[NCSG-PC] Public Comment : CSC Charter Review

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Wed May 16 13:01:01 EEST 2018


Hi Farell,

Thanks for the draft and update. @everyone please review the short comment
and consult the charter to see if we can add anything relevant comment.
we should also share the draft in NCSG list for membership consultation
Best,

Rafik


Le mar. 15 mai 2018 à 16:34, Farell FOLLY <farell at benin2point0.org> a
écrit :

> Dear all,
>
> On April 11th, a call for a Public Comment was announced so as to collect
> input on the initial report of the Customer Standing Committee Review Team.
>
> To quote:
>
> *“The Customer Standing Committee was established as one of the post IANA
> Transition entities and conducted its first meeting on 6 October 2016. It
> performs the operational oversight previously performed by the U.S.
> Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information
> Administration as it relates to the monitoring of the performance of the
> IANA naming functions, currently performed by PTI. Its mission is to ensure
> continued satisfactory performance of the IANA functions for the direct
> customers of the naming services”*
>
> The purpose of the Charter review is to consider whether the Charter is
> adequate and provides a sound basis for the CSC to perform their
> responsibilities as envisioned in the development of the IANA Transition
> Proposal.
>
> The review team includes representatives of the Registries Stakeholder
> Group (RySG) and the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO).
> They reviewed the initial Charter (one year after establishment and as per
> the Bylaws) and suggest some small changes
> <https://community.icann.org/display/CRT/Reports?preview=/84213949/84214353/Initial%20Report%20CSC%20Charter%20Review%20Team%20FINAL%20April%202018.docx> to
> the charter.
>
> All in all, there is actually nothing substantial to object or to add
> except endorse and insist that the CSC follows effectively the guidelines
> included in the Charter. However, one might be tempted to include a
> representative of the NCSG either in the CSC Committee or in the next
> review team (as a liaison), but since there should always be a call for a
> Public Comment for any review, it is, in my opinion, useless.
>
> I therefore suggest a brief comment (see attached link
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Q0SDh97XsN0m8etdGGhVby1c_vYT3omJTaeymLbfKk/edit>)
> to acknowledge the call and endorse it.
>
>
> @__f_f__
>
> Best Regards
> ____________________________________
>
> Ekue (Farell) FOLLY
> Technology Champion & Chapter Head
> Africa 2.0 Foundation.
> www.africa2point0.org
> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180516/655a118c/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list