[NCSG-PC] Fw: [council] GNSO PDP 3.0 discussion paper

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

SG/C leaders will be reached to see if/when the input is provided on PDP
3.0 and also inform them that is being on the agenda on GNSO working
session on Monday. We may also add one session but that depends of the
progress we will make on other fronts. The expectation is to get input from
SG/C as groups not individuals at the stage. I think we can collect
suggestions here and make a consolidated NCSG input.

I created a google doc and uploaded the proposal
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13iQjVPy_yqfMu0jT3CrNu0WfHfyXLOWSMGaGb3PnnnM/edit
in order to collect and consolidate suggestions for input on PDP 3.9. I
also attached the report for reference.

Best,

Rafik

Le mar. 19 juin 2018 à 00:20, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
écrit :

> Thanks Rafik,
>
> Any updates on this? If no extension is forthcoming I'll send in the
> comments I shared here a fortnight ago in under my own name, just so they
> are there and can be considered... I am thinking it is not outside the
> realm of possibilities that we'll discuss PDP 3.0 in Panama?
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 12 June 2018 12:49 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ayden,
>
> It is likely (quite high) there will be an extension.
>
> Best.
>
>
> Rafik
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2018 2:45 AM, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Rafik, looking forward to hearing whether or not an extension is
> possible.
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 10 June 2018 2:35 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ayden,
>
>
> I think the deadline is flexible, I am following-up to get an extension
> for all groups. Unfortunately, EPDP sucked most of the bandwidth for
> everyone but we cannot drop that. as the topic is of interest for GNSO
> council leadership, we count on getting input for the report. the
> expectation is to get input from SG/C at this stage.
> so we can work on NCSG comment in these coming days, hopefully prior to
> Panama meeting.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le dim. 10 juin 2018 à 05:16, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Thanks Rafik, I have identified one gap in the discussion paper, and have
>> attached a suggested additional incremental improvement to 4.3 'Complexity
>> of Subject Matter.' However given the time crunch, I am happy to submit
>> this in my personal capacity, as I doubt we will have time to get an NCSG
>> position together (given the deadline was yesterday)?
>>
>> —Ayden
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 5 June 2018 4:57 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the deadline for submitting any input is quite close, we can work on some
>> input this week.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> Le sam. 12 mai 2018 à 06:52, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> yes, it is for feedback now. I encourage everyone to review the paper. I
>>> am likely biased as I reviewed it several times, so fresh eyes would be
>>> helpful.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le sam. 12 mai 2018 à 06:33, Stephanie Perrin <
>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I think so...
>>>>
>>>> Steph
>>>> On 2018-05-11 17:30, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Should we respond as the NCSG?
>>>>
>>>> -- Ayden
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>> On 11 May 2018 11:23 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>>>> <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *Sending on behalf of the Council leadership*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached for your review the GNSO PDP 3.0 discussion paper.
>>>> The Council leadership team has collaborated with staff in bringing all
>>>> discussions and suggestions to date into one document for your and your
>>>> respective communities’ consideration. We welcome input, particularly on
>>>> section 4 – potential incremental improvements for consideration. In
>>>> particular, which potential incremental improvements should be prioritized,
>>>> are there any missing, are there additional implementation steps that
>>>> should be considered? After receiving feedback, we hope to commence the
>>>> development of an implementation plan proposing the when/how/who of
>>>> implementing those incremental improvements agreed upon by the Council. To
>>>> contribute to this next step in the improvements process we kindly request
>>>> your feedback and/or that of your community by 8 June so that the Council
>>>> can consider next steps during its meeting at ICANN62.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> GNSO Council leadership team
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Marika Konings*
>>>>
>>>> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
>>>> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>>>>
>>>> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>>>>
>>>> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
>>>> <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>. *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180619/bf616ccb/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO PDP 3.0 - 8 May 2018.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 692229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180619/bf616ccb/attachment.pdf>