[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: [Accred-Model] Version 1.6 of the Accreditation and Access Model

[Kathy Kleiman]

Tx Ayden, I would think that we would need a full frontal response ASAP 
-- ideally from the CPH + NCSG -  that while we appreciate the effort, 
this is an IPC/BC response and an "accreditation model" largely written 
without actual knowledge of the GDPR (see training issues under 
discussion) itself. While we appreciate the effort, it is clearly just 
one input into the EPDP process.

Given the work of the CPH in compliance which dominated their work for 
the last many months, they have not had time to review this "IPC/BC 
accreditation model" closely, and given that the organizations of this 
self-initiated process rejected out of hand anything the NCSG 
participants offered about limiting access to third parties, such as 
Intellectual Property Owners, this is not a fair, balanced, 
representative or legal document.

I think this should be loud and prominent, in a letter *before Panama 
City*, from Farzi to Goran, Akram, Cyrus and posted on CircleID. /Short 
and sweet is fine. /If Graeme could co-sign, all the better. *Best to 
plant the landmine ASAP :-).*

Best, Kathy


On 6/18/2018 9:52 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> Thoughts -- do we legitimise this process by commenting, tearing it 
> apart, or just pay no attention to it? It is a very problematic 
> proposal.... I hope it is not being taken seriously anywhere, but 
> given Akram's comments quoted in Domain Incite last week (i.e. we will 
> have an accreditation model very soon as the community wants it), 
> maybe it is...
>
> - Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 18 June 2018 3:37 PM, Vayra, Fabricio (Perkins Coie) 
> <FVayra at perkinscoie.com> wrote:
>
>> Please see attached version 1.6 of the Accreditation and Access Model 
>> that includes tweaks to the second paragraph under the introduction 
>> in Annex I: Registration Directory Service Accreditation Authority 
>> (RDSAA).
>>
>>
>> Thanks and we look forward to your further input.
>>
>>
>> *Fabricio Vayra****| **Perkins Coie LLP*
>>
>> *PARTNER*
>>
>> D. +1.202.654.6255
>>
>>
>> *From:* Vayra, Fabricio (WDC)
>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 16, 2018 1:29 AM
>> *To:* 'accred-model at icann.org' <accred-model at icann.org>
>> *Subject:* Version 1.6 of the Accreditation and Access Model
>>
>>
>> Attached for discussion and additional comment is version 1.6 of the 
>> Accreditation and Access Model.  This, following further comment and 
>> input from many parts of the community, is a much richer and robust 
>> model. Notably, this version 1.6 contains new:
>>
>>
>>   * Annex D: Accreditation Approach for Intellectual Property Owners
>>     and Agents
>>   * Annex J: Lawful Bases for Access to WHOIS Data
>>
>>
>> Many thanks to those who made constructive contributions to further 
>> developing this model.
>>
>>
>> Thank you again for your input and support.
>>
>>
>> *Fabricio Vayra****| **Perkins Coie LLP*
>>
>> *PARTNER*
>>
>> D. +1.202.654.6255
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other 
>> confidential information. If you have received it in error, please 
>> advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message 
>> and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank 
>> you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180618/ad262b51/attachment.htm>