[NCSG-PC] Preliminary comments on WHOIS Review 2 agreements

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Stephanie,

in general and as review teams are different and special beasts compared to
other structures where members have more influence in final product versus
to community input, I would advice pushing as much as possible. personally,
I think EWG was a big mistake from the previous CEO and we are still paying
the price.

Best,

Rafik

Le jeu. 3 mai 2018 à 03:47, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :

> Attached are my preliminary comments on the WHOIS review team 2 initial
> findings.  This is the rollup of the subgroups work, which we recently
> discussed in Brussels.  I objected strenuously to one item, that the Board
> had delivered on its responsibilities re a policy.  I think the EWG was a
> violation of the MS process, the failure of the RDS was a failure of ICANN
> as a whole (not the GNSO as Alan G claims) and that the Board initiated
> interim policy is a fundamental failure of the MS process.....
>
> anyway I have asked for more time, which I doubt the Chair will grant.
> Volker, who did not attend the meeting, has not had time to go over it.  He
> is the only contracted party there (there are 3 GAC members) and they have
> to live with all our recommendations, which I find fundamentally wrong.
>
> Let me know if you have comments, I will push to get them added.  They are
> rushing this through when we are all GDPRing....
>
> cheers Steph
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180503/57cc8011/attachment.htm>