[NCSG-PC] Fw: [council] GNSO PDP 3.0 discussion paper

Kathy Kleiman kathy at kathykleiman.com
Thu Jun 21 16:05:44 EEST 2018


Ayden, could you post the paper again?  These have been busy times!

Tx, K


On 6/21/2018 8:56 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> We need input then from other members of the PC. I have shared my 
> input (on our list some weeks ago) and if there are no objections to 
> it, I would like it to be taken forward to the working session this 
> Monday. I think it is an important addition. There are likely other 
> ideas that I haven't thought of too - if others have ideas please 
> share them. Thanks.
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 19 June 2018 5:18 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> SG/C leaders will be reached to see if/when the input is provided on 
>> PDP 3.0 and also inform them that is being on the agenda on GNSO 
>> working session on Monday. We may also add one session but that 
>> depends of the progress we will make on other fronts. The expectation 
>> is to get input from SG/C as groups not individuals at the stage. I 
>> think we can collect suggestions here and make a consolidated NCSG input.
>>
>> I created a google doc and uploaded the proposal 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/13iQjVPy_yqfMu0jT3CrNu0WfHfyXLOWSMGaGb3PnnnM/edit 
>> in order to collect and consolidate suggestions for input on PDP 3.9. 
>> I also attached the report for reference.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>> Le mar. 19 juin 2018 à 00:20, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com 
>> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>     Thanks Rafik,
>>
>>     Any updates on this? If no extension is forthcoming I'll send in
>>     the comments I shared here a fortnight ago in under my own name,
>>     just so they are there and can be considered... I am thinking it
>>     is not outside the realm of possibilities that we'll discuss PDP
>>     3.0 in Panama?
>>
>>     Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>
>>     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>     On 12 June 2018 12:49 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>>     Hi Ayden,
>>>
>>>     It is likely (quite high) there will be an extension.
>>>
>>>     Best.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Jun 12, 2018 2:45 AM, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com
>>>     <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Thanks Rafik, looking forward to hearing whether or not an
>>>         extension is possible.
>>>
>>>         Best wishes, Ayden
>>>
>>>
>>>         ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>         On 10 June 2018 2:35 AM, Rafik Dammak
>>>         <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>         Hi Ayden,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         I think the deadline is flexible, I am following-up to get
>>>>         an extension for all groups. Unfortunately, EPDP sucked
>>>>         most of the bandwidth for everyone but we cannot drop that.
>>>>         as the topic is of interest for GNSO council leadership, we
>>>>         count on getting input for the report. the expectation is
>>>>         to get input from SG/C at this stage.
>>>>         so we can work on NCSG comment in these coming days,
>>>>         hopefully prior to Panama meeting.
>>>>
>>>>         Best,
>>>>
>>>>         Rafik
>>>>
>>>>         Le dim. 10 juin 2018 à 05:16, Ayden Férdeline
>>>>         <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>             Thanks Rafik, I have identified one gap in the
>>>>             discussion paper, and have attached a suggested
>>>>             additional incremental improvement to 4.3 'Complexity
>>>>             of Subject Matter.' However given the time crunch, I am
>>>>             happy to submit this in my personal capacity, as I
>>>>             doubt we will have time to get an NCSG position
>>>>             together (given the deadline was yesterday)?
>>>>
>>>>             —Ayden
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>>             On 5 June 2018 4:57 PM, Rafik Dammak
>>>>             <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>             <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>             Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>             the deadline for submitting any input is quite close,
>>>>>             we can work on some input this week.
>>>>>
>>>>>             Best,
>>>>>
>>>>>             Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             Le sam. 12 mai 2018 à 06:52, Rafik Dammak
>>>>>             <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>>             <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>                 yes, it is for feedback now. I encourage everyone
>>>>>                 to review the paper. I am likely biased as I
>>>>>                 reviewed it several times, so fresh eyes would be
>>>>>                 helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Best,
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Le sam. 12 mai 2018 à 06:33, Stephanie Perrin
>>>>>                 <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>>>>                 <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>                     I think so...
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Steph
>>>>>
>>>>>                     On 2018-05-11 17:30, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>>>>>                     Should we respond as the NCSG?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     -- Ayden
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>>>>                     On 11 May 2018 11:23 PM, Marika Konings
>>>>>>                     <marika.konings at icann.org>
>>>>>>                     <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     /Sending on behalf of the Council leadership/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     Dear colleagues,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     Please find attached for your review the
>>>>>>>                     GNSO PDP 3.0 discussion paper. The Council
>>>>>>>                     leadership team has collaborated with staff
>>>>>>>                     in bringing all discussions and suggestions
>>>>>>>                     to date into one document for your and your
>>>>>>>                     respective communities’ consideration. We
>>>>>>>                     welcome input, particularly on section 4 –
>>>>>>>                     potential incremental improvements for
>>>>>>>                     consideration. In particular, which
>>>>>>>                     potential incremental improvements should be
>>>>>>>                     prioritized, are there any missing, are
>>>>>>>                     there additional implementation steps that
>>>>>>>                     should be considered? After receiving
>>>>>>>                     feedback, we hope to commence the
>>>>>>>                     development of an implementation plan
>>>>>>>                     proposing the when/how/who of implementing
>>>>>>>                     those incremental improvements agreed upon
>>>>>>>                     by the Council. To contribute to this next
>>>>>>>                     step in the improvements process we kindly
>>>>>>>                     request your feedback and/or that of your
>>>>>>>                     community by 8 June so that the Council can
>>>>>>>                     consider next steps during its meeting at
>>>>>>>                     ICANN62.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     GNSO Council leadership team
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     */Marika Konings/*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     /Vice President, Policy Development Support
>>>>>>>                     – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned
>>>>>>>                     Names and Numbers (ICANN) /
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     /Email: marika.konings at icann.org
>>>>>>>                     <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org> /
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     //
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     /Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     /Find out more about the GNSO by taking our
>>>>>>>                     interactive courses
>>>>>>>                     <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and
>>>>>>>                     visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>>>>>>>                     <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>.
>>>>>>>                     /
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>                     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>                     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>>                     <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>>                     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>                     _______________________________________________
>>>>>                     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>                     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>                     <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>                     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180621/dd8076e4/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list