[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] ICANN Proposal to adjust scope of RDS-WHOIS2-RT

[Rafik Dammak]

Thanks, Stephanie, I shared yesterday in the NCSG list the 2 public
comments regarding the adjustments of reviews timelines and asked for
volunteers to be penholders. can I assume that you are volunteering for the
one covering ATRT and RDS RT?

Best,

Rafik


Le mer. 16 mai 2018 à 21:49, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :

> we need to respond to this.  I can draft, once we discuss a bit.  Has
> implications...so we need to consider carefully, much as I would like to
> curtail this stupid review .....
>
> steph
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] ICANN Proposal to adjust scope of
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 06:57:21 +0200
> From: Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com> <erika at erikamann.com>
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> CC: RDS-WHOIS2-RT <rds-whois2-rt at icann.org> <rds-whois2-rt at icann.org>
>
> Hi Alan, hi All -
> There's a complete reasoning for these 3 options included here:
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/specific-reviews-short-term-options-timeline-14may18-en.pdf
>
> I'm traveling today with little time to think about these options. My
> understanding is that large part of our work, independently of the WHOIS
> model going to be selected in the future, is going to be relevant
> nonetheless. Insofar - currently! - I favor option a).
>
> Best,
> Erika
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 16, 2018, at 4:30 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
>
> I call your attention to a Public Comment (PC) launched yesterday asking
> for input on alternatives to alter the RDS-WHOIS2-RT Scope and plans (as
> well possible changes to the not yet started ATRT3) -
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en
> .
>
> I proposes three possible scenarios for our RT:
>
> a) Proceeds as planned;
>
> b) reduce scope to just an analysis of the WHOIS1-RT Recommendations;
>
> c) pause the review entirely for some as yet to be determined time.
>
> If recommended by the community, b) and c) would require our agreement.
> The implications of a community recommendation that we refused to agree
> with are not known. If there is a pause, it is not clear when the unpause
> would happen and to what extent it would be the same team moving forward.
>
> The PC ends on 06 July 2018 and the report on input received is due on 23
> July 2018, a few days before we are currently planning to meet in Brussels
> to close-to-finalize our report.
>
> Although the PC was issues yesterday, neither I nor Susan and Cathrin had
> any prior knowledge of it and in fact we only heard of it today.
>
> We have initiated discussions with MSSI on exactly what this means and
> will get back when I have a better understanding.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180516/00922496/attachment.htm>