Doc to your gmail address. It is very unlikely I will be online tomorrow and for much of next week. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Ayden
>>>>>
>>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>>> On 11 May 2018 12:10 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you may be aware, the Contracted Parties House sent a letter to ICANN org recently in relation to the critical ALAC Review, whose recommendations seem to have been ignored:
>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/bunton-to-chalaby-07may18-en.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have drafted an NCSG response; a first draft is here:
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oDVkLsr-jx_yPBRQ9gepGe2MQPIGbUmXJS9PplEBXzc/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm happy to receive edits and comments today or tomorrow. However I will be offline Sunday and most of next week at the RIPE meeting in Marseille, so if any comments come in during this time, I will ask the NCSG Chair if she can please resolve them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, I think it would be advantageous to get this comment finalised and sent to the Board before their Vancouver workshop tomorrow. I know this is a very tight turnaround, and I'm not sure we can manage it, but just a thought...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ayden
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180518/2140a6b7/attachment.htm>